Korean Agency BB

[GentleSun]

I recently got verified with MKC and had my sights set on several very tantalizing options. But I did'nt realize that verification and your first visit had to coincide on the same day. Not complaining, because it actually makes sense regarding LE, but I still wasn't aware until the 8th inning. With little time to spare, I had to go with Lulu in Irvine (desired locale and desired time).

The booker tried to talk me out of it, LOL. He mentioned she was kind of large. What he didn't say was that she's also 40 ish. Anyways, it wasn't terrible, but I wouldn't call her a k-girl. Maybe k-gilf. On top of that, no pre-BJ in the shower and no cim. I wasn't even aware that this type of "k-girl" existed! Looking forward to booking with Scarlett or someone else.

I did end up seeing Lulu today and she doesn't even resemblance her pics not even a little bit, now I know why the booker doesn't recommend her that much. I'm sure some will even say that she is a bait and switch. Her face and body is maybe a 4. I don't want to sound harsh but, I'm in this hobby to see decent looking girls. I'm not asking they be models but I was really disappointed with her. There was no preview in the shower or kisses but I never insisted on that. She has a good attitude though but I would not repeat. She is BB with upcharge but honestly it is not worth it, at least for me.

[TobeYoung]

Got to love her hair too. Great gal.

I was in the mood to see Scarlett again after all the recent talk about her in this thread. I saw her last year and I must say her oral skills have improved since then. She focused on DT the whole time and was able to go deeper than before. Her effort was commendable, as she gagged repeatedly and even shed a tear. I had to stop her a few times to make out with her because I was too turned on. Now she is among the top oral practitioners on the scene.

[Madamenhu]

I was in the mood to see Scarlett again after all the recent talk about her in this thread. I saw her last year and I must say her oral skills have improved since then. She focused on DT the whole time and was able to go deeper than before. Her effort was commendable, as she gagged repeatedly and even shed a tear. I had to stop her a few times to make out with her because I was too turned on. Now she is among the top oral practitioners on the scene.

[Bartolo2003]

I did end up seeing Lulu today and she doesn't even resemblance her pics not even a little bit, now I know why the booker doesn't recommend her that much. I'm sure some will even say that she is a bait and switch. Her face and body is maybe a 4. I don't want to sound harsh but, I'm in this hobby to see decent looking girls. I'm not asking they be models but I was really disappointed with her. There was no preview in the shower or kisses but I never insisted on that. She has a good attitude though but I would not repeat. She is BB with upcharge but honestly it is not worth it, at least for me.

[Bartolo2003]

Was going to meet jo today, but booker just texted me to tell she isn't working. I might try Lulu, will post if I see her. Nana with lovelykgirl was my favorite, I have seen her many times but lost the bookers number. I only know it starts with 562. Any of you gentlemen have the number for lovelykgirl? You can pm me. Thanks.

[Jack926]

The first 4 pics on site are from an instagram model, but the last one is real.

You can look up SuzyDD or MelodyDD in LA forums if you want more details and more accurate pics.

She has tattoos; she is OK looking but not great: Purely mechanical. Nothing to ride home about.

[Bartolo2003]

Hey fellow hobbyist, a newbie here in this forum. Made and appointment with jo tomorrow. Will write about the experience. First time I will be writing about this hobby so any advice is welcome. Thanks.

[JackTms]

Anyone seen JO. Before? She looks hot but I know lots of posts are photoshopped.

Thanks in advance.

The first 4 pics on site are from an instagram model, but the last one is real.

You can look up SuzyDD or MelodyDD in LA forums if you want more details and more accurate pics.

[RedPunter]

Anyone seen JO. Before? She looks hot but I know lots of posts are photoshopped.

Thanks in advance.

[SsStuntCock]

Yes, hair is exactly like the photos.

Scarlett's photos are some of the most accurate I've seen for a kgirl.

[Mothaass]

Hello guys,

I'm new. I've been seeing Sue in Costa Mesa, I'm not sure the booker or the Korean agency. Sue is like a mid 30 spinner, I think she might go by the name of Angel. I was wondering if you guys have any info on her or her agency.

Thank you.

[Punter3]

Is the hair still frizzy like in the photos?

Yes, hair is exactly like the photos.

[Omfgitzjin]

I don't know of the previous Scarlett, but the girl currently working is definitely worth a visit. Pics are fairly representative, friendly, wants to please, good BBBJ and offers BBFS option. I saw her last week and will repeat.

Is the hair still frizzy like in the photos?

[Madamenhu]

I'm trying to see if the Scarlett from posts long ago are is the current Scarlett on MyKupcake. Currently there's 7 girls and I don't even know if the other ones are legit. I know Photoshop plays a big part, but trying to see if anyone has her or the current girls on the list.

It is the same Scarlett. Photos are shopped to lighten skin and make her look a bit younger, but crucially, her tits are actually that big.

[RikDog55]

I don't know of the previous Scarlett, but the girl currently working is definitely worth a visit. Pics are fairly representative, friendly, wants to please, good BBBJ and offers BBFS option. I saw her last week and will repeat.

Thank you. I appreciate it, I might see her or Carla. I might buy the erotic review subscription for just a month and see reviews of them as well. I feel here we get more honest answers like yours.