Korean Agency BB

**IAmGib1** · 01-27-22 09:09

Originally Posted by BastardChorum [View Original Post]

I would disagree here. I would like to be afforded a fair chance at vetting if I happen to pass through NorCal, Seattle, Houston, Philly, or any other kgirl hotspots throughout the country. Moreover, it wasn't revealed, at least to my knowledge, if most of the offending mongers to date were comprised of out of towners or not.

The problem lies in that screening does absolutely nothing to evaluate a mongers proclivity for violence, theft, or deception. Nor will it, unless they start asking for mental health assessments from certified psychologists or psychiatrists. It's mainly predicated on an honor system of past history with established bookers who may or may not have connections to themselves. In the end, it's really a judgement call. In addition, like in stocks, past history does not guarantee future performance. I think, in part, this is why screening has becoming more stringent and strict, invasively so. Because in truth, only the threat of doxing, public shaming, blacklisting, or the possibility of jail time can act as an effective deterrent. While it is unfortunate when something does happen, in the grand scheme of things, the catch 22 of kgirl vetting has worked well enough compared to other portions of the sex industry to provide a high level of safety and security for both the girls and mongers.

Interestingly enough, C-orgs uses the fact that mongers, girls, and bookers are all visible to one another in an, for me, uncomfortably public fashion to deter anyone from doing something stupid. They pit the mongers own penchant for secrecy against each other in the presence of everyone to maintain a tentative stalemate of unease. It's a rather extreme but effective way to manage chaos given that they have such poor screening standards.

Yes, protect the girls and the mongers. Screen as needed to ensure this.

However, I believe having a track record of booking 50+ appointments per year, for many years (without issue) and with reputable agencies that have been in business for over 5 yrs. Is the best reference you can have for another agency. I have found that many kgirl agencies already have relationships with each other or have done competitive intelligence on other kgirl orgs.

Most bookers will only verify a longtime client and they do it as a favor to that client, not because it adds to their own business.

**Cream Inside** · 01-27-22 08:12

Originally Posted by TDLeafs [View Original Post]

Hell No.

Does this look like she was pushed?

She got beat up. And robbed.

This is the post that I refer to. This is what happens when screening is not good enough. Yes it's not a perfect system but I would much rather the bookers take as many precautions as possible if it lessens the chance of something like this ever happening again. Why don't these out of towners visit the Bay Area instead? It's much cheaper and there's virtually no real screening.

**Kakashiz** · 01-27-22 07:50

Originally Posted by CreamInside [View Original Post]

There's a reason why some k-orgs don't even take references from each other. Do you think that it is absolutely worth it to go through the trouble of screening an out of towner for one weekend for like maybe one appointment? It's just not efficient at all considering the risk involved of clearing a new monger. These out of town mongers are going to come in and want to see the most popular girl. So we are going to have to disagree. I do see your point but at the same time, I'm a selfish local monger who wants to protect our hobby for our sakes so you need to see it from other people's perspectives as well. From an org stand point, it really makes no sense when there are plenty of local mongers that they could be screening that can become weekly regulars instead, which is a better use of their time. Look at how hard it is to get into M's agency, there's a good reason for that. I mean sure, we don't absolutely have proof that the violators and bad actors are out of towners. But why take that risk even? Like I've mentioned in the past, I've had no issues getting cleared when traveling so if anyone passing through has legit references then they have nothing to worry about.

Another thing to think about is the constant increases in pricing. These guys like to complain about the prices so often. Well maybe if there were fewer mongers getting cleared then the girls would not be so hard to book (even among upcharge girls) and fewer price increases (theoretically of course). Anyone who deserves to get cleared and who goes through the hard screening absolutely deserves to be cleared. I'm just saying let's not try to help EVERYONE get cleared. There's absolutely no need for it since all it takes is one bad apple to ruin everything.

When I hear about these guys with no references being asked for their license and paystubs, it makes me feel a bit more at ease and safe that it's so tough to get in compared to years ago. Last thing I want to do is worry about whether or not the girl's roommate having some sort of psycho customer that's trying to rob the apartment when I'm balls deep inside a kgirl. It has happened in the past.

**Cream Inside** · 01-27-22 07:03

Originally Posted by PussyDestroyr [View Original Post]

Provided my seed to Jamie, it really never gets old with her. Great monthly option. She's around and living here now, so go pay her bills.

Only those who have seen Jamie know about how devilish smile that she has when you fill her up with cum that is so sexy and makes the experience even hotter. For all those mongers who are hungry for short and stacked with legs and thighs. She encourages CIP and makes sure to milk every drop while she stares into your soul. Jamie is the one.

https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%9D%B4%EB%AF%B8

**Cream Inside** · 01-27-22 06:59

Originally Posted by BastardChorum [View Original Post]

I would disagree here. I would like to be afforded a fair chance at vetting if I happen to pass through NorCal, Seattle, Houston, Philly, or any other kgirl hotspots throughout the country. Moreover, it wasn't revealed, at least to my knowledge, if most of the offending mongers to date were comprised of out of towners or not.

The problem lies in that screening does absolutely nothing to evaluate a mongers proclivity for violence, theft, or deception. Nor will it, unless they start asking for mental health assessments from certified psychologists or psychiatrists. It's mainly predicated on an honor system of past history with established bookers who may or may not have connections to themselves. In the end, it's really a judgement call. In addition, like in stocks, past history does not guarantee future performance. I think, in part, this is why screening has becoming more stringent and strict, invasively so. Because in truth, only the threat of doxing, public shaming, blacklisting, or the possibility of jail time can act as an effective deterrent. While it is unfortunate when something does happen, in the grand scheme of things, the catch 22 of kgirl vetting has worked well enough compared to other portions of the sex industry to provide a high level of safety and security for both the girls and mongers.

Interestingly enough, C-orgs uses the fact that mongers, girls, and bookers are all visible to one another in an, for me, uncomfortably public fashion to deter anyone from doing something stupid. They pit the mongers own penchant for secrecy against each other in the presence of everyone to maintain a tentative stalemate of unease. It's a rather extreme but effective way to manage chaos given that they have such poor screening standards.

There's a reason why some k-orgs don't even take references from each other. Do you think that it is absolutely worth it to go through the trouble of screening an out of towner for one weekend for like maybe one appointment? It's just not efficient at all considering the risk involved of clearing a new monger. These out of town mongers are going to come in and want to see the most popular girl. So we are going to have to disagree. I do see your point but at the same time, I'm a selfish local monger who wants to protect our hobby for our sakes so you need to see it from other people's perspectives as well. From an org stand point, it really makes no sense when there are plenty of local mongers that they could be screening that can become weekly regulars instead, which is a better use of their time. Look at how hard it is to get into M's agency, there's a good reason for that. I mean sure, we don't absolutely have proof that the violators and bad actors are out of towners. But why take that risk even? Like I've mentioned in the past, I've had no issues getting cleared when traveling so if anyone passing through has legit references then they have nothing to worry about.

Another thing to think about is the constant increases in pricing. These guys like to complain about the prices so often. Well maybe if there were fewer mongers getting cleared then the girls would not be so hard to book (even among upcharge girls) and fewer price increases (theoretically of course). Anyone who deserves to get cleared and who goes through the hard screening absolutely deserves to be cleared. I'm just saying let's not try to help EVERYONE get cleared. There's absolutely no need for it since all it takes is one bad apple to ruin everything.

**DragonWolf** · 01-27-22 05:24

Originally Posted by BastardChorum [View Original Post]

Short answer is not really, if all you're looking to do is book an appointment and are straight to the point. Of course, there will be differences like how short their fuses are, their command of the English language, their CS (customer service, not the other one) skills, prompt response times, etc. But by the by, dealing with the first to screen you through vs others shouldn't be all too different.

If you have HX and have seen girls through Splashme, Cubandreams, or HawaiiRocks, check out if they can help you get in contact with LA or OC bookers. It'll make the transition much smoother. If you don't have HX, see what I posted below.

Yeah, I've got HX, although only for the last couple years or so. Mostly have dealt with Splashme / HawaiiRocks down here, or what we refer to SDAsianGirls and FarEastCuties (the SD side of ca-kdolls) I know both bookers have indicated I can book their respective OC offerings through them and have given me the simple safety thumbs up. LOL I have been on tee ee ar for a good while.

I suppose I'll just reach and see where that takes me. If I have to go the roundabout way by establishing a "presence" so to speak in OC before heading up to LA, then so be it.

**Bastard Chorum** · 01-27-22 03:11

Originally Posted by CreamInside [View Original Post]

This is why I'm so adamant about being careful who you help get into this hobby. This is why it doesn't benefit us to help these out of towners who are just passing through. You never know what can happen, there's just no upside and little to be gained. Not too long ago there were reports about some K-girl who had her ribs broken by a monger? I wonder who messed up on that screening that let that happen.

I would disagree here. I would like to be afforded a fair chance at vetting if I happen to pass through NorCal, Seattle, Houston, Philly, or any other kgirl hotspots throughout the country. Moreover, it wasn't revealed, at least to my knowledge, if most of the offending mongers to date were comprised of out of towners or not.

The problem lies in that screening does absolutely nothing to evaluate a mongers proclivity for violence, theft, or deception. Nor will it, unless they start asking for mental health assessments from certified psychologists or psychiatrists. It's mainly predicated on an honor system of past history with established bookers who may or may not have connections to themselves. In the end, it's really a judgement call. In addition, like in stocks, past history does not guarantee future performance. I think, in part, this is why screening has becoming more stringent and strict, invasively so. Because in truth, only the threat of doxing, public shaming, blacklisting, or the possibility of jail time can act as an effective deterrent. While it is unfortunate when something does happen, in the grand scheme of things, the catch 22 of kgirl vetting has worked well enough compared to other portions of the sex industry to provide a high level of safety and security for both the girls and mongers.

Interestingly enough, C-orgs uses the fact that mongers, girls, and bookers are all visible to one another in an, for me, uncomfortably public fashion to deter anyone from doing something stupid. They pit the mongers own penchant for secrecy against each other in the presence of everyone to maintain a tentative stalemate of unease. It's a rather extreme but effective way to manage chaos given that they have such poor screening standards.

**Bastard Chorum** · 01-27-22 02:34

Originally Posted by DragonWolf [View Original Post]

Fellow connoisseur from down south (SD) here, and looking to add a little variety w / some LA / OC talent. I've noticed a trend in LA / OC to have multiple bookers for certain talent and I was wondering if there's bookers that are better to work with than others, such as KGLA vs. Preciousklove, in this case, or does it not really matter?

Things are simpler down here, though we lack the wide range of talent, so I'm trying to get the lay of the land up there.

Thanks in advance!

Short answer is not really, if all you're looking to do is book an appointment and are straight to the point. Of course, there will be differences like how short their fuses are, their command of the English language, their CS (customer service, not the other one) skills, prompt response times, etc. But by the by, dealing with the first to screen you through vs others shouldn't be all too different.

If you have HX and have seen girls through Splashme, Cubandreams, or HawaiiRocks, check out if they can help you get in contact with LA or OC bookers. It'll make the transition much smoother. If you don't have HX, see what I posted below.

**Panda1203** · 01-27-22 02:23

In terms of looks, how does Daisy fair compared to Jean, Eunji, and Pink?

**Bastard Chorum** · 01-27-22 02:18

Originally Posted by Bulldog4094 [View Original Post]

I am headed to LA in early Feb and would love to sample your local talent. Atlanta has nothing like what you have so rejoice and be merry. I do have a question. Do all bookers / agencies only offer beauties with man made tits? I am a fan of smaller, natural boobs. Any advice and guidance on finding options would be appreciated. PM is fine. Thanks.

I would get the ball rolling on getting screened even before you land. There's a monger made website with a fairly exhaustive list of k agencies in the LA area but I don't have it saved. Maybe someone will repost it.

A good portion of kgirls will have enhanced tits but you can always let the booker know your preference for natural and smaller tits and they should let you know if anyone fits that criteria in their roster. As someone from out of town, you're at a huge disadvantage for screening. It's going to be tough. Even if you're an open book and willing to part with personal info, that may be not enough. Good Luck.

**Kanek18** · 01-27-22 01:13

I recently got in at Booker Gray. Suggested Vixen. I did a quick search and was impressed by the reviews. Well she's definitely a MILF and despite the raving reviews, I did not find her very attractive or sexy. Kinda reminds me of the older Korean ladies at the salon. Minus the perm. I mean she is ok for her age but I'm here to fuck younger girls not 50 year old. Legendary service? She kept making these sucking hissing noises and it was actually a turnoff. I want to get fucked wild or sensual GFE, either or. I got generic massage parlor service minus the condom. Booker Gray and Vixen was a disappointment. I would think booker would suggest a great girl for a new customer but I guess they don't really care. I guess someone new isn't important enough. Booker was impatient with me and sending weird texts I could barely understand. Then gets impatient when I send a question mark. If guess you need to prove you have money to hobby often to get Booker Grays attention. Smh, I'll stick to the bookers that treat me nice and are truthful about the girls

Originally Posted by JrueArtist [View Original Post]

Vixen is a freak. She is a MILF but don't let that stop you. Haven't seen her in well over a year. Yesterday I stopped by for a reunion. I think I'm going to go on a reunion tour to say hello to my old friends. It was a fantastic fuck suck marathon that I haven't had in a while. She's game. Like my own porn via mirrors LOL. Still looks good with that sexy face. Def worth the 320 no upcharge.

.

**Kanek18** · 01-27-22 00:53

I thought Jennie looked just like her pictures. Yes her hair and skin is almost luxurious haha. Flawless creamy white skin and pink. Watching her kissing me everywhere and blowing me, this is what it's like to fuck a Kpop star. Tight wet light pink pussy. I don't think she has any ugly on her. She made me feel special for the whole hour. Jennie is top tier.

Originally Posted by Jack926 [View Original Post]

I concur to above review 100%: I saw her yesterday and I found her real sweetheart. In regard to her age, I would think that she is in her high 20 years or low 30 but I love her hair and skin. I plan a 2nd visit very soon. A definite sweetheart in term of the attitude and definitely she has a body that is super nice.

.

**JrueArtist** · 01-27-22 00:33

My post was providing useful information for us mongers. To maximize our experience with Kgirls. But being offended by your looks is what your focus is on. We shouldn't exaggerate just because the girl didn't worship you like some expect. Positive vibes results in positive experiences. Let's keep the information flowing

Originally Posted by Jack926 [View Original Post]

Objectively and truthfully speaking, she is not more than "5" or "6" in her look. But you can rate her higher. You are missing my point on her body which I said is a definite "9" and above; so I was being objective.

My look, or any other monger look is irrelevant to this discussion.

.

**RocketManP** · 01-27-22 00:21

For guys who have seen her.

Do these pics (face only, forget body) look representative?

From all descriptions it sounds like her. Except the part about dfk, Miko used to be a dfk queen. Could taste what she had for dinner last night LOL.

**Kanek18** · 01-27-22 00:14

I met Karin a few days ago. Booker let me know she is my type. She looks like the pictures however her eyes are big bright and innocent looking. She has light brown hair and white skin. Super nice natural Cs. I had fun with Karin. Dfk BBBJ BBFS cip x 2. Well worth it.

I will visit Jessica Thursday and let you guys know.

Originally Posted by RamShackled [View Original Post]

Anyone have any intel on these two girls or do I need TOFTT?

https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4 - Jessica.

https://www.candygirlla.com/%ED%82%A4%EB%AF%B8 - Karen.

.