NoVA SugarBabies

[Shier]

Sorry, I'm not seeing the extensive reviews you allude to and I've searched both her name and title.

Can you simply just advise if the reviews were good, bad or meh?

Thanks.

What Itfcd is saying and many others have said is that if the URL for her page is this:

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...5-d79a6895a833

Then you search the forum for the last 12 digits:

d79a6895a833

I would say there is some discussion (mostly people who don't know how to use the search function) but not many actual reports on her.

[Rudy Wellz]

This SB responded to my initial message that she is looking for a weekly allowance. Hasn't responded to my attempts to get her to text so that I can tell her "No Way", but I'll do PPM. She also doesn't have a face picture or private photos. Has anyone actually met her?

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...1-00b35b2ff270

[FogHorn1]

Under which name? She told me her name was Lindsay. Nothing comes up. Sorry I'm relatively new.

No worries. Copy and paste the last 12 digits of her profile URL and put that into the search box, that's usually the best way to search for a lady on here.

[Wiz Fan]

She's been reported on extensively here, try the search function.

Sorry, I'm not seeing the extensive reviews you allude to and I've searched both her name and title.

Can you simply just advise if the reviews were good, bad or meh?

Thanks.

[Itfcd]

Under which name? She told me her name was Lindsay. Nothing comes up. Sorry I'm relatively new.

The last 12 digits & letters of any SA account are the next best thing to an ID if you put them in the search box.

[Wiz Fan]

She's been reported on extensively here, try the search function.

Under which name? She told me her name was Lindsay. Nothing comes up. Sorry I'm relatively new.

[FogHorn1]

Anyone have any info on this POT:

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...5-d79a6895a833

42 year old middle Eastern chick. Had a few back and forth and seems legit.

She's been reported on extensively here, try the search function.

[FogHorn1]

Anyone seen her yet? https://members.seeking.com/member/f...8-cda4edf071c2.

She is pretty upfront that she wants online first. She actually has OF and sells a bunch of content on other sites. She did do video call to verify that it is her but asked me to buy content before even entertaining the idea of meeting. She is a pro at making content. For the meeting she quoted me at $900 ppm and deposit, but if I feel like it's way too high. She has high mileage it seems and probably a boyfriend. Just wondering if anyone has actually seen her and what the damage was. She is attractive enough to give her a good pounding but can't justify such a high price.

900 PPM for this? No way in hell, this is bedpage material at best. What in the real world fuck is going on these days?

[TomFordModel]

My experience as a married guy (who is upfront about it in his profile): there is a subsection of women that view this as a form of dating, where attraction matters as much as money and they want to know there's a future for it. It's Tinder but with guys who will pick up the tab and then some. They aren't interested in faceless profiles and they aren't interested in being the other woman. Many of them are clear about one or both; some aren't but they just don't respond. That's okay. Whatever works for them and I wish them well. For them, I'd imagine a public picture is important, both for their own initial screening and so that they know that the guy is genuine. They don't want to waste time where there is no attraction.

I am upfront about my status. I don't want to waste anyone else's time and I Definitely don't want to inadvertently bring in someone who is hoping to catch feelings and think there's a future. It eliminates some women to be sure including those where I could just meet them once or twice and then move on if it doesn't click but I am past my kid in a candy store phase.

Hmmm, you're getting it twisted. These girls just want money not some damn relationship with the busted dudes on SA.

Don't kid ourselves we're old and as much as we want to believe we're attractive. That's not the case for 99.9% of us.

So, they're here to drain as much $$$ as they can.

[Wiz Fan]

Anyone have any info on this POT:

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...5-d79a6895a833

42 year old middle Eastern chick. Had a few back and forth and seems legit.

[FogHorn1]

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...1-0d62f0432b53

This is the third profile I've seen with these same pics.

[MilesNoDavis]

Any insight regarding any of these ladies is appreciated. Direct message me if you prefer. Thanks.

[Member #6951]

This makes no sense. Not busting balls or anything but why would a girl be put off by a guy having private pics? It's an option on SA for a reason, and nearly every girl has private pics as well. Have a handful of girls from SA told you they were put off by private pics, and why? Or is this just an assumption?

My experience as a married guy (who is upfront about it in his profile): there is a subsection of women that view this as a form of dating, where attraction matters as much as money and they want to know there's a future for it. It's Tinder but with guys who will pick up the tab and then some. They aren't interested in faceless profiles and they aren't interested in being the other woman. Many of them are clear about one or both; some aren't but they just don't respond. That's okay. Whatever works for them and I wish them well. For them, I'd imagine a public picture is important, both for their own initial screening and so that they know that the guy is genuine. They don't want to waste time where there is no attraction.

I am upfront about my status. I don't want to waste anyone else's time and I Definitely don't want to inadvertently bring in someone who is hoping to catch feelings and think there's a future. It eliminates some women to be sure — including those where I could just meet them once or twice and then move on if it doesn't click — but I am past my kid in a candy store phase.

[AnonDemon69]

Anyone seen her yet? https://members.seeking.com/member/f...8-cda4edf071c2.

She is pretty upfront that she wants online first. She actually has OF and sells a bunch of content on other sites. She did do video call to verify that it is her but asked me to buy content before even entertaining the idea of meeting. She is a pro at making content. For the meeting she quoted me at $900 ppm and deposit, but if I feel like it's way too high. She has high mileage it seems and probably a boyfriend. Just wondering if anyone has actually seen her and what the damage was. She is attractive enough to give her a good pounding but can't justify such a high price.

[AnonDemon69]

This makes no sense. Not busting balls or anything but why would a girl be put off by a guy having private pics? It's an option on SA for a reason, and nearly every girl has private pics as well. Have a handful of girls from SA told you they were put off by private pics, and why? Or is this just an assumption?

I have been told by 4 of them. I also read that in a few profiles.

Any advice on what to put under relationship? Should we be honest or just lie?

At the end of the day, I feel like the ones that want Single Sugar Daddies must be delusional. I was on video call with one of them and she was all upset that I was not single. Another one also messaged me asking what my status was or she wouldn't moved forward, she wasn't even that hot.