Rants Raves and Stupid Shit in Seattle.

**Brian Shinamot** · 03-03-22 12:35

Heather Valentyne.

Had nice man mades. Was young and blonde at the time. She said she got her implants at 19. Probably had a kid at 17, then got implants. Blonde hair and big implants is one common sign of childbirth.

But, her body was flabby. Chin showed flab. The OP for her TER review put Flabby as her body type.

Tahoe Ted wouldn't let her post on TRB, because of her history as an up seller.

Memory Layne.

**RoflCopter22** · 03-03-22 07:18

Originally Posted by Camhole [View Original Post]

Or it could just be that some of us have enough power and respect in our personal and professional lives. We don't feel the need to degrade and piss on a hooker to feel better about what a pathetic, sad little loser boy that you have grown into. You don't want to pay to fuck fat bitches, then don't. I know I wouldn't but I also know that some dudes like to, to each their own.

You keep talking about what a real man does. LMAO. Like you have any idea. You think that a real man goes online and makes posts that reads somewhere between a 13 yrs old hissy fit and a low rent version of Penthouse Forums. Get off the dialup little boy, you're mom needs to make a phone call.

Wow. So you've degraded yourself to calling me broke because I genuinely hate bad prostitute practices. Every prostitute I've talked about here has done what I've experienced and I'm sorry you are upset that they won't do it for you. Hey maybe one of the obese ones you pay $400 to pork with a condom on them cuddle with and bask in their company will finally give you a real hummer, but they probably sense that you're a giant mark and will defend them to your grave.

If you want to compare net worth I'm down, but it's not about that. It's about you defending bad hooking. You defending women who only care about sucking every last dollar out of every man on here which makes you look like a *****. I'm sure every guy no matter how deep down pussy whipped he is by his "ATF" prostitute agrees with me over you. What fucking hooker turned you to the dark side?

**Brian Shinamot** · 03-03-22 01:43

Originally Posted by Camhole [View Original Post]

Or it could just be that some of us have enough power and respect in our personal and professional lives. We don't feel the need to degrade and piss on a hooker to feel better about what a pathetic, sad little loser boy that you have grown into. You don't want to pay to fuck fat bitches, then don't. I know I wouldn't but I also know that some dudes like to, to each their own.

You keep talking about what a real man does. LMAO. Like you have any idea. You think that a real man goes online and makes posts that reads somewhere between a 13 yrs old hissy fit and a low rent version of Penthouse Forums. Get off the dialup little boy, you're mom needs to make a phone call.

I don't disagree, that women deserve respect and equality. The problem with women nowadays is, they don't want just respect and equality: They want domination. Nowadays, on a real dating site, if a man says he wants a woman who believes in mutual respect, that is a negative for the women who see that. They want a man who will let her dominate him, and trample on him.

And, you seem to also believe, that that's the way men should be: Kowtow to women.

**Camhole** · 03-03-22 00:53

Originally Posted by RoflCopter22 [View Original Post]

Because they either have fallen in love with a prostitute and he sob story, are prostitutes from TNA who have infiltrated this board to defend bad hooking for outrageous rates, or think that the prostitutes who read this board will see their comments and immediately decide that these cowards deserve better service or discounted rates. Seriously. Any man who advocates for WGs isn't a man. Any man who thinks WGs should be paid hundreds of dollars for covered everything isn't a man he's a cuck. Most importantly any man who would think about paying their hard earned money to have vagina sex with a fat chick is just pathetic. Fat WGs literally exist to do the most degrading things we can imagine to, that's it. If they insist that they won't do anything a man wants really what the fuck is a fat WG good for? I can personally say I've never stuck it in a fat WG's vag just their butthole and mouth.

Or it could just be that some of us have enough power and respect in our personal and professional lives. We don't feel the need to degrade and piss on a hooker to feel better about what a pathetic, sad little loser boy that you have grown into. You don't want to pay to fuck fat bitches, then don't. I know I wouldn't but I also know that some dudes like to, to each their own.

You keep talking about what a real man does. LMAO. Like you have any idea. You think that a real man goes online and makes posts that reads somewhere between a 13 yrs old hissy fit and a low rent version of Penthouse Forums. Get off the dialup little boy, you're mom needs to make a phone call.

**BusSit69** · 03-02-22 19:43

Let me grab my POPCORN!

**RoflCopter22** · 03-02-22 18:53

Originally Posted by KeatsAiken [View Original Post]

I notice that Lee Groinman, Toomgis, Cameltoe, and Camhole only post, when they have something negative to say to, or about, someone else. Why do you all have to be so aggressive all the time? Why not try to be positive for a change?.

Because they either have fallen in love with a prostitute and he sob story, are prostitutes from TNA who have infiltrated this board to defend bad hooking for outrageous rates, or think that the prostitutes who read this board will see their comments and immediately decide that these cowards deserve better service or discounted rates. Seriously. Any man who advocates for WGs isn't a man. Any man who thinks WGs should be paid hundreds of dollars for covered everything isn't a man he's a cuck. Most importantly any man who would think about paying their hard earned money to have vagina sex with a fat chick is just pathetic. Fat WGs literally exist to do the most degrading things we can imagine to, that's it. If they insist that they won't do anything a man wants really what the fuck is a fat WG good for? I can personally say I've never stuck it in a fat WG's vag just their butthole and mouth.

**MartyByrde** · 03-02-22 18:08

Originally Posted by MarkoRamius [View Original Post]

You miss the very important point that the vast majority of people who own and ride bikes also own motor vehicles and pay all of those taxes. Only in a very simplistic worldview would those two things be mutually exclusive.

And all those taxes don't completely pay for roads. The Federal Highway Trust fund has been losing money since 2008, and has been dependent on periodic donations from the general fund. Similar processes go on at the state and local level. So non gas-tax, non user-fee, and non-toll money are paying for our roads.

You completely missed my point about paying the additional $1450 for that road and bike lanes, in addition to the taxes we already pay for whatever. And yet that a**hole who gave me the finger, yet riding outside the bike lane, did not pay a dime directly at that time, like we needed to.

**SfoDavid67** · 03-02-22 14:35

This is an oddball request for this place, but I am hopeful. I start my new job in SEA on 3/14. I am trying to find a room to rent within 20 minutes of the airport. If anyone has any intel please PM me.

**Gostz1953** · 03-02-22 13:43

You do notice how I say bicycles don't pay these taxes. And yes, let's take it to it's logical conclusion. All government funded projects are the peoples. We get rights to vote on what they do with that money. We might not get to trespass at JBLM, but we can vote to defund that whole place. We get to decide what happens through voting. It is ours, all of ours. We, also, get to decide we want to fund it more if the protection it provides makes us safer.

Not missing the point. But you are clearly missing the point, if they are riding their bike instead of driving that they fund less of it. Almost nothing is mutually exclusive, but bicyclists don't put as much money in but yet want more rights to the road. Only a simpleton couldn't see how that works.

Originally Posted by MarkoRamius [View Original Post]

That is an interesting philosophy. If you take the idea "I paid taxes for it therefore it is partially mine" to its logical conclusion, doesn't that mean that we can all go down to JBLM and borrow a Stryker for a day? Or an F-15?

You miss the very important point that the vast majority of people who own and ride bikes also own motor vehicles and pay all of those taxes. Only in a very simplistic worldview would those two things be mutually exclusive.

And all those taxes don't completely pay for roads. The Federal Highway Trust fund has been losing money since 2008, and has been dependent on periodic donations from the general fund. Similar processes go on at the state and local level. So non gas-tax, non user-fee, and non-toll money are paying for our roads.

**Brian Shinamot** · 03-02-22 13:03

https://www.quora.com/Police-officer...-the-situation

Read this.

A FEMALE police officer, 100 percent backed up the HUSBAND in court, in a domestic violence case she witnessed and had to handle and make arrests.

You see, sometimes we need to look at things as "right vs. Wrong," instead of just being PC.

For those of you who think that men are ALWAYS in the wrong, and that women are NEVER wrong, read this link.

I'm taking to you:

Toomgis.

Camhole.

Camel Toe.

Jimmysix.

Lee Groinman.

Michael1967.

Butsit.

AsaMona.

A2.

A12.

Jackson.

Before any of you get mad, look at this objectively, and think about it.

Be fair about things, for the first time in your lives.

**Marko Ramius** · 03-02-22 11:17

Originally Posted by Gostz1953 [View Original Post]

...Bikes don't use gas so can't even fathom how you think they pay for the roads. ... If Walter pays taxes that is partially his lane. Funded by him and his hard work. By a lot of our hard work. If you have the time to ride a bike all around cause you have nothing better to do, go to the fucking forest and out of the way of hard working civilization.

That is an interesting philosophy. If you take the idea "I paid taxes for it therefore it is partially mine" to its logical conclusion, doesn't that mean that we can all go down to JBLM and borrow a Stryker for a day? Or an F-15?

You miss the very important point that the vast majority of people who own and ride bikes also own motor vehicles and pay all of those taxes. Only in a very simplistic worldview would those two things be mutually exclusive.

And all those taxes don't completely pay for roads. The Federal Highway Trust fund has been losing money since 2008, and has been dependent on periodic donations from the general fund. Similar processes go on at the state and local level. So non gas-tax, non user-fee, and non-toll money are paying for our roads.

**Brian Shinamot** · 03-02-22 00:16

Originally Posted by Camhole [View Original Post]

You do realize that you arguing with a guy that got banned from the TV Guide website for arguing in the comment section.

Why do more than half of your posts seem to be about playing Whack A Mole, calling out people for making another alt? Most of your contributions should be related to the hobby, rather than criticizing other people.

**Gostz1953** · 03-02-22 00:15

This is very untrue. Cars and trucks don't do 100% of the damage to roads. Weather contributes a ton to that. Look what heat waves do to cement and bridges. Fuel taxes are top 5 in the country in WA state. Bikes don't use gas so can't even fathom how you think they pay for the roads. RE taxes heavily go to Fire Departments, Police and schools. Not hard to find if you know how to google. Link to Department of Revenue Website pie chart explaining this here.

https://dor.wa.gov/sites/default/fil...ax/homeown.pdf

Vehicle tabs (again something a bicyclists don't pay for) fund other road projects as well as alternative forms of transportation like the light rail. Excise taxes for trucking businesses etc. pay for road projects. Shoot all the business owners pay for these taxes as well. Wonder how your bikes will get transported here without. Wait for it. Vehicles. How will your kids go to school without. Wait for it. Busses. The whole world runs on vehicles that use gas. The bicyclist is just too dense to realize that their self righteousness doesn't pay for shit. Shoot Seattle has an extra. 3% sales tax on vehicle purchases that go to the roads. Guess what, your bicyle purchase doesn't come with an extra. 3% tax when you buy it. The list goes on. Take vehicles away and all these businesses shut down. Vehicles subsidize your entire being. You ain't getting shit from Amazon online orders without the use of a vehicle. All businesses pretty much would shut down without the heavy lifting by the cars. BTW, don't argue back. I do taxes for a living. You will just look silly. If Walter pays taxes that is partially his lane. Funded by him and his hard work. By a lot of our hard work. If you have the time to ride a bike all around cause you have nothing better to do, go to the fucking forest and out of the way of hard working civilization. Don't get in our way and slow us down to your level. Most of us have shit to do. Cause we got to make enough to subsidize the weak as bike riders and our own shit we want.

Originally Posted by EngrJoe [View Original Post]

It's not YOUR lane and there is no requirement to use a bike lane in this state. All users pay property taxes either directly or through rent and it's your motor vehicle use that is subsidized. Cars and trucks do 100% percent of the damage but only contribute an extra 2-4% in vehicle taxes for city and county roads. State gas tax allocated to cities must be used for roads.

**Camhole** · 03-01-22 23:35

Originally Posted by EngrJoe [View Original Post]

It's not YOUR lane and there is no requirement to use a bike lane in this state. All users pay property taxes either directly or through rent and it's your motor vehicle use that is subsidized. Cars and trucks do 100% percent of the damage but only contribute an extra 2-4% in vehicle taxes for city and county roads. State gas tax allocated to cities must be used for roads.

You do realize that you arguing with a guy that got banned from the TV Guide website for arguing in the comment section.

**MartyByrde** · 03-01-22 19:59

Originally Posted by EngrJoe [View Original Post]

It's not YOUR lane and there is no requirement to use a bike lane in this state. All users pay property taxes either directly or through rent and it's your motor vehicle use that is subsidized. Cars and trucks do 100% percent of the damage but only contribute an extra 2-4% in vehicle taxes for city and county roads. State gas tax allocated to cities must be used for roads.

Yes, it is not my lane, but I PAID the $1450 over and above all the taxes, etc. For the improvement, including the bicycle lane. Hence, I am correct in expecting bicyclists to use the lane and stay out of my car lane. And that bicyclist is definitely causing issues doing that. It is only a 2 lane road, and at that part (actually along the entire road), it is illegal to cross that line and enter the other lane. But I guess that bicyclist (and obviously others) who cannot exercise maturity or common sense. Plus, I'll say it again: his 2 buddies Were in the bicycle lane.