Massage Parlor Reports

**Pilot Aviator** · 06-02-08 00:54

Rather than repeat with one of the therapist's I'd met before, on my most recent visit to ***** (aka Mike Ono's place) I asjed for an appointment with Jennie. I am very happy to have made that appointment. and I am very grateful to some other more experienced Seniors whose comments influenced my request [**THANKS A LOT - owe you a beer!**]

As is customary, I passed a few pleasantries with the MMS who took me to my room, collected the. 8 for the hour and told me to undress to my comfort level (actually it was the assistant MMS as Angie was out when I arrived).

Jeannie arrived a few minutes later – confirmed a TS was wanted – and off we went.

Jennie is likely late 30s, and is the most attractive therapist I’ve met - taller and more slender than some with a nice figure and a very happy smile. Please excuse me if I don’t use for the typical "rating scale" (these ladies are nicer to most of us than perhaps we deserve and in my book that invalidates an impersonal and purely subjective scale). Suffice it to say for this RBAM (red blooded American male), she is "very easy on the eyes, and has a great attitude – friendly, appropriately cautious (she does not want to offend a client) – and a winning smile.

Jeannie understands the temperature of the water and lots of suds make the shower just right – and it was.-- and sometime, I may ask to spend the entire hour just enjoying the back and feet scrub.

Playful slaps and laughs and the TS was over. Stand to dry the back – and return to the room for the massage

Jeannie’s skill with massage is the best I’ve experienced since returning to NoVA and discovering quality AMPs.

Hot towels from neck to ankle followed by 15 minutes of the best deep back and leg work as she walked on my back. Perfect placement of feet released "cracks" and "pops" from back, neck, hips, and joints.

Towels now cool were removed, she dried my back, re-draped (yes, she drapes and like many of us have learned, relax. Don’t worry about it) – being relaxed is a good thing.

Talc (I assume lotion would be an option) and now medium work with her hands. She was able to work just about everything with the deep work when she was walking on my back – but her massage skills on my neck, shoulders, back, and legs now were like magic.

Some creative stretching – I’ve not been so flexed and so flexible in years perhaps – and it was time to turn over. .

Now work on the face, head, abs, knees, feet, etc. And a friendly ending where polite reciprocal touches were permitted – then more massage on the neck. Sit up. Pound some on the back, a little more stretching. And just over an hour later, I’m walking out the door – relaxed and in a better frame of mind.

To find a provider who really understands the power of a good massage is a treat and is worth a big hug and thanks, and nothing less than the full standard gratuity – and in Jeannie's case, perhaps even more generous because she’s really good. <And, if it needs to be said more explicitly- yes, the ending was happy- standard NoVA, but very happy.

I like all the providers I’ve met at ***** – but I will be asking for Jeannie by name for quite some time.

As I left, I chastised the Angie (she was back now) when she told me Jennie had been a member of the therapeutic staff for quite some time. As I left, Angie gave me a hug and said she would remember for next time to schedule me with Jeannie.

Always be nice to the ladies.

**Roamin Roman** · 05-31-08 20:05

Originally Posted by Badboycik

That is an interesting argument but the statute specifically mentions a single visit, "Each and every day such bawdy place shall be. Visited, shall constitute a separate offense. " Also I have never seen a Virginia judge split a hair that finely in favor of a criminal defendant.

I believe what we may be seeing, in the language of the law, is a holdover of an archaic use of the word 'frequent'. In times past, it meant 'visit' and no time span or multiplicity of occurrence attended its use. In other words, a single visit can equate to 'frequenting' a place. One would probably have better luck arguing that the visit was 'for immoral purposes'.-- something that is hard to prove without evidence. All one needs to do is introduce reasonable doubt as to the veracity of the charge.-- "Hey, I was only there because they do a great back-walking technique that is typical of the Orient. " Just my 2 Bahts' worth.

**Pathfinder04** · 05-31-08 18:57

Can someone please email me or PM me Lisa in Vienna's contact info?

I had it and lost it.

Thanks

**Oldrasputin** · 05-30-08 19:26

My visit was about 2 weeks ago. Meant to post this sooner, but, better late intel than no intel.

Went to Sunstar, which is right down the road from the old Golden. Went upstairs, rang the bell, and was met by (name withheld by her request). Not sure if there's a mamasan there or not. I guess there wasn't on the day of my visit. This girl was early-mid 30s, face maybe a 6, body an 8 with nice natural Cs, good figure, good ass for as Asian girl. Asked how long I wanted to stay, chose the hr at $80. Asked if I wanted a table shower. I passed as I had showered shortly before arriving.

Massage was medium strength, and good. Draped at first, but she removed the towel after about 5 mins. 10 mins into the session the doorbell rang and she excused herself to leave. Was gone for 2 mins, came back in and said something about Angie having an appointment. Her English wasn't too good. Continued with massage. Right before the flip she left the room again, this time with no explanation. Came back 2 mins later and asked 'did you miss me? ' and giggled. On the flip, some direct tongue action on the boys and the tip. Then started with standard nova finish, then after some prompting got up on top for some daty. Full roaming allowed. After the finish, did some more massage of chest and shoulders. Damage was. 8/. 6. Was in and out in about 50 mins. Other than her leaving the room twice briefly during the session I would rate the overall experience as very good.

**Badboycik** · 05-30-08 15:18

That is an interesting argument but the statute specifically mentions a single visit, "Each and every day such bawdy place shall be. Visited, shall constitute a separate offense. " Also I have never seen a Virginia judge split a hair that finely in favor of a criminal defendant.

Originally Posted by Ycwinva

fre·quent (frkwnt)
adj.
1. Occurring or appearing quite often or at close intervals: frequent errors of judgment.
2. Habitual or regular: a frequent visitor to our house.
tr.v. also (fr-kwnt) fre·quent·ed, fre·quent·ing, fre·quents
To pay frequent visits to; be in or at often: frequent a restaurant.

It would also seem to be a valid defense if they could not prove that you visited more than once or often. But, again, the damage is done at that point.

**Ycwinva** · 05-30-08 14:05

Originally Posted by Badboycik

§ 18.2-347. Keeping, residing in or frequenting a bawdy place; "bawdy place" defined.

What the previous poster says is in fact probably the best defense to the charge. But by the time you get to make that defense the damage is done. Your name has been in the newspaper and whatever other problems this has caused have already happened. And of course you can't really argue that the place is licensed for any of the activities of which you ay be accused of partaking beyond "massage."

fre·quent (frkwnt)
adj.
1. Occurring or appearing quite often or at close intervals: frequent errors of judgment.
2. Habitual or regular: a frequent visitor to our house.
tr.v. also (fr-kwnt) fre·quent·ed, fre·quent·ing, fre·quents
To pay frequent visits to; be in or at often: frequent a restaurant.

It would also seem to be a valid defense if they could not prove that you visited more than once or often. But, again, the damage is done at that point.

**Badboycik** · 05-30-08 10:15

§ 18.2-347. Keeping, residing in or frequenting a bawdy place; "bawdy place" defined.

It shall be unlawful for any person to keep any bawdy place, or to reside in or at or visit, for immoral purposes, any such bawdy place. Each and every day such bawdy place shall be kept, resided in or visited, shall constitute a separate offense. In a prosecution under this section the general reputation of the place may be proved.

As used in this Code, "bawdy place" shall mean any place within or without any building or structure which is used or is to be used for lewdness, assignation or prostitution.

(Code 1950, §§ 18.1-195, 18.1-196; 1960, c. 358; 1975, cc. 14, 15.)

What the previous poster says is in fact probably the best defense to the charge. But by the time you get to make that defense the damage is done. Your name has been in the newspaper and whatever other problems this has caused have already happened. And of course you can't really argue that the place is licensed for any of the activities of which you ay be accused of partaking beyond "massage."

Originally Posted by Roamin Roman

As long as the place has a business license from the county, it would seem that the police would have a difficult (though not impossible) time making the case that a customer at that AMP was "frequenting a bawdy place. " It is unreasonable to expect that customers, upon entering a legitimate massage establishment or an AMP, would request to see the license or certificate of the therapist in question. This charge that the PWP cited of the six customers at SKO is intended to harrass and intimidate the customers more than anything else. And, they may be hoping that one or more of the customers, being freaked-out by such a charge, would knuckle under and testify against the establishment.

Have fun at the Forum R: R

P.S..-- I'm not an attorney, nor do I play one on TV, but I believe my assessment of this situation is fairly close to the mark. Nevertheless, these six customers would still be well-advised to check with a lawyer.

**Roamin Roman** · 05-29-08 23:58

Visited old Mike Ono's place again and requested (and received) Genie as my therapist. I am happy to report that my findings on this visit were very consistent with my prior visit, and I left somewhat poorer but a great deal more relaxed.

All of the previous acolades and ratings apply to this most recent visit. The hot towel treatment and back-walking at the beginning were excellent (as was the thoroughly soapy TS beforehand). Scalp massage, like last time, was a nice plus, and the Shangri-La finish was even more so than previously. Seniors and trusted members (i.e., those making useful contributions to this forum) can PM me for details to this abbreviated report.

Have fun at the Forum

R: R

(BTW, I'm still trying to convince the mamasan to give me a session. I got a bit closer this time, but still no promise yet of future success. Oh, well, it gives a guy a challenge to shoot for.)

**Roamin Roman** · 05-29-08 23:49

Originally Posted by Superman06

What's interesting is six customers were charged with frequenting a bawdy place.

As long as the place has a business license from the county, it would seem that the police would have a difficult (though not impossible) time making the case that a customer at that AMP was "frequenting a bawdy place. " It is unreasonable to expect that customers, upon entering a legitimate massage establishment or an AMP, would request to see the license or certificate of the therapist in question. This charge that the PWP cited of the six customers at SKO is intended to harrass and intimidate the customers more than anything else. And, they may be hoping that one or more of the customers, being freaked-out by such a charge, would knuckle under and testify against the establishment.

Have fun at the Forum R: R

P.S..-- I'm not an attorney, nor do I play one on TV, but I believe my assessment of this situation is fairly close to the mark. Nevertheless, these six customers would still be well-advised to check with a lawyer.

**Sleazebum** · 05-29-08 22:01

Do what you want but as for me, I am staying OUT of PWC when looking for things!

It just is not worth the risk!

JJ

Originally Posted by Superman06

What's interesting is six customers were charged with frequenting a bawdy place. That in itself kind of worries me. In this case the police didn't just give the customers a hard time but decided to charge them. Likely done so that they would give testimony against SKO Therapy in return for lesser or dropped charges. Good to know the PWP are hard at work against consenting adults just trying to have a pleasant day.

**Superman06** · 05-29-08 19:28

Originally Posted by Any Mouse

This happened in March. No Panic Please!

What's interesting is six customers were charged with frequenting a bawdy place. That in itself kind of worries me. In this case the police didn't just give the customers a hard time but decided to charge them. Likely done so that they would give testimony against SKO Therapy in return for lesser or dropped charges. Good to know the PWP are hard at work against consenting adults just trying to have a pleasant day.

**Any Mouse** · 05-28-08 16:39

Originally Posted by Joey Boots

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/fo.../38/86609.html

This happened in March. No Panic Please!

**AKFourtySeven** · 05-28-08 11:20

I checked the new Kim's out yesterday. I got Jeanie.Nice looker in her 30s.

First I got a shower.Gave a good wash but didn't wear wellies.

Great massage with a light touch Nova finisih.Place got busy befoe I left. I think I got the full hour.Roaming was allowed. I forgot to check the time before I went in.

**Just Ken** · 05-25-08 13:31

Was somewhat cautious because of all the recent attention, but I thought I would take a chance. Mama took me to the room and sent in Bebe. Nice looker, warm smile, great attitude and very sweet. I would put her around 34 y/o, but for me it is sometimes hard to tell. She was a bit taller than your typical korean with a few extra pounds and natural C's. TS was great, took her time and cleaned everything twice. Finished up and back to the room. I prefer the soft touch and she followed instructions very well. Last few minutes were spent with her lying next to me with some nice conversation. Overall, great experience and I would repeat. PM for the details please.

Originally Posted by Firmwearnova

Finally pulled the trigger and stopped in for a massage. Stopped at Oasis in Dumfries (formerly Soo Young) first but no response at the doorbell. Went to SKO (Sakura) and was greeted by a woman who was younger and prettier than I expected. After requesting the 70 for hour, she hurriedly shuffled me off to a room where I only waited a minute before my therapist came in. Barbie was a very cute, small, Korean spinner with smooth skin and C cups. Don't know age, but looked great. I'm mid-30s and she was younger than me that's for sure or just keeps in great shape. Table shower was thorough and relaxing. Back to the room for the massage, which was very relaxing as well. First time so started slow and didn't want the 'works', just a little extra massage. Put 40 on table for tip but Barbie 'suggested' it should be 60. The experience was great and Barbie was definitely more attractive than I was expecting. Korean heritage but raised in America so she spoke perfect English. Would definitely repeat with Barbie, and also would be nice to try the other young gal who was scampering around the office.

**Guitarman1** · 05-25-08 07:53

Link didn't work. I'll try these. One is to the store and the other is to a video where they name USASG as a source of information. There is another video where the cop says how nearly a dozen agencies were involved and their investigation had been going on since 2003.

http://www.local12.com/mostpopular/s...d-aa0056d0b77b

http://www.local12.com/mediacenter/l...video.wkrc.com