Escort Reports

[Matty1169]

Who gives a shit about that other stuff now. That also applies to me. LOL.

Anyone on this Boston Forum know about that Bonnie Starr woman!? I've seen her ads recently, several of them. I've only really noticed 1 mention of her. Over on the Lowell Forum. I'm just wondering if her attitude in person and her Srvc is any good? She told me she's only willing to take on like 2-3 more new clients, that's IT.

I can't find her ads right now. I'll look and post it later, if I find it.

[Win56]

Enough already, why are we wasting so much energy on someone that doesn't want to see someone of a certain age who really cares she's the only one that I've ever heard that discriminates against that age group plenty out there I could care less about seeing her.

It's not uncommon to want someone of a more mature age. McKenna is the opposite of the norm. Let's go onto a more important topic like people's experiences with providers.

[JClearMan1]

If it were legal in Massachusetts, then laws against Dscrimination or ageism may apply.

If "this" was legal in Massachusetts, there would be an "escape hatch", like "at will employment". You can terminate any employee from "at will employment", as long as there's no reason at all, ie. "It is no longer the will of the company to employ _person_" (trust me, I was a engineering staff director for years and know Mass employment law very well). If, in the course of an at-will termination the company implies there are "reasons" for the termination, then it triggers legal requirements to produce records related to those reasons. At-will is an escape hatch designed to technically allow the option for both employee and employer to terminate a relationship "just because". It's insidious. So, back to my point: any legislation of such a profession would have to include escape hatches that allow providers the legal safety (for the purpose of personal safety) of declining service for a client "for no reason". So they'd likely have to change their ads and responses, but the net effect would be the same: they can decline for any reason, by way of "no reason".

[PinayLuver]

At its core, thls is a private business and they can impose any rules they want. If it were legal in Massachusetts, then laws against Dscrimination or ageism may apply. Alas, this isn't the case. As mongers we have our own personal set of rules of who to see. For me, I avoid providers in Lynn since several experiences not been good. I cross out bbw or MILF types because they are not attractive to me. It just my own preferences. If she wants to restrict her client base, it's her choice. She seems to have enough other interested and willing clients from a different deogaphic.

If I read an AD that simply states that a provider does not see men over the age of 65 ! . No problem I move on! Mckenna went on to say how disgusted she was by the thought of a man 65 or older! That's the point. So it doesn't matter what age or ethnicity limits a provider prefers. It's the lack of professionalism and poor attitude with Mckenna that is insulting not her preferences in men.

PL.

[Jr Koff]

When one realizes that providers are actually human beings and puts a tiny amount of effort into trying to imagine and understand their perspective, setting such standards /boundaries is easily understandable.

At its core, thls is a private business and they can impose any rules they want. If it were legal in Massachusetts, then laws against Dscrimination or ageism may apply. Alas, this isn't the case. As mongers we have our own personal set of rules of who to see. For me, I avoid providers in Lynn since several experiences not been good. I cross out bbw or MILF types because they are not attractive to me. It just my own preferences. If she wants to restrict her client base, it's her choice. She seems to have enough other interested and willing clients from a different deogaphic.

[Blately]

If they're in to make that Cold Hard Cash, then it doesn't matter if I'm 31,41,51, or even 61/71. They shouldn't be in the Hobby if that's the Case. That's JMHO! This coming from a 41 yr old guy.

When one realizes that providers are actually human beings and puts a tiny amount of effort into trying to imagine and understand their perspective, setting such standards /boundaries is easily understandable.

[Matty1169]

That's what I should've originally said. If guys don't want to see a provider based on the providers restrictions, then the client guy has the right to not Buy their Time.

Also if a provider wants to have restrictions in place, well then that's her Rights. Then you can know better first hand, so that you can move on to the Next Ad, that Tickles Your Fancy.

[Gianni Versace]

Do you actually expect some low level provider to be able to articulate something in a classy fashion? The only thing her mouth is good for is bbj if even that. I wouldn't let it get to you this much. Now if she were a high end ho. You can't take the hood out of a hoodrat LOL. Just got to find the right classy educated girls that either have a fetish or too much student debt.

I would never see that provider. That woman is not attractive imo. I’m with us on finding a classy provider. Too much student debt and single moms are where it’s at.

[Chuchunga]

True I get your point. What she said was excessive and unnecessary.

Do you actually expect some low level provider to be able to articulate something in a classy fashion? The only thing her mouth is good for is bbj if even that. I wouldn't let it get to you this much. Now if she were a high end ho. You can't take the hood out of a hoodrat LOL. Just got to find the right classy educated girls that either have a fetish or too much student debt.

[ScrewLoose]

That was my experience with her. She's terrible. Why would you waste your money again? Do what you want but you can find better to spend your hobby dollars on besides that washed up ho.

The reviews are too good not to try for the second time I think. And Greek is a plus point. But last chance. LOL.

[Mattis1775]

Yes I understand what you are saying but I don't recall any of those other providers listing anything beyond their simple preferences. She could simply put "no one over the age of 65 " instead of.

I prefer to NOT hangout with guys that look over 65 ish. EXAMPLE: Herbert from family guy or Anna Nicole Smith's husband.

Look no offense, but I still have to sleep at night, right? Hanging out with someone who falls into that very specific criteria definitely keeps me up at night.

Sorry but YuUuuCKY.

Five finger salute to all the sugar babies taken one for the team. Why'all are the REAL MVPS.

Pours liquor onto floor and has a moment of silence.

I don't bother with girls on restrictions. I ran into one that doesn't see anyone under 45, doesn't see other than a white person or someone that's out of state. I tried convincing one years ago and it was a total waste of time. If they don't want my money, I go elsewhere. We're all here to avoid the drama.

[Matty1169]

I didn't mean that in a bad or negative way. Providers have the right to have Age.

Preferences, I guess. I was just saying the last time I tried to get with this 22 year old gal, turned me down because she don't like guys over 30 yrs old. And I was like 37 at the time. So I thought she was rather ignorant and stupid. But just because of her being that way, I shouldn't assume that ladies shouldn't get to have a Age Preference Limit. Example this McKenna provider sounds way way more mature than her. And sure ya guys are indeed right, she should get to turn down guys who are like Ancient looking. I agree. Sorry last Post I admit, I sounded like a dumbass.

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted in accordance with the Forum's policy prohibiting any discussion regarding racial issues. This action is in no way a reflection of the merits of the author's comments.

I am aware that the vast majority of references to racial issues are legitimate attempts to advise other fellow members about local racial issues and prejudices. However, past discussions in the Forum has repeatedly demonstrated that the subject simply cannot be discussed intelligently, in any form or for any reason, without being misinterpreted and without starting flame wars.

Please do not engage in discussions about race in the Forum. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

Thanks!

[Henny1234]

Has anyone tried Daisy?

Saw her last week, she's real and the pics are pretty recent, I had a OK time but I feel as she wasn't into it.

[TheList00]

Daisy is one of the most discussed providers in the last 4 weeks, on this and the Seeking Arrangements thread.

Everyone should relax on daisy, she's a lesbian and not a former drug addicted crackhead. If you know her real name and google her you can find a picture of what she really looks like years back when she was working the streets of michigan looking for crack, that will change all your minds once you see those pics.

[Style20]

Plus there are providers with age minimums of 35, sometimes 40+ among other requirements. If I don't meet a providers requirements it saves me the hassle and she'll probably provide better service to people that meet her requirements if she has any. It's usually the high volume SWs posting as escorts that take all customers for better or worse which is alright but then you may end up paying more than what you would if you picked her up instead.

I don't like seeing providers over 40's and up. Something about their body not hot enough for my taste.