Thread: Asian Providers
+
Add Report
Results 5,941 to 5,955 of 9081
-
12-12-21 15:35 #3141Senior Member

Posts: 329Fake pics of choice
Good Ol' Mr. Cong. LOL.
Originally Posted by Apharmd
[View Original Post]
Whenever I see a certain class of pics I assume they pulled it from Xiuren / you-Girls / Tuigirls, etc. That set of pics. When it's just the body, with a blurred face, then I at least hope it's a similar body type, but when they show the face and claim ethnicity other than Chinese it gives me a chuckle, since most of the models from that set of publications are Chinese. Those ads on Adultsearch and such that promise everything anyone could possibly want, and seem to be a dozen ads & numbers funneling to a small group of ladies in seedy motels, have a lot of pics taken from that collection. I see ads all the time w / models I recognize, but it's when they use the well known JAV stars, especially ones I like, that I really get annoyed. Hahaha.
FEC seems to often favor the P.S., though I've seen them use outright fake pics, but SDAG sometimes gets carried away. And I like SDAG. They were my first agency dealing (think Bunny / Kiko was my very first), but I still see one of my ATFs, Bryn being advertised in different cities w / the same pics from 7 or so years ago.
-
12-11-21 22:30 #3140Banned Member

Posts: 3075I definitely prefer going to the AAMPs if I want FS, but when our favorite agencies bring unknown talents and uses fake pictures I'm not too excited about scheduling. I haven't been to FEC in almost a year for that reason. The good thing with SDAG is they still bring known talents like Petra, Ash, Kiko, etc. so I'm more willing to go.
Originally Posted by Apharmd
[View Original Post]
I'm glad there are places like 108, 7 and now VIP that are bringing beautiful ladies to our city and allowing us to see their lineup before paying the HF.
-
12-11-21 21:23 #3139Senior Member

Posts: 144Have not seen Evon yet but pics are fake as usual.
Originally Posted by Po4456
[View Original Post]
https://buondua.com/ugirls-u314-mode...pictures-12490
If young is the most important factor for you I'd say go try Momo over at FEC.
-
12-11-21 16:00 #3138Senior Member

Posts: 177And just like that, her profile is gone.
Originally Posted by DragonWolf
[View Original Post]
-
12-11-21 13:16 #3137Banned Member

Posts: 100Any intel on Evon? Hoping for younger talent.
Originally Posted by DragonWolf
[View Original Post]
-
12-11-21 01:19 #3136Senior Member

Posts: 329Sdag
Dang. They're already prepping for the next business day. That's work ethic!
Originally Posted by RChangDatyKing
[View Original Post]
-
12-11-21 00:41 #3135Banned Member

Posts: 3075Ms. Evon at SDAG
Ms. Evon at SDAG looks pretty good.
https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/1653
-
12-09-21 07:21 #3134Senior Member

Posts: 287Massage therapist arrested
Thought this was kind hilarious.
https://www.jsonline.com/story/commu...es/6414163001/
An employee at a Franklin spa has been charged with having nonconsensual sexual contact with clients.
Yingfeng Huang, 58, of Chicago, is facing two counts of fourth-degree sexual assault, according to a criminal complaint filed in Milwaukee County Circuit Court.
If convicted, Huang could face up to $20,000 in fines and 18 months in prison.
A Franklin police log entry from May 10 said a man, then 19 years old, requested a 45-minute massage and said a masseuse, later identified as Huang, touched his genitals without consent at Nurture Massage Spa, 6564 S. LoversLane Road.
According to the criminal complaint:
An undercover police officer went to the same spa on June 29, where Huang also touched his genitals without consent. Both the 19-year-old and undercover officer said they stopped Huang from any further sexual contact.
Huang admitted to touching both the officer and the 19-year-old and said she did so to earn extra money to send to her family. Police noted that multiple online reviews discussed the sexual contact offered at the spa.
-
12-08-21 01:59 #3133Senior Member

Posts: 3642I can't see rating on TER but my guess it's because LA Momo is more experienced and more willing to please. I prefer young looking girl so I like SD Momo more. LA Momo could be a hit in SD.
Originally Posted by DragonWolf
[View Original Post]
-
12-07-21 14:24 #3132Senior Member

Posts: 329Momo
Thanks for clearing that up BA. The pics seemed a little bit of a stretch, but other things lined up such that it seemed plausible. This one, currently in SD, appears to have a solidly lower rating than the other one.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
12-07-21 02:39 #3131Senior Member

Posts: 144I saw Momo when she had a short stay with CAKD OC, didn't realize she would come visit SD. She is legit on the younger side for k-girls. I didn't ask her age (they always lie anyway) but I would believe her if she said she's in her 20's and looked younger than most providers, especially the ones we get here in SD. Face and body are more full / round than pics. I personally think the pics look better but I prefer thinner girls. A lot of the extra weight went straight to her tits and ass. Definitely not a spinner. As mentioned in other reviews, her tits are all natural and they're great. The downside is that her service isn't the best. The session was quite scripted and she was a bit "cold" at the start. She spent a lot of time in the shower with no preview and as you said MSOG was a definite no go. She also wants you to go slow and gentle. Her BBBJ and BLS was probably the highlight of the session. She's a nice girl but not sure I'd repeat. If you like them young and curvy she fits the bill.
Originally Posted by SirBishop
[View Original Post]
-
12-07-21 00:21 #3130Senior Member

Posts: 3642Wrong Momo
This is her review: (Click here). Momo might also had reviews in OC and LA forums.
You should recognize her face and body from photoshopped pics. I thought she looked younger and hotter than pics. Beautiful big tits, thicc body, and nice booty. English has accent but felt like talking to a young Korean American. Great BBBJ. I recommended in LA.
The other Momo you found does not look as close or young as pics but still hot.
Originally Posted by DragonWolf
[View Original Post]
-
12-06-21 20:48 #3129Senior Member

Posts: 106Ice from ASAG
I don't know if anyone saw Ice or remember from this agency. It was back in 2012/2013.
She used to be my favorite. Solid natural B+/ C. Nice complexion and very nice ass and prefect waist. I would hold her waist and doggy. She could ride you from the top and moaned.
She stopped having sex and just gave me HJ. I then decided to end the session. I liked her so much that I even brought a coffee for her on that day. It's the first appointment of the day.
-
12-06-21 17:50 #3128Banned Member

Posts: 904Mom seems to have many good reviews on the LA / OC board for those that can't see T e are. Overall she's good with the two exceptions of no MSOG and guys calling her thighs "thicc" or a Latina figure. It's all opinion on looks but I don't see any real negs in looks, body or performance. No option on her per reviews and ca-kdolls. If I didn't have to buy those damn Christmas gifts I'd be there several times!
Originally Posted by DragonWolf
[View Original Post]
-
12-06-21 15:58 #3127Senior Member

Posts: 329Momo
I know 100% I've seen her advertised by the same agency in either LA or OC (I like to browse up there just for fun, and in case I'm ever in the mood for a road trip). I'm fairly certain it was under the same name, but the only reviews I could find were.
Originally Posted by Gbrand
[View Original Post]
https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...4479396-363187
https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...5054270-361446
Same provider, just the second one was a random one off.
They both are for this Momo.
https://www.candygirlla.com/%EB%A3%A8%EC%8B%9C
And though it's a completely separate set of pics, I can somewhat see the resemblance, assuming two different Photoshoppers did the respective sets of pics.
Candygirlla has other ladies on the CA-kdolls roster on their site as well, and it's showing "back Dec 10th", so it's quite plausible that they're the same person.
With that said, her reviews are really solid, pretty much across the board.
Rating 8. 51.
Looks 7. 96 / Performance 8. 26.









Reply With Quote




