Thread: NoVA SugarBabies
+
Add Report
Results 10,726 to 10,740 of 17751
-
08-20-21 12:24 #7026Senior Member

Posts: 618Grawrgrawr
Originally Posted by RazorFish1801
[View Original Post]
She's back with a new profile.
Originally Posted by MikelSuTiger
[View Original Post]
https://www.seeking.com/member/24b56...6-37a8689419c5
Same screen name, and not sure if she's still looking for 3 k monthly with only CFS unless you actually go with her to the clinic and get tested. LOL.
-
08-20-21 12:23 #7025Regular Member

Posts: 8Annajes snapchat or Instagram
I was just wondering if anyone cares to share Annajes Snapchat or Instagram? My SA account is expiring today and she has being offline for the past 10 days or so. Obviously I would gladly take her number but I know sharing numbers is a touchy subject to some and I haven't had much info to share. Yes, I have sent her messages but I am sure she gets many, many messages a day.
She has a great ass and I like ass!.
-
08-20-21 12:15 #7024Senior Member

Posts: 131Explicit
I think it's pretty high. I've actually paid for a few local women I had met. Off the top of my head I can count 6. It was a way of me continuing to support them and keep that line of communication alive without just sending them something for nothing. I'm talking like $10 a month type of subscriptions here. 6/6 all had full lengths full blown. I imagine there are a lot less men willing to pay for it if that was the expectation and it's now that content is suddenly gone. Perhaps I'm wrong? I have to imagine OF its trying to find a way to work around the issue. That's a lot of dough to lose for a company.
Originally Posted by Dimples572
[View Original Post]
-
08-20-21 12:00 #7023Senior Member

Posts: 618What he said
OF hasn't yet defined what will be explicit and banned. Like Dimples, I suspect they will still allow solo nudes, etc. I think it's the outright porn and chicks getting banged out that will probably get tailored a little bit.
Originally Posted by Dimples572
[View Original Post]
-
08-20-21 11:58 #7022Senior Member

Posts: 618She sounds like a piece of work. Profile states she emotional (I mean they all are but for her to have to warn a dude says a lot) and that condoms are a must.
Originally Posted by EasyeOne
[View Original Post]
-
08-20-21 11:30 #7021Senior Member

Posts: 1021I could be wrong but the way I read it really the only thing they're not allowing is explicit sex, right? Like actual intercourse. And maybe oral sex and maybe some masturbation vids if the chic penetrates herself. So idk what the percentage of OF accounts that had that type of content on them was but I'm guessing it's not all that high. So if that is indeed the case then idk how much of an impact it'll have on these girls business, but I'm guessing not that much.
Originally Posted by GMarts018
[View Original Post]
-
08-20-21 10:46 #7020Senior Member

Posts: 231Just sharing
Looks like daddyslilbunny is back. I'm sure I'm not the only one who's experience lilbunny. Always a great experience with reasonable expectations.
https://www.seeking.com/member/bc156...d-a36bc4149f0e
-
08-20-21 10:33 #7019Senior Member

Posts: 131Resurgence of SB?
You beat me to this. But I was wondering the same. A lot of these women have been able to stay at home, record videos, and then be a lot more selective when meeting in person. I think the fallout of this will be substantial (if OF doesn't buckle to pressure).
Originally Posted by MadeYoulLook29
[View Original Post]
First OF makes 20% of each dollar spent. That's a lot of money to lose, but it my understanding that the reason they are banning explicit material is because the banks and credit companies are threatening pulling support.
That said, I suspect the following:
1. Some SB will come back to seeking etc.
2. Some will miss the money from OF and simply lower their allowance so they have a more steady stream of income.
3. Some still got the GPS and will ask ridiculous amounts.
4. Girls who got got into this for OF and never intended on meeting will still not want to meet and attempt to get easy money by scamming people on SB websites.
Either way, once OF does this, I think there will be an influx of girls on these websites, but the need to filter through, verify, and play the game will not change. It will just be a bigger pool of "SBs", whatever their intentions.
-
08-20-21 01:31 #7018Senior Member

Posts: 452Never have done more than $ $ $ $ $
Max Ill provide for an allowance is $500, even for the full weekend. After covering meals, room and expenses, total spend can easily breach $1 k. If you were doing all meals as room service, I suspect you probably busted $1. 5 k quickly.
Originally Posted by ErnestLl
[View Original Post]
Not hating at all. More power to you if you have it and can spend it like that. I wish I did. In order to get quality SBs I have to differentiate with providing a long term thing or with my winning smile. Frankly though, I'd rather be able to just drop a g instead and have a new girl in the bed each morning.
-
08-20-21 01:27 #7017Senior Member

Posts: 452I used to enjoy messing with the crazies and scammers.
But after being banned once, it was such a PItA trying to get back on that I now just politely let them know that I really would like to see where things might go, but probably don't have the funds to take care of them in the manner they should be taken care of.
Originally Posted by Itfcd
[View Original Post]
That usually makes them just go away.
I do miss the back and forth with the crazies tho.
-
08-19-21 23:00 #7016Senior Member

Posts: 583Someone's off their meds.
https://www.seeking.com/member/f645e...3-5b60db0d7677
Viewed this profile because she's relatively close by, plus the tagline made me think a little bit. Left the site, did other things, played a video game for a bit, came back to a Favorite from her and the following message 6 minutes after the Favorite:
"Didn't get a hi, so I assuming I'm just a "another woman". I mean who wants that? Am I right? BORING (boo me out of this site please)".
I thought only guys got crazy when a woman doesn't pay attention to them on these sites!
This was a fairly direct and pointed reference to something I had in my profile, but have now since changed. Awfully touching of her to think I was talking about her so specifically! I have about a thousand trollish things I'd like to say, but unlike this woman, I'm not 23 anymore, and I know better. Mostly, I just want to tell her this is an exceedingly unproductive use of her time. But, I think I'll just block her.
-
08-19-21 22:58 #7015Senior Member

Posts: 376Agree with that logic, although I'd expect the entire weekend with a model for that.
Originally Posted by ErnestLl
[View Original Post]
But this young lady meant for 2 hours. I wished her well amd told her that definitely wasnt the norm but to enjoy it while she could.
-
08-19-21 22:11 #7014Senior Member

Posts: 363Couple more
https://www.seeking.com/member/d21ad...6-8cf0d00fd71e
Started convo with her, moved to texting, invested a lot of time into it, she's down to meet, but haven't committed to intimacy, or rule out. Anyone has experience?
SensualSiren, reported here and discussed by few others, met her and boy she loves to fuck, as much as I do, which worked out well. A bit skeptical to see again based on reports here on her temperamental nature.
https://www.seeking.com/member/69412...c-bb403ef1758f
Still talking to her, she randomly messaged me asking to meet her for lunch same day, I couldn't drop everything and go, so said another day, let's see if her interest hold, not sure yet what she'll want or do.
-
08-19-21 21:06 #7013Senior Member

Posts: 269Fyi
This may bring a lot of girls back down to reality.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cne...ng-in-october/
-
08-19-21 18:48 #7012Senior Member

Posts: 317Hey dimp
Sent ya a message.
Originally Posted by Dimples572
[View Original Post]







Reply With Quote




