Find Your New Baby
rubmaps
High Class Companions
Top Tier Escorts
The hottest girls are here
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Best Escorts
Top Escorts
High Class Companions
Top Tier Escorts
The hottest girls are here
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Best Escorts
Top Escorts
High Class Companions
Top Tier Escorts
The hottest girls are here
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Best Escorts
Top Escorts

Thread: KAngels Discussion

+ Add Report
Page 240 of 425 FirstFirst ... 140 190 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 290 340 ... LastLast
Results 3,586 to 3,600 of 6368
We Will Help You Relax
This blog is moderated by Admin
  1. #2783
    Quote Originally Posted by SuroAwei  [View Original Post]
    Boggles the mind how it's so much cheaper down there when the cost of living is much higher.
    Different cost structure. There, the girls take less money for the same job but they do it because of competition. You can see the number of agencies down there vs up here. We only have 2. To get the rates they want, they pretty much have to be on the east side close to the tech bros, so limitation on complexes to rent. Same as LA and Vegas.

  2. #2782
    Thanks. Still mind boggling that prices are so much lower there, despite higher cost of living.

    Is any I'd required to book? I don't ever give out personal info. But hopefully TNA references would be sufficient?

    Quote Originally Posted by ShinamotoJason  [View Original Post]
    The South Bay Area (LA, CA): Pepper-Sonay.

    https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/sonay

    The Bay Area (SF / SJ, CA): Glamorous Ravi.

    https://top-kgirls.com/ravi

  3. #2781
    Quote Originally Posted by SuroAwei  [View Original Post]
    Boggles the mind how it's so much cheaper down there when the cost of living is much higher.
    Yeah, that thought also has crossed my mind many times.

  4. #2780
    Quote Originally Posted by Acura8888  [View Original Post]
    280 hr for Ravi in the Bay Area? Holy crap. Remind self to party down in the Bay area.
    Boggles the mind how it's so much cheaper down there when the cost of living is much higher.

  5. #2779
    Quote Originally Posted by ShinamotoJason  [View Original Post]
    The South Bay Area (LA, CA): Pepper-Sonay.

    https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/sonay

    The Bay Area (SF / SJ, CA): Glamorous Ravi.

    https://top-kgirls.com/ravi
    280 hr for Ravi in the Bay Area? Holy crap. Remind self to party down in the Bay area.

  6. #2778
    Quote Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty  [View Original Post]
    Maisie was certified CYA. Nice body, nice natural tits and ass.
    Maisie is definitely in her 30's, but she looks young.

  7. #2777
    Quote Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty  [View Original Post]
    Definitely Maisie over Alina for looks. I mean Alina looked decently attractive but not on my list of certified Cute Young Asian girl. Maisie was certified CYA. Nice body, nice natural tits and ass. Both of their reviews on looks are pretty accurate.
    Yeah I got duped by the pics. Lesson learned.

  8. #2776

    KAngel Maisie got my vote

    Definitely Maisie over Alina for looks. I mean Alina looked decently attractive but not on my list of certified Cute Young Asian girl. Maisie was certified CYA. Nice body, nice natural tits and ass. Both of their reviews on looks are pretty accurate.

    Quote Originally Posted by Noblaxs  [View Original Post]
    Alina or Maisie for looks?
    Quote Originally Posted by ArizonaRanger  [View Original Post]
    ... (Alina) Pics are not accurate at all in regards to the face. B cups with a little extra skin and large dark areolas with big eraser nipples... May be an inch or 2 taller than listed, but I'm not good at estimating heights in that range. Fit enough body with no belly, no complaints in that department. I would describe her skin tone as pretty average. Looked pretty attractive, but she had some light colored streaks in her makeup that I didn't really like. No stretch marks and no tattoos that I could see. No ass to speak of, very slim back there...
    Quote Originally Posted by TigerBalm  [View Original Post]
    ... (Maisie) is really cute. My kind of cute. Photo's are fairly accurate but touched up. Nice slim figure with good proportions. Soft round butt. She is petite, stands around 5'0". Those that were a fan of KA's fairly recent Apple will like her. Her demeanor is a little stand-offish but when the main event starts, she got into it. LFK with occasional tongue. Good BJ but doesn't take it too deep. She has somewhat of an innie down below. Shaved with stubble today. Her English is decent, so communication was easy enough. I'm already a fan and thinking about another visit...

  9. #2775
    Quote Originally Posted by MitchCor  [View Original Post]
    Kangels here are typically beyond my price point, but I hear they have substantially lower rates in bay area?

    Any recommendations for San Jose? Or a really good FBSM+ would work as well.

    Thanks!
    It's been a long, long time (late 90's) since I saw any escorts in the San Jose area, but maybe this link will help:

    https://bayareakoreangirls.com/bay-a...rls-south-bay/

  10. #2774
    Quote Originally Posted by MitchCor  [View Original Post]
    Kangels here are typically beyond my price point, but I hear they have substantially lower rates in bay area?

    Any recommendations for San Jose? Or a really good FBSM+ would work as well.

    Thanks!
    You don't need to travel that far, just head up to Vancouver BC, its has an insane amount of sex providers without the odds of being in a police bust.

  11. #2773
    Troll, if you don't put me on ignore then don't complain about what I post


    Posts: 443

    Ravi And Sonay

    The South Bay Area (LA, CA): Pepper-Sonay.

    https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/sonay

    The Bay Area (SF / SJ, CA): Glamorous Ravi.

    https://top-kgirls.com/ravi

    Quote Originally Posted by MitchCor  [View Original Post]
    Kangels here are typically beyond my price point, but I hear they have substantially lower rates in bay area?

    Any recommendations for San Jose? Or a really good FBSM+ would work as well.

    Thanks!

  12. #2772

    Recommendations for south bay area?

    Kangels here are typically beyond my price point, but I hear they have substantially lower rates in bay area?

    Any recommendations for San Jose? Or a really good FBSM+ would work as well.

    Thanks!

  13. #2771
    Troll, if you don't put me on ignore then don't complain about what I post


    Posts: 443

    Dana

    I was really tempted to see Dana when she was active in our town. If she returns to Washington as a GFE / CFS only provider, I will see her. Until then, however, I prefer beautiful lve, Ravi, Suzie, Mijoo-Ella, Chloe-Bora, Addison, Amanda, even pre-MILF Gloria than Dana.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tigger6969  [View Original Post]
    I agree with AvereageQ. I'm a big Dana fan. There's a reason why she has over 150 favorable reviews in Southern California on TER (under her 361139 I'd, not the 373341 I'd). https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...2638948-361139.

    To me, Dana is a more attractive version of the porn star Rae little Black. She is petite (5 feet), slim, patient with you (I pop twice every time we met up), tight, passionate and has a great attitude. I was sad about her early departure and hope she returns again.

  14. #2770

    Haru vs Dana

    Quote Originally Posted by AvereageQ  [View Original Post]
    Both Haru and Dana had excellent service. From my experience: Dana liked to work up to the action with kissing and then foreplay. Haru goes quickly into foreplay (BJ /69) and moved in the action fairly quickly. Dana does more DT but Haru has more suction for BJ. Dana is petite with a tighter box. Haru has curvier hips/butt and bigger bust. Haru might have somewhat of a tan but it was hard to tell due to dark lighting. Both can take it hard. Dana has more of a sexy / sultry look but Haru has more of a pretty / kgirl look. I think both are great, but personally, Dana edges out Haru for me because Dana manufactured better chemistry with her GFE way of doing things.
    I agree with AvereageQ. I'm a big Dana fan. There's a reason why she has over 150 favorable reviews in Southern California on TER (under her 361139 I'd, not the 373341 I'd). https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...2638948-361139.

    To me, Dana is a more attractive version of the porn star Rae little Black. She is petite (5 feet), slim, patient with you (I pop twice every time we met up), tight, passionate and has a great attitude. I was sad about her early departure and hope she returns again.

  15. #2769

    I might say they're nearly on par

    Quote Originally Posted by Boowoo  [View Original Post]
    How would you compare Haru vs Dana?
    Both Haru and Dana had excellent service. From my experience: Dana liked to work up to the action with kissing and then foreplay. Haru goes quickly into foreplay (BJ /69) and moved in the action fairly quickly. Dana does more DT but Haru has more suction for BJ. Dana is petite with a tighter box. Haru has curvier hips/butt and bigger bust. Haru might have somewhat of a tan but it was hard to tell due to dark lighting. Both can take it hard. Dana has more of a sexy / sultry look but Haru has more of a pretty / kgirl look. I think both are great, but personally, Dana edges out Haru for me because Dana manufactured better chemistry with her GFE way of doing things.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Live Escorts
Meet Sugar Babies
The Velvet Rooms
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Live Escorts
Meet Sugar Babies
The Velvet Rooms
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Live Escorts
Meet Sugar Babies
The Velvet Rooms
The Only Limits are Your Imagination

Protected by Copyscape