Thread: What in the fuck are you talking about?
+
Add Report
Results 2,596 to 2,610 of 3059
-
12-13-21 12:38 #464Regular Member

Posts: 6New to Site
Hey all,
I do business in NC Charlotte and decided to sign up on this site. I am based in Dallas and we use Ourhome2 or Eccie before we shut down. This site is somewhat similar to the setup of the TX sites. Is Eros the best way to search for providers in NC?
Be safe out there.
RT.
-
12-13-21 06:45 #463Senior Member

Posts: 7342The Charlotte thread goes back as long as I have been here. I have seen a lot of girls that I thought were awesome go downhill. That is why I don't white knight them. They may be awesome today and be totally shit tomorrow. Find them, fuck them as long as they are fun, and forget them. I suspect Jackson started the forum in the late 90's or early 00's. Then the backpage stuff happened and Jackson sold the forum and the servers went overseas. Everything didn't seem to transfer over for some reason. This forum has been around closer to 20 years than 10.
We all don't like the same things either. Some like em skinny, some like them fat. A woman I may be crazy about you may not like and that is a good thing. There would be a lot more fights if we all wanted the same pussy.
Originally Posted by MachoManny
[View Original Post]
-
12-12-21 22:24 #462Senior Member

Posts: 120617 years for me
I've been here for at least 17 years.
Originally Posted by KingEpqng
[View Original Post]
-
12-12-21 22:02 #461Senior Member

Posts: 1456Right
I also remember seeing what the other monger said about a thread saying 2004-2005. So, it's been around for a long time for sure. I just located the thread for the 2000-2004 archive reports below 😂
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?233-2000-2004-Archived-Reports
.
Originally Posted by Hollowpoint1
[View Original Post]
-
12-12-21 21:38 #460Senior Member

Posts: 246At least 2007
I joined this board back in 2007.I went back and looked at my newbie reports and pm messages. I know for certain I was no pioneer. The board easily predates me by a few years.
Originally Posted by KingEpqng
[View Original Post]
-
12-12-21 21:04 #459Banned Member

Posts: 634You are right
I was wrong about that, I did realize it goes back longer than I thought. I will admit when I am wrong. I think the Charlotte section has only been around for a bit over 10 years but not 100% sure. Not sure it matters much how long someone has been posting here it really matters how many white knights are going to come to the rescue. NCT, in over 5000 posts in here I have never seen you come off as a White Knight which is refreshing. I just don't get the whole White Knighting thing and what people really think they are going to get in return for doing it. The proof is in the pudding. Have a good night NCT.
Originally Posted by NCTransplant
[View Original Post]
-
12-12-21 20:55 #458Senior Member

Posts: 518Facts don't matter MM
He's been instigating drama all his life. I know his game. Always bringing drama and attacks, but no intel. Why? I think you have it figured out. He's been called out before but never banned.
Originally Posted by KingEpqng
[View Original Post]
-
12-12-21 19:31 #457Senior Member

Posts: 1456Usag
USAG has most definitely been around since at least 2009 and I know that for sure. So, that makes it at least 12 years old.
.
Originally Posted by MachoManny
[View Original Post]
-
12-12-21 18:58 #456Senior Member

Posts: 7342I don't know what happened to the thread but there was an archived 2004 section and I had the last post of that year. This forum is at least 15-20 years old. I know it goes back before 2005.
Originally Posted by JohnWhitman
[View Original Post]
-
12-12-21 18:37 #455Senior Member

Posts: 743Very well said
John, I need to go on the record saying that everything in this post and your two previous ones about this silly drama is spot on accurate in my opinion. Actually you have been very restrained in correcting some of the lies and misrepresentations which have polluted these boards. This idiot just makes up his own supposed "facts" to support his flimsy or incorrect allegations. A prime example is the age of this board. A2 may or may not chime in since he obviously doesn't read everything that gets posted. But I actually went back and found a welcome email showing I joined this website more than eleven and a half years ago. So saying this website is only ten years old is flat out WRONG.
I understand that you prefer not to get into a shit-slinging contest with a baboon. Never going to be a pleasant experience.
Originally Posted by JohnMarigold
[View Original Post]
-
12-12-21 14:57 #454Senior Member

Posts: 736Samara
Okay, there is no point in continuing this drama. I'm sure experienced mongers have already made up their mind from reading the reviews of Samara from other trusted senior members. My only point that I would argue is that this board is indeed much older than 10 years. I'm sure A2 or other experienced mongers can attest to that but I think we are all tired of this drama. Peace and out, JM.
Originally Posted by MachoManny
[View Original Post]
-
12-12-21 14:18 #453Senior Member

Posts: 105Why?
Why isn't Maniac Manny banned yet? Over 15 posts now (to include two other boards) trolling this one provider. Half those posts fall under "pointless drama, arguments, and criticizing other members on here. Mostly seniors. Other members have been banned for way less bs on this site. I couldn't find these 5 handles you claim are hers posting self reviews. I did come across a bunch of reviews by seniors who I do believe saw her, unlike yourself. You are right JM. Macho "Maniac" Manny must have this Samara confused wit the other that was mentioned a ways back, as he doesn't have her age range correct either. She doesn't take appointments late in the evening either.
Originally Posted by MachoManny
[View Original Post]
It's time to stop and move on.
-
12-12-21 09:42 #452Banned Member

Posts: 634John Knight, you are right about everything you say about Samara she is a real gem and a an absolute unicorn. She is true under the radar that just sees a handful of guys and always acts professional 1000% of the time. You are also correct that you have been posting on these boards for 15 years considering the site has only been around for 10. Johnny Knight, you are a pioneer, probably the very first person to leave a review here so whatever you say goes. You must not have played with many large breasted women in your lifetime if you consider Samara to have large breasts because that isn't a YMMV thing, it is just a fact they aren't large. The bad skin thing I didn't notice as much on my first visit with her because it was kind of late and dark so maybe you just didn't notice it on your one visit. She has really bad birthmarks which aren't very attractive at all so to say her skin is flawless is just misleading people. Have a good day Mr. Knight!
Originally Posted by JohnMarigold
[View Original Post]
-
12-12-21 05:19 #451Senior Member

Posts: 736Samara
You are wrong. I have been posting here for at least 15 years. I clicked on my Name up at the top of my screen and then Number of Posts and only the last 200 posts show up there, but you can see that I have 547 posts (before this post). Do the math: the post that was 8 years ago (Jan. 2013) was my 347th post I guess. So you did not "straighten things up" concerning my time here posting on this board. The point I was trying to make stands: She would have been a child when I created this Username and therefore she is not using this account to self-post a rebuttal to the erroneous things that are being said about her.
And YES, the Samara that I posting about is the "Senior Members Only" Samara. I had to provide her with my Username from this site to get screened by her. I would describe her breasts as ample (I'm guessing a C cup but I didn't bring a measuring stick with me when we met). I guess I could go back and find and post the photos of her breasts that she sent me, but I don't think she wants that posted here for everyone's viewing pleasure. Anyways, I think they are large (ample) but what I consider to be large may not be what you consider to be large. But anyways, I am 100% sure that I am referring to the same Samara that is being written about. You are the one who is confused. Furthermore, Samara never deceived or manipulated me. She did not have bad skin. In MY opinion, her body is nearly flawless. It is my guess that you have either never seen her (did not make it past her screening process) or that you had one session with her and you somehow pissed her off (and she put you on her Do Not Repeat list.).
Samara is a pure gem and does not deserve the shit you are saying about her. I really think it's time for you to STFU and move on. Other than that, I hope you have a nice day.
Peace,
JM.
Originally Posted by MachoManny
[View Original Post]
-
12-11-21 22:01 #450Banned Member

Posts: 634Samara
How you doing John? It is good seeing you as we all appreciate your contributions over the years, but I just want to straighten a few things up. You have been posting for 8 years and not 15, so that would put Samara in her late 20's not a child like you claim. Secondly, she definitely doesn't have large breasts and she has far from a perfect body unless you don't consider bad skin part of the body. So I am not sure we are talking about the same Samara here. The Samara we are discussing is the Senior Members Only Samara who has over 15 handles in here and writes glamorous reviews about herself. She even puts herself as her all time favorite. John you are a good man but I think you are getting your Samara's confused here. Our Samara has manipulated and deceived many people in here over the last 3 years and has even written many fake reviews about other providers which isn't a very professional thing to do. Sorry that you jumped into the conversation late and got your Samara's mixed up but from your description we are talking about 2 totally different hookers. Thanks for the input buddy as we are all here to help each other and I wish you nothing but the best But always remember bros before hoes!
Originally Posted by JohnMarigold
[View Original Post]










Reply With Quote





