Sugarbabies?

**JackOhLantern** · 03-29-22 21:45

PrincessM.

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...5-4eb6768b6f25

Wants to get to know each other for a couple of weeks, which entails her selling pics.

Magic8 Ball.

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...c-467748111775

Wants an uber to me, and her rate is 550 - wayyyy too high.

FitnessFreak.

https://members.seeking.com/messages...e-04e978fbe414

Was with her maybe a year ago a couple of times. I think someone reported that she's not much in terms of conversation / personality. I can confirm. But, she is super super fit and tight. I think we agreed on 400 if I'm not mistaken.

**AlanDodson** · 03-28-22 14:57

Not at all, I don't even have a SB account at the moment. I encourage all to pursue her if you want because she is even hotter in person. Just please take extra care, that's all I'm trying to say.

Originally Posted by BamBam [View Original Post]

I have all of her social media (and there's lots.) There is zero indication of a boyfriend. The only pictures of males with her are her dog and her dad. She is exclusively hanging with other women. I have no dog in the fight since she already turned me down. However, you wouldn't be cock-blocking would you? Trying to scare away competition? That's a black mark on you if true..

**Bkbh1** · 03-28-22 13:14

Originally Posted by BamBam [View Original Post]

Someone asked me how risky were cops on Seeking. I thought I would share my answer here.

The cops sometimes get on Seeking but they can really only go after the girls. They set up in a hotel room trolling for John's. Using the escort sites. If bored they might send offers to girls at absurd levels. If the girls agree, they say come on over and give the hotel room. This actually happened to a GPS woman who was on Seeking for a while. Anyone remember her name? It was like aniska siska or some such. (Too lazy to look it up.) If the girl shows she is busted. They might make the same approach to men but most men on seeking aren't after pros and are unlikely to agree to go straight to a hotel room. Avoid anything like that and you are good.

The seeking site, for men, usually involves 1-1 meetings first. If you always ask for an in-person MnG, in a public place, before private time, you are safe. This should be your standard procedure in any case just to avoid the muggers and blackmailers. Cops need to make arrests in wholesale numbers. They cannot afford the time to set up singles. I am even safer because the minute a girl talks ppm, or any sex for money talk, I slowly back away. I want true amateurs. In any case, aside from trolling for pedos, are there any other reports of the cops on Seeking?

BAM.

StunningDuchess went straight to ppm but can't host. She suggested a park or car play for 200. She is clear out in Moscow so hotel could even be chore. Running away. Fast.
When I said goodbye, she dropped her offer to 60. Not my thing.

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...1-f4c5cb2ebff8

**BamBam** · 03-28-22 12:40

Someone asked me how risky were cops on Seeking. I thought I would share my answer here.

The cops sometimes get on Seeking but they can really only go after the girls. They set up in a hotel room trolling for John's. Using the escort sites. If bored they might send offers to girls at absurd levels. If the girls agree, they say come on over and give the hotel room. This actually happened to a GPS woman who was on Seeking for a while. Anyone remember her name? It was like aniska siska or some such. (Too lazy to look it up.) If the girl shows she is busted. They might make the same approach to men but most men on seeking aren't after pros and are unlikely to agree to go straight to a hotel room. Avoid anything like that and you are good.

The seeking site, for men, usually involves 1-1 meetings first. If you always ask for an in-person MnG, in a public place, before private time, you are safe. This should be your standard procedure in any case just to avoid the muggers and blackmailers. Cops need to make arrests in wholesale numbers. They cannot afford the time to set up singles. I am even safer because the minute a girl talks ppm, or any sex for money talk, I slowly back away. I want true amateurs. In any case, aside from trolling for pedos, are there any other reports of the cops on Seeking?

BAM.

**BamBam** · 03-28-22 12:23

I am now routinely requesting a video chat on Seeking. There are few excuses for saying No and, while not as convenient, it also works. Just not as good for initial screening.

BAM.

Originally Posted by RickMann [View Original Post]

I wish SA offered the video idea it is very telling LOL.

**WanderingAbout** · 03-28-22 07:48

Originally Posted by RickMann [View Original Post]

I wish SA offered the video idea it is very telling LOL.

Very true.

**RickMann** · 03-28-22 06:50

Originally Posted by WanderingAbout [View Original Post]

Kaybaybee580 300 ppm Passed as she is BBW.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...664e0d2404fb6a

NataliaL985 asks 500 per meet. Passed. Contributing Seniors can request more info.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...114615488ffb54

SecBen credit wasters. They message. You reply. They ghost. You lose credits.
Links only. Click to see pics and name.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...3cdbd4ae04d1b2
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...8c7e3099d697e5
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...763ced366aa788
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...af14718272c76b
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...8e48c5c8c72448

Littlesweetheart LOL.
https://members.seeking.com/member/6...0-13537459bffb
https://thedirty.com/ohio/paige-hollmeyer-5/#post-2658507.

I wish SA offered the video idea it is very telling LOL.

**WanderingAbout** · 03-27-22 19:02

Kaybaybee580 300 ppm Passed as she is BBW.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...664e0d2404fb6a

NataliaL985 asks 500 per meet. Passed. Contributing Seniors can request more info.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...114615488ffb54

SecBen credit wasters. They message. You reply. They ghost. You lose credits.
Links only. Click to see pics and name.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...3cdbd4ae04d1b2
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...8c7e3099d697e5
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...763ced366aa788
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...af14718272c76b
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...8e48c5c8c72448

Littlesweetheart LOL.
https://members.seeking.com/member/6...0-13537459bffb
https://thedirty.com/ohio/paige-hollmeyer-5/#post-2658507.

**BamBam** · 03-27-22 12:21

Originally Posted by ChargersFan18 [View Original Post]

I've been messaging girls for the last month. My experience is if i message 5 girls only 1 or two are "real". The others are content pic sellers. Some want to go straight to snapchat. I have message one that sent sexy pics. And videos and asked to meet, but later said it was that time of month. Another cute blonde with the name "Cincy-Fun_Today" anyone met her? She claims can host in Clifton. Is that a good or not good area? I read before where a certain area is to be avoided due uncle setups, I just can't remember which. Any help is appreciated. I was supposed to meet a girl from dayton area her name was Babby_99 or something, I became skeptical when she text me at 8 am asking if she could "see" me today. I saw she had two profiles. Also in her initial text she said she does ppm gave an amount and after a few messages she says " if you get a room I can give you a massage" She ended up deleting her profile. Idk may have dodged a bullet with that one. Pic was pretty 22 yo.

If you share links, I don't mind sharing my experiences with them. For example, cincy-fun-today. I recognize that name because it seems a bit TGTBT. Picture also look TGTBT. Regardless, I tried to engage with her and she completely ignores me. No face pic always risks it being someone I have met or talked with before and they know I am not a good fit. In such a case, I would rather they just block me. Regardless, you are making progress. If you get a number, DM me and I will look for her. Meanwhile, Clifton is GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe.) Sharonville, Montgomery County and Boone County are considered High Risk. That doesn't mean you cannot play there but it does mean taking extra precautions.

BAM.

**Bkbh1** · 03-27-22 10:14

Originally Posted by RickMann [View Original Post]

I set my search too low to really see these mature babies. I feel like telling them they are too old to qualify as a SB. Who wants some wrinkled old lady LOL. Maybe a freebie that would be different, wine and dine one then BAM! But not on a PPM basis, worse than online only IMHO.

The 50+ year old ladies are looking for 70+ Daddy's for a sugar relationship. And there are enough men on SA to qualify.

Otherwise those ladies are happy to traditionally date men their own age.

**Bkbh1** · 03-27-22 10:09

Originally Posted by BamBam [View Original Post]

I think there is an element of "dating up" involved as you mentioned. If they are in good shape and have a fun attitude, I do not totally reject them. However, I treat them as Ashley Madison type candidates. I will hook up with them if they want but I never offer an allowance. Since they enroll thinking it is a dating app, a lot of them do not know there can be an allowance involved. I have two I see occasionally like that. There are different dynamics for the 35 and over contingent. They still want sex but have a hard time finding someone they like on the other dating apps. They think seeking offers a higher class pool of candidates. As long as they understand we are just dating and there is no sugar, no problem! Given what's available on the escort market, a few of these AM types are diamonds in the rough. And I don't have to go bar-hopping to find them. Just my 2 cents.

BAM.

BAM gets it. And considering him and I have enjoyed a couple of the same babies years back, his take on the more mature SA market is 100%. I'll add that you can get the same almost free but much better than provider's, by willing to reach out to younger SA girls that don't look like models. The 23 to 32 crowd often have their own clean place, know how to take care of a man, also take care of a woman which turns into 3 somes, and are willing to do it all for dinner / club / concert / movie and a very small financial gift. They are so happy to get 100 or even less if you treat them to a nice day and great sex. You should have seen what a good bottle of vodka brought me yesterday from a sexy lady in her twenties. And I just got back on SA last week after 2 years gone.

Stay away from the girls that look like... way out of your league, and SA becomes easy. Most of them are either scammers or have ridiculous GPS. And most don't know how to take care of a guy. Selfish lovers. Has been my experience with the model types.

SA right now seems to be as good as when I started in 2017. They have found a way to filter some of the scammers. And as BAM said, the maturing of the young girls has matured to some hot easily available women.

**RickMann** · 03-27-22 07:50

Originally Posted by ToddCincy [View Original Post]

Part of it is likely the way the site is being marketed. In the beginning, the tagline was, "find a sugar daddy for tuition." Now it's "start dating up". That is catnip to women over 30, who are starting to feel their biological clocks ticking. (Wait until they learn that the average SD is a married man twice their age, who wants to pay them $300 for ppm! Ha!

The Millennials (who were the original sugar babies of 2009-2014) are now entering early middle age. I suspect that some of the older ones on Seeking today are returnees. Also, the Millennials (the oldest of whom are now 40) were the original online generation. In 1999, Yahoo magazine ran an article about "camwhores", who were teen girls selling naughty pics online (and probably meeting for cash, too.) Well, an 18-year-old girl of 1999 is 41 in 2022!

I don't have kids. But I'm a GenXer (early 50's), and it seems that today's parents hover over their young adult children like hawks. They track their adult kids' whereabouts with iphone apps and whatnot. My best friend from high school has a 23-year-old daughter, and the girl's mother still tracks her location via a smartphone app. It's insane. For us, though, the upshot is probably that 18 to 23 year-old young women are subject to a lot more parental monitoring than was the case just a few years ago.

Finally, the lingering effects of COVID and the labor shortages. I think that will rebound, though, as most of the free COVID money is gone now, and inflation is providing an incentive for people to seek extra sources of income. (We may see a new crop of economically motivated providers and SBs before the end of 2022.).

In short: I have noticed it, too. And those of you who've read my prior posts know how I feel about "mature" providers and sugar babies: I have zero interest in them! But I believe the causes are multiple, and (hopefully) temporary. If I wanted older women I'd join Silver Singles!

I set my search too low to really see these mature babies. I feel like telling them they are too old to qualify as a SB. Who wants some wrinkled old lady LOL. Maybe a freebie that would be different, wine and dine one then BAM! But not on a PPM basis, worse than online only IMHO.

**ChargersFan18** · 03-26-22 20:59

Originally Posted by BamBam [View Original Post]

Here are some problem profiles from the last few days:

ImpishBish: met for MnG. Not ready for FC, much better looking in person, ghosting me now. No sex SB.

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...f-b2b028fda363

LusciousRunner: this is my second report on her: made two profiles when registering and one of them was immediately deleted. Shared the following: "I will only text I will never meet up with anyone".

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...85-ff5b8181cfd ??

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...5-ff5b8181cfd4 ??

Voiceofenigma: Scammer: age 38, pics much younger, few words in description. Has been on the site before: "My snap / KIK, Instagram is Pearl1Polish and you can text 702-329-6225. " Pearl traces to a guy named Andre. The number traces to a guy named Jack.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...4-b13c62d51303

BabEevelyn, 31, living in a battered women's shelter, gave me attitude when I attempted a joke, I suspect a sad story but I'm not prepared for the drama.

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...4-299c05ca1868

Shybaby: Hot private pictures, agrees dtf and allowance by DM, went to text, voip, suddenly wants to know what I am seeking. Wants allowance to start at MnG and until she "get's comfortable. " Claims sexual trauma and bad experiences. I say RINSER! YMMV.

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...5-cb873e2db4c7

Lavishl0 ve: Profile says Asian but pic says different. Description is that of a crypto scammer. Proceed with caution.

https://members.seeking.com/member/1...5-05bc4a63d25e

Sunny: pretty sure another crypto scammer, no obvious tells but TGTBT. Husband hunter language.

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...5-0422aa8a8eaa

WittyModel: Classic crypto scammer, Pic is Korean model: https://www.facebook.com/kimgnaaa/.

https://members.seeking.com/member/9...5-ef9fd35772dc

LunaStarr: joined 8-21 then left shortly later, back now: pregnant, jealous boyfriend, online only. Feels like a lot of drama to me.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...c-0c157325ac9e

I welcome comments or feedback.

BAM.

I've been messaging girls for the last month. My experience is if i message 5 girls only 1 or two are "real". The others are content pic sellers. Some want to go straight to snapchat. I have message one that sent sexy pics. And videos and asked to meet, but later said it was that time of month. Another cute blonde with the name "Cincy-Fun_Today" anyone met her? She claims can host in Clifton. Is that a good or not good area? I read before where a certain area is to be avoided due uncle setups, I just can't remember which. Any help is appreciated. I was supposed to meet a girl from dayton area her name was Babby_99 or something, I became skeptical when she text me at 8 am asking if she could "see" me today. I saw she had two profiles. Also in her initial text she said she does ppm gave an amount and after a few messages she says " if you get a room I can give you a massage" She ended up deleting her profile. Idk may have dodged a bullet with that one. Pic was pretty 22 yo.

**BamBam** · 03-26-22 19:36

Here some profiles that have been around for a while but without a lot of progress or reviews:

Bella: private pics show a bit of a butterface, travel nurse occasionally visiting Dayton but lives far east of Cinti, Was moving right along, moved to text, had a MnG agreed then ghosted, Still on the site but ignoring me. I have PII.

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...8-b6b222379e24

Babiebirdie: since 4-18. On the site every day but ignoring me, I love her pix and description but no joy for me. Has anyone else met her?

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...9-21d46be62277

Hunny7354: Hot pictures, Her second profile. Does not respond to me. On the site a lot. Banning suggests either pic seller or maybe GPS but a bit too loose in her language. Anyone have anything to add?

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...c-4f2156f1a0c9

MissVtoyou; on the site since 1-16, Profile pic is likely even older than that. I met her about five years ago. Admits to 47, Asking 500 ppm, GPS and not worth it. What is her incentive for being on the site. Are one of you actually doing her at that price?

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...b-f9f137bfb982

Collegegirl1618: since 1-19, on the site every day, hot pictures, no answer to multiple approaches. Is this some girl's research project? Has anyone had meaningful contact?

https://members.seeking.com/member/9...f-5705715a4bee

Any comments or reviews?

BAM.

**BamBam** · 03-26-22 19:27

Here are some problem profiles from the last few days:

ImpishBish: met for MnG. Not ready for FC, much better looking in person, ghosting me now. No sex SB.

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...f-b2b028fda363

LusciousRunner: this is my second report on her: made two profiles when registering and one of them was immediately deleted. Shared the following: "I will only text I will never meet up with anyone".

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...85-ff5b8181cfd ??

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...5-ff5b8181cfd4 ??

Voiceofenigma: Scammer: age 38, pics much younger, few words in description. Has been on the site before: "My snap / KIK, Instagram is Pearl1Polish and you can text 702-329-6225. " Pearl traces to a guy named Andre. The number traces to a guy named Jack.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...4-b13c62d51303

BabEevelyn, 31, living in a battered women's shelter, gave me attitude when I attempted a joke, I suspect a sad story but I'm not prepared for the drama.

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...4-299c05ca1868

Shybaby: Hot private pictures, agrees dtf and allowance by DM, went to text, voip, suddenly wants to know what I am seeking. Wants allowance to start at MnG and until she "get's comfortable. " Claims sexual trauma and bad experiences. I say RINSER! YMMV.

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...5-cb873e2db4c7

Lavishl0 ve: Profile says Asian but pic says different. Description is that of a crypto scammer. Proceed with caution.

https://members.seeking.com/member/1...5-05bc4a63d25e

Sunny: pretty sure another crypto scammer, no obvious tells but TGTBT. Husband hunter language.

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...5-0422aa8a8eaa

WittyModel: Classic crypto scammer, Pic is Korean model: https://www.facebook.com/kimgnaaa/.

https://members.seeking.com/member/9...5-ef9fd35772dc

LunaStarr: joined 8-21 then left shortly later, back now: pregnant, jealous boyfriend, online only. Feels like a lot of drama to me.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...c-0c157325ac9e

I welcome comments or feedback.

BAM.