Thread: Streetwalker Reports
+
Add Report
Results 2,371 to 2,385 of 7696
-
12-09-21 22:01 #5326Banned Member

Posts: 964Residents have definitely been complaining about the nearly-naked girls walking out into the street, walking-up and attempting to open car doors, etc. What's odd is that the police have been telling them "there's nothing we can do" which was and is false. They can still get out there and enforce the laws, that hasn't changed, laws are still laws. Whether or not girls get charged is another matter, but they can still apprehend. I just think they've been very whiny about it. The other thing is that we keep resorting back to the same tactics which have been used for years and that has never squashed prostitution of any kind. I'm not sure how this law-and-order approach will do much other than get the girls to stop being so obvious. In the end I think that's what residents really want, not to see it out in the open. It's the same with the homeless, nobody wants to see it but they're okay with sending it to somewhere else. Doesn't really fix anything. I still really believe that City Attorney candidate Kennedy had the right approach, or at least it was something we could have tried. The old way doesn't work, so why not try de-criminalizing and see how that goes? I'm to the point where we need to start listening to sociologists, arresting our way out of the problem hasn't really worked very well for drugs, homelessness, prostitution and a myriad other issues. The police union called Kennedy an anarchist, but we need to start doing something different. Maybe it won't work, I don't know, but we know for sure that what we've been doing doesn't work, either.
My opinions, of course. But it doesn't matter, because she lost so here we go again. We'll see how it goes.
That being said, Aurora does seem to be the only stroll left in the entire Seattle metro area. When I first got into this game there were active strolls in Everett, Kent / Tukwila / SeaTac, Georgetown, Rainier, Denny Park / AAA as well as Aurora. I'm not sure where it will go next if it ever gets pushed-out.
Originally Posted by FilthyAnimal
[View Original Post]
-
12-09-21 02:20 #5325Regular Member

Posts: 10It is inevitable
Couldn't agree more, too many reasons point to increase in AA arrests. The violent crime along AA hasn't been good in 2021 including murders so the locals are livid. New the vowed to crack down. Police have been making similar promises. Voters have made their preference for law and order known. The strip is pulling in swarms of out of town women and AA can only handle so much increased traffic.
If AA does see a task force or other other prolonged LE pushback expect the non-local girls to quit coming to town and chunks of the AA scene to move elsewhere.
Originally Posted by StreetTroller
[View Original Post]
-
12-08-21 14:31 #5324Banned Member

Posts: 964What's interesting is that quite a few girls still stand out there with SPD parked nearby expecting men to pull-over for them and pick them up. I'm not sure why they don't move to the south end of the stroll south of 105th. To me this just highlights the fact that they don't care what happens to us, other than our money we don't factor at all into their concerns.
I still think a stroll smack-down is coming.
Originally Posted by GinVermo
[View Original Post]
-
12-07-21 16:35 #5323Senior Member

Posts: 483Yup! I saw 6 southbound and 7 northbound. The entire north precinct is parked on Aurora.
Originally Posted by SomeOne8492
[View Original Post]
-
12-07-21 02:10 #5322Senior Member

Posts: 54Mon night
Went out for window shopping and PokMon. Go stroll. Soon realized famed Seattle misty rain has taken over and can't expect any activity.
Saw few girls but visibility was bad and they all had hoods so couldn't make out of it.
But boy o boy our blue friends are out there. Spotted 5 while doing southbound and 6 northbound. Two parked in Les Schwab, one in Firestone, one on random spot, two by dodge dealership.
Why'all be extra safe this week. Rub one out before heading out so you can think clearer.
-
12-06-21 21:29 #5321Banned Member

Posts: 93Be safe out there first and foremost.
Originally Posted by MongerSeeker
[View Original Post]
-
12-06-21 21:28 #5320Banned Member

Posts: 93Keep looking. You'll find the right one.
Originally Posted by Raven1855
[View Original Post]
IHateStreetTroller.
-
12-06-21 05:55 #5319Banned Member

Posts: 964Weekend Report. Again No Luck
I went out twice over this weekend. Not a lot of girls out there, but enough to look and stop for. I talked with a few from 145th to 97th, none of which would entertain any open service, even BBBJ. Didn't get any names, most don't stick around that long once they know we aren't going to date. I met a slim brunette around 105th with long hair and glasses who came to the window and immediately quoted $120 for a car date. Not a fancy dresser but had a nice face. No open service, so she walked away. I stopped for a nice BSW with a long wig and tight stretch pants a block away and realized we had met before. She approached and said, "so, changed your mind yet?" with a big smile. She tried everything she could to convince me, but I held firm. I stopped for a beautiful tiny BSW spinner with dreadlocks somewhere around 96th. She seemed really young when she got to me so I got spooked and told her that I thought I knew her and drove-off. Around 137th I stopped for a nice Latina spinner in a miniskirt and short dark hair but she was a no as well. When I pulled away SPD pulled-up parked immediately behind her as she waited on the corner. She apparently decided they were bad for business so she boogied on.
One thing I noticed is that I saw SPD cruisers parked in more clandestine spots. One was parked immediately next to a garage wall at Les Schwab, very hard to see. I'm wondering if they're starting to pounce on johns now. I still think the big sting is coming to Aurora soon.
-
12-06-21 05:37 #5318Banned Member

Posts: 964Anytime there is a minor involved we're going to lose. What I don't like about this is that an SW can get a fake identification card and even if we check and she gets caught we can still be held accountable, particularly if she's working the street. That part really freaks me out.
About 10 years ago I was communicating via PM to trade information with a few guys on TNA on a pretty regular basis. One of them had met a nice young BSW and she volunteered to show him her identification and he saw her pretty regularly for a year. Always raved about she and her friends. They were running ads on TNA as well as working the AAA stroll and had a lot of reviews up. Well, he met with her one night and it was her birthday and he said, "happy 19th birthday!" and she said, "no, I'm 18". He immediately reminded her that he'd been seeing her for a year and that she had lied to him. Apparently her response was something to the effect of "I'm not a ***** nor a snitch". She'd been out there working the boards and the street starting at 16 and all through her 17th year. All of those guys on both TNA and the street had booked time with her over that year. She had identification which said she was one year older than she was. If she had been discovered out there, all of those guys could have potentially gone down even though she provided false information.
Like with the AAA, I think we're going to see more of this on Aurora. The pimps and their crews seem to bring more of that in than from any other circle.
Originally Posted by Colnago
[View Original Post]
-
12-05-21 17:03 #5317Senior Member

Posts: 160Saturday
Decided to cruise the stroll last night, not much action out there. Eventually picked up a skinny blonde WSW near KK around 1 am. Pretty face, seemed like she might be a user.
Great BBBJ, no CIM but was okay with me giving her head directions with my hand. Standard bare rate, was more than satisfied. Doesn't have a phone but gave me her friends number, supposedly getting a new one today. Really hopeful her friend gives her my number.
-
12-05-21 13:41 #5316Senior Member

Posts: 755Years ago, I had GF who worked with a guy who was on trial for having sex with a minor. He picked her up at a bar. I don't remember all the details, but essentially he was found guilty. His defense, of course, was he assumed she was legal age because she was at a bar. The judge / jury did not feel that was sufficient to let find him not guilty.
Originally Posted by StreetTroller
[View Original Post]
-
12-04-21 01:19 #5315Banned Member

Posts: 964ISO: BSW with Big Hair Near 125th Area
So I realize that an ISO is a longshot these days, doesn't seem as though many of us are posting date reports anymore, instead we post more about what the scene is like out there as we cruise through. However, I thought I'd post and ask anyway, just in case.
I drove through Aurora at about 8 pm Friday evening. As I passed near Firestone / Lowe's, I noticed a nice BSW with what looked to be big, natural hair standing on a corner. It wasn't an afro per se, but definitely in that style. In all honesty, I sort of have a thing for that afro-look, not sure where that comes from but I like it. She was wearing tight beige stretch pants, slightly thicker but not at all fat. She was maybe in her 20's, but of course who actually knows. I had to be somewhere, but I actually did two passes just to check her out a bit more. She caught me spying her and she smiled big, but I didn't want to stop. Seems as though these days the hookers out there are more like strippers, they want that instant deal right there on the spot or you don't get anything from them such as a phone number or even a name. I didn't want to blow that when I couldn't date at that moment.
Again, longshot posting an ISO in here these days, but anyone know who she is? Rates, services, all that?
I'll be my typical cynical self here lately and say that I'm guessing she's a lot of money for very limited service and she'll only be here a week before she goes back to LA, but hey it's worth a shot.
Anyone?
-
12-02-21 15:56 #5314Senior Member

Posts: 2198I agree with you that there not a way to be 100% certain that a girl is not a minor in that age range. In years past if were found with a minor the cop would asked the girl if you inquired if she was a minor or not. If she did then the cop would cite you for indecent exposure in a public place. Now if you were stopped by a vice officer than chances are they would cite you statutory rape. These days with all the human trafficking crackdowns the prosecutor will probably try to charge you with the maximum charges. The upside however is that you follow the 22 rules and take precautions your chance of being caught is extremely low.
Originally Posted by StreetTroller
[View Original Post]
-
12-02-21 15:00 #5313Banned Member

Posts: 964I'll go out on a limb and say that there isn't really any good way to verify for absolute certain. An underage girl can easily do the math ahead of time and pick a year that instantly makes her 20 years-old. We can also ask for identification but if she has a fake identification card then that goes right out the window. My understanding is that in this state if an SW shows an identification card which is fake then we still can't use that legally in our defense. In the eyes of the law if she's underage then she's underage, no ands ifs or buts. So a girl can lie and apparently that's okay no matter if we tried to cover our bases. Basically we're screwed either way.
Originally Posted by MongerSeeker
[View Original Post]
-
12-02-21 12:54 #5312Senior Member

Posts: 698Age test?
That's not true, many of these girls have been trained by the pimp, and can fool even some of the savviest of us. And although most girl don't carry I'd with them, you have to sometimes just go with you gut.
Originally Posted by MongerSeeker
[View Original Post]









Reply With Quote


