Thread: Asian Providers
+
Add Report
Results 3,376 to 3,390 of 8844
-
09-11-23 16:52 #5469Senior Member

Posts: 29Max SDAG
Looking forward to your feedback as well. Her first TER review indicates that her pics are not accurate. Her photoshopped pics looks more like Korean. Her review says her whole body had hairs that felt scratching the whole time.
Originally Posted by Kodak619
[View Original Post]
-
09-11-23 16:04 #5468Senior Member

Posts: 29SDAG Niko Niko
Has anyone seen Niko Niko from SDAG before? Not sure since when she is on SDAG calendar. Let me know if she used go by diff name earlier and if her pics are accurate or not.
-
09-10-23 20:13 #5467Senior Member

Posts: 2553Don't. It'll come with time. Not ideal, but consider seeing someone with high ratings just for 30 min (or less) to minimize cost for the same rating.
Originally Posted by AnalCreamDream
[View Original Post]
-
09-10-23 19:35 #5466Regular Member

Posts: 23I have 3 including FEC but it's been a few years since I've used HX. Maybe it's because I don't have anything recent. It's a shame since I would be going to them rather than AMPs.
Originally Posted by BigCoomer
[View Original Post]
-
09-10-23 13:50 #5465Senior Member

Posts: 75I got approved with 1 connection
Hey ACD! I was able to get approved by SDAG with one other connection. What I did was first see a girl from FarEastCuties and asked the FEC booker to leave me a rating. With just the FEC rating the SDAG booker approved me. The nice thing is that FEC should be a bit more lenient, and can use other approval methods if you don't have a big enough network. If you have another kgirl org in your network, I feel like you should be good. The new lollygirls booker is on HX as well so you'd be able to try out the SAG ladies as well.
Originally Posted by AnalCreamDream
[View Original Post]
I think the network size question also relates to the user who you connect with as well. For example, 2-3 connections with level 0’s probably doesn’t mean much, but 1 or 2 from level 3-4 users means more. So that might also play into the difficulty. Overall it’s nice to hear that our little club is somewhat well gatekept. (Although I hope you’re able to get in!)
Good luck!
-
09-10-23 13:27 #5464Senior Member

Posts: 71Maybe, I've been rejected by wowclub with 2 & 3 ladies in my network. I'm still looking for 1 or 2 more good looking women to meet and get good ratings but it seems like the ones I find attractive are 1. 5 - 2 hrs away, don't stay in SD long enough to fit my schedule, or want too much $$$ for the basics. Good luck, I'm about ready to give up on HX.
Originally Posted by BrainLara
[View Original Post]
-
09-10-23 11:41 #5463Senior Member

Posts: 128I can't confirm if this Kona is the same as the FEC Kona but I guess I assume that she is based on the pictures. But as Bishop said, he's been taking notes and if he senses that something is off or different, he is probably correct.
Originally Posted by BrainLara
[View Original Post]
-
09-10-23 11:07 #5462Senior Member

Posts: 735I reckon 2-3 should be enough but easier said than done to get those first few. Good luck.
Originally Posted by SDpyro
[View Original Post]
-
09-10-23 11:05 #5461Senior Member

Posts: 735Thank you.
Originally Posted by SirBishop
[View Original Post]
-
09-09-23 18:18 #5460Senior Member

Posts: 38Network Size
Does anyone know big your network has to be for SDAG?
They're always having hot ass Latinas and I'd like to see them but don't want to waste my time with the other providers.
-
09-09-23 16:56 #5459Senior Member

Posts: 651I also saw her a while back. She was sweet but certainly had some belly fat, and no ass to speak of. Service was good, but I wouldn't repeat. As with 90% of AA pice, they were not accurate. Representative for sure. Of a few million a.
Asian females. In this era I think its safe to make a few pre-booking assumptions. The pics are not accurate. Of she offers BBFS its because she's not particularly hot. If she doesn't chances are she is cute, or very skilled. Prove me wrong guys.
Originally Posted by JbBlack77
[View Original Post]
-
09-09-23 12:29 #5458Banned Member

Posts: 904
Originally Posted by Sdsaluki
[View Original Post]
Originally Posted by CityboysUp
[View Original Post]
BrainLara, I doubt this is the same Kona. Looking back on my notes for the SAG / Lollygirls Kona, she has been with BookerGray and two other bookers previously. K-girls are using multiple bookers now. Lollygirls and SAG have Kona in SD starting 9/7. Same rate of 320/ hr. Lollygirls is a new booker that will also send you PMs on HX. IMHO, the FEC Kona and SAG Kona are different girls.
Originally Posted by BrainLara
[View Original Post]
-
09-09-23 09:58 #5457Senior Member

Posts: 735Any one know if this is the same Kona who was in SD with FEC earlier this year?
Originally Posted by CityboysUp
[View Original Post]
-
09-09-23 09:44 #5456Senior Member

Posts: 735Sounds like you don't have a network yet. Sending a pm with an empty network does not help with screening.
The SDAG booker can be difficult for sure. I think things being slow has not helped his mood LOL.
Originally Posted by Dmdpall
[View Original Post]
-
09-09-23 07:15 #5455Senior Member

Posts: 181Lolygirls
Yes,
Originally Posted by Sdsaluki
[View Original Post]
I sampled Baby Ruby a couple of weeks ago. Yes $260/30 BBFS. Which was $160 + 100 raw. 40 something meaty gal. F: 6, B:5. Service adequate with a post coital shower.
I won't trust their lineup with pictures that don't remotely look like them. Other than they are Asian and female.
Jb.








Reply With Quote



