Bareback Providers

[PlayingJsea]

I get that, and I was a bit disappointed that she was not as fit as the pics suggested, though they are her at favorable angles. But I think "fat" and "tits are awful" is a bit extreme. More like HWP GND. Compared to the absolute skanks often drooled over on these pages, and compared to the typical BB offerings elsewhere, she's pretty decent. BB was a simple negotiation with no previous discussion. Her skills, enthusiasm and personality are extraordinary compared to the average. Super fun, though the price is a bit high.

If you're seeking (near) perfection, I recommend Penelope Lovees. She's the closest experience to Dirty Annie I've seen since she left. Beautiful, slim body with a cute-but-not-pretty face. And she does it ALL!

Maybe I was too harsh to say fat. Pudgy might be a better way of putting it? Anyways, thank you for info re BBFS. I guessed it was on the table but she ain't worth those prices imo. Penelope I agree is awesome. I have drained into both holes, and it was fun. I think I will give the Brazilians a try before hitting up my UTR regulars again LOL.

[DickIncider12]

In another thread it was suggested she will do BBFS. That may be the case but the chick who I saw was essentially a bait and switch from who is shown in the ads. I got the feeling bare was on the table for a second session but I didn't go for it because I was so put off by how different she was from the ads. She is heavy, with no definition or curves except some in the rear. The tits are awful too. She is a cool chick to chat with but if I wanted chill fat chicks I'd just go on tinder.

Was a lot bigger also than her pics and not at all my type but I am picky as it gets I need to see hot young perfect tight bods reason I avoid almost all those raves reviews on the other board which is way over hyped bs. I'll stick with my hot young strippers, bikini baristas and college hotties on SA they are more of a challenge but so worth it since I get them all to do BBFS, expensive but worth it to me. Quality at higher prices vs quantity and not so hot and not as good to fuck.

[Duke Of Exeter]

In another thread it was suggested she will do BBFS. That may be the case but the chick who I saw was essentially a bait and switch from who is shown in the ads. I got the feeling bare was on the table for a second session but I didn't go for it because I was so put off by how different she was from the ads. She is heavy, with no definition or curves except some in the rear. The tits are awful too. She is a cool chick to chat with but if I wanted chill fat chicks I'd just go on tinder.

I get that, and I was a bit disappointed that she was not as fit as the pics suggested, though they are her at favorable angles. But I think "fat" and "tits are awful" is a bit extreme. More like HWP GND. Compared to the absolute skanks often drooled over on these pages, and compared to the typical BB offerings elsewhere, she's pretty decent. BB was a simple negotiation with no previous discussion. Her skills, enthusiasm and personality are extraordinary compared to the average. Super fun, though the price is a bit high.

If you're seeking (near) perfection, I recommend Penelope Lovees. She's the closest experience to Dirty Annie I've seen since she left. Beautiful, slim body with a cute-but-not-pretty face. And she does it ALL!

[BillyKlub]

In another thread it was suggested she will do BBFS. That may be the case but the chick who I saw was essentially a bait and switch from who is shown in the ads. I got the feeling bare was on the table for a second session but I didn't go for it because I was so put off by how different she was from the ads. She is heavy, with no definition or curves except some in the rear. The tits are awful too. She is a cool chick to chat with but if I wanted chill fat chicks I'd just go on tinder.

Thanks for the report! I was planning to see her. I was hoping she actually resembled Joey Lauren Adams.

[LayPipe69]

OK, I am unable to be the first here due to a hectic work schedule. Someone please find out if she belings here. She looks incredible.

https://www.tnaboard.com/showthread....w-on-the-hobby

[Tiberium]

In another thread it was suggested she will do BBFS. That may be the case but the chick who I saw was essentially a bait and switch from who is shown in the ads. I got the feeling bare was on the table for a second session but I didn't go for it because I was so put off by how different she was from the ads. She is heavy, with no definition or curves except some in the rear. The tits are awful too. She is a cool chick to chat with but if I wanted chill fat chicks I'd just go on tinder.

Appreciate the info. I had her on my tdl, because her pics are fire but this intel changes that.

[PlayingJsea]

In another thread it was suggested she will do BBFS. That may be the case but the chick who I saw was essentially a bait and switch from who is shown in the ads. I got the feeling bare was on the table for a second session but I didn't go for it because I was so put off by how different she was from the ads. She is heavy, with no definition or curves except some in the rear. The tits are awful too. She is a cool chick to chat with but if I wanted chill fat chicks I'd just go on tinder.

[BirdWatching]

Does she belong here? Some of her postings say Open Minded.

https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?548589-AminaLovesU

[ScotchYoke]

Where is Steph Located?

https://www.tnaboard.com/showthread....le-for-lessons

[ScotchYoke]

She has two ads with different phone numbers.

https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...ttle/123216693

One ad is 30 yo the other is 38.

A google image search yields ads and phone numbers inconsistent with being a PNW provider.

[Original703]

Any AMPs known for BBFS?

Welcome to Seattle!

You can find information on that by searching your desired acronym in the thread below:

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...Parlor-Reports

[DrtyHarry]

Yeah, she has been reviewed here tons of times. Good lady very easy to schedule with but sometimes is a little flaky on timing. Overall a good time and worth the repeat. She lives very far away for me.

If ads outright mention full menu like BBFS, cim, Greek, etc. , 99% they are fake ads and will ask ask 2 things: 1. Your location (cause they're probably in India or Russia or some foreign land) and 2. They will ask for a deposit.

Duke you may have quoted the wrong message. My post was about Steph, a long time provider with lots of reviews here and the other board. What you mention here is extremely true, but not relevant to Steph in any way. I. E. She does not post BBFS in any post openly and she has never asked for location or deposit (at least not that I am aware of). You maybe confusing this Steph with someone else.

[BBPornoGeek]

If your talking strictly BBFS, then yeah I guess NYC is better but only in terms of AMPs. Trying to find decent non asian BBFS service at reasonable rates is much harder especially in the last few years. And even the AMP rates aren't that great, used to be if the girl offered it, then it was BBFS / cip no upcharge, but now they know they can get away with asking for an extra 100 for BBFS and and an extra 100-200 for cip on top of the session rate which ranges from 300-400 per hr, and guys are paying it, so this is becoming more the norm. And most of the non Asian BBFS providers, who are fewer and far between now, have similar or even more outrageous rates. It's not what it was even 5 years ago. A lot of the better agencies are gone or a shell of what they once were. Really the Asian spots are the most reliable, but hey I love pizza, but I don't want pizza for dinner every day know what I mean?

But another reason I say Seattle / WA looks better option wise (BBFS and non BBFS) is just compare the providers ad page on the other well known board (TitsNAss) and they ny page maybe has 5 new ads a day if that? While the WA ad section has about a whole new page of ads every day and most of those providers have a good number of references and reviews too. Maybe the grass is greener but I look forward to exploring a bit when I visit.

The upcharge issue is common on both coasts. High quality BBFS providers are now really by recommendations of the ladies you see. Build a rapport with them and they'll open up their friend list to you. That's what I've been relying on more than sites particularly non-Asian ones.

I don't know why the well known board is so sparse for the east coast particularly NYC. Maybe the providers there get enough traffic they don't need to deal with the stupid bitcoin payment crap the site uses? While Seattle has more activity, you will find out that unless you hit up a girl right as she posts the first time, it just goes down hill after the pussy mafia gets to them.

[DukeDraper]

Yeah, she has been reviewed here tons of times. Good lady very easy to schedule with but sometimes is a little flaky on timing. Overall a good time and worth the repeat. She lives very far away for me.

If ads outright mention full menu like BBFS, cim, Greek, etc. , 99% they are fake ads and will ask ask 2 things: 1. Your location (cause they're probably in India or Russia or some foreign land) and 2. They will ask for a deposit.

[DukeDraper]

Visiting from the East coast and trying to have some fun.

Is it normal here for providers to expect you to send a pic of your drivers license?

I have had several ask for that as well as deposit.

And not from random picks from sites, but ones referenced here.

Hell no! Never send a pic of your drivers license OR a deposit (unless verified provider with lengthy positive history). The license will open you up to blackmail / sting and 9/10 "deposits" are total scams. Especially if you the alt sites like use LC, STG, sumo, etc. Send a face pic or video chat if you want but avoid deposits unless you're willing to lose it.