Asian Providers

[ApplePi]

Yeah, pretty much what I'm hearing, its almost a 50-50 for me. Guess I'm slightly leaning towards Bora at the moment.

There are some people on this forum with incredibly low standards and its hard for me to take recommendations from anyone now. I went to see Zora based on positive reviews and my god I was so disappointed in myself for not walking out as soon as I saw her face. There were mentions about her looks being so-so but no one mentioned that she looked like a 2/10. Not only does she have plastic done ALL over her face, she has a fake ass and fake tits. The only way I could finish was doggy so I don't have to see her face. I don't write too many reviews but I'm just putting this out there for you dudes because we work hard for our money and to waste it on this type of pussy is just a blow to your ego.

[Apharmd]

First time in the San Diego scene. Most of my experience has either been in the Bay Area (this was years ago though) and in the NYC area. Back in the day I used to use **** for some reliable information, but unfortunately that is completely down. I was wondering if I could get some info on some of the agencies around here -.

I noticed FEC and SDAG, could I get the links to their sites or ads? I seem to be kind of lost on where to find that.

Any advice would be great! I've been really pent up during Covid times and now that I'm vaccinated I wanted to check back in.

Sign up on humaniplex. FEC and SDAG are the 2 k-girl agencies here in SD. Both post ads on there and both require pretty heavy screening if you have little to no network on HX already. There's also Sandra99 on HX which has Thai girls.

FEC website - https://www.ca-kdolls.ch/.

SDAG website - https://sdasiangirls.com/ - password is given to you once you are screened.

[IslandFan]

Saw Candy as her TER reviews rated her highly. Looks are about 7/7. 5, Solid body with soft MM C / Ds. Not petite, solid frame, just a little padding on the belly but nice all around. Soft skin and cute oval / round face. Her performance is where she shines BBBJ / dt with all the dfk you can handle. DT is the kind that hurts a bit when Jr's head hits the back of her throat. DT was no problem but then again, I am avg. Candy is not up to Salma's naughty level but pretty high up there. Default play is covered. Using TER rating, I would give her 7. 5/8. Recommended.

Can anyone comment on sdag Rey?

[Ashura]

First time in the San Diego scene. Most of my experience has either been in the Bay Area (this was years ago though) and in the NYC area. Back in the day I used to use **** for some reliable information, but unfortunately that is completely down. I was wondering if I could get some info on some of the agencies around here -.

I noticed FEC and SDAG, could I get the links to their sites or ads? I seem to be kind of lost on where to find that.

Any advice would be great! I've been really pent up during Covid times and now that I'm vaccinated I wanted to check back in.

[AeroStartC]

A great attitude, good performance, and willingness to please are also a must have.

Agree whole heartedly.

[JitMarc]

I've seen both and Bora at her best is better than Zora. However, like you, my recent experience with Bora has not been as good. Also, Zora does allow BBFS for an upcharge, if you are interested. For me, Zora's performance was a little bit better than my recent experience with Bora. YMMV of course. Also, Zora's face might be a turn off for some people since she's had a lot of work done and looks very artificial.

Yeah, pretty much what I'm hearing, its almost a 50-50 for me. Guess I'm slightly leaning towards Bora at the moment.

[TootsieJoe]

Ok, finally was able to see Tatum 3 weeks ago and she was a real sweetheart. I've always been an avid supporter of Bora but the last session was a slight step back. Now I'm debating if I should see Bora or Zora this Friday. I've seen decent reviews for Zora, but would like to see how she compares for people who have seen both.

I've seen both and Bora at her best is better than Zora. However, like you, my recent experience with Bora has not been as good. Also, Zora does allow BBFS for an upcharge, if you are interested. For me, Zora's performance was a little bit better than my recent experience with Bora. YMMV of course. Also, Zora's face might be a turn off for some people since she's had a lot of work done and looks very artificial.

[BigWaffle]

Ok, finally was able to see Tatum 3 weeks ago and she was a real sweetheart. I've always been an avid supporter of Bora but the last session was a slight step back. Now I'm debating if I should see Bora or Zora this Friday. I've seen decent reviews for Zora, but would like to see how she compares for people who have seen both.

Service with bora wasn't so good for me also. Had a good time with Zora though. She kinda got a butter face but service makes up for it.

[JitMarc]

Ok, finally was able to see Tatum 3 weeks ago and she was a real sweetheart. I've always been an avid supporter of Bora but the last session was a slight step back. Now I'm debating if I should see Bora or Zora this Friday. I've seen decent reviews for Zora, but would like to see how she compares for people who have seen both.

[Wahoo2000]

Anyone have any info on the new girl Rey at SDAG?

Seconding this request. If anyone has seen her and doesn't want to comment publicly, PM me. What I like to know. Is she thin / toned / enhanced? Is the service passionate?

Thanks!

[RChangDatyKing]

King, I didn't mean to steer you in the wrong direction with a previous description, but you are right, as the individual that I referred to is very simply a GND, with an average look about her. What really attracted me was her attitude then, and still continues to attract me. She is a definite go to for bare everything except FS, which is covered, and I am working on that. I'm more of a great attitude guy, and that will attract me more than a 9-10 with a poor attitude.

Next report, I will tone it down a bit.

A.

Hey Aero! I appreciate your acknowledgement. It wasn't just your review that had "steered" me in the wrong direction. I get it we all see beauty differently. Yes, a description that she has an average look about her / simple GND would be more of how I described her.

Yes, I look for beauty first but I also don't want a dead fish either, or someone with GPS because she's pretty. A great attitude, good performance, and willingness to please are also a must have.

[AeroStartC]

I couldn't agree with you more. It's not just about the body type some of these reviewers write that are off IMO, it's also when they say "very pretty. " To me very pretty would be at least a 7 or even higher. I've gone to AMPs where mongers would post about girls they've seen and write in their reviews the girls they saw being very pretty and when I get there I see someone who I can't even rate a 3 with my sunglasses on. I know we all see beauty differently, or like different body types but at least try to describe what you think majority of men would describe them. I do my research and eventually start noticing patterns with some reviewers. I find reviewers I think have similar tastes in terms of body types, appearances, etc and I use their reviews as a reference / guide before I make my appointment.

King, I didn't mean to steer you in the wrong direction with a previous description, but you are right, as the individual that I referred to is very simply a GND, with an average look about her. What really attracted me was her attitude then, and still continues to attract me. She is a definite go to for bare everything except FS, which is covered, and I am working on that. I'm more of a great attitude guy, and that will attract me more than a 9-10 with a poor attitude.

Next report, I will tone it down a bit.

A.

[RChangDatyKing]

I wish people were clear with the type of "thick" they mean.

I'm happy with truly thick girls. I enjoy that body type, but often when people are reviewing kgirls they mean fat when they say thick.

To me thick means curves, and if there is a belly, they are still hourglass shape.

But I've seen girls described as "thick" who just have a stomach abd there are no "curves. ".

I may try her out and see for myself later this week, but I also plan on trying the new girl at sdag.

I couldn't agree with you more. It's not just about the body type some of these reviewers write that are off IMO, it's also when they say "very pretty. " To me very pretty would be at least a 7 or even higher. I've gone to AMPs where mongers would post about girls they've seen and write in their reviews the girls they saw being very pretty and when I get there I see someone who I can't even rate a 3 with my sunglasses on. I know we all see beauty differently, or like different body types but at least try to describe what you think majority of men would describe them. I do my research and eventually start noticing patterns with some reviewers. I find reviewers I think have similar tastes in terms of body types, appearances, etc and I use their reviews as a reference / guide before I make my appointment.

Yes, I would think a provider is "fat" in overall appearance if I read thick being described in a review. Now if someone wrote thick ass, and thin waist then I would think the provider just has a very Big butt.

[Apharmd]

I wish people were clear with the type of "thick" they mean.

I'm happy with truly thick girls. I enjoy that body type, but often when people are reviewing kgirls they mean fat when they say thick.

To me thick means curves, and if there is a belly, they are still hourglass shape.

But I've seen girls described as "thick" who just have a stomach abd there are no "curves. ".

I may try her out and see for myself later this week, but I also plan on trying the new girl at sdag.

Some of the reviews mention her extra meat is "in the right places" but I haven't seen her myself. I agree that a lot of times "thick" usually ends up meaning just fat. Her average score of 8 for looks is a good sign. I like them thin so I won't be vising her, just thought I'd share what I found.

As for Rey over at SDAG, pics are some random magazine model so I couldn't find any previous reviews.

https://buondua.com/xingyan-vol-125-sara-43-anh-16995

[BlaneJames]

New girl in town at FEC from Vegas. Reviews mention that she's a bit thicker than pics in a good way and she provides great service. FEC's website doesn't mention BBFS but her ad in Vegas does.

https://www.vegasasian.club/candy

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...8243221-355220

I wish people were clear with the type of "thick" they mean.

I'm happy with truly thick girls. I enjoy that body type, but often when people are reviewing kgirls they mean fat when they say thick.

To me thick means curves, and if there is a belly, they are still hourglass shape.

But I've seen girls described as "thick" who just have a stomach abd there are no "curves. ".

I may try her out and see for myself later this week, but I also plan on trying the new girl at sdag.