"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[SuperFlee]

This chick messaged me first a few months ago, and was adamant about coming over to my place before talking about $ or seeing my pictures. She had a terrible attitude and became really annoying after a day or two, so I never pulled the trigger, but almost 100% sure I didn't miss out on anything, outside of somehow being set up or scammed.

Thanks for the feedback. That is exactly what happened to me. Now I'm ignoring her and she won't stop texting me.

[LouisHernandez]

This is already a problem, its not a future issue. There's one that creates new accounts every day with random pictures but the same profile text. Can't find one right now buts it's something like "I'm naughty want to find out more? Text me now" You'll get seemingly real messages, but when you message the various accounts they're just too similar. Using an existing AI model and feeding it new datasets for training is easymode, it's building the model that's hard. Interfacing that with something like seeking's chat system is also trivial. All of this is why you don't pay until the pussy is on the bed in front of you, AI can't replicate that yet. If it could, I would probably fuck that and wouldn't put up with women's bullshit anyway lmao.

All subscription sites will have to require sim card phone number validation and photo validation at minimum otherwise they are being overrun with these AI bots / scammers. It's already happened on seeking. Personally I consider seeking a scam site now, try some other sites.

[DocHolliday35]

I think she's a pro, been hitting me up also, wants to meet same day, I don't even have a picture up.

Anybody who is willing to meet without seeing you in person or multiple pictures of you is not good. I would delete and move on.

[NewAnonymousName]

Does anyone have information about Bcharisma19999? I just started chatting with her last night.

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...1-61623d04192b

[SalvatoreIttup]

MysteriousGirlie.

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...c-d5d339657515

Any info? Was really aggressive on meeting today without first discussing price. Unfortunately, I couldn't make it today but would like to get some more info on her first.

This chick messaged me first a few months ago, and was adamant about coming over to my place before talking about $ or seeing my pictures. She had a terrible attitude and became really annoying after a day or two, so I never pulled the trigger, but almost 100% sure I didn't miss out on anything, outside of somehow being set up or scammed.

[SalvatoreIttup]

MixieViolet.

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...d-aecf7fa03858

Anyone ever see this this cutie, and if so what was the $ and how was the service?

She was reviewed well here a few years ago, but when I tried to set something up, she was super flakey so I eventually gave up. Didn't want to meet up on weekends, and worked from like early afternoons-midnight during the week. Also, she has never updated her pics from years ago, so she may look completely different in real life now.

[SuperFlee]

Anyone have insight on this? Wants to meet pretty quick and had verification pics, but something just seems off. If no one knows I will meet and report back.

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...4-8dd7acd12d72

Did you end up seeing her? I'm in talks with her now. But communication is flaky at best.

[AdmirerSecret]

Hello my dear friends.

Do some background investigation on this lady. Let me know if she is legit.

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...3-0c3040a41813

Got another girl she seems to be legit but I don't want to give my address to her. She does not have place to do.

In this situation how you guys manage to fuck. Do you get a hotel? Or any tricks to play?

Like pick up and drop blind folded? Kidding I don't want to avoid any risk. After booking hotel and all the prices are more than lkatl.

Give me some insights on how should I proceed next.

[Tdm7075]

MysteriousGirlie.

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...c-d5d339657515

Any info? Was really aggressive on meeting today without first discussing price. Unfortunately, I couldn't make it today but would like to get some more info on her first.

I think she's a pro, been hitting me up also, wants to meet same day, I don't even have a picture up.

[Peter Johnson]

This is already a problem, its not a future issue. There's one that creates new accounts every day with random pictures but the same profile text. Can't find one right now buts it's something like "I'm naughty want to find out more? Text me now" You'll get seemingly real messages, but when you message the various accounts they're just too similar. Using an existing AI model and feeding it new datasets for training is easymode, it's building the model that's hard. Interfacing that with something like seeking's chat system is also trivial. All of this is why you don't pay until the pussy is on the bed in front of you, AI can't replicate that yet. If it could, I would probably fuck that and wouldn't put up with women's bullshit anyway lmao.

I forgot that women actually don't have to pay any subscription fee, to use Seeking, so there probably will be more and more fake accounts and bots, and convincing chats with them, as AI improves even more. They will all be pic sellers or scammers, or both.

[SuperFlee]

MysteriousGirlie.

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...c-d5d339657515

Any info? Was really aggressive on meeting today without first discussing price. Unfortunately, I couldn't make it today but would like to get some more info on her first.

[PrinceOfFools]

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/tech/new...nline-29993832

Before long, probably most of the "girls" we are talking to online, will be ChatGPT (or similar) scammer bots. But hopefully we still have a few more years before this happens, and the subscription fee on Seeking makes it less likely that it will be that extreme, very soon.

This is already a problem, its not a future issue. There's one that creates new accounts every day with random pictures but the same profile text. Can't find one right now buts it's something like "I'm naughty want to find out more? Text me now" You'll get seemingly real messages, but when you message the various accounts they're just too similar. Using an existing AI model and feeding it new datasets for training is easymode, it's building the model that's hard. Interfacing that with something like seeking's chat system is also trivial. All of this is why you don't pay until the pussy is on the bed in front of you, AI can't replicate that yet. If it could, I would probably fuck that and wouldn't put up with women's bullshit anyway lmao.

[Peter Johnson]

Probably not a woman either, it's a dude in an Eastern european / african / eastern Asian country or a bot written by someone there.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/tech/new...nline-29993832

Before long, probably most of the "girls" we are talking to online, will be ChatGPT (or similar) scammer bots. But hopefully we still have a few more years before this happens, and the subscription fee on Seeking makes it less likely that it will be that extreme, very soon.

[PrinceOfFools]

If she knew "you won't agree to this" then why did she ask? How much time did this retard waste chatting you up?
You have to wonder if these are just Nigerian run scam accounts, although she does have a blue checkmark on her profile if that means anything.

This is pretty standard for scammers, it helps qualify a real mark vs someone they shouldn't spend any more time on. Ever notice misspellings and bad grammar in scam messages? That's not an accident, it's intentional. Someone who ignores the red flags that early in the scam is less likely to back out later. Trying to goad men by saying not a real man / only a real man / you won't respond to this / etc baits dumb people into continuing to talk to them, which means there's still a chance the scam works. If you don't respond, they move on.

Probably not a woman either, it's a dude in an Eastern european / african / eastern Asian country or a bot written by someone there.

[PrinceOfFools]

MixieViolet.

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...d-aecf7fa03858

Anyone ever see this this cutie, and if so what was the $ and how was the service?

Chatted a bit, then she ghosted me.

QTCorinna.

No link as she blocked me. Great conversation over the site, moved to snap. We chatted a bit then she shared some great pics almost unprompted. Did a little sexting and got a solo vid of her masturbating. She told me she was down to meet but liked to chat for a little while beforehand for a couple of days to become comfortable.

I told her that was fine with me. She then asks what my ideal arrangement is. I tell her something regular, in person and isn't transactional. She blocked me on snap and SA in response LOL. I think she was hoping to sucker me into buying content. Yet she seemed fine sharing it for free. Or maybe she just wanted to chat and do nudes for attention but not want to meet. Pity.

If you can get her chatting longer you can probably get more from her, just deftly dodge the arrangement conversation and pump her for nudes and you can likely get more than I did, so at least not a complete waste of time.

This is either a bot or an attention seeker. Did the same thing to me on blocking as soon as a meet was brought up.