Arrangement Reports

**Piper2005** · 01-06-23 18:30

Has any one actually met her? I have been texting with her but she is not aggressive about meeting like most pros. It has been more friendly chatting than getting down to business.

Originally Posted by XpertTraveler [View Original Post]

This lady on SA is an escort, not an SB. 400/ hr. She promises everything covered with BBBJ YMMV because she doesn't CIM.

I asked for PPM and she gave me her straight rate. Decent looking with bolt ons. But for that price you can do better if you search harder. If you want an ez in and out, go for it but some GPS attached.

**Donger999** · 01-05-23 12:22

Has anyone met this gal and would like to share any info, here or PM?

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...c-4d75b8a16a98

**FarFarAway** · 01-05-23 10:31

Originally Posted by DynoJr [View Original Post]

I find using words as filters will be too limiting, but what you could do is eliminate any that use the word "platonic" since most will likely mean it. IMO discretion is a given since none of them want their friends knowing that they are hanging out with an old guy and they sure don't want their peers finding out that they are getting money for sex.

As far as a filter is concerned I put face shots in the hidden photos and show a body shot no face in the public.

To be clear you can save money vs pros but you will most definitely waste time. If that's not something you're willing to do maybe stick with the pros. I personally enjoy the hunt so don't mind spending the time.

You could miss out on a lot by eliminating profiles that have platonic in them, either as a bubble or just in the text. That is, if you are interested in a real SB and not just an UTR escort. The real SBs are appalled by the vast majority of initial messages that are literally just money offers and hotel room #s. They are trying to repel that, and one way to do so is say platonic or no sex in their profile. In the real world, a lot who say 'platonic' understand how the site works, and are down for it.

**DynoJr** · 01-04-23 23:29

Originally Posted by Witness2002 [View Original Post]

Hey fellas,

For those that have a second life, would SB's that list "discretion" in the bio a must? Or are you finding that most on SA kinda understand that already? It seems like a mix. But I feel like women don't list "discretion" often because it may assume they are a pro or something. Tell me if I'm wrong.

Seriously considering dropping some coin to try this out. But don't want to just waste money and time on this.

Also, any advice on apps to use to filter my face if I upload a picture? Do you guys upload your pictures with face in litter or hidden?

I find using words as filters will be too limiting, but what you could do is eliminate any that use the word "platonic" since most will likely mean it. IMO discretion is a given since none of them want their friends knowing that they are hanging out with an old guy and they sure don't want their peers finding out that they are getting money for sex.

As far as a filter is concerned I put face shots in the hidden photos and show a body shot no face in the public.

To be clear you can save money vs pros but you will most definitely waste time. If that's not something you're willing to do maybe stick with the pros. I personally enjoy the hunt so don't mind spending the time.

**Witness2002** · 01-04-23 20:21

Hey fellas,

For those that have a second life, would SB's that list "discretion" in the bio a must? Or are you finding that most on SA kinda understand that already? It seems like a mix. But I feel like women don't list "discretion" often because it may assume they are a pro or something. Tell me if I'm wrong.

Seriously considering dropping some coin to try this out. But don't want to just waste money and time on this.

Also, any advice on apps to use to filter my face if I upload a picture? Do you guys upload your pictures with face in litter or hidden?

**BaltoMan66** · 01-04-23 12:28

Originally Posted by Bsuh69 [View Original Post]

This is why I always get a coffee or drink first, I hate misleading photos.

But timing was an issue, and frankly, if she was hot, I wanted to get to the deed.

I have been in the escort "hobby" for almost 20 years, so I have had my share of bait and switch. I decided years ago that if I went through with it, I was rewarding bad conduct. So I am not afraid to walk away from a situation like this.

**RitTigers** · 01-04-23 12:25

Originally Posted by Wyze1 [View Original Post]

Another scammer who wants money up front for a babysitter. This one wasted two weeks smooth talking me before asking for a babysitting fee of $115 prior to meeting up the following day.

She will provide a 623 area code number which made me suspicious from the get go.

She already blocked my account once I denied her babysitting fee.

https://members.seeking.com/messages...5-ccdc1184c5b5

Yes, she is a scammer. Same experience.

**Wyze1** · 01-04-23 02:48

Another scammer who wants money up front for a babysitter. This one wasted two weeks smooth talking me before asking for a babysitting fee of $115 prior to meeting up the following day.

She will provide a 623 area code number which made me suspicious from the get go.

She already blocked my account once I denied her babysitting fee.

https://members.seeking.com/messages...5-ccdc1184c5b5

**Bsuh69** · 01-03-23 14:55

Originally Posted by Meddic80 [View Original Post]

Kudos to you! I been in the same situation plenty of times (not with her), but never had the courage to call it off, but I wished plenty of times I did.

Thanks for the warning and sorry to hear about your experience.

This is why I always get a coffee or drink first, I hate misleading photos.

**Meddic80** · 01-03-23 13:39

Originally Posted by BaltoMan66 [View Original Post]

I saw this listing for DrLovin https://members.seeking.com/member/f...e-55217b286c5d.

She lists herself as "slim" and the pictures show you a shapely young lady. Too bad that wasn't the reality.

I had her send me a "selfie" which looked pretty similar to the SA pictures. We texted and agreed on $400. I had to pick her up, but it was last minute so whatever.

It was cold out, so she had on a coat. She looked thick when she walked up, but I thought it would be ok. I was wrong. I check into the hotel and we get to the room.

When she removes her coat, she has about 30 extra pounds wrapped around her midsection. "slim" was a long time ago. No waist at all. She was shaped like a barrel. I was pissed. I hate fake pictures. They either think you will be too "nice" to call them out or they think you are too desperate to care. I am neither. I stopped taking off my shoes, and told her this isn't going to work.

I tried to explain that it doesn't make sense to show pictures that are not accurate, because the guy showing up wants to see that person, not who you are today (different). I told her that if she had accurate pictures, the guy showing up would be excited to see who shows up. But that didn't happen.

Took her back to her place and dropped her off. I lost the cost of the hotel room, but the $400 stayed with me.

Avoid her unless you like big girls. She seemed nice enough, but I can't to big like that.

Kudos to you! I been in the same situation plenty of times (not with her), but never had the courage to call it off, but I wished plenty of times I did.

Thanks for the warning and sorry to hear about your experience.

**BaltoMan66** · 01-03-23 12:27

I saw this listing for DrLovin https://members.seeking.com/member/f...e-55217b286c5d.

She lists herself as "slim" and the pictures show you a shapely young lady. Too bad that wasn't the reality.

I had her send me a "selfie" which looked pretty similar to the SA pictures. We texted and agreed on $400. I had to pick her up, but it was last minute so whatever.

It was cold out, so she had on a coat. She looked thick when she walked up, but I thought it would be ok. I was wrong. I check into the hotel and we get to the room.

When she removes her coat, she has about 30 extra pounds wrapped around her midsection. "slim" was a long time ago. No waist at all. She was shaped like a barrel. I was pissed. I hate fake pictures. They either think you will be too "nice" to call them out or they think you are too desperate to care. I am neither. I stopped taking off my shoes, and told her this isn't going to work.

I tried to explain that it doesn't make sense to show pictures that are not accurate, because the guy showing up wants to see that person, not who you are today (different). I told her that if she had accurate pictures, the guy showing up would be excited to see who shows up. But that didn't happen.

Took her back to her place and dropped her off. I lost the cost of the hotel room, but the $400 stayed with me.

Avoid her unless you like big girls. She seemed nice enough, but I can't to big like that.

**Pau Ford** · 01-03-23 11:10

Happy new year fellas, don't say I never hooked you up.

This one joined SA today and man oh man she's a beauty. She's a shorty clocking in at sub 5 foot but she's a good woman so it's all good. Of course you'll need to step up your game to keep her happy. She's got a bakers dozen worth of kids so you can be sure to help them out too.

Idk though. I'm guessing she has shaved a few years off her stated age. She's got at least 65 years of hard miles on her. We're talking decades of marlboro red's and jack daniels on the daily folks.

Was hoping 2023 would be a bounce back year for SA but it's not off to a good start hahaha.

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...f-0893e2d83d9c

**Freakspead** · 01-02-23 16:20

Ya filthy animals.

Here's my gift to you all: https://members.seeking.com/member/c...8-5a77c979ba3b.

$300 everytime ya'll meet up. She's expressed no time limit. She PREFERS BARE. She's a shorty.

She'll lick your ass and get fucked in the ass too. Might be too good to be true! But its true!

**Bokinchitwn** · 01-02-23 10:15

On SA anyone partake? No thread for SA on Waukegan board. Pm ok.

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...f-2828702b7719

**DynoJr** · 12-31-22 15:59

Originally Posted by JDuB1970 [View Original Post]

I'm in the same boat. At least they threw me off when my renew was about to be due.

Found this.

https://sugar-daddies.us/top-websites

A women that I'm chatting with sent me a screenshot of her SB inbox. It was filled with generic one line messages from guys, and knowing most of you I have a hard time believing that this would be your initial intro. So I suspect this is how SB works:

Whenever you look at or favorite someone's profile, the system sends a generic intro message to the woman who does not need to pay to read it. This results in her looking at your profile, and they either send a legit message back or at least engage with a favorite.

Meanwhile, you are intrigued because she noticed you and you either pay to send a message or respond to the bs auto note.

I think this is how it works because it is the only way to explain why I get an initial message but no response when I engage. The hit rate on this platform really sucks.