KAngels Discussion

[VietLuv1980]

Hey gents,

I had the pleasure of visiting Mini in Houston at KGFE. Just purely out of curiosity, how much do you guys trust the kgirls to stay clean, get regularly checked and / or treated, etc? Seems like everyone has pretty high regard for that but figured I'd ask the stupid question anyway.

They do not get checked or regularly treated. I have asked many of the top girls and they have all told me the same thing. When they go back to Korea they will get a checkup but none of them ever leave because they will not be able to come back. They also have no health insurance here and would never go to a hospital in the states. They don't speak the language and it's not like they are going to take an Uber to the emergency room. Play at your own risk and at your own safety level. Expect that everyone is probably not tested and you should be testing yourself regularly.

[Jd058]

Hey gents,

I had the pleasure of visiting Mini in Houston at KGFE. Just purely out of curiosity, how much do you guys trust the kgirls to stay clean, get regularly checked and / or treated, etc? Seems like everyone has pretty high regard for that but figured I'd ask the stupid question anyway.

[AussieFury]

No Greek, facial yes!

Nice! This based on first-hand intel? .

[JoeSmith11]

Tldr; never explicitly talk about details over the phone.

Not a lawyer, but as far as I am aware (and I've gone through the screening) as long as there is no explicit reference to sex and money exchange in the texts / message history, then there generally is not a legal case. The idea being that there needs to be proof that there was money exchanged for sex ie. Prostitution. So prove there was sex, and prove there was money exchanged. Discussing details and being explicit in these detail provides decent proof, so never ever discuss explicit details (especially over the phone since phones can be argued to be "linked" to you. There's not much defense). However discussing stuff here is all right, IMO, simply because we could all be speaking out our asses here and there needs to be proof that what we did discuss here was said by us (prove the post and the account used to make said post was you. Likewise prove what you discussed is actually true). Likewise, as long as there is no hard, physical evidence, like a video or recording of a provider and a hobbyist (1) paying money and (2) having sex for said money. So as long as you can trust that once you see the girl in the room there is nothing recording what you do in that room, then there is no evidence. And with no evidence, there is no case. Everything else is circumstantial.

Side note: This is why some providers call them "donations" or roses and always ask for the exchange of cash to be into a box or some other intermediary and never handed directly to them. Since this can be argued as "payment."

The KA booker literally texts "pse=BBFS requires extra Benjamin tip ($100)" with every booking confirmation. Also not a lawyer but that seems like a pretty explicit reference to paying for sex. Not something I'd want to be in the same text covno as a pic of me holding up my I'd. I guess the lollipop booker is at least a little more discrete.

[HonestOne]

Tldr; never explicitly talk about details over the phone.

Not a lawyer, but as far as I am aware (and I've gone through the screening) as long as there is no explicit reference to sex and money exchange in the texts / message history, then there generally is not a legal case. The idea being that there needs to be proof that there was money exchanged for sex ie. Prostitution. So prove there was sex, and prove there was money exchanged. Discussing details and being explicit in these detail provides decent proof, so never ever discuss explicit details (especially over the phone since phones can be argued to be "linked" to you. There's not much defense). However discussing stuff here is all right, IMO, simply because we could all be speaking out our asses here and there needs to be proof that what we did discuss here was said by us (prove the post and the account used to make said post was you. Likewise prove what you discussed is actually true). Likewise, as long as there is no hard, physical evidence, like a video or recording of a provider and a hobbyist (1) paying money and (2) having sex for said money. So as long as you can trust that once you see the girl in the room there is nothing recording what you do in that room, then there is no evidence. And with no evidence, there is no case. Everything else is circumstantial.

Side note: This is why some providers call them "donations" or roses and always ask for the exchange of cash to be into a box or some other intermediary and never handed directly to them. Since this can be argued as "payment."

[DMV Average Joe]

Do you know if she does Greek or allows facials?

No Greek, facial yes!

[ShinamotoJason]

No Greek.

Facial, I don't know. Her TER profile indicates she allows CIM, but spits it out.

Do you know if she does Greek or allows facials?

[Acura8888]

Part of the hobby is more will come and you will probably meet someone better. If you stay in this hobby long enough there are a few diamonds every year but you just have to keep seeing new ones. I also wouldn't believe reviews as good ones get bad reviews and bad ones get good reviews. Just go and enjoy yourself with no strings attached.

I am doing this right now, had more than enough K girls this spring and summer. Bucket list is European ladies, but I have to make the trip North for that. I guess there are the TNA ones but I don't trust it to be legit.

[AussieFury]

I was finally able to meet my ATF for the first time in our town! I guess some of the mongers got distracted by an obvious trick of the eye. Siena's photos are real, but she actually looks much younger & sexier in person. On top of everything, she's service oriented and has such a pure personality she tries her best to be transparent about herself while keeping her attractive smile on her face, which is rare in this field. Also, I believe she's the prettiest & possibly youngest K-girl currently available in our town. She's incomparably beautiful, lovely, and classy, elegant, but extremely sexy! I'll repeat a few more times before she leaves, hopefully. She's a rare gem!

Do you know if she does Greek or allows facials?

[FatJoeRodeo]

Saw Mina from KA the other day. I'll add to the positive reviews. Very GFE and friendly. Lots of DFK as well. For those wondering about rimming it wasn't offered or did I want it. Sweet girl with a rocking body. She's only here a few more days. Than back in a month.

Enjoy!

[ShinamotoJason]

I was finally able to meet my ATF for the first time in our town! I guess some of the mongers got distracted by an obvious trick of the eye. Siena's photos are real, but she actually looks much younger & sexier in person. On top of everything, she's service oriented and has such a pure personality she tries her best to be transparent about herself while keeping her attractive smile on her face, which is rare in this field. Also, I believe she's the prettiest & possibly youngest K-girl currently available in our town. She's incomparably beautiful, lovely, and classy, elegant, but extremely sexy! I'll repeat a few more times before she leaves, hopefully. She's a rare gem!

[PapiChulo0]

Anyone see MayaDD?

[NinjaTribe]

This new rose may be just great, but whoever she is she isn't the old rose with the TER reviews they are linking to.

Such a shame that they do this BS. Lollipop doesn't pull this crap.

[HelloThar]

Only area I'd give Rose the edge was on the rimming, which Mina did not provide.

Based on other reports, she does provide it so I assume it's either a YMMV or it depends on if you skip the pre-shower or not (I just say I showered at home which I do right before) as many won't want to do it unless they clean you up thoroughly themselves.

[AussieFury]

KA has a new Rose starting today. I think they have had multiple girls name Rose in the past but these pics look different than before. This Rose has a TER link. Can anyone with TER share if the reviews are good?

I think they're trying to make us think it's the same Rose who was here before (I liked her a LOT).

But if this one is 5 foot 5 she's too tall to be the "original" Rose. These types of K-agency antics have kept me away from the K-girls for months now.