Sugarbabies?

**MattChavan23** · 02-17-22 01:05

Originally Posted by RickMann [View Original Post]

What a great opportunity for someone to start a site like the old "SA" would be a gold mine.

Guys pussymarket is one othe world's oldest profession and its not going to go anywhere until mankind exists, it will change platforms / avenues / stores as change is always name of this game. In my last 15 years of mongering, I / we have seen several websites come and disappear but market is there and will exist. Where there is demand there will always be supply. Maybe in future, some smart dude (like myself, LOL) will figure out how to use Metaverse or any other verse to feel the tightness of pussy and warmth of mouth virtually before actually pounding and paying for it and will soon become the next American billionaire like Brandon W did,. Platform will change, business will still be there. Keep hunting guys, don't be discouraged and change with changing times.

**RickMann** · 02-16-22 05:28

Originally Posted by WanderingAbout [View Original Post]

Just FYI there is a good bit of chatter in the Chicago Arrangements forum about Seeking's re-imaging attempt if you want to stroll over there for a look-see and not duplicate post info here. Nothing you don't already know.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...gement-Reports

What a great opportunity for someone to start a site like the old "SA" would be a gold mine.

**WanderingAbout** · 02-16-22 01:13

Originally Posted by Decatur21 [View Original Post]

It appears that seeking is rebranding as a dating site but I don't see anything different. Everything looks the same as before.

Just FYI there is a good bit of chatter in the Chicago Arrangements forum about Seeking's re-imaging attempt if you want to stroll over there for a look-see and not duplicate post info here. Nothing you don't already know.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...gement-Reports

**Vinnie Kramer** · 02-15-22 16:20

The way I ready the actual statement is that only Switter is shutting down.

I'll put the rest in Rants.

Originally Posted by RogerOver [View Original Post]

Tryst is closing too. Maybe that will help with the automatic $200 price bumps when they post ads there.

"In a statement on Monday, Assembly Foura collective of sex workers and technologists who run Switter, as well as advertising site Tryst would shut down permanently on March 14. ".

Switter, the Twitter for Sex Workers, Is Shutting Down

**RegulatorD** · 02-15-22 15:36

Of course its not as good as the old days, BUT there is still new talent to find, just more drama, scams, fake, on and on. Been on SA for years and I keep a nice stable of talent, a few I've known for years, and to me that's the key, and then every now in the then I zip back on for a month, and EVERYTIME I still find at least 1 or 2 and make it worth my time. If you think now you can just open an account and blast thru 10 girls in a month or whatever, not saying its impossible, but the probability is lower now, then say a few years ago.

**Decatur21** · 02-15-22 13:24

It appears that seeking is rebranding as a dating site but I don't see anything different. Everything looks the same as before.

**RogerOver** · 02-15-22 11:19

Originally Posted by TickleJay [View Original Post]

Very true, and due to some of that govt bs, switter is closing, it was announced.

Tryst is closing too. Maybe that will help with the automatic $200 price bumps when they post ads there.

"In a statement on Monday, Assembly Foura collective of sex workers and technologists who run Switter, as well as advertising site Tryst would shut down permanently on March 14. ".

Switter, the Twitter for Sex Workers, Is Shutting Down

**MKimball** · 02-15-22 09:04

Originally Posted by Mikse [View Original Post]

Newb question: it seems like all of the posts here focus on seeking arrangements. Does anyone here use secret benefits? I like the verified feature they have but is there a downside that site?

The selection on SB was impressive at first. I worked to connect with a few before paying using their profile clues. I was getting nowhere.

Then a woman I knew sent me a message. I reached out to her directly and asked if she meant to write me there. She said she hadn't.

The site generates a lot of fake messages and photo access invitations so guys use up lots of credits. I decided not to put any money into that machine and closed my account.

I also got in contact with another woman from there. She'd given up on it a long time ago. The site made her appear active.

Maybe some are real, but I decided the value wasn't there for me.

**Tickle Jay** · 02-15-22 05:04

Originally Posted by Decatur21 [View Original Post]

Although Seeking is changing I don't think it is all their fault. The government is cracking down on the language used on sites like this. The whole paying for sex is a big no no. Also credit card companies are having a bigger say on what sites can use their services. And Pornhub are 2 sites recently that were targeted.

Unfortunately Seeking is by far the best option right now. It will change even more as time goes on and they crack down on things more. All the dating sites are going through this. Try signing up for any of them and put "sugar baby" or "arrangement" in your profile and you get a lifetime ban by the end of the day.

Very true, and due to some of that govt bs, switter is closing, it was announced.

**MattChavan23** · 02-15-22 01:53

Originally Posted by ToddCincy [View Original Post]

Given that Seeking is become an increasingly unfriendly platform, this warrants a post of its own.

When I first got into sugar dating about 10 years ago, I started with sugar daddy for me. I had very good success on it.

Then seeking arrangements basically took over the market. All the girls left SugarDaddy for me, and went over to seeking.

I just looked on SugarDaddy for me. There does seem to be some profiles on there, but I'm not sure how legit they are.

Has anyone used sugar daddy for me in the recent past? It used to be a very good site. But this was, as I said, about 10 years ago.

I had used SDM a year back. You are not losing anything as most chicks that are on SDM are on seeking as well. It's cheap at 59.99 and best thing about it is they have 3 day moneyback guarantee if you are unsatisfied customer and cancel before 3 days by emailing customer service. I was able to get few numbers and sent my snap to truckload of chicks before canceling right at 3 days mark and got my money back successfully. Unfortunately most chicks contacted were wayy too curvy and out of my league, so it didn't work and I never tried again. It has very limited selection and operates on similar platform like Tinder I. E. Swipe left and right crap and you deal with scammers and pic sellers there as well. I heard it works well in big cities but mid / small tier cities have very limited selection and most chicks don't even bother to check messages on there. Other good thing is it has location tracker, so it shows actual gps location I. E city / county of profile in case someone is faking location it's easy to figure out, from what I saw. Hope that helps.

**Joe999** · 02-14-22 14:16

Originally Posted by ToddCincy [View Original Post]

Given that Seeking is become an increasingly unfriendly platform, this warrants a post of its own.

When I first got into sugar dating about 10 years ago, I started with sugar daddy for me. I had very good success on it.

Then seeking arrangements basically took over the market. All the girls left SugarDaddy for me, and went over to seeking.

I just looked on SugarDaddy for me. There does seem to be some profiles on there, but I'm not sure how legit they are.

Has anyone used sugar daddy for me in the recent past? It used to be a very good site. But this was, as I said, about 10 years ago.

I've been away from isurgardaddy for me for several months since it switched over to Seeking. Sucked because you could find some out there every once in a while. Good luck hunting.

**Mikse** · 02-14-22 13:31

Newb question: it seems like all of the posts here focus on seeking arrangements. Does anyone here use secret benefits? I like the verified feature they have but is there a downside that site?

**Decatur21** · 02-14-22 13:18

Although Seeking is changing I don't think it is all their fault. The government is cracking down on the language used on sites like this. The whole paying for sex is a big no no. Also credit card companies are having a bigger say on what sites can use their services. And Pornhub are 2 sites recently that were targeted.

Unfortunately Seeking is by far the best option right now. It will change even more as time goes on and they crack down on things more. All the dating sites are going through this. Try signing up for any of them and put "sugar baby" or "arrangement" in your profile and you get a lifetime ban by the end of the day.

Originally Posted by ToddCincy [View Original Post]

If you got the email, this all about Brandon Wade finding true love.

I remember back in the old days (circa 2011), it wasn't just seeking. There was also sugardaddyforme and sugardaddie-dot-com.

At the time, Seeking (then Seeking Arrangements) was the best of the bunch, and became the market leader.

Things have changed. I would say that Seeking's position is "ripe for disruption" as they say. It is rapidly becoming as pretentious as Match or eHarmony, and as scam-ridden as Ashley Madison or Friendfinder.

**Todd Cincy** · 02-14-22 09:08

Given that Seeking is become an increasingly unfriendly platform, this warrants a post of its own.

When I first got into sugar dating about 10 years ago, I started with sugar daddy for me. I had very good success on it.

Then seeking arrangements basically took over the market. All the girls left SugarDaddy for me, and went over to seeking.

I just looked on SugarDaddy for me. There does seem to be some profiles on there, but I'm not sure how legit they are.

Has anyone used sugar daddy for me in the recent past? It used to be a very good site. But this was, as I said, about 10 years ago.

**Todd Cincy** · 02-14-22 08:59

Originally Posted by WanderingAbout [View Original Post]

We launched in 2006 at Seeking, the premier dating website for sugar babies and sugar daddies. As times have changed, so have we. We welcome anyone looking for a premium online dating experience. Our continuing mission at Seeking is to help members find relationship success by providing a platform that encourages honesty between partners. Seeking members are sophisticated individuals who wish to date attractive and successful people in a way that goes beyond typical social dating traditions and trends.

Seeking's attempt to project itself as a sophisticated dating site for the elite and encourage honesty (amongst all the scammers) is like putting paint on a pig.

If you got the email, this all about Brandon Wade finding true love.

I remember back in the old days (circa 2011), it wasn't just seeking. There was also sugardaddyforme and sugardaddie-dot-com.

At the time, Seeking (then Seeking Arrangements) was the best of the bunch, and became the market leader.

Things have changed. I would say that Seeking's position is "ripe for disruption" as they say. It is rapidly becoming as pretentious as Match or eHarmony, and as scam-ridden as Ashley Madison or Friendfinder.