Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 10,231 to 10,245 of 23385
-
05-21-21 08:53 #13155Senior Member

Posts: 168Peach
No tats on Peach. My neighbor saw Singha a couple of years ago and seems to remember a fairly large tat on Singhas back. Maybe someone else has a better recollection.
Originally Posted by ParisT312
[View Original Post]
-
05-20-21 23:15 #13154Senior Member

Posts: 38Singha vs Peach
Hey guys, I'm looking to try out some Thai this month. Who would you recommend b / w these two? Both of them seem of have average to voluptuous bodies and decent service. They have a ton of reviews on TER but I wasn't sure if either of them are tattooed up. I'm fine with small tattoos but not in to full sleeve or larger tatts. Any recommendations?
-
05-20-21 23:12 #13153Senior Member

Posts: 309Preggo
Absolutely agree. Zariah was great when pregnant. Only downside was no CIP. Sorry to see her off the circuit and now making money from porn videos and her pay-per-view website. Pregnant providers are more likely to go for BBFS than non-pregnant girls.
Originally Posted by BunkerBuster
[View Original Post]
-
05-20-21 20:01 #13152Senior Member

Posts: 2686Better to reply from knowledge than imagination
Originally Posted by PSmith0380
[View Original Post]
Over half of the preggos I've seen have been fine with BBFS.
Originally Posted by SexFrustrate23
[View Original Post]
Skinny Zariah (who was pregnant last year but still does BBFS) would ask you to pull out, but for extra you could finish inside her ass.
Texas Shannon (lots of tattoos, advertises three inputs) was crazed for BB when she was pregnant 7-8 years ago, but doesn't do it anymore.
I can think of at least 4 others who also did BBFS, but only 3-4 who required covers.
The answer is, it depends.
-
05-20-21 17:11 #13151Senior Member

Posts: 61Phone disconnected
No return on texts and her phone now appears to be disconnected.
Originally Posted by FunDreams
[View Original Post]
-
05-20-21 16:15 #13150Senior Member

Posts: 61Any follow up?
Might give her a try depending where she's at.
Originally Posted by SexFrustrate23
[View Original Post]
-
05-20-21 12:54 #13149Senior Member

Posts: 263Wrong Samantha
Because the original message had no link, I thought you were talking about the Asian Samantha that several of us know, not the nycgirl one you know. The Orange County website, which is down now, used the same photos as CVIP. The TER number for her in OC is 357607 and is still active.
Originally Posted by Rhinopole
[View Original Post]
-
05-20-21 10:16 #13148Senior Member

Posts: 225Response to Are you sure?
I can't be 100% positive, but here's what I know. When I found her on TER I was able to see some pics and general information available. Today I saw someone who last saw her 12+ years ago posted this website for her: http://www.nycgirl.net. The pics on this website are the same as those I saw on TER. The other thing is that I'd last spoken with her on the phone before COVID-19 hit. I'm sure when I contacted her recently it was the same woman. So my conclusion is that this is really Samantha. And my memory of when I was a TER member and read her full reviews, other guys commented on her age being in the 50 ties. So if she told a guy who posted recently that she's 60, that also fits. The pics of her on http://www.nycgirl.net are old, but IMHO for a GLIF she looks darn good. Then again, I'm in my 70 ties.
Originally Posted by HardanFast
[View Original Post]
Hope this helps.
-
05-20-21 08:09 #13147Senior Member

Posts: 168Sam
My landscaper has visited a couple of time over the last 2 years. She's a cool gilf. Easy to talk to and good consistent service. Pics are about 20+ years old, but she's upfront about it. He said the price point is consistent with the service. She good in a pinch.
Originally Posted by Xquisitely4
[View Original Post]
-
05-20-21 07:32 #13146Senior Member

Posts: 114I imagine not. Almost all escorts require a condom because they don't want an STD.
Originally Posted by PSmith0380
[View Original Post]
-
05-20-21 06:01 #13145Senior Member

Posts: 523Tyson Girls
Does anyone know what happened to Tyson Girls? I used them twice and now it looks like the site is gone. DM if you prefer that.
-
05-19-21 17:18 #13144Senior Member

Posts: 250Do the pregos allow BBFS?
Originally Posted by BunkerBuster
[View Original Post]
-
05-19-21 16:50 #13143Senior Member

Posts: 2686Skeptical about Pregnant Mary
Her phone number has no other results, and pix on Eros on not easily searched. She literally showed up out of nowhere with no history. Also, I called and she wants $400/ hour, but could do a half for $250.
Originally Posted by SexFrustrate23
[View Original Post]
Here's another "pregnant Mary" with a different phone number.
https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/b...heart/37262609
-
05-19-21 15:03 #13142Senior Member

Posts: 31Update
Just spoke with her. Sounds nice. She asked me how old I was and when I told her I'm 35 she was like "you know I'm 60 right? I told her I didn't know but thanked her for the update. She's more GILF age than MILF age to me. I do like Caucasian MILFs but guess there aren't too many here.
Originally Posted by Xquisitely4
[View Original Post]
-
05-19-21 13:52 #13141Senior Member

Posts: 28Cp
The # on the agency website is the correct one. The number on TER reviews is outdated.
Originally Posted by PSmith0380
[View Original Post]
TH.








Reply With Quote



