Korean Agency BB

[GardenBae]

Anyone bring lingerie to an appointment and have the provider wear it during the session? If so, did she accept or reject? Did it cost you more donations? Is it frowned upon by providers in general?

[JackDaniels12]

I am very experienced seeing escorts (from HX and PD mostly) but have exactly zero experience with the Korean Agencies and don't know what to expect when I go. I am ready to try it out (in fact I was ready to go tonight) but I want to make sure I am seeing a good provider for my first experience. I have been looking through this forum and a couple of others and it is hard to make sense of all the information. I am interested in the Koreatown / L. A. Agencies (not O. C.).

Could someone help me out by recommending a few providers that are currently active in the area, as well as the name of the agencies along with the link to the HX page for those agencies. There are a lot of acronyms and nicknames to sort through so sometimes even when I find a good review I haven't always been able to locate the HX page so I can send my screening info.

Another question, if the providers offer BBFS, do they generally require papers proving you're STI-free?

Also, if there is a good place to find this info already, please send me in the right direction as I am still wading through a lot of stuff in the forums. Thanks in advance!

Did you find any k agency? I'm new too and want to get into it? Can you help me out.

[AlexisDavis]

Hey folks,

Visiting LA from Europe in February and very keen to get one of those once in a lifetime no-holds-barred experiences with a K-Girl or two. What's the best way of getting verified or approved by a booker in advance when I will have no track record?

Thanks in advance.

The truly fastest way is to verify with your personal info, but it involves giving them your driver's license, pay stubs, business card, etc. I believe CA-kdolls will verify you this way if you have no references. Not positive if they still do that, but two years ago before I had the right references the booker told me I could verify that way.

[PumpNDump]

She looks tasty. Hope she is both sweet and spicy between her legs.

Tiana. Starts tomorrow. 5' 3" 34 B Natural. 320 BBFS and MSOG with no up charge.

[RamShackled]

The small print is pretty hilarious if taken literally:

"Please remember this before you visit us.

Isn't Viagra a drug? There goes my chances with this agency.

[Jack926]

You represent boner school very well. Helena service and attitude remind me of Hana. I did notice something a little unusual about Ring's mouth, may be it was a little wide, but it didn't bother me. I don't dwell too much on a girl's flaws cause it may kill my boner. I save those thoughts for the ride home.

On Ring, you wrote: "I did notice something a little unusual about Ring's mouth, may be it was a little wide, but it didn't bother me. I don't dwell too much on a girl's flaws cause it may kill my boner. I save those thoughts for the ride home".

Smart thinking. I like that methodology and way of thinking I should do that. I do Vividly remember that once I saw her tits and ass, I forgot the mouth.

[Toungsten]

Tiana. Starts tomorrow. 5' 3" 34 B Natural. 320 BBFS and MSOG with no up charge.

[BonerAppetitty]

You represent boner school very well. Helena service and attitude remind me of Hana. I did notice something a little unusual about Ring's mouth, may be it was a little wide, but it didn't bother me. I don't dwell too much on a girl's flaws cause it may kill my boner. I save those thoughts for the ride home.

You wrote: "Ring, Jean, and Daisy remind me of high school" - Yes, hopefully the senior in HS and you can easily say that Hana is / was the slutty one; Jean, Daisy are the innocent one and Ring will be the chick that you can't take your eyes off when she is sitting next to you in the library.

All four are GND cute but I know some guys will prefer Hana, some guy will prefer Ring, some will prefer Jean and some Daisy.

I really liked Hana, Daisy, Jean and Ring service and the champ there is Hana.

I really like Jean, Daisy look and the champ there is Jean. Hana to me was special because she was such eager pussy and while Ring service was very very good, she has a mouth that look like Joker.

In term of body, Ring, Jean, Hana and Daisy all have great body but the best body is Jean for me for all natural and best ass was Daisy and best skin is Ring.

Out these for, the Best fuck was Hana.

[Cricket79]

The small print is pretty hilarious if taken literally:

"Please remember this before you visit us.

WE RESERVCE THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE & BLACKLIST ANYONE WHO DOES ANYTHING BELOW.

No Drug. No Toy. No Crime. No Video Recording.

And most importantly, NO CANCEL".

So yea. Apparently cancelling is worse than treating their girls like you were playing GTA.

Ktown has a horrible reputation. Saying a girl is 100 lbs and you get there and she pushing 140. I walked out last time paid the girl anyways but she was a complete fucking ***** with no personality what so ever. She told the booker I wasn't wearing a mask I'm like I'm here to raw dog you what the fuck would it matter! Imo Ktown is shady and misleading all they want is your money.

[SsStuntCock]

Looks like she has changed her mind again and is now offering BBFS for who knows how long. This price breakdown is wild and comical. Especially the "Free Shot" once you fork out 6 hundy.
https://ktownescort.com/lucky-(nuru)-

The small print is pretty hilarious if taken literally:

"Please remember this before you visit us.

WE RESERVCE THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE & BLACKLIST ANYONE WHO DOES ANYTHING BELOW.

No Drug. No Toy. No Crime. No Video Recording.

And most importantly, NO CANCEL".

So yea. Apparently cancelling is worse than treating their girls like you were playing GTA.

[RocketManP]

Sorry for the text wall but I've always been verbose. But I believe this topic and my take on it would help a lot of other mongers.

Simply put: don't bite the hand that feeds you pussy. At least not directly. The consequences of doing so doesn't benefit either party. While I don't condone catfishing, bait and switches, gatekeeping popular girls, etc. , I try to place myself in the bookers' point of view. Their job is to push for business and book the girls as solidly as possible. In addition, in the vast majority of cases they have no control of whose is coming anyways (hence the off chance). They've been dealt their hand and have to work with it. More unscrupulous bookers will say half-truths to get you in the door, banking on a looming BL to pressure you to go through with it.

No worries about the length my man, I love long reads and am a rather very verbose man myself.

I fully agree with you about impact of community and impact of posted info. What I don't fully agree with is that I think it results in newbies led astray having to go through pains of finding out who's a shill or not, via mostly trial and error. Which is not cheap in this hobby, I might add. Anyway.

I think the second question wasn't really answered tho. Not biting hand that feeds you often means appeasement and not posting truthful info. Many orgs threaten bl for truthful reviews that are negative or mediocre. And that's where I'm interested in the "how far will you go for a Klondike beef curtain".

You say that anything that doesn't well with you reaches mongers. That's excellent and I fully support it! Still, I think that at some point that's kind of biting the hand that feeds you, kinda. No?

To me, when it comes to deception, the sides have deeply opposed interests: supplier will deceive with info about product (OK, "good" since some dislike the term "product") to make the most $, and customer will want product / good that matches the description. If customer knows the truth, he doesn't schedule the apt and girl loses money. There's no win-win scenario in such situation.

So to me, by definition, NOT biting the hand at some point means it's impossible to maintain integrity in the community.

I don't really know what good standing is, but my question is if telling the truth and sharing truthful info jeopardizes your standing, which comes first? Standing or telling the truth? That really is the question here, and "both" is not an answer, sadly.

[DonaldTwain]

Hey folks,

Visiting LA from Europe in February and very keen to get one of those once in a lifetime no-holds-barred experiences with a K-Girl or two. What's the best way of getting verified or approved by a booker in advance when I will have no track record?

Thanks in advance.

[Jack926]

AngelsInWLA became defunct when Hana went back to Korea and then WordPress banned the site shortly afterward. It was run by the same booker as KGLA and she consolidated her operations.

She was actually very Chill booker.

[Cream Inside]

Looks like she has changed her mind again and is now offering BBFS for who knows how long. This price breakdown is wild and comical. Especially the "Free Shot" once you fork out 6 hundy.

30 MIN / 230 ROSES.
40 MIN + NURU / 250 ROSES.
+BBFS / EXTRA 100 ROSES.

1 HR / 280 ROSES.
1 HR + NURU / 300 ROSES.
+BBFS / EXTRA 100 ROSES.

90 MIN NURU +2 SHOT / 500 ROSES.
+BBFS / 700 ROSES.
2 HRS NURU + DEEP LOMI LOMI MASSAGE.
+FREE SHOT / 600 ROSES.
+BBFS / 800 ROSES.

**EXTRA SHOT / 40 ROSES.

https://ktownescort.com/lucky-(nuru)-

[Bastard Chorum]

May I ask, what does good standing with disreputable agencies entail?

And how far are you willing to go down this route in the exchange for that off chance?

Sorry for the text wall but I've always been verbose. But I believe this topic and my take on it would help a lot of other mongers.

Simply put: don't bite the hand that feeds you pussy. At least not directly. The consequences of doing so doesn't benefit either party. While I don't condone catfishing, bait and switches, gatekeeping popular girls, etc. , I try to place myself in the bookers' point of view. Their job is to push for business and book the girls as solidly as possible. In addition, in the vast majority of cases they have no control of whose is coming anyways (hence the off chance). They've been dealt their hand and have to work with it. More unscrupulous bookers will say half-truths to get you in the door, banking on a looming BL to pressure you to go through with it.

Having said that, it does not mean we as mongers don't have any recourse. Back channeling, review sites, and discussion forums such as this very one you're reading my post on acts as an indispensable platform and resource to exchange salient information about agencies, bookers, and girls. I think many that frequent this board have seen several instances of how potent and far-reaching posted content can be, for good and for bad. As an example, when glowing reviews of a new girl by trusted posters goes live, said girl suddenly becomes hard to book or requires to be pre-booked for days or weeks on end. Conversely, when a not so stellar post goes up, her business tanks, she's gone in days, or reinvents herself somewhere else. Needless to say but lurkers far outnumber the active members on any public board. This silent majority is what we can leverage against agencies, bookers, and girls that have shown themselves to be dishonest and undeserving of our continued patronage.

That's why others and I try to push for everyone to post their honest reviews regardless if she has no reviews or 100+ reviews. The more there are, a more truthful and closer to what you actually will experience narrative can be gleaned from collating the information. I myself do use the posts here coupled with other sources to make a more informed decision on who to see next. While I see a nice chunk of kgirls, it pales in comparison the kgirl monger client pool. Moreover, I do not have the time, wherewithal, or libido to see every kgirl that pops up. Still, we all need to roll with the punches when mongering with kgirls. By definition, you'll see more average and below average kgirls than starlets. I certainly have. Take that chip off your shoulder from the experience and put it to good use: post PSA's, write reviews, let monger friends know, etc.

To answer your question directly: the route is a short one for me. I'll typically TOFFT with a new agency if they have a girl that piques my interest. My interaction and correspondence with booker, how the session went, the quality of the girl, the general vetting process, and anything else noteworthy is then succinctly summarized in my little black book so to speak. Anything that doesn't sit well with me is passed off to mongers I know, written into a review, or disseminated to the community as I deign necessary. In the same vein, potential ATFs or diamond in the roughs are similarly handled. If I did experience any frustration, ire, or disappointment, it won't reach the bookers ears via my texts but indirectly through the collective monger hivemind.

Obviously, this can be abused but I believe that most mongers can distinguish the shills, the honest reviews, and the manipulative reviews with ulterior motives fairly well. In the end, I still saw a girl in the booker's book, treated her well, and didn't complain. You would be amazed that even if I didn't see another girl from them for an extended period time (if they last that long anyways), they will still respond. Because I was a 'good' client. Because I was in 'good' standing.