"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[LovePunnany]

Do you really think that the girls on Sugardaddymeet are really that different from Seeking? It sounds like you are correct that you are having good luck on SDMeet, but the girls are not likely to be that different. Of course many girls are on both sites.

And doing more work, for the same reward, doesn't sound that attractive to me. I would get on SDmeet, just to see if I could find some undiscovered gems, but a naked. smiling 22 y/o who takes a load in her twat is going to be about the same, on either site.

Anyway it's a fun game to try to score girls from multiple sites and glad you are having so much success on there. That's what it's all about. Maybe I will try it, once I go through all my Seeking prospects, but that is going to take some time. I wish I was still in my 20's and could knock out three a week, but those days are long past....

Mr. Johnson point well taken. I am just having better luck on SDM and have to filter through less scamming.

[LovePunnany]

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...d-25c1f1c90383

LOL, interesting. All I am saying is that I was on Seeking for over one year and I had some good scores. With Sugar Daddy I have had more victories in a shorter time.

[Roddee]

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...d-25c1f1c90383

So have been communicating with this little beauty, scheduled to meet for lunch this Sunday to see if there is chemistry. If all goes well with the first meet then next week the fireworks will happen. Will keep you mongers posted.

Gentlemen I must say, Sugar Daddy requires more work than Seeking, but to me the pay off is better. There is little to no scammers on Sugar Daddy and the selection of women is better in my opinion.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...serId=71355961

[Machintosh]

Do you really think that the girls on Sugardaddymeet are really that different from Seeking? It sounds like you are correct that you are having good luck on SDMeet, but the girls are not likely to be that different. Of course many girls are on both sites.

And doing more work, for the same reward, doesn't sound that attractive to me. I would get on SDmeet, just to see if I could find some undiscovered gems, but a naked. smiling 22 y/o who takes a load in her twat is going to be about the same, on either site.

Anyway it's a fun game to try to score girls from multiple sites and glad you are having so much success on there. That's what it's all about. Maybe I will try it, once I go through all my Seeking prospects, but that is going to take some time. I wish I was still in my 20's and could knock out three a week, but those days are long past....

This.

Based on my experience, the cost is aligned with how I'd set your expectations for the site.

My largest gripe is you cannot search profiles you've viewed or messages. It takes a lot of time to weed through the profiles you've already took a shot.

[Peter Johnson]

Dude, ignore all that fluff, money talks.

Good point, and that's the way to dominate a findom c**t. Also got to think mostly the hottest girls can only pull off that findom worship nonsense. Yes there are a lot of pathetic guys out there, but still a limited supply.

And the same thing applies to some girls who are looking for "Platonic". I've had a couple of them tell me that they put that in there, so they don't get treated like a prostitute quite as much. I usually just hide/block those profiles but might not hurt to talk to a few of them and see what's up.

[Peter Johnson]

I totally agree with you, I am having more luck and better quality women on Sugar Daddy. Now it does required more work but the pay off is far better that Seeking. I have had four meet this month and some of the best BBBJ I can recall plus they swallow.

Do you really think that the girls on Sugardaddymeet are really that different from Seeking? It sounds like you are correct that you are having good luck on SDMeet, but the girls are not likely to be that different. Of course many girls are on both sites.

And doing more work, for the same reward, doesn't sound that attractive to me. I would get on SDmeet, just to see if I could find some undiscovered gems, but a naked. smiling 22 y/o who takes a load in her twat is going to be about the same, on either site.

Anyway it's a fun game to try to score girls from multiple sites and glad you are having so much success on there. That's what it's all about. Maybe I will try it, once I go through all my Seeking prospects, but that is going to take some time. I wish I was still in my 20's and could knock out three a week, but those days are long past....

[WillDuff]

Is this the famous Jessica from couple years back?

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...?locale=en_USS

No, Kennesaw Jessica "Megan" is 5'8" at least and has never been connected to Lawrenceville as far as I know. I saw her in Kennesaw 2 days ago.

[LovePunnany]

Try Sugar daddy meets, it's $144 for 6 months, easy to get 2 to 3 meet & greets monthly which usually turn into successful arrangements 90% of the time. I'm up to 8 girls now in 7 months I've banged, I met a great 25 year old MILF off the site who I am now seeing 6 x a month for a $1200 allowance, combined with my long term sb which is 10 nights a month & about all I can handle.

My advice is if a girl will not do a meet & greet then it's usually not going to be a long term arrangement as you will not want to see her more than once.

I totally agree with you, I am having more luck and better quality women on Sugar Daddy. Now it does required more work but the pay off is far better that Seeking. I have had four meet this month and some of the best BBBJ I can recall plus they swallow.

[LovePunnany]

So have been communicating with this little beauty, scheduled to meet for lunch this Sunday to see if there is chemistry. If all goes well with the first meet then next week the fireworks will happen. Will keep you mongers posted.

Gentlemen I must say, Sugar Daddy requires more work than Seeking, but to me the pay off is better. There is little to no scammers on Sugar Daddy and the selection of women is better in my opinion.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...serId=71355961

[LovePunnany]

Based on reading her profile. I'm a bit surprised. She seems to only want to be paid with no work. She is asking for findom & subs only.

Dude, ignore all that fluff, money talks.

[Machintosh]

So, had my date with Ale and I must say it is one of the better meets I have had. Top notch service, she made me feel like I was her man.

She met me at the hotel with her laptop since she was still on the clock, had to do a quick conference call before the fun started. She was dressed in a sexy dress which came off immediately reveling black thongs. She went for Johnny and I was in heaven. I got one of the better BBBJ I have had in a while and yes she swallowed my DNA. After resting a bit I put the cover on and went nuclear for the next 40 minutes it was crazy. Multiple positions but I could not finish due the condom made it difficult and the BBBJ really drained me. She took the condom off and proceeded to give me a BBBJ again and that did the trick. Mission accomplished.

So to conclude, she spent about 2 hours and I had 2 pops for $300, not a bad deal.

Will definitely repeat. She is also very cool, down to earth and take orders very well.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...serId=65885709

Based on reading her profile. I'm a bit surprised. She seems to only want to be paid with no work. She is asking for findom & subs only.

[Peter Johnson]

What in the actual fuck is that profile? The sense of entitlement is breathtakingly cunty.

I don't get it either, but this could explain much of it:

It is that findom bullshit:

https://www.businessinsider.com/side...ay-pigs-2022-7

[JokeSterkev]

Been positive reviews of her in the past in here someplace.

Yeah I've only seen the one review this far.

[Bill Ginn]

I messaged her but she read and did not respond.

Been positive reviews of her in the past in here someplace.

[JokeSterkev]

I messaged her but she read and did not respond.

Did you message her recently?