Escort Reports

[George Stark]

Fake listing for Lisa in Lansing

Someone is using her pictures, under a different number, and asking for a deposit even. (See attached.).

Lisa never asks for deposits and her real link is:

https://listcrawler.eu/last_phone_post/7087304121

(Above URL contains phone number).

Below pic of fake, demanding deposit and wit NO comments. Real Lisa has 32 comments.

[Eric444]

I haven't been active in a long time. Trying to get back in the game. Saw redhead NG Lara back in the day. Now looking for a new regular near downtown. Anyone see this one? I'm happy to report back. This one is a different Laura.

https://adultsearch.com/illinois/chi...scorts/1665406

Eric444.

[Just Asian]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because the content of the report was pointless, unproductive drama. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

[Eric444]

Hi all,

It's been a while since I've been in the game. Saw Lara from NG way back with red hair. She was awesome. Also saw Brandy? From Lansing / Glenwood back then too. She was great. Anyway I will be happy to report back but does anyone have anything on Laura.

https://adultsearch.com/illinois/chi...scorts/1665406

I am looking for a new regular near downtown. Gold coast, old town, loop, etc.

Any help would be appreciated.

Stay safe.

Eric444.

[George Stark]

Lisa In Lansing

Lisa asked me to mention that her LC listing has been flaky, but you still can see her here (phone number in link):

https://sumosear.ch/phone/708-730-4121

When her LC listing *is* workiing it's at: https://listcrawler.eu/last_phone_post/7087304121.

Nice girl with a good menu at a very reasonable price.

[George Stark]

A Request: When linking to EB / LC:

Please use the "_list" links or "last_phone_post" links.

Examples:

https://escortbabylon.net/image_list/7089201743

https://escortbabylon.net/posts_list/7089201743/1

https://listcrawler.eu/last_phone_post/7089201743

These links contain the phone number within the URL. Additionally, these links will work as long as there are *any* posts left. Other links to individual posts are subject to disappaearing if the girl deletes those posts, which many seem to do.

Thank you.

Attached below: places to click to produce the desired links:

[JohnsDoe]

No, entrapment is is when they entice you to commit a "crime" that you normally wouldn't have done. So let's say you were just at the mall minding your own business, and a woman approaches you and asks if you want to go back to her place and fuck. You agree, and then she's like, "but I'll only fuck you if you give me a hundred bucks", and you're like, yeah sure. That could be entrapment because you weren't actively seeking a prostitute and could argue that you never would have willingly done that under normal circumstances. But because that was an unusual circumstance, you weren't thinking clearly and acted.
But if you find an ad on a website for escorts, reach out to them, they explicitly state they are offering sexual services, and you proceed. That isn't entrapment.

Actually, I was actively looking for a companion and then she said this.

I do vaginal only with condom.

I do handjobs.

No anal.

No oral.

No kissing.

No aa.

I love spending quality time.

Massages.

I am open to pleasing fetishes.

Qv-100.

Hhr-150.

HR-200.

That entrapment? LOL Serious question on the technicality though.

[Chicago Istp]

I thought about the same. But her saying "I do vaginal only with condom", is entrapment? I'm going to reach out and see what happens.

No, entrapment is is when they entice you to commit a "crime" that you normally wouldn't have done. So let's say you were just at the mall minding your own business, and a woman approaches you and asks if you want to go back to her place and fuck. You agree, and then she's like, "but I'll only fuck you if you give me a hundred bucks", and you're like, yeah sure. That could be entrapment because you weren't actively seeking a prostitute and could argue that you never would have willingly done that under normal circumstances. But because that was an unusual circumstance, you weren't thinking clearly and acted.

But if you find an ad on a website for escorts, reach out to them, they explicitly state they are offering sexual services, and you proceed. That isn't entrapment.

[JohnsDoe]

https://listcrawler.eu/last_phone_post/8153290061

Not sure if I missed someone just breaking into the business or avoided a scam or a bust. I texted this one the other day hoping to set something up. Price point and location was good. But she texted me almost exactly what she said in her ad about no oral no anal and with a condom only. At first I thought if she was new maybe she just doesn't want to suck and if she is new that was going to be acceptable since she had that "fresh" look about her and I thought it might be an opportunity to have a "new" girl. But I got to thinking that her ad contain no nudity and her texts were very explicit so the guy knew exactly what he was getting. Maybe just a rookie mistake or maybe not. I had that gut feeling so I passed.

Anyone see this girl before? Or any thoughts? Did I miss my chance?

B.

I thought about the same. But her saying "I do vaginal only with condom", is entrapment? I'm going to reach out and see what happens.

[Crimp03]

Alright who got Lauren pregnant. LOL. I saw her recently and she looks to have a baby bump. She claimed that she has been gaining weight but I've seen her a few times and the only thing getting bigger is her baby bump. Anyone else notice this.

There's a handful of them.

[Bkmsw]

https://listcrawler.eu/last_phone_post/8153290061

Not sure if I missed someone just breaking into the business or avoided a scam or a bust. I texted this one the other day hoping to set something up. Price point and location was good. But she texted me almost exactly what she said in her ad about no oral no anal and with a condom only. At first I thought if she was new maybe she just doesn't want to suck and if she is new that was going to be acceptable since she had that "fresh" look about her and I thought it might be an opportunity to have a "new" girl. But I got to thinking that her ad contain no nudity and her texts were very explicit so the guy knew exactly what he was getting. Maybe just a rookie mistake or maybe not. I had that gut feeling so I passed.

Anyone see this girl before? Or any thoughts? Did I miss my chance?

B.

[ChiTownGuy23]

Anyone seen Macie recently? I've been trying to get ahold of her and haven't heard back from her at all. Usually when I text her on her off days, she will get back to me the following day or so. I know she likes me because I treat her really well and always tip so I don't think she's sick of me LOL.

https://tryst.link/escort/macie-17

I reached out to her this past weekend and she said she would possibly be available this week Wednesday and Friday and maybe this coming weekend.

[MrFun6969]

FYI. Seen Savannah near 47 and Cicero. She's looking hot as ever. Great BJ for 50. Grab if you can won't disappoint.

[RationalityLoL]

Like I said, I thought it would be a nice heads up. I didn't even say that she in fact DID give something to me. I said I think she did because she was the only person I had been with recently and I started to exhibit classic symptoms of an STI.

I could have reworded it to say, "I am showing symptoms of an STI. Awaiting test results. This provider is the only one I have been with during this time. If anyone has seen her, I'd recommend getting tested, just in case. ".

Is that really such an awful thing to do?

I know if I had recently seen a provider and one of you said that you were experiencing some weird things after seeing her, I'd greatly appreciate it, especially since a lot of these things can be asymptomatic for a while.

Also. I think it's important to state that I meant no ill will towards the provider. She was one of the best I've seen in some time. I had 0 complaints about her performance or attitude.

Thanks for the info bro. I appreciate it!

[Chicago Istp]

Weird? Why post unsubstantiated allegations about a provider in a public setting with absolutely no evidence that the particular provider in question is transmitting a medical condition.

Like I said, I thought it would be a nice heads up. I didn't even say that she in fact DID give something to me. I said I think she did because she was the only person I had been with recently and I started to exhibit classic symptoms of an STI.

I could have reworded it to say, "I am showing symptoms of an STI. Awaiting test results. This provider is the only one I have been with during this time. If anyone has seen her, I'd recommend getting tested, just in case. ".

Is that really such an awful thing to do?

I know if I had recently seen a provider and one of you said that you were experiencing some weird things after seeing her, I'd greatly appreciate it, especially since a lot of these things can be asymptomatic for a while.

Also. I think it's important to state that I meant no ill will towards the provider. She was one of the best I've seen in some time. I had 0 complaints about her performance or attitude.