Thread: Sugarbabies?
+
Add Report
Results 1,756 to 1,770 of 9141
-
12-27-22 13:08 #7386Senior Member

Posts: 44This is true, but the girls pulling down $90 k still have money problems all the same. Ordering stuff off Amazon and DoorDash everyday. Constantly upgrading new gadgets and accessories. Financing a car they can't afford. While it's unlikely they'll actively advertise themselves as an SB, if an opportunity falls into their lap they might just pursue it. You've got to approach them, build up a rapport and offer "your help" once you sense an opening. It's possible to see PPMs as low as 200 bucks. Which can be the difference between making their minimum credit card payment, bank getting overdrafted or what little emergency pops up.
Originally Posted by ToddCincy
[View Original Post]
-
12-27-22 09:56 #7385Senior Member

Posts: 621Seeking is unlikely to improve until the job market weakens
As for simps: There have always been guys willing to pay exorbitant rates. But they are limited in number.
Originally Posted by RockaBillyRiot
[View Original Post]
Our problem right now is not one of demand, but of supply.
When I started on Seeking in 2011, I was meeting recent UC grads who were working hourly jobs at Starbucks and Panera to make ends meet. Unsurprisingly, I was getting some very high-quality women at reasonable prices.
I was typically offering college girls $300 ppm and doing very well. I was sometimes able to go as low as $200.
Needless to say, some rejected those offers, but I was always able to go on to the next one. I *never* had to go much above $350.
This is a different environment. We now face a situation not where college grads are working at Starbucks, but where corporate employers are foregoing college degree requirements to get workers. One of my friend's daughters is a recent UC grad hauling down $90 K at P&G. She's not an idiot, but she's no valedictorian, either. About average. We aren't likely to see her on Seeking.
IMHO, the girl market is going to suck until the job market dips, or at least normalizesaside from the old women, the druggies, and the skanks.
I've hobbied off and on since the 1990's, and I've observed a clear trend: the hobby gets better in inverse proportion to the job market.
When unemployment is very low, the selection, quality, and pricing of girls in the hobby is worse. When the job market weakens, more women are willing to consider opportunities in male entertainment: not only as SBs, but also as escorts. In 2011, there were lots of good escorts, too.
The escort market is often a good indicator of how Seeking is going to go. Right now, most of the escorts available to us are pre-pandemic women, most of whom are older, and some of whom have been around since the early 2010's. There is no new crop of 21-32 year old escorts. As a result, the few girls who are young and conventionally attractive (refer to recent discussions about Tia Taylor and Tiffany Teigan) can practically double their rates.
Similarly, I've also noticed that the younger generation of college students and recent college grads is largely "missing" from Seeking. (You may have noticed that a disproportionate number of the women on Seeking nowadays are older.) The economic reality is that relatively few 23-year-olds are going to want to hook up with guys their dads' age for cash, when they can make $90 K at P&G. And if they *are* on Seeking, their expectations are *very* high.
I'm not saying you should stop looking. Just don't *expect much* when the unemployment rate is 3. 7%, as is currently the case. In 2011, a great year on Seeking and in the escort market, the unemployment rate was 8. 5%. Therein lies the difference.
I'm not interested in older women or skanks, and I don't want to pay $500 just to get a mid-level SB or escort. Nor do I want to spend 30 hours per week on Seeking, sorting through fake profiles. This is why I'm biding my time for now.
-
12-27-22 09:35 #7384Senior Member

Posts: 155MostFavorite
I've been asking the same question.
Originally Posted by Cincyfunguy
[View Original Post]
-
12-26-22 19:31 #7383Senior Member

Posts: 384Top
A few of the top SBs here can get $500 ppm. I don't think either of those girls fall into that category.
Originally Posted by RockaBillyRiot
[View Original Post]
Sometimes whale SDs will take an interest in a mid chick that they like and give them way too much money. That happens, but I don't think it's that common.
-
12-26-22 18:10 #7382Senior Member

Posts: 87Looks like a drunken 5 year old drew on her with a Sharpie.
Originally Posted by WanderingAbout
[View Original Post]
-
12-26-22 18:08 #7381Senior Member

Posts: 87What Is Up With These Broads!
"Met" both of these birds on SA:
Daisycat69: Wants $500 per date.
Xenberry: Wants $800 (EIGHT HUNDRED! Per date.
These chicks are either off their meds or there's a LOT of simping in Cincy going on. LOL.
-
12-26-22 18:07 #7380Senior Member

Posts: 2220Asks $500 will do $300 ppm. She went ghost. Same person with three accounts below.
Barbiebabe8989.
https://members.seeking.com/member/3...0-2efd1d137aba
CuteTemptress.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0...e-c7796f24c5fa
Barbienicole89.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...3d34a928b0730b
-
12-26-22 11:59 #7379Senior Member

Posts: 186F*ckbook
Came across this site, does anyone have any experience with it? Looks like a scam, but seem some reviews that say sift through the shit and it can work.
-
12-26-22 10:54 #7378Senior Member

Posts: 80Any onfob
Any information I'll be in town the 1st of Jan been talking to this one does not seem to be a scammer found her Facebook as well.
Quoting 300 as many rounds as I want.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d...3-59b0de77d1f4
-
12-25-22 20:01 #7377Senior Member

Posts: 2220Melaine794
Profile reads like a thurst trap.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d...f-9afd3d92ab4b
-
12-25-22 19:48 #7376Senior Member

Posts: 1871Theelovelyvalentinaa
I guess that amount is why she doesn't include a rate schedule on her Tryst ad. I cannot believe she get's many takers at that level. https://tryst.link/escort/jenna-423. I have an IG and * link for her if any seniors are interested.
Originally Posted by Ginzo666
[View Original Post]
BAM.
-
12-25-22 18:41 #7375Senior Member

Posts: 47ChicTemptress
https://members.seeking.com/member/2...1-243352ad6069
Pic seller. Just ran her thing in Indianapolis under different profile, now trying Cincy. Has no interest in meeting. White trash from southern Illinois / Kentucky border.
-
12-25-22 16:13 #7374Senior Member

Posts: 412Most favorite
Has anyone actually met with this one? She's on like her 5th profile by now, aka babykay, Ashlynn777, SweetCutie, spoiledbrat. Comes on very direct. Seems legit in text convos but something just doesn't feel right.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c...4-b11155bd2c18
-
12-25-22 09:35 #7373Senior Member

Posts: 384Theelovelyvalentinaa
https://members.seeking.com/member/9...5-93486c5e1808
She wants $1,000 ppm. Hard pass for me. Didn't even try to negotiate with her because we're just too far apart in expectations. She has enough makeup on to be Vecna in Stranger Things. How does she look without it?
-
12-23-22 15:57 #7372Senior Member

Posts: 1871Update 12-23-22
I am now posting whenever they number above five or more. They just add up tooo quickly.
Kittywer: No 40+ in age SD's, not necessarily a scammer but likely using a stolen pic. I have some SM for pic.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0...b-015be8d64b68
Lady Liberty: Classic crypto-scammer.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c...1-d04be676e839
Lovergirl: Pic Seller, I have PII, Does not live in Ohio.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0...0-bbe833e43750
HumorousMermaid: Another Humorous scammer! , https://twitter.com/linadai96;.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c...2-c4cc1943998a
HumorousDame: crypto-scammer!
https://members.seeking.com/member/9...6-a9c7ab7366ec
BAM.









Reply With Quote


