Escort Reports

[SpazzBoy78]

https://skipthegames.com/posts/grand...y/765625832924

Has anyone meet with this provider? I have searched and can't find anything. Seems she has been posting for a while now. Any info would be great. Thank you in advance.

[Geek317]

Holy mother of God.

I love all of you here and not so much at the same time. I have read the reviews of Hunter and they are all good, but not good enough. I mean 15 out of 10 at least. Been at least a few months and seen about a dozen providers. Hands down the best experience to date by like miles.

Got to see her this morning (her last day in the area) and holy christ. So good. From the BJ to the finish. No rush, comfortable setting, so many positions and so on.

I would go into more detail but seems moot at this point. I mean she is the whole deal, fun to talk too, great interaction during, and even when leaving. So nice and fun. Would definitely see like 100 more times, but those days are done. Next time tell us newbies how good some of these providers really are so we know to get our butts in gear.

[Gene2]

Yes, it's just really challenging to take your own picture, right? I mean some people can do it, but it's kind of like self-editing. It's helpful to get another person's eye.

There are so many new tools for realistic touch-ups, in photo-editing applications. It takes some time to learn, but the results can be very convincing. The tools get better every year.

I'm sure some providers would love your assistance. Probably the better providers.

[Gene2]

https://skipthegames.com/posts/grand...-/533532755950

Wondering if anyone has seen this provider? I see she offers overnight appointments?

Or this one who also offers overnight:

https://skipthegames.com/posts/grand...-/090402360883

I return soon to GR. Feel free to post or PM.

Thanks.

G2.

[Cassidy69]

Not necessarily. Some providers will do a simple BBBJ, or ss FS for a low rate to drum up clients and repeat business.

My issue (and not everybodys) is when the said provider doesn't have a face or full body photo posted. It could be literally ANYBODY who answers that door upon your arrival.

The ad (not necessarily this ad) could be a fake (time waster), L.E., a scam for $$ via on-line, or a set up strong-arm robbery with no future recourse from the monger(s).

I realize this omission can be for a providers general safety, but I rarely respond to ads w/o at least a single face pic.

I can totally appreciate and respect your wish for a picture of a provider's face. However you have to think about the provider's day life and the people that she may know. There's work issues, custody issues, safety issues, etc. With sharing pictures of one's face. And let's be honest here. We could post any picture of any face we want to and you still will have absolutely no way of knowing if it's actually her or not until she opens that door.

[TypicalDude]

You are correct, TypicalDude. I'm a former professional photographer and have photographed many people and Photo shopped away the tattoos they wish they hadn't gotten. I firmly believe that providers would benefit greatly from better photos.

Yes, it's just really challenging to take your own picture, right? I mean some people can do it, but it's kind of like self-editing. It's helpful to get another person's eye.

There are so many new tools for realistic touch-ups, in photo-editing applications. It takes some time to learn, but the results can be very convincing. The tools get better every year.

[GRHunter]

I recently had the distinct pleasure of catching Miss Hunter on her farewell tour. So I guess in a way this review is moot. But anyway I would just like to give her kudos for conducting herself very professionally through the coms-set up-direction portion of our meet. The meet started with some very comfortable conversation as we discovered we had been travelling in parallel universes separated by a coupla decades. If I only could get Dr Strange to multiverse me back 20 or so years you guys would've never heard of her, just saying. Back to meeting, when we got down to the business, she was patient, passionate, and purrr-ect! I truly missed the boat on Miss Hunter. Should have pulled the trigger long ago. Hoping at some point to catch up with her as she embarks upon her version of High Plains Drifter. Good Luck! Be safe my friend! T. H. Out.

Thank you very much TH for your sweet review of our time. I thoroughly enjoyed our time together and I love having intellectual conversation with a handsome man Too bad there isn't a time machine, we definitely have a lot in common.

Thanks again and going to miss my GR peeps.

Be safe everyone and Happy Hunting.

XOXOX.

Hunter.

[TypicalDude]

TD.

You may have stumbled onto something here. Your obvious professional eye for photos could really help most of our providers. It's a definite need when we see the low quality photos used to capture the essence of these beautiful women. CJ posted earlier about not wanting to use actual photos that show tattoos or birthmarks etc that could make our favorites uneasy if they were noticed by someone in their "real life. " And the lighting and composition of some of the photos is so obscuring that no one really knows what will be on the bed in that room. One photo of a lovely young lady had her arm situated so at first glance it appears to be a rather large male appendage. Other photos appear to be doused in red or purple lighting so nothing can be seen. Even older or heavier women are beautiful. And an artful photographic eye could certainly capture that beauty. I know most of us are very disappointed when a provider uses a photo that looks like Kim Kardashian or Salma Hayek, only to have the door open to a women looking nothing like the photos. Most of us appreciate realistic photos that, while maybe using some airbrushing or careful angles, still portray the woman we will see. The reviews here are full of anecdotal evidence to support that conclusion.

One hundred percent agree. We have so many beautiful providers. Over and over, reviews start by saying, "She's even better looking in person. ".

At the same time, skillful photography and processing is important: we all understand the importance of anonymity. A good photographer can resolve identifying attributes and remedy imperfections, while remaining truthful. Who among us doesn't appreciate skillful touch-up work in our own photographs? I definitely do.

Obviously, providers are basically running their own businesses: it's not always an option to hire someone for xyz, because those expenses add up. But, with so many beautiful providers in our area, what photographer wouldn't jump at the chance to work with a few of these amazing West Michigan providers? I definitely would.

I also agree that I'd much rather see an artful representation of the actual person I'm scheduling with. Rather than a stock photo from Google Images. I'm not the least bit bothered by digitally disguised tattoos, skillfully touched up crow's feet, or flattering lighting. But, as you said, it's great see a good photo of the actual person.

It's awesome when a provider in a STG photo looks like the best version of the person who greets you at the door. That's the definition of good portrait photography. It'd be great if we saw more of that.

[Stroker417]

This provider has shown her face. She probably quit showing her face due to poor reviews in GR. When she was in Holland she received outstanding reviews. Holland has fewer providers to choose from and she was at the top of the list.

This is one of many reasons providers change their advertising techniques. Poor business practice, in my opinion.

I think you guys are confusing and comparing two different women with similar "names. ".

[RubberKnickers]

Agreed. Unless a provider has a ton of tattoos, it is possible to post-process images to remove, replace or obscure (identifying features).

I'd rather see an actual image of the actual person, knowing some features have been post-processed. Versus an image of someone else.

I get why some providers use images of someone else who "resembles" them. But it's almost always possible to remove those unique identifiers while using the actual image. Especially if the image is captured and processed by someone who knows what they're doing.

You are correct, TypicalDude. I'm a former professional photographer and have photographed many people and Photo shopped away the tattoos they wish they hadn't gotten. I firmly believe that providers would benefit greatly from better photos.

[Gene2]

Agreed. Unless a provider has a ton of tattoos, it is possible to post-process images to remove, replace or obscure (identifying features).

I'd rather see an actual image of the actual person, knowing some features have been post-processed. Versus an image of someone else.

I get why some providers use images of someone else who "resembles" them. But it's almost always possible to remove those unique identifiers while using the actual image. Especially if the image is captured and processed by someone who knows what they're doing.

TD.

You may have stumbled onto something here. Your obvious professional eye for photos could really help most of our providers. It's a definite need when we see the low quality photos used to capture the essence of these beautiful women. CJ posted earlier about not wanting to use actual photos that show tattoos or birthmarks etc that could make our favorites uneasy if they were noticed by someone in their "real life. " And the lighting and composition of some of the photos is so obscuring that no one really knows what will be on the bed in that room. One photo of a lovely young lady had her arm situated so at first glance it appears to be a rather large male appendage. Other photos appear to be doused in red or purple lighting so nothing can be seen. Even older or heavier women are beautiful. And an artful photographic eye could certainly capture that beauty. I know most of us are very disappointed when a provider uses a photo that looks like Kim Kardashian or Salma Hayek, only to have the door open to a women looking nothing like the photos. Most of us appreciate realistic photos that, while maybe using some airbrushing or careful angles, still portray the woman we will see. The reviews here are full of anecdotal evidence to support that conclusion.

Maybe you should reach out to some of our favorites here and offer to help. It would be cool to see some new, but accurate photos that don't endanger the privacy of these beautiful women.

Envision.

G2.

[Geek317]

I texted Jenna late this morning as I was approaching GR from the north and asked if she was available in 45 minutes. She texted me back in a couple minutes and said "nope".

I would have loved to have seen her but it's refreshing to get an answer back so you can move on.

I have only seen her once for a BBBJCIM and so worth it, keep at it till you can get it. Was professional and so good, I plan on going again but have to see if I can sneak in a hunter visit before the farewell tour is over.

[Toes63]

I have had a couple visits now with the woman previously reviewed by Mr. Coffee and J. J. A couple months ago. She gave me express permission to review her as she is very UTR. She is a very passionate woman who will take special care of you! She knows her way around a man's body and really enjoys it. She makes sure you have a good time together. If you would like to see her, she is accepting new clients. Please pm me directly for her contact information. You'll be glad you did!

[Benz1]

Not necessarily. Some providers will do a simple BBBJ, or ss FS for a low rate to drum up clients and repeat business.

My issue (and not everybodys) is when the said provider doesn't have a face or full body photo posted. It could be literally ANYBODY who answers that door upon your arrival.

The ad (not necessarily this ad) could be a fake (time waster), L.E., a scam for $$ via on-line, or a set up strong-arm robbery with no future recourse from the monger(s).

I realize this omission can be for a providers general safety, but I rarely respond to ads w/o at least a single face pic.

This provider has shown her face. She probably quit showing her face due to poor reviews in GR. When she was in Holland she received outstanding reviews. Holland has fewer providers to choose from and she was at the top of the list.

This is one of many reasons providers change their advertising techniques. Poor business practice, in my opinion.

[TypicalDude]

My issue (and not everybodys) is when the said provider doesn't have a face or full body photo posted.

I realize this omission can be for a providers general safety, but I rarely respond to ads w/o at least a single face pic.

Agreed. Unless a provider has a ton of tattoos, it is possible to post-process images to remove, replace or obscure (identifying features).

I'd rather see an actual image of the actual person, knowing some features have been post-processed. Versus an image of someone else.

I get why some providers use images of someone else who "resembles" them. But it's almost always possible to remove those unique identifiers while using the actual image. Especially if the image is captured and processed by someone who knows what they're doing.