Rubrankings.com
rubmaps
Best Escorts
High Class Companions
Live Escorts

Thread: Escort Reports

+ Add Report
Page 683 of 1559 FirstFirst ... 183 583 633 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 733 783 1183 ... LastLast
Results 10,231 to 10,245 of 23385
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #13155

    Peach

    Quote Originally Posted by ParisT312  [View Original Post]
    Hey guys, I'm looking to try out some Thai this month. Who would you recommend b / w these two? Both of them seem of have average to voluptuous bodies and decent service. They have a ton of reviews on TER but I wasn't sure if either of them are tattooed up. I'm fine with small tattoos but not in to full sleeve or larger tatts. Any recommendations?
    No tats on Peach. My neighbor saw Singha a couple of years ago and seems to remember a fairly large tat on Singhas back. Maybe someone else has a better recollection.

  2. #13154

    Singha vs Peach

    Hey guys, I'm looking to try out some Thai this month. Who would you recommend b / w these two? Both of them seem of have average to voluptuous bodies and decent service. They have a ton of reviews on TER but I wasn't sure if either of them are tattooed up. I'm fine with small tattoos but not in to full sleeve or larger tatts. Any recommendations?

  3. #13153

    Preggo

    Quote Originally Posted by BunkerBuster  [View Original Post]
    Over half of the preggos I've seen have been fine with BBFS.

    Skinny Zariah (who was pregnant last year but still does BBFS) would ask you to pull out, but for extra you could finish inside her ass.

    Texas Shannon (lots of tattoos, advertises three inputs) was crazed for BB when she was pregnant 7-8 years ago, but doesn't do it anymore.

    I can think of at least 4 others who also did BBFS, but only 3-4 who required covers.

    The answer is, it depends.
    Absolutely agree. Zariah was great when pregnant. Only downside was no CIP. Sorry to see her off the circuit and now making money from porn videos and her pay-per-view website. Pregnant providers are more likely to go for BBFS than non-pregnant girls.

  4. #13152

    Better to reply from knowledge than imagination

    Quote Originally Posted by PSmith0380  [View Original Post]
    Do the pregos allow BBFS?
    Quote Originally Posted by SexFrustrate23  [View Original Post]
    I imagine not. Almost all escorts require a condom because they don't want an STD.
    Over half of the preggos I've seen have been fine with BBFS.

    Skinny Zariah (who was pregnant last year but still does BBFS) would ask you to pull out, but for extra you could finish inside her ass.

    Texas Shannon (lots of tattoos, advertises three inputs) was crazed for BB when she was pregnant 7-8 years ago, but doesn't do it anymore.

    I can think of at least 4 others who also did BBFS, but only 3-4 who required covers.

    The answer is, it depends.

  5. #13151

    Phone disconnected

    Quote Originally Posted by FunDreams  [View Original Post]
    Might give her a try depending where she's at.
    No return on texts and her phone now appears to be disconnected.

  6. #13150

    Any follow up?

    Quote Originally Posted by SexFrustrate23  [View Original Post]
    I imagine not. Almost all escorts require a condom because they don't want an STD.
    Might give her a try depending where she's at.

  7. #13149

    Wrong Samantha

    Because the original message had no link, I thought you were talking about the Asian Samantha that several of us know, not the nycgirl one you know. The Orange County website, which is down now, used the same photos as CVIP. The TER number for her in OC is 357607 and is still active.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rhinopole  [View Original Post]
    I can't be 100% positive, but here's what I know. When I found her on TER I was able to see some pics and general information available. Today I saw someone who last saw her 12+ years ago posted this website for her: http://www.nycgirl.net. The pics on this website are the same as those I saw on TER. The other thing is that I'd last spoken with her on the phone before COVID-19 hit. I'm sure when I contacted her recently it was the same woman. So my conclusion is that this is really Samantha. And my memory of when I was a TER member and read her full reviews, other guys commented on her age being in the 50 ties. So if she told a guy who posted recently that she's 60, that also fits. The pics of her on http://www.nycgirl.net are old, but IMHO for a GLIF she looks darn good. Then again, I'm in my 70 ties.

    Hope this helps.

  8. #13148

    Response to Are you sure?

    Quote Originally Posted by HardanFast  [View Original Post]
    I saw her recently right after she returned to the area. I agree about the age, and she has gained about 15 pounds from when she was here several months ago. Also, are you sure you are looking at the right Samantha on TER when you say she is on there? When I checked, I saw no mention of her in this area anymore and the only thing I could find were 3 reviews from a couple of months ago in Irvine, CA (search on Orange County). Interestingly enough, the link to Happy Zone where she worked there is also down with the same message as the one for CVIP. I will grant you that someone may have stolen her pictures and name, but she told me she had recently worked there when I saw her.
    I can't be 100% positive, but here's what I know. When I found her on TER I was able to see some pics and general information available. Today I saw someone who last saw her 12+ years ago posted this website for her: http://www.nycgirl.net. The pics on this website are the same as those I saw on TER. The other thing is that I'd last spoken with her on the phone before COVID-19 hit. I'm sure when I contacted her recently it was the same woman. So my conclusion is that this is really Samantha. And my memory of when I was a TER member and read her full reviews, other guys commented on her age being in the 50 ties. So if she told a guy who posted recently that she's 60, that also fits. The pics of her on http://www.nycgirl.net are old, but IMHO for a GLIF she looks darn good. Then again, I'm in my 70 ties.

    Hope this helps.

  9. #13147

    Sam

    Quote Originally Posted by Xquisitely4  [View Original Post]
    Talk about a blast from the past. I've seen her a few times approx 12+ years ago. Pics have not changed. Link below of her website.

    http://www.nycgirl.net
    My landscaper has visited a couple of time over the last 2 years. She's a cool gilf. Easy to talk to and good consistent service. Pics are about 20+ years old, but she's upfront about it. He said the price point is consistent with the service. She good in a pinch.

  10. #13146
    Quote Originally Posted by PSmith0380  [View Original Post]
    Do the pregos allow BBFS?
    I imagine not. Almost all escorts require a condom because they don't want an STD.

  11. #13145

    Tyson Girls

    Does anyone know what happened to Tyson Girls? I used them twice and now it looks like the site is gone. DM if you prefer that.

  12. #13144
    Quote Originally Posted by BunkerBuster  [View Original Post]
    Her phone number has no other results, and pix on Eros on not easily searched. She literally showed up out of nowhere with no history. Also, I called and she wants $400/ hour, but could do a half for $250.

    Here's another "pregnant Mary" with a different phone number.

    https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/b...heart/37262609
    Do the pregos allow BBFS?

  13. #13143

    Skeptical about Pregnant Mary

    Quote Originally Posted by SexFrustrate23  [View Original Post]
    Anyone have info on her? I definitely want to try this fetish once, don't see it available often.

    https://www.eros.com/washington_dc/f...?cat=6208&wn=1
    Her phone number has no other results, and pix on Eros on not easily searched. She literally showed up out of nowhere with no history. Also, I called and she wants $400/ hour, but could do a half for $250.

    Here's another "pregnant Mary" with a different phone number.

    https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/b...heart/37262609

  14. #13142

    Update

    Quote Originally Posted by Xquisitely4  [View Original Post]
    Talk about a blast from the past. I've seen her a few times approx 12+ years ago. Pics have not changed. Link below of her website.

    http://www.nycgirl.net
    Just spoke with her. Sounds nice. She asked me how old I was and when I told her I'm 35 she was like "you know I'm 60 right? I told her I didn't know but thanked her for the update. She's more GILF age than MILF age to me. I do like Caucasian MILFs but guess there aren't too many here.

  15. #13141

    Cp

    Quote Originally Posted by PSmith0380  [View Original Post]
    What number is everyone using to book with Sira? The one on TER or the one on the website with the agency?
    The # on the agency website is the correct one. The number on TER reviews is outdated.

    TH.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Top Tier Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
The Velvet Rooms
Top Escorts

Protected by Copyscape