Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 23,926 to 23,940 of 50206
-
01-28-22 03:06 #26281Senior Member

Posts: 1834Again, I wouldn't lay offense to out of towners just because they are out of towners. No one has provided concrete proof that it was or wasn't. It's disingenuous to point fingers when we don't know the facts.
Originally Posted by CreamInside
[View Original Post]
I'm not sure what screening would be enough to sniff out bad actors like this. The current system no ways addresses this as everyone whose gone vetting knows. And to pivot to measures that do would scare away business of all but incredibly dedicated and die hard kgirl fans.
-
01-28-22 02:51 #26280Senior Member

Posts: 1834I'm not sure what you have against out of towners to be so biased against their inclusion to be screened. Whether a potential client is worthwhile to screen or not will fall onto each booker / agencies' requirements and their particular situation. There's no telling where or when a bad apple will appear but all else being equal, the likelihood of one being an out of towner or a local is the same. Being a local or out of towner does not inherently make you a bad apple. Furthermore, there's theoretically a higher chance of a bad apple appearing in the local client pool than out of towners due the sheer numbers involved. Screening isn't perfect and not up to the task of evaluating how a monger will act so there will be a few who fall through the cracks.
Originally Posted by CreamInside
[View Original Post]
Everyone will have different opinions but my take on helping newcomers is simple. I'll help anyone who wants to genuinely enter the kgirl scene by pointing where to find contact information and what they can expect and need to provide for screening. Whether they are local or not matters not to me. It'll be up to what references they already have, what they are willing to disclose, and the bookers evaluation of them to see if they get access or not. My helping them does not affect whether or not they will get cleared, it only eliminates a step in the process that they can do on their own by browsing here or on other forums. In addition, bookers worth their salt knows that they need to keep increasing their client pool to combat losses from attrition (mongers leaving the kgirl scene and competition / favoring other agencies) to keep their girls booked as much as possible.
I'm not sure how price increases fits into all of this in from your perspective. But price increases has been a long time coming given how flat rates have been for years. Take a moment to ponder that they increased prices during a pandemic and economic downturn. This flies in the face of any sane business model. We can only speculate on why but I think increased overhead costs started to eat at their margins or simple greed works too. Regardless, it would be naive to think it would remain the same.
-
01-28-22 01:21 #26279Senior Member

Posts: 45Daisy
Just saw Daisy today. She lost a lot of weight. She wasn't fat or chubby before. But she wasn't a spinner. She's got bolt on B's that are perfect for her frame. Her DFK and BBBJ have both improved since her long break. I'll definitely be repeating as often as I can. She's my current ATF and best currently available, especially with no upcharge.
Originally Posted by LandOfKGirls
[View Original Post]
-
01-27-22 22:39 #26278Senior Member

Posts: 421Stella
Damn. Stellas look is right up my alley. Lets hope she's real.
Originally Posted by TheAbc
[View Original Post]
-
01-27-22 19:23 #26277Banned Member

Posts: 1333Vivian of M
Vivian of "M" used to be Hazel of SweetAsianGem and she was at $100 up charge. The mere fact that she has switched to "M" at no Up Charge is an indication of No Business or slow Business for her. Secondly her photos are photos of IG model and those are not her real self photos.
Originally Posted by TheAbc
[View Original Post]
Some of these girls that have re invented themselves (Aubrey, Vanessa) and start raising their rate from $320 to $380 will have a hard time sustaining or maintaining clients because once a client pay $320 for something, a client can't pay $380 for the same thing; at least, I won't. I was planning to see Aubrey / Naomi but upon her price increase she was a hard no for me.
Also with the Stock Market taking a Daily dump, I can assume that it is safe to say that business will slow down to good degree.
-
01-27-22 18:51 #26276Senior Member

Posts: 3480Stella and Vivian also booked by SFK.
Originally Posted by TheAbc
[View Original Post]
https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/models
-
01-27-22 18:49 #26275Senior Member

Posts: 98New M. Girls and price issues
I find it a little bit of a red flag with the 'new' girls coming into M's stable working elsewhere at upcharge agencies and changing prices. I actually did have an issue with Miso / Minnie wanting an upcharge for MSOG when I booked her through M. Instead of CG / Losangelesasian, luckily I have been a regular of hers long enough to be let off the hook. I told her at M. I was never charged that (but I did not complain to M). I thought (or so it has was in the past), that M's girls were always a little more exclusive and offered non-upcharge BBFS MSOG 'perks'.
So I'm a little ambivalent about it. Might TOFTT based on reports.
-
01-27-22 18:14 #26274Senior Member

Posts: 939I assume it's safe to say most of these are rebrands? Anyone know if they are good and the stats?
Originally Posted by TheAbc
[View Original Post]
-
01-27-22 18:03 #26273Senior Member

Posts: 322Daisy & Jean could be sorority sisters in college. They don't look alike but of the same vintage. Looks-wise I'm happy with either. It would have been interesting to try Daisy & Jean doubles but it wasn't advertised during the brief time they were roommates and I didn't ask. I can't comment on comparisons to Pink or Eunji.
Originally Posted by GoldDust58
[View Original Post]
Daisy cums highly recommended.
-
01-27-22 17:29 #26272Senior Member

Posts: 1190Daisy recommend
Daisy looks like those Korean college girls you want to nail. Real cute, def recommend if you like younger. Body is closer to Pink but with full B cups. I haven't seen her since her return but booker told me she has lost some weight. I will revisit to see how she looks. You can't go wrong with her.
Originally Posted by Panda1203
[View Original Post]
-
01-27-22 17:09 #26271Senior Member

Posts: 1190Vivian was using the name Hazel at SAG. Jack had asked if it was Hazel of M but it is not. Sizes and pictures didnt match her at all.
Originally Posted by AvgGuy
[View Original Post]
-
01-27-22 16:36 #26270Regular Member

Posts: 20M's new lineup
All these rebrands and fake pics are making it confusing:
Originally Posted by AvgGuy
[View Original Post]
Mickey / Miki / Minnie appears to be Miso?
Sica / Jessica / Jessie was mentioned before: DaSmith pointed out the pics are from Alibaba's AliExpress's Pantyhose listing:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...hlight=jessica#post5747327.
-
01-27-22 16:12 #26269Regular Member

Posts: 16Oh. And Vivian is similar to Kassie from violafriends.net.
But I think that picture is from an ig model.
-
01-27-22 16:12 #26268Regular Member

Posts: 5Norcal girls
Mickey went by Mari at BGC.
Originally Posted by AvgGuy
[View Original Post]
http://web.archive.org/web/202112120...om/bunny-mari/
Stella went by Kerri at Cara's angels.
http://caraangels.com/KERRI/
-
01-27-22 16:07 #26267Banned Member

Posts: 770Mickeys third pic was used by bunnygirls Mari in the bay. Tiny thing but also said to be on the older side.
Originally Posted by TheAbc
[View Original Post]
https://web.archive.org/web/20211218...om/bunny-mari/











Reply With Quote









