Rubrankings.com
High Class Companions
Live Escorts
Top Escorts

Thread: Escort Reports

+ Add Report
Page 648 of 2192 FirstFirst ... 148 548 598 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 698 748 1148 1648 ... LastLast
Results 9,706 to 9,720 of 32879
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #23174
    Quote Originally Posted by Mattis1775  [View Original Post]
    A lot of Mongers here make fun of me because I see lower priced Providers. Trust me, they are a lot better than these 300+ girls and this is a perfect example. I'd rather lose 60-100 from a robbery or scam than 300+ of cash or an App scam. Yes, there are a lot of women that are legit and will provide that high end experience. But, like this one here, it's a total robbery. She's the type that will get you arrested with fake news. I know fresh meat is good now and then. But, it's not worth losing everything you have. As far as Eros goes, it's no longer a trusted site. They want membership money to stay alive, even if it means posted for scam artists.
    I have 1 girl I see now over 7 years, addict, 40 bucks, meets anytime of the day or night is always ready, she's pretty cute to but other than that I'd rather pay 300 plus than 60-100 because you get a better type of woman, non addicted, cleaner, a lot more attractive. You get what you pay for but why you going into a meeting with the mindset if you get scammed its just 60 rather than 300. Is getting scammed always on your mind. Maybe you should due more research beforehand so your not so paranoid.

  2. #23173

    Dora Outcall

    I made a report last month on Dora and Rubi at the time I only saw rubi Dora was never around.

    They no longer work together and Dora does outcalls now had her come over for HH outcall 200 her body is nice light skin nice tits and nice ass.

    https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...oston/85102154

    Pics accurate on AD of her body no ounce of fat in her stomach.

  3. #23172
    Quote Originally Posted by Style20  [View Original Post]
    I really don't know why you laughing about her rate. We are not paying it but a lot of guys are really paying these girls those rate and it's making them junkies raising their rate to.
    BTW, on top of the 850, no drama, no African-American dudes, no raw dogging, no dirty talk. Who knows what else this hag, if she is even real has in place. Probably no touching, no kissing, no hugging, just pay me so you can look at me. I don't think so.

  4. #23171
    Senior Member


    Posts: 4406
    Quote Originally Posted by FlynNY56  [View Original Post]
    $850? Yeah, OK. *****, paint my house. LOL.

    https://adultsearch.com/massachusett...scorts/2602955
    I really don't know why you laughing about her rate. We are not paying it but a lot of guys are really paying these girls those rate and it's making them junkies raising their rate to.

  5. #23170
    Quote Originally Posted by BuggerOff69  [View Original Post]
    https://adultsearch.com/massachusett...scorts/2816073

    Looks inviting (don't they all?) but descriptors are a little terse, and somewhat reminiscent of the foolish Asian ones with "new style 69, dfk". It's not that bad, but she seems too good to be true. Who knows?
    Okay just took one for the team here. Nothing from the ad is real. I texted the number, someone very business like negotiated terms. When arrived at the hotel I was greeted by a Dominican spinner. Not the "white" woman in the pictures. She was ok looking her belly was a little large. She seemed to not be able to speak much English. She did not allow for the services that were offered such as DFK.

    69 GFE. She said she does not like DATY. Played some loud Spanish music during. Standard CBJ added lube and CFS. Became totally disinterested after the event. Pricing is odd 120 for QV then 2 O dollars move for every 15 minutes added so like 140 for 15 min 160 for 180. Would only repeat in a clutch. I get the impression that the person who sets up the appointment is definitely not the same as the person providing the service.

    https://adultsearch.com/massachusett...scorts/2816073

  6. #23169
    Quote Originally Posted by SixSteps  [View Original Post]
    Disagree.

    I follow plenty of girls on snapchat, and have seen quite a few of them from there. You just have to screen the girls you follow like you screen ads, before adding or reaching out.

    There are a lot of girls who only really operate via snapchat.

    For me, I only add girls who I can verify as at least a potential provider via ad listings etc. Snapchat is good for girls who regularly update their location / working times / visit deals on SC. Lots of younger providers use it. You also tend to get better looks at girl's bodies on SC. They tend to post more photos / clips of doing regular shit that aren't as posed / manufactured as ad listings.

    If her post talks about selling content mainly and lists her SC, its a pass.

    If she has a really weird SC handle, Name223414 then its probably generated and fake.

    If she has no presence outside of snapchat (Instagram / Twitter / etc) then its probably fake.

    Mentioning premium snapchat is fine, content selling and selling booty go hand in hand these days. But if she ever says she only meets her premiums, its a fake / scam.

    Just be more mindful of who you ad and bad signs, like you do with ads, and you'll have a good time.
    Interesting - "pay in advance" is something I have never done. How come only the snapchat girls (and every single one of them) require this? Really seems like a scam.

  7. #23168

    Neena

    Saw Neena a few days ago. 200 HH for the out.

    She showed up a little late, but I knew she would because I called her over right as work was getting out and the ETA she gave didn't account for the traffic.

    I did a video chat verification, just because I'm tired of calling girls over and getting busted ass chicks showing up after parading around 25 year old pictures.

    Neena did look like her pictures, a little bit rounder around the belly compared to the flat in her post picture, but not terrible. Definitely not slim like that blue shirt picture though.

    Covered everything, pretty standard service. She seemed nice but I didn't take the time to get to know her because I had shit to do. Had my pop and saw her off.

    Not a bad time but I wouldn't repeat because nothing stood out to me either, and I know I can get similar quality of service for less.

    https://boston.skipthegames.com/fema...b/846473816360

    Number ends in 2932 if that goes dead.

  8. #23167
    Although personally I've never seen her, my experience has been that if the women on Eros, have a link to their Twitter page, you're usually legit.

  9. #23166

    Michelle Colombiana

    Has anyone seen this one? Not much out there for reviews.

    https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/s...t-day/41375515

  10. #23165
    Quote Originally Posted by SixSteps  [View Original Post]
    I always wanted to see Mae Li, but her rate was always too high for me. Happy to see my price screen has saved me from a bad experience.

    I'm curious, does she look like her pictures?
    $850? Yeah, OK. *****, paint my house. LOL.

    https://adultsearch.com/massachusett...scorts/2602955

  11. #23164

    Snapchat is great imo

    Quote Originally Posted by LongDongTV  [View Original Post]
    Yeah Snapchat in general (emphasis on in general) is bad news for this activity.
    Disagree.

    I follow plenty of girls on snapchat, and have seen quite a few of them from there. You just have to screen the girls you follow like you screen ads, before adding or reaching out.

    There are a lot of girls who only really operate via snapchat.

    For me, I only add girls who I can verify as at least a potential provider via ad listings etc. Snapchat is good for girls who regularly update their location / working times / visit deals on SC. Lots of younger providers use it. You also tend to get better looks at girl's bodies on SC. They tend to post more photos / clips of doing regular shit that aren't as posed / manufactured as ad listings.

    If her post talks about selling content mainly and lists her SC, its a pass.

    If she has a really weird SC handle, Name223414 then its probably generated and fake.

    If she has no presence outside of snapchat (Instagram / Twitter / etc) then its probably fake.

    Mentioning premium snapchat is fine, content selling and selling booty go hand in hand these days. But if she ever says she only meets her premiums, its a fake / scam.

    Just be more mindful of who you ad and bad signs, like you do with ads, and you'll have a good time.

  12. #23163
    Quote Originally Posted by DBucketz  [View Original Post]
    I've had a similar experience with this girl that goes by MaeLi / Mae Li. Terrible experience, already agreed on the gift. I drove about 30-45 minutes out to go check her out. Just to be told to add more at the door. She's exactly like the pics, but service is just awful man. Hotel room, just vibing, chilling, asks for even more. I had told her if she wants more, certain services need to be offered. She kept saying "no, you're new, can't do that". She tried to upsell all the way up to 650. Yeah, no thanks. Was so pissed, criticized her as I was putting my shoes back on. She finally gave in, met at the original of 350. Just to only have CFS, and it was just terrible. Never again. I'll find a link to provide, but I highly recommend not seeing her at all.
    I always wanted to see Mae Li, but her rate was always too high for me. Happy to see my price screen has saved me from a bad experience.

    I'm curious, does she look like her pictures?

  13. #23162
    Quote Originally Posted by BuggerOff69  [View Original Post]
    https://adultsearch.com/massachusett...scorts/2816073

    Looks inviting (don't they all?) but descriptors are a little terse, and somewhat reminiscent of the foolish Asian ones with "new style 69, dfk". It's not that bad, but she seems too good to be true. Who knows?
    Odd, that phone number lists as a VOIP line in Virginia.

  14. #23161

    The usual question-is she for real?

    https://adultsearch.com/massachusett...scorts/2816073

    Looks inviting (don't they all?) but descriptors are a little terse, and somewhat reminiscent of the foolish Asian ones with "new style 69, dfk". It's not that bad, but she seems too good to be true. Who knows?

  15. #23160
    [Deleted by Admin]

    EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because it contributed nothing of value and in fact constituted a complete waste of bandwidth.

    The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange if information between men on the subject of finding women for sex. Let's stick to the subject.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
rubmaps
Top Tier Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Best Escorts
The Velvet Rooms

Protected by Copyscape