Escort Reviews

**Joshmo021** · 12-13-21 23:34

Originally Posted by OneHitWonder [View Original Post]

A friend of mine recently met with Jessiek. He said her communication was pretty good however, one hour before the agreed upon time he text to confirm and she pushed it back one hour. At time of arrival she asked for photo of cash. Was an additional fifteen minutes late after that. Room was in Sharonville. Some red flags but a photo of cash seemed harmless and she's been verified so going to dreaded Sharonville didn't seem too concerning. He said her photos are pretty accurate. Mid-late thirties. Attractive with nice body for her age and mileage. Maybe not worth the donation she's requesting but with how the market is right now, maybe. She's nice. Good BBBJ to CDS. He enjoyed himself but probably would not repeat. No knock on her. He just doesn't hobby much and there are better options for just a little more $.

Stay safe.

https://tryst.link/escort/jessiek

Asked for photo of cash? A little odd.

**NonEssential** · 12-13-21 19:44

Originally Posted by JustaFunHabit [View Original Post]

Seems to be some discussion on this. Video verification (facetime, google duo. Etc.) for me is helpful to prove provider and her pics are real and what you like or want and can get a quick view of incall room if desired. Do or say nothing incriminating if you fear it being recorded. Let them go first for any showing of body parts for LEO check. As far as blackmail fear. How close you ever check the room for hidden cameras if a provider wants to go that way? Anyway. Always be cautious and have antennae up. But I'm OK for facetime or google duo quick verification. But before I will do that, I've already vetted the provider out from this forum or other reviews. In the end, be cautious and follow your instincts. But I do not reject solely based on video verification request.

You sound as if you have nothing to lose. Certainly you're not married. If a provider has video of you and decides to use it, you're toast. Maybe you won't get prosecuted but it will be obviously to anyone what you were doing whether you followed though or not. Intent is everything. If sharing that part of your life with your spouse and your colleagues isn't a problem for you, video away.

**Hillbilly Bob** · 12-13-21 19:36

Originally Posted by MateoRo [View Original Post]

Hey there, this one looks familiar. She says she's new, is she familiar to anyone else?

https://cincinnati.skipthegames.com/...e/983066787146

I LikeWatch posted a not so good review of her just a couple days ago#21938 . Always helps to RTFF.

**BTownPerv** · 12-13-21 18:10

Originally Posted by Bkbh1 [View Original Post]

Seriously interested in your thoughts about allowing a video verification. The provider now has a vid of you for any possible blackmail. And if she happened to be LEO instead of legit, you just gave the court video evidence.

But I fully realize more providers are asking for this type of verification. Too scary for me. Buy clearly you and others are OK giving it to them. So why should I not be concerned with video verification?

The "verification" process was basically a variation of the classic SW "I'll show you mine, you show me yours" routine on video call, and then switched to a regular phone call. No additional identifying info exchanged other than the phone numbers we already had for each other. IMHO it wouldn't be in a provider's interest to record and try to use against me, as I am 100% capable of doing the same, and Uncle LEO gets way more upset about his nieces fooling around than his nephews. I did not see it as surrendering the upper hand.

The fact that the provider already had a number of reviews here and no warnings of scams or other unpleasantness is what tipped the scales in her favor, otherwise I may not have gone for it either.

**JustaFunHabit** · 12-13-21 17:41

Seems to be some discussion on this. Video verification (facetime, google duo. Etc.) for me is helpful to prove provider and her pics are real and what you like or want and can get a quick view of incall room if desired. Do or say nothing incriminating if you fear it being recorded. Let them go first for any showing of body parts for LEO check. As far as blackmail fear. How close you ever check the room for hidden cameras if a provider wants to go that way? Anyway. Always be cautious and have antennae up. But I'm OK for facetime or google duo quick verification. But before I will do that, I've already vetted the provider out from this forum or other reviews. In the end, be cautious and follow your instincts. But I do not reject solely based on video verification request.

Originally Posted by Bkbh1 [View Original Post]

Seriously interested in your thoughts about allowing a video verification. The provider now has a vid of you for any possible blackmail. And if she happened to be LEO instead of legit, you just gave the court video evidence.

But I fully realize more providers are asking for this type of verification. Too scary for me. Buy clearly you and others are OK giving it to them. So why should I not be concerned with video verification?

**WoodFordR69** · 12-13-21 17:06

Originally Posted by BelowMe [View Original Post]

And they will continue to ask for video verification as long as some of you continue to comply. This is risky business as outlined above. If we all say no thanks they'll stop asking. There are other way. Meet her for a cup of coffee first.

I was seriously considering meeting with her given the lack of talent in the area, at least spinner type & younger. No fucking way am I face-timing with someone until I get to know them, like really know them as much as we can in this hobby. I'll try someone else or save my money. Hell, isn't that part of the purpose of this site. Just like we can review the ladies, they can read what we post to figure out if we are legit or not. I can't see LEO running a fake profile for a couple of years just to bust one lady.

**MateoRo** · 12-13-21 16:22

Hey there, this one looks familiar. She says she's new, is she familiar to anyone else?

https://cincinnati.skipthegames.com/...e/983066787146

**D Nut** · 12-13-21 16:00

Originally Posted by Observant [View Original Post]

Wouldn't Snapchat video verification be relatively safe as the messages disappear? I am not a Snapchat expert but Incase someone screen records, you at least get a notification that someone did that?

Any Snapchat experts can comment or validate?

Ob.

By the time you find out that your Snap has been captured and stored, it's too late to change your mind. Also, there are ways of capturing a snap without informing the sender, such as using another phone, or using a screen mirror app (MiraCast) to a different device. If they're determined enough to try to blackmail you, they're determined enough to learn how to preserve evidence to use against you.

**Below Me** · 12-13-21 14:53

Originally Posted by Bkbh1 [View Original Post]

Seriously interested in your thoughts about allowing a video verification. The provider now has a vid of you for any possible blackmail. And if she happened to be LEO instead of legit, you just gave the court video evidence.

But I fully realize more providers are asking for this type of verification. Too scary for me. Buy clearly you and others are OK giving it to them. So why should I not be concerned with video verification?

And they will continue to ask for video verification as long as some of you continue to comply. This is risky business as outlined above. If we all say no thanks they'll stop asking. There are other way. Meet her for a cup of coffee first.

**OneHitWonder** · 12-13-21 13:58

A friend of mine recently met with Jessiek. He said her communication was pretty good however, one hour before the agreed upon time he text to confirm and she pushed it back one hour. At time of arrival she asked for photo of cash. Was an additional fifteen minutes late after that. Room was in Sharonville. Some red flags but a photo of cash seemed harmless and she's been verified so going to dreaded Sharonville didn't seem too concerning. He said her photos are pretty accurate. Mid-late thirties. Attractive with nice body for her age and mileage. Maybe not worth the donation she's requesting but with how the market is right now, maybe. She's nice. Good BBBJ to CDS. He enjoyed himself but probably would not repeat. No knock on her. He just doesn't hobby much and there are better options for just a little more $.

Stay safe.

https://tryst.link/escort/jessiek

**OneHitWonder** · 12-13-21 13:48

A friend of mine recently met with Jessiek. He said her communication was pretty good however, one hour before the agreed upon time he text to confirm and she pushed it back one hour. At time of arrival she asked for photo of cash. Was an additional fifteen minutes late after that. Room was in Sharonville. Some red flags but a photo of cash seemed harmless and she's been verified so going to dreaded Sharonville didn't seem too concerning. He said her photos are pretty accurate. Mid-late thirties. Attractive with nice body for her age and mileage. Maybe not worth the donation she's requesting but with how the market is right now, maybe. She's nice. Good BBBJ to CDS. He enjoyed himself but probably would not repeat. No knock on her. He just doesn't hobby much and there are better options for just a little more $.

Stay safe.

https://tryst.link/escort/jessiek

**Observant** · 12-13-21 12:55

Wouldn't Snapchat video verification be relatively safe as the messages disappear? I am not a Snapchat expert but Incase someone screen records, you at least get a notification that someone did that?

Any Snapchat experts can comment or validate?

Ob.

**Hillbilly Bob** · 12-13-21 12:36

Well back in the cold north for a couple months. The best part of being back is Raylee is still around. She was my first stop when I got back an she was as Fantastic as ever. I see her weekly when I am here hope to enjoy her as much as I can until I leave again.

**Hillbilly Bob** · 12-13-21 10:51

Originally Posted by BTownPerv [View Original Post]

So I made my trip out to Lawrenceburg last weekend, and since nobody really replied to my request for recommendations, I decided to roll the dice on Funsized Amber:

https://cincinnati.skipthegames.com/...g/033308956242

As some reviewers have mentioned, the video call verification was a new experience, but successful and she was willing to make the trip out to the casino, so we were off to the races. Some issues with her ride and finding the hotel caused some delays, but she kept in touch and updated throughout and never ghosted. Upon her arrival I was VERY pleasantly surprised.

The photos on the ad seem to be of varying ages, her current appearance is closest to the black stocking pics, but damn this young lady has the tightest little spinner body. Very easy to communicate with, very eager to please and fetish friendly, and despite it being ridiculously late her energy and enthusiasm were totally on point. One of the top five visits I've had in the last twenty five years in the hobby.

I saw a lot of grief given on this board because a number of her reviews were from first time posters or new accounts. Well take it from this long time Senior, Funsized Amber is 100% worth your time and money, and I will absolutely repeat anytime I am back in the area.

Glad you had a good time But.

First off I can't bring myself to put a video out there second is her post says I drive myself then you said driver having a problem. That's when I would have bailed right there even though she already had me on tape.

**Bkbh1** · 12-13-21 10:12

Originally Posted by BTownPerv [View Original Post]

So I made my trip out to Lawrenceburg last weekend, and since nobody really replied to my request for recommendations, I decided to roll the dice on Funsized Amber:

https://cincinnati.skipthegames.com/...g/033308956242

As some reviewers have mentioned, the video call verification was a new experience, but successful and she was willing to make the trip out to the casino, so we were off to the races. Some issues with her ride and finding the hotel caused some delays, but she kept in touch and updated throughout and never ghosted. Upon her arrival I was VERY pleasantly surprised.

The photos on the ad seem to be of varying ages, her current appearance is closest to the black stocking pics, but damn this young lady has the tightest little spinner body. Very easy to communicate with, very eager to please and fetish friendly, and despite it being ridiculously late her energy and enthusiasm were totally on point. One of the top five visits I've had in the last twenty five years in the hobby.

I saw a lot of grief given on this board because a number of her reviews were from first time posters or new accounts. Well take it from this long time Senior, Funsized Amber is 100% worth your time and money, and I will absolutely repeat anytime I am back in the area.

Seriously interested in your thoughts about allowing a video verification. The provider now has a vid of you for any possible blackmail. And if she happened to be LEO instead of legit, you just gave the court video evidence.

But I fully realize more providers are asking for this type of verification. Too scary for me. Buy clearly you and others are OK giving it to them. So why should I not be concerned with video verification?