Sugar Daddy Sites

[TheHuntsman]

So far 1 yes and 1 no, who wants to break the tie?

I'll add that yes I met a lot of girls without a profile pic and a bare minimal profile. But filling out my profile completely has led to a lot of messages from girls.

[WhosThirsty]

So far 1 yes and 1 no, who wants to break the tie?

I've done some research looking through this and the Richmond board but can't find an answer.

Is it necessary to post a public profile pic or is it ok to just have private photos? If you just have private photos will that minimise the responses you get from SB's?

Thanks all.

[HollywoodGuy]

I've done some research looking through this and the Richmond board but can't find an answer.

Is it necessary to post a public profile pic or is it ok to just have private photos? If you just have private photos will that minimise the responses you get from SB's?

Thanks all.

Yes it will.

[TheHuntsman]

I've done some research looking through this and the Richmond board but can't find an answer.

Is it necessary to post a public profile pic or is it ok to just have private photos? If you just have private photos will that minimise the responses you get from SB's?

Thanks all.

You don't need a profile pic. Most my time on SA was without a profile pic. Sometimes I did have a private pic. But either way it never hindered me from meeting anyone.

[WhosThirsty]

I've done some research looking through this and the Richmond board but can't find an answer.

Is it necessary to post a public profile pic or is it ok to just have private photos? If you just have private photos will that minimise the responses you get from SB's?

Thanks all.

[HollywoodGuy]

After not having been on SA for a year I have had to re-remind myself of a few things. So just a few quick thoughts.

The first is to log on and sort by "recently active". Do this a couple times a day for about a week. The girls you see over and over as online or recently online are your more seasoned pros as a rule.

Depending on your budget don't waste time with the ones that are obviously GPS for what ever reason.

Stick to your demographic as your for real attraction to them will come out in your personal (not copy & pasted) messages.

Stick to your prospecting format, don't go off message even when you think you can. Do not short cut the process.

Look for the newbies and less seasoned girls. Expect to dither a bit longer with them. If any girl agrees too quickly to your allowance you are either overpaying or they are a bit too seasoned.

*These are generalizations and your individual results may vary.

[HollywoodGuy]

This broad's username is Kokobunny, as in Snowbunny. You know Jamal is having this girl hand over her allowance. That being said, she is young, 5'9" tall, toned body and long legs. She kind of reminds me of Marianne from Gilligan's Island.

She "knows what she's worth," so her initial ask is 2 k a month. I agreed to this proposal, saying I'd want to see her 3 times a week, to which she agreed. Thank the sex gods that Jamal dropped out of elementary school math, as I have been creampieing this sexy little brotha lover msog in all her holes overnight for a 165 allowance.

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...7-817017da1f8e

Hope you are just paying that weekly.

[FirstClass1]

This broad's username is Kokobunny, as in Snowbunny. You know Jamal is having this girl hand over her allowance. That being said, she is young, 5'9" tall, toned body and long legs. She kind of reminds me of Marianne from Gilligan's Island.

She "knows what she's worth," so her initial ask is 2 k a month. I agreed to this proposal, saying I'd want to see her 3 times a week, to which she agreed. Thank the sex gods that Jamal dropped out of elementary school math, as I have been creampieing this sexy little brotha lover msog in all her holes overnight for a 165 allowance.

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...7-817017da1f8e

[HollywoodGuy]

I just passed 30 days in on my new membership at seeking. I currently have a dozen numbers and have only had one M&G. I am being a lot pickier this time around. Something I have never done before. I always just fucked almost any girl that said yes. Knowing that out of that mass of girls a few good ones would rise to the top. But I am on a limited budget so I would rather find just 1 or 2 or 3 that could be regulars. My real #'s in the past were to fuck about 30 girls to find one real keeper. Someone that I would then get 30-100 or even 200 more dates out of. Also got my first burner # that is untraceable to anything. Never did that before and I wish I did but finally popped for the extra bill. So nothing much to report. The game is the same. I am using the same well worn pitch which I have changed very little in about 10 years.

[Horseman69]

I tried reading this, but my eyes glazed over from all the yeehaws.

SA has implemented an algorithm that trawls all messages for keywords, including "ppm," "incall," GFE / pse, numbers and currency symbols, and other terms which may hint at solicitation. These messages get flagged for analysis, and may result in suspensions and bans. It is very difficult to appeal their decision. They're tightening the screws now that they've been de-platformed from app stores, and are trying to demonstrate that they're a conventional dating site.

Keep your conversations on site as clean as possible, using neutral terms, and take the convo offsite as soon as you can. Once you're offsite, keep using neutral terms until the girl demonstrates she's DTF, at which point you can communicate plainly.

It has been dully noted good sir. I've signed one more time, we shall see what happens. Will follow your sound advice and practice good decorum on the site. Their algorithm can't and won't stop me from young sweet PANOCHA.

Yeeeehhhaaa Cowboys, Giddy UP.

-Horseman.

[TheHuntsman]

This girl wants 500. Wow. Idk what to even say to that.

https://www.seeking.com/member/406dc...e-9f9a4bc66724

[CaliFun84]

Wondering is anyone has had any luck with this site? I get a lot of replies and hookups with SA but tried this site also. I get lots of emails but maybe 1 or 2 replies out of say 50 emails. Seems like it's a scam. Maybe fake accounts to get guys to buy credits to be able to email girls.

I'm in the LA area.


sugardaddy.com

[FirstClass1]

If you're wondering what's going on with the summary bans in SA, this is what's going on:

https://slate.com/technology/2021/04...r-daddies.html

As I've suggested before, just be mindful of how you word your preliminary conversations. They can't go after you for what you and another consenting adult decide to do on a regular date.

[TheHuntsman]

JFC. Even the headline is obnoxious and shallow. I stay away from accounts like these, where the wh0 r* has a thousand cock stare.

Agree 100%. If there's anything in their heading or profile like that or says treat me like a princess or how I deserve to be treated. That's a hard pass. Also her profile is like I previously mentioned. Caucasian or Latina looking female, ethnicity says mixed and in the what she's looking for section is blank. I'm telling you profiles with that are highly suspect to me. Maybe, I'm just crazy idk.

[FirstClass1]

She didn't want to come off cocky, is "new" to this but apparently asking $3 k per meet. LOL.

https://www.seeking.com/member/0f22f...8-a28545302a44

JFC. Even the headline is obnoxious and shallow. I stay away from accounts like these, where the wh0 r* has a thousand cock stare.