Thread: Agency Discussion and Reviews
+
Add Report
Results 10,936 to 10,950 of 11257
-
08-10-21 19:59 #322Senior Member

Posts: 560Precisely why I've hesitated on visiting
Originally Posted by RichmondPhoto
[View Original Post]
When I came back to the DMV, the agency was known as Lotus Flowerz / Star Bunnyz--two different sites yet run by the same folks with identical models & rates. After my one jaw-droppingly awesome experience in fall 2019, the agency got rolled up by LE a few weeks later. Figured that was the end of them, which was a shame owing to it being the best Asian agency experience I'd ever had.
Originally Posted by JWebster
[View Original Post]
While I wouldn't mind a go with some cute Asian spinners, the rates aren't what they used to be (500 for two hours was hard to beat). Also, I'm personally hesitant to trust someone with my PII who just had to contend with legal issues as recently as they have. Even more so if the foot traffic is as bad as others are reporting with the agency engaging in careless shenanigans. As JWebster pointed out, it's probably just a matter of time. Stay safe, everyone.
-
08-10-21 18:25 #321Senior Member

Posts: 414Lulu at MP
I agree. I don't think the pics are her, as her hips are not that wide. The movie may be. Lulu is tiny and tight with a great attitude. Early / Mid 20's. Beautiful face and nice teeth unlike some other providers. I would guess 5'1, 90-100 lbs, A / B cups, long black hair almost to her butt. Highly recommend if you like tiny spinners.
.
Originally Posted by Balix
[View Original Post]
-
08-10-21 15:51 #320Senior Member

Posts: 42Seven?
All this talk about Tessa, anyone seen seven?
Originally Posted by Hum115
[View Original Post]
-
08-10-21 15:39 #319Senior Member

Posts: 59Lulu at MP
She is tiny, light smooth skin. Are the pictures her? I don't know but the video of the person swimming might just actually be her. The pictures are a fair representation of her except smaller. Honestly they should have used her pictures, she's petite and has a pretty face.
She is a true definition of a spinner, tiny package and boy is she super tight, might be the tightest or one of the tightest providers I have encountered. She is young, I would say early twenties. DFK, DATY, BBBJ, not sure if CIM was available.
I don't see C-girls often but she was a good experience. I've seen Seria which everyone raved about, I would say lulu body is an even match.
-
08-10-21 12:50 #318Senior Member

Posts: 40Can't believe they're doing it exactly the same without changing. They're bound to get caught again.
Originally Posted by RichmondPhoto
[View Original Post]
-
08-10-21 11:04 #317Senior Member

Posts: 889Has anyone sampled Lulu at MP yet?
I would like to pull the trigger but knowing C-girl is not known for GFE, I want to see a review from you guys before I drive 2 hours down.
From my past experience, C- girls are none GFE, J-Girls are over and beyond the scope of service, and J-Girls are right on the spot, but a tap older- which is not an issue.
Let me know. I can get info here faster than the other board.
-
08-10-21 01:39 #316Senior Member

Posts: 46She's not even really that old. Definitely older than the age they give on the site. Anyone who's used to Asian looks can tell Tessa is older. I'd say late 20's early 30's, but again, she's Asian so she looks younger than her age. On that note, yea her face is far from the picture on the site. It is a good representation of her body, though. Except she's a bit darker skin tone than the picture. She's hella cute, though. Way cuter than many of the k-girls out there. In my opinion, more so than some of the more popular k-girls here.
Originally Posted by RichmondPhoto
[View Original Post]
-
08-09-21 21:22 #315Banned Member

Posts: 770Like I've said, extremely unlikely.
Originally Posted by RichmondPhoto
[View Original Post]
The first pic is the pic off random Chinese Twitter.
The second is lulu's pic off MP site.
Note the doctoring of the image.
-
08-09-21 20:56 #314Senior Member

Posts: 889I highly doubt the pictures are of her
If someone can confirm it is her I be there in 2 hours top. Lol No easy drive for me.
Originally Posted by Balix
[View Original Post]
-
08-09-21 20:50 #313Senior Member

Posts: 889unfortunately it's not that close. It's the age thing
Tessa has a very beautiful body. Nice, tone, and small. But due to age her face is rougher than the model. In my opinion, it's not close. I will be running back to see her if she is the one in the picture.
Originally Posted by BobORama
[View Original Post]
Also no rimming like most K girl, and no FIV. It's not a deal breaker for me but definitely not running back. Now, definitely no match for the younger J girl like Meriko. How Rocket is able to find that model is beyond amazing.
Now, Tessa is definitely not ugly. So, don't count her out. The pictures are what draw me in to begin with. Especially with cc info now. It's a no no in this hobby.
-
08-09-21 20:22 #312Senior Member

Posts: 90LOL, why am I not surprised? But maybe they are a fairly decent representation of her? Can Richmond Photo confirm?
Originally Posted by RocketManP
[View Original Post]
-
08-09-21 20:02 #311Banned Member

Posts: 770I wouldn't trust Lulu's pics.
I mean.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ExVVSsVVEAAQ0ZA?format=jpg
-
08-09-21 17:03 #310Senior Member

Posts: 59Lulu
Anyone seen Lulu from MP yet?
-
08-09-21 16:34 #309Banned Member

Posts: 770BEG Tessa is using model pics
FYI for those who don't know already -.
https://www.tumbex.com/girl-map.****...t/175695871326
Replace the stars with t_u_m_b_l_r
(no underscore)
Or simply Google "haneul Kim hee jeong lingerie set"
-
08-09-21 16:21 #308Senior Member

Posts: 136Ami
I thought Ami was just ok. She was the first one I didn't think really matched up with her picture. Maybe we just personally didn't have chemistry, but for the hh just a little dfk and immediate spitting and disengagement on the BBBJ finale. For me, Narumi is a much better choice.
Originally Posted by SexAddict96
[View Original Post]








Reply With Quote



