Rants Raves and Stupid Shit in Seattle.

[Brian Shinamot]

Because they either have fallen in love with a prostitute and he sob story, are prostitutes from TNA who have infiltrated this board to defend bad hooking for outrageous rates, or think that the prostitutes who read this board will see their comments and immediately decide that these cowards deserve better service or discounted rates. Seriously. Any man who advocates for WGs isn't a man. Any man who thinks WGs should be paid hundreds of dollars for covered everything isn't a man he's a cuck. Most importantly any man who would think about paying their hard earned money to have vagina sex with a fat chick is just pathetic. Fat WGs literally exist to do the most degrading things we can imagine to, that's it. If they insist that they won't do anything a man wants really what the fuck is a fat WG good for? I can personally say I've never stuck it in a fat WG's vag just their butthole and mouth.

I bet that these names guys, have not only gotten emotionally attached to providers before, but would openly admit to it, too!

[Brian Shinamot]

I am on EHarmony. I wrote that I believe in mutual respect. I reached out to a woman. She is 41. Here is a paraphrase of her reply to me. Keep in mind, she could have just closed me out, but she wrote this back:

How is your evening? I looked at your profile. You look like trouble. I am too old for trouble, heh.

Because we all have to pay to be on EHarmony, I do not believe that this is a scammer or troll, but I do wonder. For one, that does not sound like a 41 year old woman response. If she thinks she's too old for trouble, then why doesn't she act like it? I expect that kind of reply from a 22 hear old girl. Heh? What the hell is that from a woman over 40?

Second, there is absolutely nothing about my profile that spells trouble. If anything, my profile says boring, uninteresting, not very exciting. Nothing about me would make me stand out, to a woman who has many options.

So, here is what I conclude: Basically, because my profile doesn't say that all women are superior, women are always right, women always wear the pants in every relationship, men need to let women trample all over them, that makes me look like a trouble guy, in her mind.

If I read that a guy got that response from her, heh, I would have thought that this bio read that he likes to party, smoke weed, do drugs, and bed as many women as possible. Believe me, my profile is nothing like that.

And, there are so many simp men, who would agree with this woman, that my boring profile sounds like trouble. The same kind of simp men that are on TNA, and now on this board. This permeates the hobby world, and real life dating.

Oh, and if a 41 year old woman says she's too old for trouble, is she basically saying, that when she was younger, she outright looked for trouble guys?

[Street Troller]

The problem with your reply is that this isn't a dating site. I think this highlights just how confused you really are.

Are you seeing providers simply because you are unable to connect with females in any other way? That sounds like a potential problem in your part.

What's up with all of the pro-abuse incels on this forum lately? Also a lot of alts floating around here in the past several months. I'm not sure a lot of these "reports" are actually valid and real, I think about 20%, at the very least, of what we read here is absolute bullshit. Some of these posts seem to be written by guys who need to inflate their own sense of lacking masculinity. "I wanted to fuck her in the ass, she said "no" so I MADE her do it". That sounds dangerously close to rape. Who gets-off on that? Well, apparently some here do. Now, whether these reports are true or not, well....I think there's a lot of fantasy posted here to make some powerless guys here feel as if they're so-called "real" men.

I don't disagree, that women deserve respect and equality. The problem with women nowadays is, they don't want just respect and equality: They want domination. Nowadays, on a real dating site, if a man says he wants a woman who believes in mutual respect, that is a negative for the women who see that. They want a man who will let her dominate him, and trample on him.

[Brian Shinamot]

Feminist's vision of equality: women get the authority of men, the privileges of women, the accountability of children, and the self-awareness of a fetus.

[Brian Shinamot]

Heather Valentyne.

Had nice man mades. Was young and blonde at the time. She said she got her implants at 19. Probably had a kid at 17, then got implants. Blonde hair and big implants is one common sign of childbirth.

But, her body was flabby. Chin showed flab. The OP for her TER review put Flabby as her body type.

Tahoe Ted wouldn't let her post on TRB, because of her history as an up seller.

Memory Layne.

[RoflCopter22]

Or it could just be that some of us have enough power and respect in our personal and professional lives. We don't feel the need to degrade and piss on a hooker to feel better about what a pathetic, sad little loser boy that you have grown into. You don't want to pay to fuck fat bitches, then don't. I know I wouldn't but I also know that some dudes like to, to each their own.

You keep talking about what a real man does. LMAO. Like you have any idea. You think that a real man goes online and makes posts that reads somewhere between a 13 yrs old hissy fit and a low rent version of Penthouse Forums. Get off the dialup little boy, you're mom needs to make a phone call.

Wow. So you've degraded yourself to calling me broke because I genuinely hate bad prostitute practices. Every prostitute I've talked about here has done what I've experienced and I'm sorry you are upset that they won't do it for you. Hey maybe one of the obese ones you pay $400 to pork with a condom on them cuddle with and bask in their company will finally give you a real hummer, but they probably sense that you're a giant mark and will defend them to your grave.

If you want to compare net worth I'm down, but it's not about that. It's about you defending bad hooking. You defending women who only care about sucking every last dollar out of every man on here which makes you look like a *****. I'm sure every guy no matter how deep down pussy whipped he is by his "ATF" prostitute agrees with me over you. What fucking hooker turned you to the dark side?

[Brian Shinamot]

Or it could just be that some of us have enough power and respect in our personal and professional lives. We don't feel the need to degrade and piss on a hooker to feel better about what a pathetic, sad little loser boy that you have grown into. You don't want to pay to fuck fat bitches, then don't. I know I wouldn't but I also know that some dudes like to, to each their own.

You keep talking about what a real man does. LMAO. Like you have any idea. You think that a real man goes online and makes posts that reads somewhere between a 13 yrs old hissy fit and a low rent version of Penthouse Forums. Get off the dialup little boy, you're mom needs to make a phone call.

I don't disagree, that women deserve respect and equality. The problem with women nowadays is, they don't want just respect and equality: They want domination. Nowadays, on a real dating site, if a man says he wants a woman who believes in mutual respect, that is a negative for the women who see that. They want a man who will let her dominate him, and trample on him.

And, you seem to also believe, that that's the way men should be: Kowtow to women.

[Camhole]

Because they either have fallen in love with a prostitute and he sob story, are prostitutes from TNA who have infiltrated this board to defend bad hooking for outrageous rates, or think that the prostitutes who read this board will see their comments and immediately decide that these cowards deserve better service or discounted rates. Seriously. Any man who advocates for WGs isn't a man. Any man who thinks WGs should be paid hundreds of dollars for covered everything isn't a man he's a cuck. Most importantly any man who would think about paying their hard earned money to have vagina sex with a fat chick is just pathetic. Fat WGs literally exist to do the most degrading things we can imagine to, that's it. If they insist that they won't do anything a man wants really what the fuck is a fat WG good for? I can personally say I've never stuck it in a fat WG's vag just their butthole and mouth.

Or it could just be that some of us have enough power and respect in our personal and professional lives. We don't feel the need to degrade and piss on a hooker to feel better about what a pathetic, sad little loser boy that you have grown into. You don't want to pay to fuck fat bitches, then don't. I know I wouldn't but I also know that some dudes like to, to each their own.

You keep talking about what a real man does. LMAO. Like you have any idea. You think that a real man goes online and makes posts that reads somewhere between a 13 yrs old hissy fit and a low rent version of Penthouse Forums. Get off the dialup little boy, you're mom needs to make a phone call.

[BusSit69]

Let me grab my POPCORN!

[RoflCopter22]

I notice that Lee Groinman, Toomgis, Cameltoe, and Camhole only post, when they have something negative to say to, or about, someone else. Why do you all have to be so aggressive all the time? Why not try to be positive for a change?.

Because they either have fallen in love with a prostitute and he sob story, are prostitutes from TNA who have infiltrated this board to defend bad hooking for outrageous rates, or think that the prostitutes who read this board will see their comments and immediately decide that these cowards deserve better service or discounted rates. Seriously. Any man who advocates for WGs isn't a man. Any man who thinks WGs should be paid hundreds of dollars for covered everything isn't a man he's a cuck. Most importantly any man who would think about paying their hard earned money to have vagina sex with a fat chick is just pathetic. Fat WGs literally exist to do the most degrading things we can imagine to, that's it. If they insist that they won't do anything a man wants really what the fuck is a fat WG good for? I can personally say I've never stuck it in a fat WG's vag just their butthole and mouth.

[MartyByrde]

You miss the very important point that the vast majority of people who own and ride bikes also own motor vehicles and pay all of those taxes. Only in a very simplistic worldview would those two things be mutually exclusive.

And all those taxes don't completely pay for roads. The Federal Highway Trust fund has been losing money since 2008, and has been dependent on periodic donations from the general fund. Similar processes go on at the state and local level. So non gas-tax, non user-fee, and non-toll money are paying for our roads.

You completely missed my point about paying the additional $1450 for that road and bike lanes, in addition to the taxes we already pay for whatever. And yet that a**hole who gave me the finger, yet riding outside the bike lane, did not pay a dime directly at that time, like we needed to.

[SfoDavid67]

This is an oddball request for this place, but I am hopeful. I start my new job in SEA on 3/14. I am trying to find a room to rent within 20 minutes of the airport. If anyone has any intel please PM me.

[Gostz1953]

You do notice how I say bicycles don't pay these taxes. And yes, let's take it to it's logical conclusion. All government funded projects are the peoples. We get rights to vote on what they do with that money. We might not get to trespass at JBLM, but we can vote to defund that whole place. We get to decide what happens through voting. It is ours, all of ours. We, also, get to decide we want to fund it more if the protection it provides makes us safer.

Not missing the point. But you are clearly missing the point, if they are riding their bike instead of driving that they fund less of it. Almost nothing is mutually exclusive, but bicyclists don't put as much money in but yet want more rights to the road. Only a simpleton couldn't see how that works.

That is an interesting philosophy. If you take the idea "I paid taxes for it therefore it is partially mine" to its logical conclusion, doesn't that mean that we can all go down to JBLM and borrow a Stryker for a day? Or an F-15?

You miss the very important point that the vast majority of people who own and ride bikes also own motor vehicles and pay all of those taxes. Only in a very simplistic worldview would those two things be mutually exclusive.

And all those taxes don't completely pay for roads. The Federal Highway Trust fund has been losing money since 2008, and has been dependent on periodic donations from the general fund. Similar processes go on at the state and local level. So non gas-tax, non user-fee, and non-toll money are paying for our roads.

[Brian Shinamot]

https://www.quora.com/Police-officer...-the-situation

Read this.

A FEMALE police officer, 100 percent backed up the HUSBAND in court, in a domestic violence case she witnessed and had to handle and make arrests.

You see, sometimes we need to look at things as "right vs. Wrong," instead of just being PC.

For those of you who think that men are ALWAYS in the wrong, and that women are NEVER wrong, read this link.

I'm taking to you:

Toomgis.

Camhole.

Camel Toe.

Jimmysix.

Lee Groinman.

Michael1967.

Butsit.

AsaMona.

A2.

A12.

Jackson.

Before any of you get mad, look at this objectively, and think about it.

Be fair about things, for the first time in your lives.

[Marko Ramius]

...Bikes don't use gas so can't even fathom how you think they pay for the roads. ... If Walter pays taxes that is partially his lane. Funded by him and his hard work. By a lot of our hard work. If you have the time to ride a bike all around cause you have nothing better to do, go to the fucking forest and out of the way of hard working civilization.

That is an interesting philosophy. If you take the idea "I paid taxes for it therefore it is partially mine" to its logical conclusion, doesn't that mean that we can all go down to JBLM and borrow a Stryker for a day? Or an F-15?

You miss the very important point that the vast majority of people who own and ride bikes also own motor vehicles and pay all of those taxes. Only in a very simplistic worldview would those two things be mutually exclusive.

And all those taxes don't completely pay for roads. The Federal Highway Trust fund has been losing money since 2008, and has been dependent on periodic donations from the general fund. Similar processes go on at the state and local level. So non gas-tax, non user-fee, and non-toll money are paying for our roads.