Thread: Escort Reviews
+
Add Report
Results 10,786 to 10,800 of 32763
-
12-14-21 09:11 #21978Senior Member

Posts: 206Agree 100%
Agree 100%. I was communicating with a provider in Dayton years ago. She insisted on a face pick so I offered to meet her for coffee for her QV price. It satisfied her and it worked for me as a monger because I was able to judge that she was worth pursuing. A meeting in a coffee shop is a random event. Any kind video interaction is not random.
Originally Posted by WoodFordR69
[View Original Post]
-
12-14-21 07:55 #21977Advertiser-Escort

Posts: 1[Commercial Message deleted by Admin]
EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted because it appeared to be a commercial message and/or it contained links to a commercial website. All commercial advertising must be posted at our new site, The USA Adult Classifieds http://theclassifieds.nl Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines and the Forum's FAQ for further information.
-
12-14-21 03:56 #21976Senior Member

Posts: 360Marley Preggo, Again
https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...nnati/71635101
For those into that sort of thing she is showing more now than a few months ago. Got to be closing in on double digits.
-
12-14-21 00:55 #21975Senior Member

Posts: 546Video or pics
I'm not a lawyer, but the way I understand it is that if you send a video or pic that is rated are or X via phone it then becomes a federal crime because of the gray area in the telecommunications law. Not just a misdemeanor anymore. Be safe be smart.
Originally Posted by Bkbh1
[View Original Post]
-
12-14-21 00:18 #21974Senior Member

Posts: 59Ahha
I wonder if that's why she deleted that post. I didn't realize that was the same person.
.
Originally Posted by HillbillyBob
[View Original Post]
-
12-13-21 23:34 #21973Senior Member

Posts: 30JessieK
Asked for photo of cash? A little odd.
Originally Posted by OneHitWonder
[View Original Post]
-
12-13-21 19:44 #21972Senior Member

Posts: 206Nothing to lose
You sound as if you have nothing to lose. Certainly you're not married. If a provider has video of you and decides to use it, you're toast. Maybe you won't get prosecuted but it will be obviously to anyone what you were doing whether you followed though or not. Intent is everything. If sharing that part of your life with your spouse and your colleagues isn't a problem for you, video away.
Originally Posted by JustaFunHabit
[View Original Post]
-
12-13-21 19:36 #21971Banned Member

Posts: 5352I LikeWatch posted a not so good review of her just a couple days ago#21938 . Always helps to RTFF.
Originally Posted by MateoRo
[View Original Post]
-
12-13-21 18:10 #21970Senior Member

Posts: 69The "verification" process was basically a variation of the classic SW "I'll show you mine, you show me yours" routine on video call, and then switched to a regular phone call. No additional identifying info exchanged other than the phone numbers we already had for each other. IMHO it wouldn't be in a provider's interest to record and try to use against me, as I am 100% capable of doing the same, and Uncle LEO gets way more upset about his nieces fooling around than his nephews. I did not see it as surrendering the upper hand.
Originally Posted by Bkbh1
[View Original Post]
The fact that the provider already had a number of reviews here and no warnings of scams or other unpleasantness is what tipped the scales in her favor, otherwise I may not have gone for it either.
-
12-13-21 17:41 #21969Senior Member

Posts: 132Video Verification
Seems to be some discussion on this. Video verification (facetime, google duo. Etc.) for me is helpful to prove provider and her pics are real and what you like or want and can get a quick view of incall room if desired. Do or say nothing incriminating if you fear it being recorded. Let them go first for any showing of body parts for LEO check. As far as blackmail fear. How close you ever check the room for hidden cameras if a provider wants to go that way? Anyway. Always be cautious and have antennae up. But I'm OK for facetime or google duo quick verification. But before I will do that, I've already vetted the provider out from this forum or other reviews. In the end, be cautious and follow your instincts. But I do not reject solely based on video verification request.
Originally Posted by Bkbh1
[View Original Post]
-
12-13-21 17:06 #21968Senior Member

Posts: 89Agreed!
I was seriously considering meeting with her given the lack of talent in the area, at least spinner type & younger. No fucking way am I face-timing with someone until I get to know them, like really know them as much as we can in this hobby. I'll try someone else or save my money. Hell, isn't that part of the purpose of this site. Just like we can review the ladies, they can read what we post to figure out if we are legit or not. I can't see LEO running a fake profile for a couple of years just to bust one lady.
Originally Posted by BelowMe
[View Original Post]
-
12-13-21 16:22 #21967Senior Member

Posts: 59Sexy Blonde Ready to have some Fun
Hey there, this one looks familiar. She says she's new, is she familiar to anyone else?
https://cincinnati.skipthegames.com/...e/983066787146
-
12-13-21 16:00 #21966Senior Member

Posts: 2645By the time you find out that your Snap has been captured and stored, it's too late to change your mind. Also, there are ways of capturing a snap without informing the sender, such as using another phone, or using a screen mirror app (MiraCast) to a different device. If they're determined enough to try to blackmail you, they're determined enough to learn how to preserve evidence to use against you.
Originally Posted by Observant
[View Original Post]
-
12-13-21 14:53 #21965Banned Member

Posts: 1057Video verification
And they will continue to ask for video verification as long as some of you continue to comply. This is risky business as outlined above. If we all say no thanks they'll stop asking. There are other way. Meet her for a cup of coffee first.
Originally Posted by Bkbh1
[View Original Post]
-
12-13-21 13:58 #21964Senior Member

Posts: 44Jessiek
A friend of mine recently met with Jessiek. He said her communication was pretty good however, one hour before the agreed upon time he text to confirm and she pushed it back one hour. At time of arrival she asked for photo of cash. Was an additional fifteen minutes late after that. Room was in Sharonville. Some red flags but a photo of cash seemed harmless and she's been verified so going to dreaded Sharonville didn't seem too concerning. He said her photos are pretty accurate. Mid-late thirties. Attractive with nice body for her age and mileage. Maybe not worth the donation she's requesting but with how the market is right now, maybe. She's nice. Good BBBJ to CDS. He enjoyed himself but probably would not repeat. No knock on her. He just doesn't hobby much and there are better options for just a little more $.
Stay safe.
https://tryst.link/escort/jessiek







Reply With Quote



