Massage Parlor Reports

[Coopertars]

Hey guys, dumb location, trying to find where the CLM on Milwaukee and Irving Park is? I went there and couldn't see it.

It's not really a massage parlor with a storefront. It's more like apartments where you have to contact the booker and make an appointment. Once you've gotten through their screening process (pretty simple) then you can book an appointment based on the scheduled ladies and the booker will send you exact location.

[IMissCutler]

The one that is chucky is Anna. But the one with the tattoo is not May since she doesn't have a back tattoo. And also hers is fake as hell. But I don't remember any other girls that is older with a tattoo.

Hey bro, can you confirm Anna has big tits or is she just chunky and they are proportioned for her? Got to love huge naturals. Like the ones Happy used to have in Norridge.

[FellowMonger]

Hey guys, dumb location, trying to find where the CLM on Milwaukee and Irving Park is? I went there and couldn't see it.

[Narcissus19]

I ask because that's within stumbling distance to my locale and would be perfect if it pans out. Their website went off air, BTW. Also, whatever happened to Loganticas (spelling?) They were the hottest MP for a while and then vanished into thin air.

[Sjohns]

Come on guys I posted an AMP Girl pic let's post some new hidden camera stuff.

Trader. Check your inbox. Thanks.

[Gene2]

I haven't seen Suzie since she changed her name, and that was just before the pandemic. The description you gave describing her as pear shaped with cellulite doesn't sound at all like the girl I remember, so either she put on a lot of weight in the past year or even our physical descriptions of the girls are different, which isn't uncommon. Salma is a great example, where some people think she's late 20's and some think she's well into her 40's.

Next release I'll incorporate a wider range of feedback, but I don't want to create so many contradictions that nobody knows what to make of anything.

I and many other here greatly appreciate your compilation of the CLM girls.

I've been able to see Lilly, Bella, and Sophie. And I believe your descriptions were very accurate and helpful.

Thanks.

G2.

[Jinurso]

I am not trying to argue or criticize you but everyone has their own tastes and ideas about what is hot and not. Suzie is bottom heavy pear shaped, she works out but has a bit of cellulite and thick thighs and wide hips with small boobs for her frame. I liked her and she is a great girl but her body type is not my thing and I am not likely to see her again. As my tastes are probably different than yours off the top of my head I would rate Jane, Lily, and Sarah as far hotter than her and in an entirely different class as far as looks go. I think you are doing a great service with a lot of hard work but in the interest of clarity you might want to make mention of the girls body types in your descriptions. I find most of CLM pictures to be fake or misleading making it more difficult for guys to judge the girls level of attractiveness to them based on each guys preferences.

I would call Jane tall and thin with small boobs and hips. Thin but not much muscle tone. Her ass a bit saggy for a thin girl. Lily a short curvy hardbody with fake tits, and a lot of muscle and no real fat She would bank as a stripper. Sarah a tall big boned Polish girl with nice fake tits, curves, and a few extra pounds. Sarah works out and carries a fair amount of muscle, if she lost 10 lbs she would be a hardbody.

I haven't seen Suzie since she changed her name, and that was just before the pandemic. The description you gave describing her as pear shaped with cellulite doesn't sound at all like the girl I remember, so either she put on a lot of weight in the past year or even our physical descriptions of the girls are different, which isn't uncommon. Salma is a great example, where some people think she's late 20's and some think she's well into her 40's.

Next release I'll incorporate a wider range of feedback, but I don't want to create so many contradictions that nobody knows what to make of anything.

[Enderwiggen]

May is at H Wellness Spa, Milwaukee and Pulaski.

I've read that May owns H wellness. If she does more than lvl 1 can be had, if you know her I imagine.

[Enderwiggen]

Man, it's been years. Seems like technology as improved, yet services have declined with prices going up which makes no sense. My old CEO said something about this. He said were fast approaching a time in which cost won't matter anywhere near as much as customer service. Part of it I think would be the inconstancy of tipping. A MT who gets a $100 tip for a L1, looks at the $40 tippers like: "I deserve more. " and that was building for a while. I'm so glad I kept my favorites from the Senina, and Relax days.

If you guys never got to experience Senina. I pity you.

I've hit Pink in Norridge, typical shit, good massage, never got more than a L1.

Harmony has a full menu but they tax. I saw happy there, pretty awesome, but overpriced.

I also found a little gem on Milwaukee that I never saw mentioned here. It's by appointment only. I've only got a level 1 so far, but there was a lot of under the shirt and through the pants. The massage was great too.

She makes you take your shoes of in the entrance so heads up.

Also, past couple of years I had a pretty awesome experience at green spa and saw my old friend from relax May at T-pro. Anyway, vets want to trade spots hit my inbox.

Miss you guys.

[Moejoo]

They're very different from each other, just keep that in mind.

Natalia: early 40's, wild, sensual, GFE full service with no real inhibitions.

Suzie: mid-20's, no full service or BBBJ or GFE. CBJ is the furthest she goes anymore. But she's probably the hottest girl on the roster.

Bella. Late 20's. Less attractive than Suzie, less attractive body than Natalia, but prettier face than Natalia and much better menu than Suzie. She's a little more sexually passive than Natalia but if she likes you will provide a good GFE session.

I am not trying to argue or criticize you but everyone has their own tastes and ideas about what is hot and not. Suzie is bottom heavy pear shaped, she works out but has a bit of cellulite and thick thighs and wide hips with small boobs for her frame. I liked her and she is a great girl but her body type is not my thing and I am not likely to see her again. As my tastes are probably different than yours off the top of my head I would rate Jane, Lily, and Sarah as far hotter than her and in an entirely different class as far as looks go. I think you are doing a great service with a lot of hard work but in the interest of clarity you might want to make mention of the girls body types in your descriptions. I find most of CLM pictures to be fake or misleading making it more difficult for guys to judge the girls level of attractiveness to them based on each guys preferences.

I would call Jane tall and thin with small boobs and hips. Thin but not much muscle tone. Her ass a bit saggy for a thin girl. Lily a short curvy hardbody with fake tits, and a lot of muscle and no real fat She would bank as a stripper. Sarah a tall big boned Polish girl with nice fake tits, curves, and a few extra pounds. Sarah works out and carries a fair amount of muscle, if she lost 10 lbs she would be a hardbody.

[Jinurso]

Good feedback on Sandy and Salma. I'll update the next iteration of the master list with more of your details.

I booked with CLM today, and originally requested Salma.

Whoever gave info on this site that she was young looking. I'm sorry but that was really bad info. She didn't look young to me at all. She admitted she's in her 30's but to me she looked like early 40's. I know Latin women age well and there was just no way she was 30. I felt like she was my mother and apologized and told her that unfortunately I couldn't go through with it as I prefer a younger person. She was a very sweet lady and didn't take my criticism harsh. (She seemed relieved honestly) and she admitted this is not her Jam and doesn't plan to say much longer. On a positive note she did recommend that I see Sandy and indeed I was very happy when she walked through the door. Sandy was in her 20's, told me she was a previous hostess and working towards an airline stewardess. She was really cute, with glasses and a raspy voice. I thought initially she was Polish but found out later she was Latin and was mixed with some Spaniard. She had light brown eyes and just very young looking. Her menu however is very limited, she only provides L1, and she didn't want her breasts kissed nor her kitty touched. She said she just went through her menstrual cycle and it was very sensitive. I have to take her word for it, but if she uses this excuse in the future you know she simply isn't into it. I did get the same vibe from her, she will never offer more than L1 as this isn't where she wants to make a career. Just trying to make it through tough Covid times and I can respect that. I would normally want to repeat but she seemed a bit distant sometimes; something tells me she has a boyfriend and is not wanting to cross the lines much. She's about 5"6 weight is about 125, B breasts, light skinned. She has a jiggly butt but not fat; just not tight. Better than normal is my best definition. Well that's about it. Enjoy.

[Jinurso]

Hey Guys. Just saw Sarah today. She reminds me of the legacy NG Lara! She is prolly my top 3 now! My upper lip still smells and tastes from DATY. One thing I have to concur. It's all about your vibe with these girls. Even spoke to the other ladies there in the place! I went in with a positive calm aura and made her feel the same and just treated her good! DFK, GFE, CBJ, and FS on the menu along with some stimulating convo. Guys she's been here for a while so treat her good! Even gave those cute toes of hers some attention. I will definitely be back!

SK.

Great review. I'm thinking about taking her up on her offer to do a threesome with Jessica. They're my two favorites at CLM and apparently they are good friends.

[Trader1973]

Come on guys I posted an AMP Girl pic let's post some new hidden camera stuff.

[Jinurso]

Appreciate the info. Definitely going to give it a try now. Leaning toward scheduling Bella, Suzie or Natalia based on pics and your reviews.

They're very different from each other, just keep that in mind.

Natalia: early 40's, wild, sensual, GFE full service with no real inhibitions.

Suzie: mid-20's, no full service or BBBJ or GFE. CBJ is the furthest she goes anymore. But she's probably the hottest girl on the roster.

Bella. Late 20's. Less attractive than Suzie, less attractive body than Natalia, but prettier face than Natalia and much better menu than Suzie. She's a little more sexually passive than Natalia but if she likes you will provide a good GFE session.

[Gene2]

Their website is Chicagolandbodyrubs.com and it has fees and everything else you need there.

I think they do advertise on some site or other. Occasionally posters will add a link to one of their ads but I don't know where. I just go to their website for their weekly schedule.

Upcharges for services beyond a handjob are usually anywhere between $100-$150. Some of the sillier girls want $250-300 for things like Greek and Salma wants $1000 for FS. But some of them won't charge at all if you have genuine chemistry with them.

CLM posts several times a day on RubRatings. They feature the girls at each location that day.

Here's one from yesterday.

https://chicago.rubratings.com/122334

Gene.