Find Your New Baby
High Class Companions
Best Escorts
Top Tier Escorts

Thread: Escort Reports

+ Add Report
Page 299 of 1130 FirstFirst ... 199 249 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 349 399 799 ... LastLast
Results 4,471 to 4,485 of 16939
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #12469
    Quote Originally Posted by BlahBl  [View Original Post]
    I said similar further down. The misspellings between good grammar. Just the dialect varying between sentences drastically. It seems obvious, now, but might not be as obvious. Initially.

    I was wanting to ask all you guys (or gals). If you contacted this ad s number and declined ALL services, behaved well, maybe even said, 'hey, I'm not into that. ' and so on. Or even a similar yet different situation via text:

    Do you continue to use and keep the same number in future? I personally wouldn't, unless I had no choice / can't get new number. I realize nothing can happen for texting and declining services. I'd still worry about it whether using a voip number or not. Do these guys have lists they save. I would think so. Nothing has happened but a mere text, I understand.
    Me personally I'm not worried about it at all. I'm not going to change my number. What can they do besides randomly text me and see if I want to meet up which I would never meet with anyone who just randomly text me and will never meet with anyone who says they are underage.

    I'm curious as to what you think they can do with a list of phone numbers of men who declined to see someone under age. I could see them saving the number if you still sounded interested in meeting after you heard age but ended up declining. If you just flat out decline they probably move on to the next either way I'm not worried about it and will keep my same number.

  2. #12468
    Quote Originally Posted by Slimpicker  [View Original Post]
    I know enough has been said about this but what struck me as obvious sting was simple. Why even say you are 16?

    The ad could have simply said 'no bb' or 'everything covered', and the appointment was already setup, they didn't need to entice anyone further once he agreed to see them.

    Also, anyone under age would usually want to make you believe they were of age. 99% of escorts are 'use condom' anyway, why even mention that too.

    IMO LE was just stupid the way this whole thing was setup.
    I said similar further down. The misspellings between good grammar. Just the dialect varying between sentences drastically. It seems obvious, now, but might not be as obvious. Initially.

    I was wanting to ask all you guys (or gals). If you contacted this ad s number and declined ALL services, behaved well, maybe even said, 'hey, I'm not into that. ' and so on. Or even a similar yet different situation via text:

    Do you continue to use and keep the same number in future? I personally wouldn't, unless I had no choice / can't get new number. I realize nothing can happen for texting and declining services. I'd still worry about it whether using a voip number or not. Do these guys have lists they save. I would think so. Nothing has happened but a mere text, I understand.

  3. #12467
    Quote Originally Posted by Hobbyist1234  [View Original Post]
    Hit this ad up today to setup an appointment they messaged me back and said they were full today but could get me in tomorrow I told them that was fine. Age on ad said 22.

    They then proceeded to message me back and tell me that I had to use a condom because they were 16
    I know enough has been said about this but what struck me as obvious sting was simple. Why even say you are 16?

    The ad could have simply said 'no bb' or 'everything covered', and the appointment was already setup, they didn't need to entice anyone further once he agreed to see them.

    Also, anyone under age would usually want to make you believe they were of age. 99% of escorts are 'use condom' anyway, why even mention that too.

    IMO LE was just stupid the way this whole thing was setup.

  4. #12466
    Quote Originally Posted by DreamStar74  [View Original Post]
    Is this girl real seen her posting forever yet still no comments seems fishy but damn she so my type. If you have dealt with this one let me know how it was! https://yolo.com.listcrawler.eu/post...ouis/141730375#.
    Ad is clearly fake as hell bro.

  5. #12465

    Seen this one posting for a while.

    Is this girl real seen her posting forever yet still no comments seems fishy but damn she so my type. If you have dealt with this one let me know how it was! https://yolo.com.listcrawler.eu/post...ouis/141730375#.

  6. #12464
    Quote Originally Posted by Hobbyist1234  [View Original Post]
    Ya I didn't ask for a price they also never asked me for anything. They pretty much just wanted me to acknowledge that I knew they were 16.
    I didn't either, just asked if I wanted to see her and her friend and I said "sure" and replied with her prices. And that was when I was like "ha- yeah ok. Those pics, plus an extra friend, is not that price". Just deleted the text and moved on.

  7. #12463
    Quote Originally Posted by Hobbyist1234  [View Original Post]
    Hit this ad up today to setup an appointment they messaged me back and said they were full today but could get me in tomorrow I told them that was fine. Age on ad said 22.

    They then proceeded to message me back and tell me that I had to use a condom because they were 16 and asked if that was ok. I replied no thanks I thought you were adults and her final response before I blocked the number was I'm 16 but experienced.

    I've been hobbying for 15+ years and never had the feeling that I was talking to LE. Today I feel like I was 99% sure talking to LE. Be safe out there fellas.

    https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...ouis/141272559
    The song reference in that add alone was enough to tell me that was a scam add. I would have blocked them without even responding if someone told me that. It's either a sting or a pedo Hunter looking to expose people. Either way if someone gets caught up in that they deserve everything they get.

  8. #12462
    Quote Originally Posted by BlahBl  [View Original Post]
    The real damage is person-by-person pics on news sites, with names, which I think should be privacy infringement. But undoubtedly intentional. None of us supports trafficking. Goes without saying.

    All of this is also like a giant radar gun. There may be 300 drivers on a highway doing 80 mph, but the one guy that gets ticketed slows other drivers down as they pass by. Then word gets out "they" are taking radar in the area and people slow down. We can argue over misplaced priorities but this is why I avoid all of these areas. Can anyone imagine a widower just wanting some consensual, over 18, companionship. Being arrested. Then having the name and pic blasted all over local news sites. I know one such guy, a vet etc. L, his wife passed. He was detained in a nearby county but was let go because the people were reasonable (Westport area). He's no longer here but was a decent guy, just alone. Anyway, the below IL ad is a scam or setup. I'm quite sure people read these boards and are saying, "Lt smithWho wrote that ad. It's been spotted. Who added the blurb about xyz. " I like how the ad has intentional misspellings peppered between perfect grammar.
    They text the same exact way too. Felt like they wanted me to think a younger teen was texting the way they were misspelling words.

  9. #12461
    Quote Originally Posted by AceChase  [View Original Post]
    If those girls were real, they wouldn't be asking the 125 for both of them (I checked to make sure it isn't real, I would have placed an anon tip for O'Fallon). They, like scammers, want the guy who doesn't see it's too good to be true and fall for it and get busted.
    Ya I didn't ask for a price they also never asked me for anything. They pretty much just wanted me to acknowledge that I knew they were 16.

  10. #12460
    Quote Originally Posted by DVelvet69  [View Original Post]
    I really hope this "is" an LE sting operation (damn that sounds weird to say!) because the alternative, if true, is FAR worse and anyone out there who'd even entertain the idea of seeing a 16 year old "victim" has NO business in this hobby and deserves their fate if they attempt to do so...Period.
    If those girls were real, they wouldn't be asking the 125 for both of them (I checked to make sure it isn't real, I would have placed an anon tip for O'Fallon). They, like scammers, want the guy who doesn't see it's too good to be true and fall for it and get busted.

  11. #12459

    Damage

    Quote Originally Posted by Cybinv1  [View Original Post]
    My friend who was busted in a sting in St. Charles finally told me the outcome. Happened on November 10th, he ended up paying a little over $600 bucks to get out of a charge of soliciting a prostitute. In Missouri that charge can carry a fine of $1000 bucks, and a year in jail. Plus he paid for a lawyer.
    The real damage is person-by-person pics on news sites, with names, which I think should be privacy infringement. But undoubtedly intentional. None of us supports trafficking. Goes without saying.

    All of this is also like a giant radar gun. There may be 300 drivers on a highway doing 80 mph, but the one guy that gets ticketed slows other drivers down as they pass by. Then word gets out "they" are taking radar in the area and people slow down. We can argue over misplaced priorities but this is why I avoid all of these areas. Can anyone imagine a widower just wanting some consensual, over 18, companionship. Being arrested. Then having the name and pic blasted all over local news sites. I know one such guy, a vet etc. L, his wife passed. He was detained in a nearby county but was let go because the people were reasonable (Westport area). He's no longer here but was a decent guy, just alone. Anyway, the below IL ad is a scam or setup. I'm quite sure people read these boards and are saying, "Lt smithWho wrote that ad. It's been spotted. Who added the blurb about xyz. " I like how the ad has intentional misspellings peppered between perfect grammar.

  12. #12458

    Quick Report on Ty

    Was in STL a couple weeks ago and met up with Ty. Very accomodating to see me late. As per previous reports her head game is outstanding. I even showed her a video ahead of time of what I was looking for and she said "I got you". Takes her time, no complaints. Didn't swallow but that's ok.

    Of note she has gained a fair amount of weight, probably 40 lbs over the photos. She wore a black dress, pulled down the top, hiked up the skirt and kept the middle covered. She mentioned her weight gain as she was doing this, so definately self conscious. I will repeat.

    https://skipthegames.com/posts/edwar...3/712003703554

    Your traveling Northern Virginia correspondent. VAM.

  13. #12457
    Quote Originally Posted by Hobbyist1234  [View Original Post]
    Hit this ad up today to setup an appointment they messaged me back and said they were full today but could get me in tomorrow I told them that was fine. Age on ad said 22.

    They then proceeded to message me back and tell me that I had to use a condom because they were 16 and asked if that was ok. I replied no thanks I thought you were adults and her final response before I blocked the number was I'm 16 but experienced.

    I've been hobbying for 15+ years and never had the feeling that I was talking to LE. Today I feel like I was 99% sure talking to LE. Be safe out there fellas.

    https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...ouis/141272559
    My friend who was busted in a sting in St. Charles finally told me the outcome. Happened on November 10th, he ended up paying a little over $600 bucks to get out of a charge of soliciting a prostitute. In Missouri that charge can carry a fine of $1000 bucks, and a year in jail. Plus he paid for a lawyer.

  14. #12456
    Quote Originally Posted by Lucky697  [View Original Post]
    She is easily 50-75 heavier than her pics and very rough and callous. She also requires a deposit because she realizes once you get there you've already paid a substantial amount toward her fee. I could not get out fast enough. Lesson learned.

    https://preferred411.com/Provider_Pa...cfm?Cid=409373

    https://tryst.link/escort/sensualsophie

    Pics are much younger and skinnier days.
    Thanks for the info. At first I thought you actually saw the thick thighs Sophie, and I was surprised anyone actually saw her, at least at her advertised rate ($1600 minimum with 50% deposit). I wouldn't expect her to ever show up once she made an easy $800.

    https://tryst.link/escort/spoiledsophie

  15. #12455
    Quote Originally Posted by Lucky697  [View Original Post]
    She is easily 50-75 heavier than her pics and very rough and callous. She also requires a deposit because she realizes once you get there you've already paid a substantial amount toward her fee. I could not get out fast enough. Lesson learned.

    https://preferred411.com/Provider_Pa...cfm?Cid=409373

    https://tryst.link/escort/sensualsophie

    Pics are much younger and skinnier days.
    She's playing a risky game misrepresenting herself on P411. But also 50% down thru an app. No way.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Escorts
Live Escorts
The Velvet Rooms

Protected by Copyscape