NoVA SugarBabies

[FatWhiteGuy]

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...c-a259da768e94

I met her off SugarDaddyMeet. Old pics, has a half shaved head, big tits, nice ass, divorced with physical abuse and heavy ADHD. She's been over 3 visits. First time was 19 days ago. Damage $250. Went two rounds with her, mouth fucking, anal and filled up her pussy in doggy, all bare. Second time was last Fri and my girl and I fucked her senseless. Damage $250. Lots of box eating, fucking and pussy swapping between the two of them. Finished on my girls face.

She texts us during the week saying she wants to be our unicorn. I had to look it up. My girl says sure lets do it but I don't care and we move forward with it. Third time was this past Fri. Damage was Zero. More box eating, ass eating, cock swallowing and finished on my girls stomach. My girl then goes to bed so Round two began with her and I and there was plenty of ass eating, anal and I filled her ass up. All bare.

Sunday she texts me saying she thinks she's pregnant. We discuss options. Mine is a no brainer. Clinic all day. $600 for a pill to take care of it. I was all in to help. Today, Mon, I ask for proof of her positive test and assurance it was mine to begin with. She blocked my number. Moral of the story, she's a fun fuck but enjoy the theatrics if that's your thing. I created a new SA profile just to find her and post her here. I've been gone from SA for months since I've been banned twice. She's a nice girl, few kids I think but a touch damaged. Carry on and enjoy, LOL.

[StickDeath]

The link goes to messages not profile.

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...5-40dd16ac359e

[EasyeOne]

Let's get back to reviews & intel sharing guys.

Met this one last week. Will not repeat!

https://members.seeking.com/messages...3-11a43d4e3be4

She has some kind of psychological problem. She is weird. She had some kind tapes on her tits instead of a bra. Apparently she does not like Bra. All holes open. If you see her, cover it up boys.

The link goes to messages not profile.

[StickDeath]

Let's get back to reviews & intel sharing guys.

Met this one last week. Will not repeat!

https://members.seeking.com/messages...3-11a43d4e3be4

She has some kind of psychological problem. She is weird. She had some kind tapes on her tits instead of a bra. Apparently she does not like Bra. All holes open. If you see her, cover it up boys.

[Mcsylv]

One, I didn't hear OP asking for your advice and it seems like he's doing pretty well LOL. Two, a lot of girls want to keep their sex life private. My girlfriend enjoys threesomes but doesn't want her friends involved. SB is the safest way to go when you want discretion. As the great philosopher Charlie Sheen noted, we aren't paying them to come over, we are paying them to go away.

Show me where I gave advice.

[Pathfinder04]

Is she reaching out pretending to be you, or openly telling girls she's your current SB and wants to find a 3 some playmate?

Any girls get turned off because they want an exclusive SD, not being part of a trio? What about allowance, are you planning on having her tell the other girl the truth about what she's getting and then give the same to both, or are you going to try to save a few bucks if you can with the new girl, same as if you were reaching out yourself?

If she wants a playmate, why doesn't she invite a friend LOL, why does it have to be off SA?

One, I didn't hear OP asking for your advice and it seems like he's doing pretty well LOL. Two, a lot of girls want to keep their sex life private. My girlfriend enjoys threesomes but doesn't want her friends involved. SB is the safest way to go when you want discretion. As the great philosopher Charlie Sheen noted, we aren't paying them to come over, we are paying them to go away.

[Dimples572]

I try and dm an SB a picture of me shitless and it gets flagged and won't upload. This chick posts a nude on one of her public pics and it gets approved, WTF?? LOL.

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...8-e85121293a80

[DWinthrop]

Just started messaging with her on the site so don't have much info yet. She kind of goes hot and cold on the site. Anyone have any info / experience?

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...5-2a088981458f

She's real. Often brings a friend for threesomes. Can be pricey, although they are legit bisexual and the threesomes are the best I've had.

[Mcsylv]

Reads like a DE&I support group. Anyways, it's raining pussy out there.

One of my SBs in rotation wants to find a third for a playmate. Can't introduce her to anyone else who is in rotation because she thinks she is the only SB. She already gets jealous of my SO.

We have a new game where she runs our seeking account. She is also legit bisexual and has great taste. Found a fun new game with her, where she reaches out to potential SBs.

No m&Gs yet, but it's nice having her do all the initial outreach. She is a lot slower at setting up m&gs because she's taking time getting to know the SBs, but since she is a woman, it gives me instant credibility.

First time in a decade of playing in the bowl. Wish it had happened earlier.

Happy hunting gents.

Is she reaching out pretending to be you, or openly telling girls she's your current SB and wants to find a 3 some playmate?

Any girls get turned off because they want an exclusive SD, not being part of a trio? What about allowance, are you planning on having her tell the other girl the truth about what she's getting and then give the same to both, or are you going to try to save a few bucks if you can with the new girl, same as if you were reaching out yourself?

If she wants a playmate, why doesn't she invite a friend LOL, why does it have to be off SA?

[ProCatHunter]

Reads like a DE&I support group. Anyways, it's raining pussy out there.

One of my SBs in rotation wants to find a third for a playmate. Can't introduce her to anyone else who is in rotation because she thinks she is the only SB. She already gets jealous of my SO.

We have a new game where she runs our seeking account. She is also legit bisexual and has great taste. Found a fun new game with her, where she reaches out to potential SBs.

No m&Gs yet, but it's nice having her do all the initial outreach. She is a lot slower at setting up m&gs because she's taking time getting to know the SBs, but since she is a woman, it gives me instant credibility.

First time in a decade of playing in the bowl. Wish it had happened earlier.

Happy hunting gents.

[OliverNP]

Hey, you know, I'd also prefer to not have narrow-minded and bigoted people on any of the sites that I affiliate with, but until I create my own websites and set my own rules then I guess I have to decide for myself if I am going to continue to use those sites. So, in the meantime, how about we all just live and let live.

As long as letting live includes letting folks express their opinions without undermining those opinions and presenting ones own opinion as superior, then sure. Outside that boundary I say live and let fuck off.

[Dkayz]

Why wouldn't it be ok? Particularly considering you can set an upper age limit when you search, and just uncheck the body types you don't care for.

But besides that, why should you get to decide the ideal body type for others?

From the SBs perspective, should the same apply to the SDs? Are you handsome, in perfect shape, and very wealthy?

I wasn't saying they shouldn't be on the site, but I think women with disabilities have as much of a right to be on the site as old or obese women.

There are definitely factors that you can filter on the site with their function, but putting a field in for "disability" would be a mess, and uncomfortable. I've met guys that do this hobby that have also been severely disabled, but no one makes a big deal about that either. When you get into disabilities, it's a huge range that shouldn't have to be broadcasted, because where do you draw the line on what is functioning and just not "aesthetically" pleasing? Sure, a girl is in a wheelchair, but I've also gone on a date with a girl who was very autistic. Talking with her online where she is able to write down her thoughts you would think you were talking to a college educated girl, but in person it was like going on a date with someone in junior high. That one didn't work out for a SB relationship, but as far as a friendship went it lasted for quite some time. Mental / physical disorders are too broad to just try and justify a filter or an exclusion on the site.

Should the girl tell you that she has a noticeable disability? Probably, and I imagine that most will when you are in the talking stage before meeting since it's probably something that they are nervous about as well. But I don't think that it needs to be posted on their profile for everyone to see.

As for your last question, yes, above average, moderate.

[ErkTheOne]

I don't think old ladies or fat girls are appropriate candidates for being an SB any more than broke guys living paycheck to paycheck with their parents qualify to be SDs. So I'm not singling out disabilities or any specific group here (or even limiting the idea to the females), it's just that the definition of fat vs. curvy for example becomes much harder to define than being disabled to the point of not being able to walk.

If someones disability is so slight that you wouldn't know until they told you (like the case of the deaf girl you mentioned), it would be nice if they mention that in their profile if its something that's going to affect verbal communication, but yes I think there is a threshold for which a mild disability becomes moot (maybe her speech is a bit off but her looks are off the charts and more than make up for it). The key there is disclosing in the profile. Is the disability such that being honest about it in the profile would result in a dramatic drop in interest? If so that's probably a sign dating should be relegated to sites that specifically cater to the need.

I would say the exact same thing about a girl who cannot speak English effectively. It may or may not be a turn off for me at all, but I should at least know about it before I invest any time pursuing. Fortunately, its not an issue because some of them communicate this to me up front by not including English at all in their profile (or at least I assume that's what they're trying to broadcast).

I also think that LGBT folks looking for non-traditional SB arrangements (meaning male daddy. Female sb) should have their own niche sites they stick to. I don't want to browse through "girls" guessing which ones have a dick and wish they didn't versus which ones are actual females.

Hey, you know, I'd also prefer to not have narrow-minded and bigoted people on any of the sites that I affiliate with, but until I create my own websites and set my own rules then I guess I have to decide for myself if I am going to continue to use those sites. So, in the meantime, how about we all just live and let live.

[LikesGirls]

But it's ok for 40 year olds to be on the site? Or obese chicks?

Why wouldn't it be ok? Particularly considering you can set an upper age limit when you search, and just uncheck the body types you don't care for.

But besides that, why should you get to decide the ideal body type for others?

From the SBs perspective, should the same apply to the SDs? Are you handsome, in perfect shape, and very wealthy?

[OliverNP]

But it's ok for 40 year olds to be on the site? Or obese chicks? Considering how many girls you have to message just to find someone who isn't a scam, time waster, or actually wants to connect with you, you're not wasting any extra time you wouldn't if you are so horrifically turned off by a wheelchair.

When I first got on SA back around 2014-15 one of the first dates I went on was a gorgeous Asian college girl who was deaf. She didn't tell me she was deaf until we were a few minutes into dinner. She was really good at reading lips and just had a slight speech impediment. But it was also one of the better girls I had in bed back then, too. It makes no difference, honestly. The girl in the wheelchair I wouldn't want to hook up with just because she's fat.

I don't think old ladies or fat girls are appropriate candidates for being an SB any more than broke guys living paycheck to paycheck with their parents qualify to be SDs. So I'm not singling out disabilities or any specific group here (or even limiting the idea to the females), it's just that the definition of fat vs. curvy for example becomes much harder to define than being disabled to the point of not being able to walk.

If someones disability is so slight that you wouldn't know until they told you (like the case of the deaf girl you mentioned), it would be nice if they mention that in their profile if its something that's going to affect verbal communication, but yes I think there is a threshold for which a mild disability becomes moot (maybe her speech is a bit off but her looks are off the charts and more than make up for it). The key there is disclosing in the profile. Is the disability such that being honest about it in the profile would result in a dramatic drop in interest? If so that's probably a sign dating should be relegated to sites that specifically cater to the need.

I would say the exact same thing about a girl who cannot speak English effectively. It may or may not be a turn off for me at all, but I should at least know about it before I invest any time pursuing. Fortunately, its not an issue because some of them communicate this to me up front by not including English at all in their profile (or at least I assume that's what they're trying to broadcast).

I also think that LGBT folks looking for non-traditional SB arrangements (meaning male daddy. Female sb) should have their own niche sites they stick to. I don't want to browse through "girls" guessing which ones have a dick and wish they didn't versus which ones are actual females.