Thread: "Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?
+
Add Report
Results 2,476 to 2,490 of 23671
-
04-08-22 15:16 #21196Senior Member

Posts: 754What the hey?
I'm sure this means something to somebody, but to me it's Martian! Thank you, Z, for replying in any case. It was fun while it lasted.
Originally Posted by Zcochran00
[View Original Post]
Happy hunting all!
Scott.
-
04-08-22 10:37 #21195Senior Member

Posts: 420Recruiting SBs in the Wild
I totally agree with one caveat. When I was married I would only do my SB hunting far from home. Now I do it anywhere I please. I like my GF but I can always get another one without giving my present GF half my stuff. LOL.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
You misread my post. I was threatened to be outed to my GF and my family not by a SB (none of whom know anything personally about me), but rather by a horny housewife I was seeing on the side for free. When a woman with whom you have bumped-uglies knows your identity, you are at her mercy if you piss her off.Yourself, somehow you got identified IRL by a SB. This failure of opsec is absolutely unacceptable for the married men on SA. I hear that around 40% of men on the site are married, IDK what proportion put that on their profiles. I do.
I have been mongering for many years: SWs, UTRs, SBs. I used to count them but it now numbers in the hundreds. I have never had an outing problem with anyone I paid. It's the free tail who knew my name that almost bit me on the ass. If you are married, I believe that paying for it is far less risky than having some "for free" on the side. The old maxim applies that the tail you get "for free" can wind up being the most expensive tail ever. That includes being married and getting caught cheating when married.I have been in the bowl for 4+ years, and have had 3 long term (6+ months) arrangements, and I have never been found out.
-
04-08-22 09:35 #21194Senior Member

Posts: 754SA loophole
Hey all,
Thanks for the quick replies! Sorry there is no longer a free way to see those messages. Guess I'll just have to bite the bullet.
Cheers,
Scott.
P.S. Far Far, good to see you're still active. Tally ho!
-
04-07-22 21:30 #21193Senior Member

Posts: 119No, their developers unfortunately wised up a while back and stopped sending back all the message contents.
Originally Posted by FScott
[View Original Post]
The one thing I can say is that it's possible to dig into the tools they're using to show the UI contents in the browser (React and Redux) and extract some more detailed info on user profiles and messages than what gets shown on screen, like the time that a message was actually viewed. I wrote a little browser "userscript" addon that adds an "Export Profile" button to a page that grabs the user profile data and lets me save it to a file, and another script that downloads profile pics if I want to save them. But, the really juicy info of message contents when you're not premium is no longer in there.
-
04-07-22 21:09 #21192Senior Member

Posts: 61No, it does not work anymore and have not seen another way in.
Originally Posted by FScott
[View Original Post]
-
04-07-22 20:53 #21191Senior Member

Posts: 3353Scott! Welcome back. Long time gone!!
Originally Posted by FScott
[View Original Post]
Nope, this loophole was done before COVID. No workarounds that IK of.
-
04-07-22 18:16 #21190Senior Member

Posts: 754Does this still work?
Hey Z,
Originally Posted by Zcochran00
[View Original Post]
Does this process still work, or did SA fix the loophole? Is there a new procedure for getting access to messages without upgrading? I've been off SA for a while, and have racked up some messages from contacts that I'd love to see without paying the new, higher, fees.
Thanks for your time and efforts.
Scott.
-
04-06-22 17:09 #21189Senior Member

Posts: 3353Just be careful. You can just block, instead of report. If you do the latter, you'll get some pinhead at SA looking at your profile, and they might not like what they see, even though it has been there for years / months. I got banned on one profile for having a photo not of me in this way, and there is really no way to recover this account (practically).
Originally Posted by BobLobLa
[View Original Post]
-
04-06-22 10:30 #21188Senior Member

Posts: 1897The PPM Trap
I think it may be a carryover from the WYP site where men pay for just a date. I can observe that seeking does not ban women for using it. I have also experienced women who are using it to mean they get paid at the MnG. They are often or sometimes using it to mean they get paid for meeting nothing more.
BAM.
Originally Posted by Happtrav
[View Original Post]
-
04-06-22 10:21 #21187Senior Member

Posts: 256I've been told I'm an idiot but.
I report them before they report me for rejecting them or offering any kind of reply / advice.
Originally Posted by Happtrav
[View Original Post]
-
04-06-22 02:00 #21186Senior Member

Posts: 631Real
Meet a 19th and 24 years old last week who use "I'm looking for ppm". Just ask them to move to text. End up BBFS both of them so I would say that real girls are using that line now. Just not sure where they got it.
Originally Posted by Happtrav
[View Original Post]
-
04-05-22 23:52 #21185Senior Member

Posts: 336PPM Convo
Ask her to move the conversation off line before you say anything further.
Originally Posted by Happtrav
[View Original Post]
-
04-05-22 22:15 #21184Senior Member

Posts: 3353Your way is one valid one. If I have had an interaction w / a girl and then she springs the "ppm" question, I have a standard paragraph I cut and paste. Something about how you can't discuss $ on the site, you can get banned, IK people it has happened to. And the site is re-branding, so it isn't as free about such things as it used to be. However, it overall isn't a good sign for the sort of girl I personally am looking for. Definitely not a pro and someone I can see ongoing. I attempt to reassure them that of course we all understand that you don't want to get into a situation where you are trusting someone to do something when you don't really know them.
Originally Posted by Happtrav
[View Original Post]
-
04-05-22 19:17 #21183Senior Member

Posts: 464The PPM Trap
I am looking for advice on this issue:
Lately on Seeking, I have had woman boldly reply: 500 ppm (no other Conversation).
Or I am looking for ppm.
No matter how PHAT the woman is, I block them and move on.
Seeking will not think twice about banning you. They are the judge, jury and executioner.
How would you handle a woman suggesting ppm?
-
04-05-22 17:19 #21182Senior Member

Posts: 3353Sugar fetch
There is another site by this name. I don't recall how I learned of it. I set up a profile. Their monthly charge is $50. I attempted to use my usual pre-paid to get the membership, it didn't work. I would be willing to TOFTT for 50 to find out if there are any reasons to be on there. I won't use a personal credit card of course. Anyone have any success paying for this site? I asked their customer service, useless as usual.
It is interesting that even though SA raised their price, they are discounting much of the time. For special occasions, and then it seems like when I reactivate my profile (I keep it deactivated when I am not paid up, to keep the inbox empty and saving everyone time).










Reply With Quote





