Thread: Agency Girls Report REVIEWS OF GIRLS ONLY
+
Add Report
Results 6,391 to 6,405 of 10802
-
06-13-21 10:20 #4412Regular Member

Posts: 76ECE Kinga
Heard through the grapevine that Kinga at ECE was fired. She isn't on the website any more so I assume it's true. Not sure what happened, she was fun.
-
06-12-21 15:50 #4411Senior Member

Posts: 116YWSM Kylie
Decided to go with my gut and saw Kylie today. As most reviews say, she's hot but her performance varies. I can now concur. She's a solid 8, maybe even a 9 depending on tour taste. She's older than the site claims, but not overly so. Probably low 30's. But her body is that of a 22 year old. Man makes, but well done, perfect hour glass figure and a small squeezable ass. Her performance was meh. Not the best I've had but certainly not the worst. She was tired, but she wanted to please, so worthy of a repeat. Perhaps a second meet will further increase the mileage with her. Or maybe not seeing her on a Saturday morning. Either way, her body alone was worth the visit. Her performance was satisfying if not spectacular but room for improvement. Will repeat when she is back in town.
-
06-12-21 14:42 #4410Senior Member

Posts: 370Is double dealing for multiple agencies normal for girls? Audrey / Scarlett / Jenni
I noticed that Scarlett / Audrey has ne pictures up with MA, but now I'm looking at next weeks schedulw at YWSM and they are getting a new girl Jenni who has the exact same pictures.
I may understand trying to get as much work as possible but is that normal for 1 girl to work for different agencies at the same time?
-
06-11-21 19:10 #4409Senior Member

Posts: 370Its already been explained on this board and on their twitter page that if you don't get a response it means you were not approved.
Originally Posted by UnitedFan
[View Original Post]
-
06-11-21 15:48 #4408Senior Member

Posts: 28Ignored by MA
Anyone else having trouble trying to get in touch with MA? I've tried p411 with Chloe, email, text, and haven't gotten any response.
-
06-11-21 13:15 #4407Regular Member

Posts: 76Kylie has a bunch of TER reviews. Most have her as an 8 in looks but her performance scores are pretty varied. Half 5's /6's, half 8's /9's.
Originally Posted by ADAvet101
[View Original Post]
-
06-11-21 13:05 #4406Senior Member

Posts: 370Last time I checked The other site full reviews they had good things to say about Kylie being a good GFE, but they kept saying YMMV. I'd probably recommend her.
Originally Posted by ADAvet101
[View Original Post]
-
06-11-21 13:01 #4405Senior Member

Posts: 116Ywsm
Going to take the dive and hit up YWSM tomorrow.
Torn between Kylie and Grace. Kylie is more my style figure wise but I haven't heard to much about her performance. I want the true GFE they advertise but haven't heard if Kylie delivers. Anyone out there able to confirm on way or the other. Otherwise I may just have to go with Grace based on reviews.
-
06-11-21 10:19 #4404Senior Member

Posts: 395Fake pictures
I totally agree with fake or heavily photo shop pictures. Veronica and Katya not there pictures. Veronica is cute little thicker not full GFE nice girl. Katya not her pics but she's very attractive. She is older not full GFE also very nice person.
Originally Posted by ManiakFun
[View Original Post]
-
06-10-21 23:57 #4403Senior Member

Posts: 433Scarlett at MA
MA finally got some real pics of Scarlett. The older ones in the bikini and on the bed are not her or are old. The new ones and the one she's holding camera is her. She's not 115 lbs by any stretch. Prob a 135-140 on 5'7 frame. Very pretty face and she's very nice and friendly. Idk why they used wrong pics at first when it just disappoints customers expecting a slim girl. She is not fat but she is not slim. She's a bit thick so they call it athletic. All firm, no jiggle but thicker. Anyway she's is a really great person and the experience was very nice with BBBJ skills that got a little too harsh for my taste. I only did L2 so not sure about the rest. But I would guess she's worth the FS. For me it's not a repeat experience as I didn't think she is my type having expected a slimmer girl and more of a GFE experience. But I would recommend her for others that like a thicker girl with a beautiful face and great personality to talk to etc. I just don't like it when agencies use photos that are fake or that are not a good exact representation. I feel it's a bit misleading given what we pay. MA is still a great agency though and quality is there so I will continue to use them.
-
06-10-21 15:58 #4402Regular Member

Posts: 7I can't even get them to respond to my emails or texts now. Website is still not done. Any info on what's going on with them?
Originally Posted by DeepBlueBc
[View Original Post]
-
06-10-21 13:20 #4401Regular Member

Posts: 15Katie. Via Alena's website
Saw Katie yesterday, nice young college girl, skinny with decent B-size breasts, OK ass, & nice legs. Slow BBBJ & nice tight pussy. Not sure I'll repeat but the overall experience was good.
-
06-09-21 15:32 #4400Senior Member

Posts: 55Miranda
I met Miranda with ECE yesterday and I definitely recommend. Great body, soft skin and a sweet personality.
-
06-08-21 15:56 #4399Senior Member

Posts: 231Wet-and-wild
Yup, they're still around.
Originally Posted by RandyOss
[View Original Post]
-
06-07-21 22:56 #4398Senior Member

Posts: 370That's the way the booker is with MCE (another sign that it really is MCE running things and trying to disguise it), kind of a prick, will do last minute changes like you said.
Originally Posted by Eseloco
[View Original Post]
They once made me wait 35 minutes and kept saying she was held up, every couple of minutes to keep me hanging. I was wondering if I could get some kind of discount because of these delays and they said no.







Reply With Quote




