Korean Agency BB

[Toungsten]

If it's a spinner you want there is no better choice than Dana with SFK. A very pretty face with a natural hot and shapely body. She has the energy and passion of Hana. The willingness and animal hunger of Lia, who many of us remember. A sensual and aggressive DFK that won't stop if you don't. Loves to use her mouth on every inch of your body with no holds barred. She will fuck you as long as you have an ounce of strength left in your body. All this with no upcharge and no clock watching. We've gone over our time on many occasions while we were in the throes of passion and not once did she attempt to break the spell. She offers everything and at what today is a more than fair donation for what you get. Every moment you feel that she really wants you and she really does. There is no better.

https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/model-dana-53036

[GoldDust58]

Oh interesting, Kara was Victoria from Gray? What was her picture like with Gray?

Not tall Victoria / Lexi. Not that girl.

If you recognize the pics on booker gray Kara was in NorCal with bunnygirls then she came down to LA. Disappeared and came back with these new pictures.

[BonerAppetitty]

You can see her previous pics from Gray Kara3. I think M Kara / CG Cara / Gray Kara3 is not the same girl as your rec CG Kara for HYA. Thanks for the rec by the way. I bang girls like a milkman on schedule and CG Kara was on my schedule.

Oh interesting, Kara was Victoria from Gray? What was her picture like with Gray?

[LandOfKGirls]

It could be devastating for the orgs if we have a thread for girls who are rebrand, not cute and not young. The biz would lose money from guys who TOFTT because we will know better.

I think a rebrand thread would be a very good idea if the moderator would keep it to just sharing facts with no trash talk about the girls.

[SuperMan333]

M Sarah is former gray / CG Aubrey (someone already mentioned this one).

M Kara / CG Cara is former Victoria with gray / CG.

CG Jiwoo / gray Jiu is from Norcal as Jun with Viola and Coco with Bunnygirls. Her face and body lower ratings but good service.

CG Sammy from NorCal Lana at SweetAngels (someone might have already mentioned this).

If you all recognize any rebrands or NorCal transplants please post. A few rough ones coming from SweetAngels in NorCal are mixed in down her I'm hearing. Do not want to walk into some of them. I want to say rebrand reporting is not always a bad thing and sometimes girls change because new org. I dont want it to be seen as always a negative thing.

Oh interesting, Kara was Victoria from Gray? What was her picture like with Gray?

[BonerAppetitty]

If everyone review all the girls then we will know which girls are worth spending money on.

Words like "cute", "young", and "hot" for a new girl are worth at least 280 roses from me. A girl won't get my money if a review convinced me she's not my type. It could be devastating for the orgs if we have a thread for girls who are rebrand, not cute and not young. The biz would lose money from guys who TOFTT because we will know better.

...My point was that people always say mongers lack control. The reviews are what mongers control fully. The reviews directly affect the biz money...

[SplendidOrchid]

Saw Aubrey and had a great time, like everyone else (except for the one monger that only complained about her a couple days ago). Fantastic figure, great energy, and definitely works to please! I definitely wish I had the funds to see her every week.

[BonerAppetitty]

I know they are rebrand too. I am not coming if I recognize pics from the past and don't remember anything good about them. I don't need to remember names.

Yoojin was Lola in the Bay. CandyGirl Lola also looks familiar. I almost thought CG Lola and CG Yoojin are the same girl.

Sunny / Sujin may be Queen Hera in the Bay.

HappyKBunny Collin / Seolah was also in the Bay and here before too.

Jewelry's Monica may be Cara's Angel Sharon. Sharon was my favorite actually.

AOV Minka was here before and was previously VAC CL.

These other girls look familiar so they were here before: 2 pop Giselle, CG Roxy, BG Joy5, AOV Beti, MissKgirlLA Jemini, M Rose, M Leah might be CG Riah, CG Fanny / BG NY_Orange look like same girl and were here before.

M Sarah is former gray / CG Aubrey (someone already mentioned this one).

M Kara / CG Cara is former Victoria with gray / CG.

CG Jiwoo / gray Jiu is from Norcal as Jun with Viola and Coco with Bunnygirls. Her face and body lower ratings but good service.

CG Sammy from NorCal Lana at SweetAngels (someone might have already mentioned this).

If you all recognize any rebrands or NorCal transplants please post. A few rough ones coming from SweetAngels in NorCal are mixed in down her I'm hearing. Do not want to walk into some of them. I want to say rebrand reporting is not always a bad thing and sometimes girls change because new org. I dont want it to be seen as always a negative thing.

[Estrange]

Had a chance to see Tiana recently, was looking forward to it given good things I heard but it just wasn't that great.

LFK / DFK was nmcot, her lips were rough and felt chapped. When we got down to business, she felt pretty loose and it was hard to finish. Granted, I'm not the biggest out there but I haven't had any issues with other gals in the past. I'm beginning to wonder if I got someone else.

She has a tattoo on her collar bone, if she didn't have that then you got someone else.

Yes, Tiana has a tattoo on the collarbone. I disagree on two counts.

Count 1: her dfk gave me an instant hard on. The moment I entered, she had me locked in dfk with my clothes still on. I have visited her multiple times and so she might be giving me preferential treatment. I guess YMMV.

Count 2: her pussy is the best I ever had. My cock is below average and even I found her pussy tight last time I visited her. In fact, as I was inserting, she slightly gasped. I felt bad and really slowed down. Once it was in all the way, I went to town with her. Other mongers have attested to the glory of her pussy. Not sure what went wrong with you.

[BustedStr8]

My take on ads that state age:

21 = 22-30.

22 = 28-35.

23 = 30-39.

24 = 35-45.

25 = 40-49.

26 = fuggetabouddit.

Personally I think there is a high correlation between age and quality of service (e. G. , Allie, Cona, Pepsi, Nana and the other service queens), but the ads keep the ages low because men in Asian cultures treat working girls like Christmas cake: no good after the 25th.

[BustedStr8]

Visit on time, she was prompt to let me in at appt time. Door opens, she was older than pictures and looks about average kgirl. Used bathroom to pee, came back, she pulls my jogging pants down and went on her knees to give a satisfying sloppy BBBJ. I picked her up with her arm around my neck as I banged her standing up, legs starting to get tired, I dropped her on the bed and proceeded to mish, pounded her hard, unloaded cip. She wiped herself with tissues and proceeded to give me another BBBJ, then went in for cg, she bounced hard on me, unloaded another cip. She wiped off again, the gave HJ and BBBJ with dt, made me blow my load cim. I spent five minutes over the hour total and it was great, considering Shower was skipped before action started. Will repeat for service wise.

Apparently somebody gave her the message. You're welcome.

[Toungsten]

Well, yeah. Nothing you said contradicted what I said. Generating profit is the goal of any business.

The question is how business is done. Is it done in a way to trick you and then strongarm you, or is the business transparent? Ethics are a thing in business. There are mechanisms in legal biz world to prevent consumer from being taken advantage of.

And if someone thinks a company is unethical, it is well within their right to not only not give the company the money, but also to try to get others to not give them money. In our world, it is done through giving bad reviews / minis (as long as they're truthful) or shitting on the org in an active thread such as this one.

My point was that people always say mongers lack control. The reviews are what mongers control fully. The reviews directly affect the biz money. The same orgs become hypocritical and practice double standards with good reviews and bad reviews. They encourage good reviews and then either threaten bl or request that the feedback doesn't go public with bad ones. As a result, many positive reviews might as well be called advertising, because they bring in money. I have no doubt many positive reviews are monetized in some way, shape, or form. Same goes for walking. If the girl looks 40 pounds heavier and 20 years older and you can't get it up for her, you walk and then post publicly on the forum. If your opinion is trusted, that will hit an org where it hurts - $. Good. That's the point. Every monger with just a tiny bit of cred has that power.

Got to love this one. Discussing business ethics with transactions being made on both sides that are unethical and illegal. Living in an upside down world. Let's get back to what this forum is all about. Pussy.

[JoyTraveller]

Nice, high-quality BBFS. From start to finish, high-quality kind of a girl and service to boot.

A little porn-star cuttie. She met me at the door with very scanty black leathers, kind of a dominatrix look, her big beautiful tits in the air and a little black G-string. She is very pretty, reminiscent of Daisy's sweet hotness, and much more pretty in person than in her pictures, even though her pics are quite good (real photos BTW). She's colored her hair to a lighter brown color, which suits her well.

I think she's very pretty, her look kind of characteristic of a traditional Korean or Japanese beauty: big oval eyes, a somewhat sharp nose, and a very delicate mouth. Good LKF / DFK in my opinion.

She took control pretty much from the start of the session like only a pro knows how to do. For example, bathroom, washing hands and doing mouthwash. She kisses me and drops straight to her knees for very nice sloppy BJ. Then ends up hoisting her own left leg up onto the sink, asking for some reciprocity. That quickly went to some doggy.

She was imaginative too. She had us change positions a number of times doing different variations of doggy, so that we could look at one another in different mirrors. That was fucking sweet (in the sense that I had never gotten into mirrors like that).

She was dirty in the sweetest and exhilarating ways. I believe it's called 'Russian' for you pros out there, but her getting on her knees, me sitting on the edge of the bed, and her sandwiching my sword between very nice big natural Cs (I don't know how to estimate tit sizes), and drooling down her own tits before going to town on me, over and over again. I had no idea how good that feels when done correctly. Amen.

Anyway, she was young, very cute, and very good at everything. Highly recommend for you guys wanting that younger, tighter, curvy kind of a body. She is fun and very enthusiastic. Good in bjj, foreplay, and enthusiastically fucking across a whole gambit of positions.

Kgla. Jane is I think is a good booker.

[BuddhaHead]

"Any business" has bbb and yelp reviews and can easily be (and does get) sued for false advertisement.

My initial response was to the claim that there aren't such mechanisms here. It's true, but it doesn't mean mongers don't get control and can't influence money flowing to pocket of offending orgs.

I don't think it's fair to pick and choose when it's convenient to call it "any business" and then turn around and say "but it's illegal" to justify any other transgressions. Either its like any business and hence entitled to same consumer protection mechanisms, or it is not and its a wild wild west.

If any business like a cake business offers me a stale or expired product on the shelf, I'm going to blast both the business and product. In most business I can return this product for a full refund if it was an expired product. And when people find out your cool festival is fyre festival, they going to be mad and will demand refunds. It's natural. Most businesses operate under assumption that customer is always right. Not that the seller is always right and the seller can do whatever it wants to do.

Any business don't have constant threat of bl and encouraging appeasement, explicit suppression of negative feedback and so forth.

Guys forget that this is an illegal / UTR "business" that is not required to follow the usual rules and protocol of regular businesses. Both and business and customer take risks in engaging in transactions. Customers may not like the way the business conducts itself, but that's the way it goes. When the business is also an oligopoly, then that allows the business to have the upper hand. Also, when certain practices are known (e. G. , "tricking" customers with fake pictures, or Bling customers who don't follow their strict rules, unchanging), then customers shouldn't be surprised or start complaining about how these organizations are bad businesses and need to change. As has been pointed out, this is a free market, and customers do not have to use these bookers. If these agencies were not the best deal for the price, then hobbyists would be leaving and going to other sources. Instead, we are seeing an influx of new customers, who want to get in on this.

[RocketManP]

"The reviews have very little effect. The long time providers i.e. 10 years or more may have 300 or 400 reviews. If they have 1,200 customers a year that indicates that reviews reflect less than 3% or less of their business. The superstars and UTRs really have as much business as they want and are quite rich (and also get expensive presents such as Rolex watches and Cartier jewelry from their regulars). The 90 day wonders just work as hard as they can and walk away with much more than they could make in a year in an ordinary job in Korea. There are some providers who are long termers and who are doing well by civilian standards but nothing like the Superstars. They probably would like to have better reviews - e.g. Nuri, Yoona. ".

I agree about established / star providers.

But we were talking about walking, so presumably a new or rebranded entity we have no idea of. We have a great idea of what a superstar who's 5 years deep in the game is and how she looks and how good service is.

The ratio of reviews to visit doesn't matter much. If the first several reviews of a new girl are negative, she is going to get far less business. If this wasn't the case, the orgs wouldn't balk at bad reviews, especially of new / rebranded girls. I know for a fact an agency who upon receiving a bad ter review contacts the monger either by phone or dm demanding to know why they haven't withheld the review. If the reviews didn't matter they wouldn't give a shit. With established providers they don't care as much for a random bad review. For a new provider? Oh yeah they do and if you write that you walked ont on the first day (as long as it was true), it will lose them money. Good.