Escort Classified Ads - Member Discussions

[Bedtime Story]

Do they require you to attend a john school session as part of your probation? Do you care to share your total out-of-pocket price for your case such as fine, court cost, john school, car impound, attorney, etc? Thanks.

Yes I have to attend the john school.

$265 court costs and fine.

$250 enrollment of john school.

$521 car impound.

$000 attorney.

$750 lost wages for 3 days.

$250 confiscated for provider.

[Cartog]

Two charges. Solicitation and possession of criminal tools.

Plea bargain for the tools charge and dropped solicitation. 1 year non reporting probation.

Do they require you to attend a john school session as part of your probation? Do you care to share your total out-of-pocket price for your case such as fine, court cost, john school, car impound, attorney, etc? Thanks.

[Chunks92]

Two charges. Solicitation and possession of criminal tools.

Plea bargain for the tools charge and dropped solicitation. 1 year non reporting probation.

If I was in your position I would have been fine with that as well, just as good as disorderly conduct. Criminal tools doesn't really look bad on a job application. Soliciting / prostitution does. I'd take that any day of the week. Glad for you man!

[Bedtime Story]

Worst you will probably get is a pair of 4th degree misdemeanor disorderly conducts. Unless you are caught in a real low crime county with aggressive prosecutors.

Two charges. Solicitation and possession of criminal tools.

Plea bargain for the tools charge and dropped solicitation. 1 year non reporting probation.

[Chunks92]

Yes you are right. But solicitation is against the law, doesn't stop us. Think they play by all the rules also. Anything they find is inadmissible, but for intelligence. Nothing on my phone though. But they don't know that until they look.

Worst you will probably get is a pair of 4th degree misdemeanor disorderly conducts. Unless you are caught in a real low crime county with aggressive prosecutors.

[Bedtime Story]

Unless they have a warrant to access your phone specifically, it doesn't matter if they can hack in or not. If there was no warrant for the phone, anything they find is inadmissible. Just like a door lock, it's not the lock that keeps cops out, but that if they break through without a warrant, not only can they not use whatever they find or anything that comes from a trail of what they find, but they just broke the law.

https://www.loc.gov/item/global-lega...-constitution/

Yes you are right. But solicitation is against the law, doesn't stop us. Think they play by all the rules also. Anything they find is inadmissible, but for intelligence. Nothing on my phone though. But they don't know that until they look.

[D Nut]

They have software that hacks in a back door. No phone is safe.

Even Apple biometric. Was a case a few years ago. Murder case if I remember. US government wanted past Apple bio metric. Apple sued. Government hired 3rd party hack and dropped case.

Unless they have a warrant to access your phone specifically, it doesn't matter if they can hack in or not. If there was no warrant for the phone, anything they find is inadmissible. Just like a door lock, it's not the lock that keeps cops out, but that if they break through without a warrant, not only can they not use whatever they find or anything that comes from a trail of what they find, but they just broke the law.

https://www.loc.gov/item/global-lega...-constitution/

[Bedtime Story]

If you were not provided a warrant for phone evidence, I would say you have grounds for a dismissal or at least the right to drop phone evidence from the case and the criminal tool charge. Plus your civil liberties were infringed because of due process not followed. Not sure if this works but, they could have hacked your phone by using your digital fingerprint copy to a gloved hand to open the biometric. Just a guess though. Plus, on some inner dimension (that Im not smart enough to find) there is on all phones, iPads, computers a small bit of memory that allows a forensic computer geek to find anything thats was on the device including passwords used. The only work around to remove this info is to delete all data and reinstall all software like 3 times and from a virtual platform or something like that.

Bio metric was face. The new LEO software does all the work once connected to the port. I want to say the founder of McAffee, but can't remember the author. Was an article in police one forum. Big software they go on about is stingray. That's how they found jihad Johnny on Montana ave a few years back.

[Reddmal]

No info when searching. She looks a little familiar but I don't recognize the name. Anyone have info?

https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/c...night/45002073

Saw her last week, was a fine visit in a SVille incall, some signs of some habits of that is something that you try to avoid.

[Twisted69]

I wouldn't expect it either in a misdemeanor case, but someone accessed an account only assessable from my phone with two part authentication while they had it. Made some smartass changes to my profile on tinder. Sure they had s blast with that. Real funny. Changed my profile to be a woman looking for man.

If you were not provided a warrant for phone evidence, I would say you have grounds for a dismissal or at least the right to drop phone evidence from the case and the criminal tool charge. Plus your civil liberties were infringed because of due process not followed. Not sure if this works but, they could have hacked your phone by using your digital fingerprint copy to a gloved hand to open the biometric. Just a guess though. Plus, on some inner dimension (that I’m not smart enough to find) there is on all phones, iPads, computers a small bit of memory that allows a forensic computer geek to find anything that’s was on the device including passwords used. The only work around to remove this info is to delete all data and reinstall all software like 3 times and from a virtual platform or something like that.

[Bedtime Story]

Sorry to hear but thanks for sharing.

I'm. Curious. Did they ask if you were LEO over text prior to meeting?

No they did not.

[Bill513OH]

They have software that hacks in a back door. No phone is safe.

Even Apple biometric. Was a case a few years ago. Murder case if I remember. US government wanted past Apple bio metric. Apple sued. Government hired 3rd party hack and dropped case.

Sorry to hear but thanks for sharing.

I always delete the apps I'm using and then just reload them later. Idk how effective this would be. But it makes me feel better. I put a passcode on the phone too, but apparently that don't matter. I also make it clear I only want to hang out. Talk. BS etc. I'm "lonely and just want to hang with an adult" I hope if its a sting they would have no interest. Which has happened. I also usually will force a convesation for a few days LOL I figure if they ate texting me out of the blue days later, that could maybe help my cause? Idk.

Def agree with GRAS.

I'm. Curious. Did they ask if you were LEO over text prior to meeting?

Maybe we should start a thread on narrowing down the odds for us and exactly what to do just in case.

Love the idea of parking offsite and walking. I hate driving in hotel areas.

With this all said, it reminds me I need to post reviews of Raine (old spinner) and Grace (6'2 chick in middletown).

[Bedtime Story]

So you're saying they hacked your phone to get access? That's pretty unusual in a misdemeanor case. Depending on your passcode, phone type, etc, it could take 4-6 months to do any sort of brute force.

I wouldn't expect it either in a misdemeanor case, but someone accessed an account only assessable from my phone with two part authentication while they had it. Made some smartass changes to my profile on tinder. Sure they had s blast with that. Real funny. Changed my profile to be a woman looking for man.

[RogerOver]

They have software that hacks in a back door. No phone is safe.

Even Apple biometric. Was a case a few years ago. Murder case if I remember. US government wanted past Apple bio metric. Apple sued. Government hired 3rd party hack and dropped case.

So you're saying they hacked your phone to get access? That's pretty unusual in a misdemeanor case. Depending on your passcode, phone type, etc, it could take 4-6 months to do any sort of brute force.

[Cartog]

They have software that hacks in a back door. No phone is safe.

Even Apple biometric. Was a case a few years ago. Murder case if I remember. US government wanted past Apple bio metric. Apple sued. Government hired 3rd party hack and dropped case.

As others have mentioned thanks for sharing your experience, but did LE actually go thru your locked phone via a back door? I was thinking they would need a warrant for that and not typically pursue that in a misdemeanor charge, but not sure. Thanks.