LA LA Land Bullshit and Fight Club

[FiatVoluptas]

*The site posted the pics in a different order than I uploaded them. So, Heather Kim is the tatted girl, Sinvee is the girl in the white lingerie, the IG girl is in the pink, and well, you can see the fatty LOL.

I hope people see this post. I don't know how many of us are on this thread, but I think it's the only appropriate place. There has been an ongoing debate in the Asian / kgirl threads about certain girls being fat (or not). There's all this argument about subjectivity vs. Objectivity, etc. I am going to post some pics here to try to clarify my position on body interpretation and "fatness. " I hope others will engage and give their opinion, whether or not is coincides with my own.

The first set of pictures is an Instagram model who seems to have a very softcore OF page. The second set is retired provider Heather Kim. The third set is Sinvee, who has been hotly debated in the Asian / Kgirl threads. I find all three of these girls to be gorgeous and would be very pleased to find similar girls behind the door. In my mind, they are "thick" and "curvy," but they are not "fat." Yes, they have thick thighs, a big waist, and you can't see their ribs, hip bones, or spine. However, I also do not see fat rolls, or cottage cheese thighs, and while they are not "skinny" or "spinners," I think they are overall healthy women who are not in bad shape.

The last girl is a random Reddit girl who I think is indisputably fat, and unhealthy; she is indeed generously endowed with fat rolls. I would walk out if I found her behind the door.

[PriscillaM]

So if you are a male pleb king like me, there are certain mandatory youtube channels, such as:

Styxhexenhammer666, gotham chess, German in Venice, edp445 (RIP), Daniel king chess, hoag vlogs, and ohnoosho.

But of seminal importance is soft white underbelly, run by Mark L. Mark apparently is some big deal in the photography ad world and decided that he would interview addicts, hookers, pimps, and other mental defecitives.

Anyhow, from time to time he tries to help out the people on the channel and all he does is complain that he makes no money off the channel, youtube demonetizes him, his keys fall to the floor because of gravity, etc.

He tried to make the channel profitable by selling subscriptions, he got like 500 subs.

So he does it for free, and most of the videos are demonetized. I flag each one.

Anyhoo, if the interviewee. Oh and he is absolutely, oprah included, the worst interviewer. Is a male, he may get them a phone or a sandwich.

But this one, well, he bought her a fucken BMW.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGhQdBizQGg

She totaled the beemer and goes on for an hour about how she is trying to stop being a ho.

This guy makes it seems like he is all pure. He has been spotted trolling the fig. He did not give this girl a beemer because of her looks.

[FiatVoluptas]

If there is anyone here that thinks an allowance isn't paying for sex. Please speak up. LOL. Sorry I couldn't help myself.

For sure, there are many girls who don't believe they are prostituting themselves when they seek out sugar daddies. They think for some reason since they aren't advertising on particular websites and aren't loitering on the street corner, there's something different about it. Obviously, they are wrong. Some girls are super naive, as well. I have a buddy who has a girlfriend that I can't stand (but that's a side issue). One day, we were all hanging out and she starting telling me, in front her boyfriend, mind you, that she was thinking about posting on SA because she "could get $500/ hour just to have dinner with old rich guys. " I, unbeknownst to them, a long time monger, proceeded to tell her that any guy that was going to pay her $500 for dinner was going to expect sex afterward. She tried to argue with me about it, which was ridiculous. I ended up telling her that she would be prostituting herself either way because even if it was just dinner, she would be getting paid a large amount of money to be some random guy's sex fantasy for an hour. I didn't bother telling her that she could also be putting herself in a risky situation by making a random guy feel robbed. I mean seriously, how naive could you be?

From the guy's standpoint, I think every guy knows that an allowance is paying for sex, but in some peoples' mind, being a sugar daddy to some civie is different than paying a prostitute for a quick nut. I guess in some ways it is, and in some ways it isn't. But, it's all prostitution, nonetheless.

[HollywoodGuy]

Every chick that is on a "SB" (huge eyeroll) site that is looking for an "allowance" is a pro. Not saying that's a bad thing, the modern "sugar world" started so that chicks who don't want to think of themselves as hookers could sell pussy. Used to be guys went along with this polite fiction in order to get fuck them. Some of you guys now actually believe that an "allowance" isn't payment and that paying for sex, isn't paying for sex.

I find it weird as fuck.

If there is anyone here that thinks an allowance isn't paying for sex. Please speak up. LOL. Sorry I couldn't help myself.

[Admin2]

By the mere fact that this girl agreed to show up at a hotel room without having met you, she must be a pro. That being said, her reaction is understandable, as there are tricks that will refuse to provide the allowance after a trip to the FC.

I'd recommend not booking the room until you've actually met the girl and know if you're into each other. Otherwise you have no idea who will show up, and it can become a "bait and switch" or a "cash and dash" situation.

Every chick that is on a "SB" (huge eyeroll) site that is looking for an "allowance" is a pro. Not saying that's a bad thing, the modern "sugar world" started so that chicks who don't want to think of themselves as hookers could sell pussy. Used to be guys went along with this polite fiction in order to get fuck them. Some of you guys now actually believe that an "allowance" isn't payment and that paying for sex, isn't paying for sex.

I find it weird as fuck.

[Toungsten]

I saw a review of Dana today in which she offered anal which caught my attention immediately. I called and spoke with the booker and manager with whom I'm very familiar and was told emphatically that it is not true. It was posted by someone with notoriously low scores and this one was not much different in spite of the offering of anal. All I can say is that the information I got tells me that we should not go in there with a predisposition for going to the Greek isles. It just ain't going to happen and now puts Dana in an awkward situation.

[AverageGuy82]

Saw that this morning and I'm expecting many banned accounts or worse yet the forum being locked down. Hopefully it doesn't lead to everyone who has ever posted on the forum from being banned.

We'll see how long this moratorium lasts in terms of effect. I'm already seeing people question each other's POV and it's barely been 1 week.

[SsStuntCock]

You want a shill to stop being a shill, LOL good luck. That guy already made his choice of telling the truth to fellow mongers vs generating money for girls, a long time ago.

It's amusing but I don't think he or the entities he shills for care much. Those entities only understand things when $ is involved. Now that people are prohibited to comment on others reviews in the BB thread, the "damage control" is relegated solely to "counter" negative reviews with positive reviews.

What's imperative imo is that everyone's voices are heard, especially those who are not satisfied.

We'll see how long this moratorium lasts in terms of effect. I'm already seeing people question each other's POV and it's barely been 1 week.

[RocketManP]

I'm ok with repeated reviews across boards but to simply gush and write basically "10/10" reviews for every review irrationally annoys me. Like, I want to ignore his reviews but like I said in my original post, I still want him to contribute, but less "shill-ey" and just more subjectively.

You want a shill to stop being a shill, LOL good luck. That guy already made his choice of telling the truth to fellow mongers vs generating money for girls, a long time ago.

While this thread pales in comparison to the LA KBB thread as far as traffic goes, it's nonetheless amusing to me. That is, the thought of him reading this is kinda fun

It's amusing but I don't think he or the entities he shills for care much. Those entities only understand things when $ is involved. Now that people are prohibited to comment on others reviews in the BB thread, the "damage control" is relegated solely to "counter" negative reviews with positive reviews.

What's imperative imo is that everyone's voices are heard, especially those who are not satisfied.

[Im Yours]

Your question sounds like a rhetorical question to me.

We all know why these reviews are identical. The author is copying and pasting his ter review to advertise a girl. The author is too lazy to write up a new one to make it at least look like he actually has seen the girl recently. Just like photoshop people at orgs are getting lazier and lazier with their work.

I'm ok with repeated reviews across boards but to simply gush and write basically "10/10" reviews for every review irrationally annoys me. Like, I want to ignore his reviews but like I said in my original post, I still want him to contribute, but less "shill-ey" and just more subjectively.

[SsStuntCock]

As far as I was told, the only things off limits in thi thread are doxxing and family members.

Maybe I took what admin said too literally but whatev.

The only issue in talking about it here is barely anyone, including people on the fence, reads this fight club subforum. If girls get business via shill reviews, that's a win for them. There's a reason shills and orgs and girls read active forums and indirectly advertise there. It literally brings them $. And a negative review will lose them $.

While this thread pales in comparison to the LA KBB thread as far as traffic goes, it's nonetheless amusing to me. That is, the thought of him reading this is kinda funny.

[RocketManP]

As far as I was told, the only things off limits in thi thread are doxxing and family members.

Maybe I took what admin said too literally but whatev.

The only issue in talking about it here is barely anyone, including people on the fence, reads this fight club subforum. If girls get business via shill reviews, that's a win for them. There's a reason shills and orgs and girls read active forums and indirectly advertise there. It literally brings them $. And a negative review will lose them $.

[SsStuntCock]

Your question sounds like a rhetorical question to me.

We all know why these reviews are identical. The author is copying and pasting his ter review to advertise a girl. The author is too lazy to write up a new one to make it at least look like he actually has seen the girl recently. Just like photoshop people at orgs are getting lazier and lazier with their work.

To be honest, I wasn't quite sure how this fight thread works. Didn't even realize it existed until just recently. But since it seems we have some latitude in here, my question was less rhetorical, and more like passive-aggressive shots fired. He doesn't have the balls to out himself and tell the truth, and would probably offer some lame excuse like it was an "accident" or some similar bs story, even if he did respond. With each attempt at playing this charade, he continues to sell his castrated soul to the devil.

[SsStuntCock]

LOL, when he has subpar sessions, he doesn't post them publicly. God forbid some girl might get less business. This is against these guys religion. Theyd rather have mongers waste their $. They. Just like people from the league and so on. Have put girls far above mongers.

When he posted this, he essentially admitted to doing just that: Omitting negative experiences with girls.

Anyone I've reviewed who opens the door with hardly any clothes on and her tits and ass hanging out and takes me in her arms for a DFK with her hands all over me would get no less than an 8 (really hot) from me. If I couldn't give that at least an 8 I wouldn't review them.

When he posted this 'less than stellar' take on Pink, he quickly attempted to do damage control on himself, and add on another one of his trademark.

I just wanted to add to my last post since when I read it it sounded kind of negative. Pink is still one of the best and busiest girls available to us. It's no secret why. She's one of the prettiest with a great natural body.

[RocketManP]

To be fair, I don't recall a review when you've written anything less than positive about your experiences. It's like every session is a unicorn.

LOL, when he has subpar sessions, he doesn't post them publicly. God forbid some girl might get less business.

This is against these guys religion. Theyd rather have mongers waste their $. They. Just like people from the league and so on. Have put girls far above mongers.