Rubrankings.com
Live Escorts
Top Escorts
Top Tier Escorts

Thread: Sugarbabies?

+ Add Report
Page 100 of 609 FirstFirst ... 50 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 150 200 600 ... LastLast
Results 1,486 to 1,500 of 9130
This blog is moderated by MisforMaster
  1. #7645

    Sarahbabe444 jayyt22

    Same girl two different profiles or unicorn twins.

    Sarahbabe444. https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...289b915cdf56a4

    Jayyt22. https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...ecec47ce1873dd

  2. #7644

    I'm with Bam on This

    Quote Originally Posted by BamBam  [View Original Post]
    I am putting this out thee for comment. The Columbus forum started a separate sugar thread just for SB and WYP. I suppose there might also be others. In any case, they did it to help avoid clogging the regular thread with a lot of irrelevant chatter. I think the people using the alternate sites could benefit from a higher degree of info exchange to help avoid wasting credits. What say the men on this thread?

    BAM.
    I agree, I have been reading their thread and like it. It does filter out some of the noise. It's more targeted. Great idea Bam.

  3. #7643
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1867

    SCAMMER, FAKE or NPC??

    Here are some profiles that trigger my caution mode.

    HardDeep

    https://members.whatsyourprice.com/p...PmKnAL4ybGMq9; The picture is of the porn star Karlee Grey. No profile content.

    Avis502

    https://members.whatsyourprice.com/p...2Yk606jWqempk; age-pic mismatch. Profile written in the third person. TGTBT.

    Empressdivine

    https://members.whatsyourprice.com/p...6M6457DLlYvQg; Reported on earlier. Using very old pics, Actual age is early 60's. She is real but just don't!

    Mansonm

    https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...f400ca487e9ea; TGTBT,. High probability to be using pictures of some porn star. Only three elements in attributes-big red flag.

    Japmorgan

    https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...a30e7bb6e4771; TGTBT. Minimal profile content, three elements in attributes.

    Marissa_599

    https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...fb90be7e407c8; Asian. Only two pics look like they might be local. Full attributes but 5'8" for an Asian girl? Inconclusive.

    I will update later with a list of profiles that appear to have wasted my credits.

    BAM

  4. #7642
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1867

    Alternate Sugar Sites

    I am putting this out thee for comment. The Columbus forum started a separate sugar thread just for SB and WYP. I suppose there might also be others. In any case, they did it to help avoid clogging the regular thread with a lot of irrelevant chatter. I think the people using the alternate sites could benefit from a higher degree of info exchange to help avoid wasting credits. What say the men on this thread?

    BAM.

  5. #7641
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1867

    Amor Fati

    Quote Originally Posted by BedtimeStory  [View Original Post]
    In thinking about the purpose of the forum here on this thread I will share what I have found in honor of Bam. Even though he surfs a different site than me, I still find his updates and insight in sorting scams, rinsers, fakes, etc. Very helpful. In crossing over from the escort threads on trying to find the right little bunny rabbit for me to the sugar baby scene.


    https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...65f7e35a61cce2

    She's real but definitely has GPS syndrome, too rich for my budget.


    BTS.
    Thanks for the kind words. Glad to see you step up. I have been experimenting with both SB and WYP during my hiatus from Seeking. The challenge on both sites is avoiding wasting money on profiles that will never engage. I used to puzzle how there could be so many SB profiles with videos that never responded. I now suspect the site is copying out of area profiles and duplicating them. No proof of this but I notice the occasional profile that appears in my local search that have a location pretty far away.

    It requires discipline to avoid spending money on hot looking profiles that keep popping up but if they do not look at your profile, it is almost certain they are either not interested or not real. I may join you in starting to capture the dry holes to help others avoid wasting money.

    I actually met one of the profiles on your list: amorxfati. She posts on all the sugar sites. We did a MnG about a year ago when I was still on Seeking. She is older than her pictures suggest. She wanted 600 ppm. I got the impression she mostly targets visiting business men. She is still a handsome woman but not worth what she is asking. Someone who sees her only once is not going to know that.

    BAM.

  6. #7640

    Contribution

    In thinking about the purpose of the forum here on this thread I will share what I have found in honor of Bam. Even though he surfs a different site than me, I still find his updates and insight in sorting scams, rinsers, fakes, etc. Very helpful. In crossing over from the escort threads on trying to find the right little bunny rabbit for me to the sugar baby scene.

    1st is cost differential. The investment of credits verses returns can vary wildly. The education from this thread has saved me alot. My education from the school of hard knocks has been expensive and frustrating at times. First and formost, the little guy cannot be allowed to make any more decisions past the first profile review of " I'd tap that". LOL, this can be an expensive lesson. The level of profiles that are scams and cons are very high. The websites typically have a certain rate of NPC's, LOL. The website staff create a percentage of fake profiles to lure more guys into spending credits. A lot of these (not all) is the messages / contacts that reach out to you, you spend credits to reply / open the message, and never hear from again.

    As in any vice, the sites are full of phishing scams / profiles. They are trying to get your personal info to re-sell on the dark web as verified info (gets a higher price).

    Bam helps by sharing the knowledge of the scams / fakes / rinsers. I think that I would like to start sharing on what I know.

    https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...ba90c1e55af9d1

    She's real, will meet but very sketchy on what her ppm is. If you want to meet, you have to be ready to meet now, not schedule for later.

    https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...65f7e35a61cce2

    She's real but definitely has GPS syndrome, too rich for my budget.

    https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...b11ba9d234c51c

    Haven't tried to contact this one, but recognize her photos from the escort sites, so probably semi-pro.

    https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...2c57de26ce9af9

    She's real but online only. No meets.

    https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...b6f253f22cce9f

    I think she is real, but sketchy in her replies and set up to meet. High probability of drug use.

    Will post more as my list developes.

    BTS.

  7. #7639

    I agree

    Quote Originally Posted by BamBam  [View Original Post]
    I never message until they have been there a long time and also shared their private pics or visited my profile or I find some way to confirm they are real. It is too easy to waste credits on attractive profiles that never answer back. It is also the case that a lot of the profiles are based on real people but never answer any message.
    BAM.
    I've learned not to reply to messages unless they have viewed my profile. My profile is pretty direct on what I am looking for. Doesn't eliminate all waste, but cuts it down a lot.

    BTS.

  8. #7638

    She reached out to me

    Quote Originally Posted by BamBam  [View Original Post]
    That's an odd profile name.

    BAM.
    Caught my eye. LOL.

    She messaged me, hasn't replied yet.

  9. #7637
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1867

    Sugababe_.80

    Quote Originally Posted by BedtimeStory  [View Original Post]
    Does anybody have any experience with this one?

    https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...6a046d841e0484
    I have not approached her. I made her a favorite which let's her know I am interested. I never message until they have been there a long time and also shared their private pics or visited my profile or I find some way to confirm they are real. It is too easy to waste credits on attractive profiles that never answer back. It is also the case that a lot of the profiles are based on real people but never answer any message. That's an odd profile name.

    BAM.

  10. #7636

    Anyone?

    Does anybody have any experience with this one?

    https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...6a046d841e0484

  11. #7635

    Yes

    Quote Originally Posted by Prat652  [View Original Post]
    ... It is ridiculous seeing all the demands right now even with fat chicks.
    Your right, but I've noticed fat chicks do more.

    Lmao, just saying.

  12. #7634
    Quote Originally Posted by ToddCincy  [View Original Post]
    I am in my 50's, and I've hobbied off and on since the 1990's. I think I can explain the current inflation, or at least part of it.

    Things are bad now because the hobby is affected by the overall economy. You've heard the news: Right now, labor of any kind is overpriced, and anyone who hires is paying more for less. Is there any reason why that shouldn't apply to the hobby, too?

    Most of the current providers (and real sugar babies, for that matter) are older women who started prior to the pandemic. There is a minimal influx of young newbies, or even older newbies, for that matter. We have a labor supply problem, just like Home Depot and your local restaurant.

    The hobby has always been very cyclical. In the early 2000's, when unemployment was around 3. 5%, people were paying $400 for obese / old providers who primarily advertised on a now defunct message board. I about gave up on the hobby altogether around 2006.

    Then the financial meltdown happened in 2007 to 2008. In 2011 and 2012, I was getting bonafide college chicks on Seeking (then Seeking Arrangements) for $200. The good times continued through about 2016, and had a slow taper off from 2017 until 2020.

    I am in reasonably good shape for a middle age man, and I have good social skills. But I'm very average looking and well under six feet tall. I do horribly on apps like Tinder and Bumble.

    I was landing hot college chicks in 2012 for $200 because supply and demand conditions were in my favor then. Now, however, you have too many guys chasing too few women, so prices are going up. And the quality is not so good, and selection is extremely limited. Even you guys who like older women: I'm sure you would like some choice beyond Natane Marie, Taylor Nikole, and other aging providers who have been around since 2009.

    I don't want to see the economy implode just so we can get some better deals on women. But everyone agrees that the labor market has been in disequilibrium.

    If you're following the news, though, the labor market is slowing, along with consumer demand. I'm holding on to my money until unemployment rises to 5 percent. That seems to be threshold (based on my 30+ years of observing the hobby) when enough new women enter the market to create an entirely new supply.

    This, too, shall pass. But keep in mind: there will always be simps. There will always be guys who are so thirsty, that they'll pay $400 for a fat provider who is 40 years old. This was true in 2003, and it's true in 2023.

    Don't be a simp, and don't overpay. That only hurts you, and other hobbyists. That's why I recently scolded the guys who were paying those traveling Ukrainians $500 for a non-FS HE.
    Thanks for the detailed explanation. Wish I was Mongering around 2012. Maybe I will also hold onto my money and wait for the change to happen. It is ridiculous seeing all the demands right now even with fat chicks.

  13. #7633

    Yes, grasshopper, rates will come down

    Quote Originally Posted by Prat652  [View Original Post]

    Some stupid / rich dudes (Not sure what I should call them) are feeding these chicks.

    Even with a recession happening in the future I feel like rates won't come down and I am not sure how previous recessions affected the rates. However, with this online content and inflation sugar relationship is becoming more expensive for a sugar daddy.
    I am in my 50's, and I've hobbied off and on since the 1990's. I think I can explain the current inflation, or at least part of it.

    Things are bad now because the hobby is affected by the overall economy. You've heard the news: Right now, labor of any kind is overpriced, and anyone who hires is paying more for less. Is there any reason why that shouldn't apply to the hobby, too?

    Most of the current providers (and real sugar babies, for that matter) are older women who started prior to the pandemic. There is a minimal influx of young newbies, or even older newbies, for that matter. We have a labor supply problem, just like Home Depot and your local restaurant.

    The hobby has always been very cyclical. In the early 2000's, when unemployment was around 3. 5%, people were paying $400 for obese / old providers who primarily advertised on a now defunct message board. I about gave up on the hobby altogether around 2006.

    Then the financial meltdown happened in 2007 to 2008. In 2011 and 2012, I was getting bonafide college chicks on Seeking (then Seeking Arrangements) for $200. The good times continued through about 2016, and had a slow taper off from 2017 until 2020.

    I am in reasonably good shape for a middle age man, and I have good social skills. But I'm very average looking and well under six feet tall. I do horribly on apps like Tinder and Bumble.

    I was landing hot college chicks in 2012 for $200 because supply and demand conditions were in my favor then. Now, however, you have too many guys chasing too few women, so prices are going up. And the quality is not so good, and selection is extremely limited. Even you guys who like older women: I'm sure you would like some choice beyond Natane Marie, Taylor Nikole, and other aging providers who have been around since 2009.

    I don't want to see the economy implode just so we can get some better deals on women. But everyone agrees that the labor market has been in disequilibrium.

    If you're following the news, though, the labor market is slowing, along with consumer demand. I'm holding on to my money until unemployment rises to 5 percent. That seems to be threshold (based on my 30+ years of observing the hobby) when enough new women enter the market to create an entirely new supply.

    This, too, shall pass. But keep in mind: there will always be simps. There will always be guys who are so thirsty, that they'll pay $400 for a fat provider who is 40 years old. This was true in 2003, and it's true in 2023.

    Don't be a simp, and don't overpay. That only hurts you, and other hobbyists. That's why I recently scolded the guys who were paying those traveling Ukrainians $500 for a non-FS HE.

  14. #7632
    Quote Originally Posted by Prat652  [View Original Post]
    https://members.seeking.com/member/7...a-b7c262fde59d

    https://members.seeking.com/member/1...0-1fb76dde5424

    Seems like Galla chicks. These two are asking for $600 each and way GPS attitude. Some stupid / rich dudes (Not sure what I should call them) are feeding these chicks..
    I know them IRL. I know about their past arrangements. Dated one and hooked up with the other. As far as arrangements go. You're looking mid-high 5 figures yearly allowance wise for something steady. Both are obtainable for free if you're good looking / wealthy / or prominent enough. But yes, both Galla girls. Run in a certain circle. Not going to have a lot of luck PPM wise.

  15. #7631
    Senior Member


    Posts: 225

    Hysterical Hottie

    Chatting and she is pressing for a meet. Any info?

    https://members.seeking.com/member/7...6-236f4184013e

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
The Velvet Rooms
High Class Companions
Best Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory

Protected by Copyscape