Korean Agency BB

[Member #6292]

Recently have been booking through CG and in my opinion, she is probably the best to book through in regards to communication and other general correspondences.

Saw Maxii, Ring, Suzy and must say that all three are on the higher end in terms of looks. I would re-visit even if they raised their prices. Probably unfair that they are receiving the same amount as other girls.

Great experiences all throughout the booking / visit process. I've experienced other agencies / bookers in LA so glad to have found a reliable one such as CG.

Hope everyone enjoys the weekend.

True, I've never had any problems with CG booker or booking a Kgirl. With options at KPL and SFK like Daisy, Helena (gone), Remi, Jean, Dana and a couple other girls. 440 for BBFS with msog is ridiculous that CG is asking for! For that much I rather see the BBFS hX girls with QOD.

[AL9822]

Recently have been booking through CG and in my opinion, she is probably the best to book through in regards to communication and other general correspondences.

Saw Maxii, Ring, Suzy and must say that all three are on the higher end in terms of looks. I would re-visit even if they raised their prices. Probably unfair that they are receiving the same amount as other girls.

Great experiences all throughout the booking / visit process. I've experienced other agencies / bookers in LA so glad to have found a reliable one such as CG.

Hope everyone enjoys the weekend.

[Toungsten]

I can understand the sentiment of not wanting to crowd the kgirl space with new mongers. It will make it even more difficult to book good girls and horrendous to book popular girls. Everyone, including myself, has experienced this. But I also attribute the difficulty to the fact that the quality and number of good kgirls has drastically dipped in recent years. As a prime example, even in Megan's heyday it wasn't particularly difficult to book her because of a good selection of contemporary talent that help dilute that demand. Compare that to booking Hana, Ara, Subi, most of the PKL roster of late and you can see that quality and quantity has dropped all around. Mongers have flocked to these tiny pockets of talent and supply and demand being what it is, we get a clusterfuck of fully booked girls and blue balled mongers.

If the bar you set to distinguish between an idiot and legit monger is knowing what is needed for screening and getting cleared properly then it is an extremely low bar you have established. That information is readily available here, on other forums, and even by the booker themselves if you text without it and they are in need of new mongers. As I've mentioned before on another post, that single step in helping a newcomer know where to look has an almost inconsequential affect on whether he gets cleared or not. That will depend on what references he has already, what he's willing to disclose, or a combination of the two.

I will say that the issue you have in regard to newcomers coming in with no references or information provided and seeing only popular girls is a non-issue. No competent booker in their right mind should ever consider such a monger. It risks the girls, other mongers, the booker, and the entire agency. If such an agency exists, they should be blacklisted by mongers. The only case where I can see this happen is if they are vouched in by a regular of that agency. But at that point, even if he is completely new, the regular should clearly inform him of what the expectations, rules, and etiquette are because it will reflect heavily on his standing with said agency depending how this newcomer acts.

I'm not sure how the behavior of new mongers have become my responsibility. For one, let's not kid ourselves, mongers behaving stupidly who should know better have existed long before my entry into this space. Secondly, we're all adults here. As such, personal agency and understanding how to appropriately conduct oneself when engaging in this hobby should be a pre-requisite. But those are ideal cases and the spectrum of mongers coming in is essentially infinite. The perspective of a new monger can vary wildly. There are those that go it alone, don't read up etiquette, and aren't aware or don't care that their behavior draws attention to themselves and may have an impact on the hobby. And then there are those with enough self awareness to understand that this hobby isn't legal, read up on do's and don'ts, and take appropriate precautions. No one, even bookers, have control of those actions. It's falls upon personal responsibility. That's why I advocate helping the new guys, point them to good places to read kgirl SOP, etiquette, how best to put yourself forward in screening and when seeing the girl. It's much more likely to keep the hobby safer than letting them run rampant trying to figure it on their own and that's if they have the motivation to begin with. Like it or not, there will always be an influx of new mongers coming into the kgirl scene.

I don't know what all the fuss is about. These girls are advertised on websites with contact information. If someone wants to make an appointment all he has to do is call or text the number or if there is an email address send an email. The booker will respond or not. I wouldn't give my recommendation to anyone and if they used my handle I'm sure the booker would check with me. They have a system and that system works 99% of the time with very, very few exceptions. If bookers didn't want new business they wouldn't advertise the girls and we don't have to worry about it.

[Bastard Chorum]

I think we can all agree that the more participants there are in the hobby, the chances of a psycho monger will inherently increase. That is simply how math works. The girls are obviously not hurting for business. Even the upsell BB girls are hard to book now (at least the popular ones). I think what CI is getting at is that we don't need to rock the boat and facilitate to make it easier for idiot mongers to get cleared. If these mongers are legit mongers, they will know what they need to do for screening and get cleared properly.

The issue is with the mongers who come in and have no references whatsoever and want to get cleared without having to give any references or information to provide assurances and then expecting to book only the popular girls. That is something I can't really agree with, everyone should have to earn their stripes. All the seasoned mongers know what I'm talking about.

I'm not sure how many times I've seen newbie mongers standing around the front of a k-girl incall by the intercom with their phone out, pacing around. This presents the obvious concerns about protecting the hobby. Can we expect all these new people you're trying to bring into the hobby to behave accordingly and be smart about how they participate? Just food for thought.

I can understand the sentiment of not wanting to crowd the kgirl space with new mongers. It will make it even more difficult to book good girls and horrendous to book popular girls. Everyone, including myself, has experienced this. But I also attribute the difficulty to the fact that the quality and number of good kgirls has drastically dipped in recent years. As a prime example, even in Megan's heyday it wasn't particularly difficult to book her because of a good selection of contemporary talent that help dilute that demand. Compare that to booking Hana, Ara, Subi, most of the PKL roster of late and you can see that quality and quantity has dropped all around. Mongers have flocked to these tiny pockets of talent and supply and demand being what it is, we get a clusterfuck of fully booked girls and blue balled mongers.

If the bar you set to distinguish between an idiot and legit monger is knowing what is needed for screening and getting cleared properly then it is an extremely low bar you have established. That information is readily available here, on other forums, and even by the booker themselves if you text without it and they are in need of new mongers. As I've mentioned before on another post, that single step in helping a newcomer know where to look has an almost inconsequential affect on whether he gets cleared or not. That will depend on what references he has already, what he's willing to disclose, or a combination of the two.

I will say that the issue you have in regard to newcomers coming in with no references or information provided and seeing only popular girls is a non-issue. No competent booker in their right mind should ever consider such a monger. It risks the girls, other mongers, the booker, and the entire agency. If such an agency exists, they should be blacklisted by mongers. The only case where I can see this happen is if they are vouched in by a regular of that agency. But at that point, even if he is completely new, the regular should clearly inform him of what the expectations, rules, and etiquette are because it will reflect heavily on his standing with said agency depending how this newcomer acts.

I'm not sure how the behavior of new mongers have become my responsibility. For one, let's not kid ourselves, mongers behaving stupidly who should know better have existed long before my entry into this space. Secondly, we're all adults here. As such, personal agency and understanding how to appropriately conduct oneself when engaging in this hobby should be a pre-requisite. But those are ideal cases and the spectrum of mongers coming in is essentially infinite. The perspective of a new monger can vary wildly. There are those that go it alone, don't read up etiquette, and aren't aware or don't care that their behavior draws attention to themselves and may have an impact on the hobby. And then there are those with enough self awareness to understand that this hobby isn't legal, read up on do's and don'ts, and take appropriate precautions. No one, even bookers, have control of those actions. It's falls upon personal responsibility. That's why I advocate helping the new guys, point them to good places to read kgirl SOP, etiquette, how best to put yourself forward in screening and when seeing the girl. It's much more likely to keep the hobby safer than letting them run rampant trying to figure it on their own and that's if they have the motivation to begin with. Like it or not, there will always be an influx of new mongers coming into the kgirl scene.

[DaddyChill]

That's a substantial height difference between what M lists compared to the other 2. Could be a typo. Gray using fake pictures is expected so who knows who is behind the door but considering that M and CGLA seem to be sharing different pictures of the same set, the likelihood that it's the same girl is high for M and CGLA.

It's unfortunate we don't have more people that TOFFT and posts reviews. New starlets will get deluged with business cause of those TOFFT review (s) but I'm positive more goes undiscovered that certainly warrant the same attention but didn't because there were no reviews.

If anyone wants to donate me their $300 I'd glady take one for the team. Mickey from M for is really resonating with me that that was the Mickey from PKL that I had a really disappointing time with. Her face on the first photo closely resembles the PKL Mickey I saw in person.

[Bastard Chorum]

When I posted about the "new" girls at M, I was curious about Sica. It seems Bookergray has her as Sicca (noticed the extra C, not sure if it's on purpose or a typo). Someone mentioned she went by Jessica and used fake pictures. It seems no one has tried her yet and she's on the cheaper end price point which in my experience tends to be an older one and they know this and charge accordingly. I hope I got it right with the names and possibly the right girl, I hate this annoying nonsense to reinvent themselves as "new" girls.

M's Sica.

https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf

Sicca at Bookergray.

https://bookergray.com/bbs/board.php..._mw&wr_id=2639 (Fake pictures indicated by someone esle).

CandgirlsLA's Jessie.

https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4

I tried a reverse image search and nothing came up. I tried searching the board under Jessica, Jessie, Sica and no reports so it looks like no one has seen her under these names. I'm half tempted to TOFT.

That's a substantial height difference between what M lists compared to the other 2. Could be a typo. Gray using fake pictures is expected so who knows who is behind the door but considering that M and CGLA seem to be sharing different pictures of the same set, the likelihood that it's the same girl is high for M and CGLA.

It's unfortunate we don't have more people that TOFFT and posts reviews. New starlets will get deluged with business cause of those TOFFT review (s) but I'm positive more goes undiscovered that certainly warrant the same attention but didn't because there were no reviews.

[LaoneBug]

Thinking about seeing one of these two when I visit OC this week but just cannot decide.

Saw Mio when she was in LA back to 2019 but now sure how she looks now but cannot find her recent information.

Yuna has a nice review but the buggy eyes scared me a little.

Just want to see who would you guys recommend.

Thanks a lot guys.

[Toungsten]

M. Viki, Allie, Stella (WLA). Miki, Sica. (MW).

https://preciousklove.escortbook.com/ Eunji, Ami, Josie, Nicole. (WLA). Remi, Daisy (MW). .

http://www.kgla.net/ Eunji, Ami, Josie, Nicole. (WLA) Remi, Daisy (MW). .

Sexy Angels. https://sexyangels.site/.................

SFK. https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/ Dana, Viki, Tiana. WLA.

[WillardJ]

Again, I wouldn't lay offense to out of towners just because they are out of towners. No one has provided concrete proof that it was or wasn't. It's disingenuous to point fingers when we don't know the facts.

I'm not sure what screening would be enough to sniff out bad actors like this. The current system no ways addresses this as everyone whose gone vetting knows. And to pivot to measures that do would scare away business of all but incredibly dedicated and die hard kgirl fans.

I think we can all agree that the more participants there are in the hobby, the chances of a psycho monger will inherently increase. That is simply how math works. The girls are obviously not hurting for business. Even the upsell BB girls are hard to book now (at least the popular ones). I think what CI is getting at is that we don't need to rock the boat and facilitate to make it easier for idiot mongers to get cleared. If these mongers are legit mongers, they will know what they need to do for screening and get cleared properly.

The issue is with the mongers who come in and have no references whatsoever and want to get cleared without having to give any references or information to provide assurances and then expecting to book only the popular girls. That is something I can't really agree with, everyone should have to earn their stripes. All the seasoned mongers know what I'm talking about.

I'm not sure how many times I've seen newbie mongers standing around the front of a k-girl incall by the intercom with their phone out, pacing around. This presents the obvious concerns about protecting the hobby. Can we expect all these new people you're trying to bring into the hobby to behave accordingly and be smart about how they participate? Just food for thought.

[Toungsten]

YMMV and everyone has their opinion. I am just making my plea anyways, just in case someone here has any sway with the k-org "bosses" or whoever selects and markets talent for employment in the LA area.

Point of information. The bookers rarely if ever see the girls. They go by what they are told by the org or by the customers.

[IAmGib1]

I'm not sure if bookers have much choice in the type of girls that are willing to get fucked by a bunch of Western mongers. If they have any choices, I personally appreciate the diversity. Petite or tall, I'm happy as long as their face, curves, and attitude are of quality. Some of them have been very enjoyable for me at least. (PKL Tiny, Teenie, Miso, Peach3).

YMMV and everyone has their opinion. I am just making my plea anyways, just in case someone here has any sway with the k-org "bosses" or whoever selects and markets talent for employment in the LA area.

[Majieroero]

Maybe it's just me but is there an invasion of height challenged kgirls in LA? Are they same girls rebranded then advertised at different agencies and with different pics?

You bookers and agencies reading this. Please get more kgirls 5'3"and taller!

Everyone has their taste but I personally prefer women that are taller than 5 foot. I see 4'9", 4' 11" popping up everywhere. Are they being imported on purpose or that is it just coincidence?

I'm not sure if bookers have much choice in the type of girls that are willing to get fucked by a bunch of Western mongers. If they have any choices, I personally appreciate the diversity. Petite or tall, I'm happy as long as their face, curves, and attitude are of quality. Some of them have been very enjoyable for me at least. (PKL Tiny, Teenie, Miso, Peach3).

[JohnPot]

Man, just glanced at the title, I though you complained the 40's MILF aunties invasion that have been happened lately. To me, 4'9, 4'11, Midget. NO PROBLEM.

Maybe it's just me but is there an invasion of height challenged kgirls in LA? Are they same girls rebranded then advertised at different agencies and with different pics?

You bookers and agencies reading this. Please get more kgirls 5'3"and taller!

Everyone has their taste but I personally prefer women that are taller than 5 foot. I see 4'9", 4' 11" popping up everywhere. Are they being imported on purpose or that is it just coincidence?

[Jack926]

When I posted about the "new" girls at M, I was curious about Sica. It seems Bookergray has her as Sicca (noticed the extra C, not sure if it's on purpose or a typo). Someone mentioned she went by Jessica and used fake pictures. It seems no one has tried her yet and she's on the cheaper end price point which in my experience tends to be an older one and they know this and charge accordingly. I hope I got it right with the names and possibly the right girl, I hate this annoying nonsense to reinvent themselves as "new" girls.

M's Sica.

https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf

Sicca at Bookergray.

https://bookergray.com/bbs/board.php..._mw&wr_id=2639 (Fake pictures indicated by someone esle).

CandgirlsLA's Jessie.

https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4

I tried a reverse image search and nothing came up. I tried searching the board under Jessica, Jessie, Sica and no reports so it looks like no one has seen her under these names. I'm half tempted to TOFT.

She is SMART-Look at her RATE at BookerGray.

* Sicca Rate.

30 min / 240 roses.

30 min B /340 roses.

1 hr / 300 roses.

2 shots / 340 roses.

B / 320 roses * (Cheaper).

B2 / 360 roses.

30 minutes appointment is more expensive than 60 minutes appointment and that means she realized that for $20 less, she will not get cum dumped every 30 minutes.

[PurpleMan07]

Saw NAV Pearl, and have no clue if she was the SA Sarah I saw in WLA like a year ago.

I asked about WLA and she said yea, but then asked if she was Sarah and she said "No, Pearl!

Could you report your experience with NAV pearl?