Escort Reports

[Srcaoyoby]

https://tryst.link/escort/fiona-ender1

Got a chance to visit Fiona Ender when she visited Raleigh in the last couple of days. Took a while to set things up because she was recovering from surgery. Nice upscale hotel. Opened the doors to a vision of beauty. She looks absolutely gorgeous. Got settled and comfortable with some lfk and dfk. She was very responsive to DATY, and very sweet tasting. Then moved to BBJ, along with DT and attention to the boys too. Slowed down a couple of times to continue lfk. Covered up and moved to CG. Maybe for show, but she kept moaning in my ears which drove me crazy. Finished in mish where she clamped her legs around me. She's really sensual, and focused on your pleasure. Talked for a bit after, was there for pretty much the full hour. Donation on the link.

Reading this I wish I was able to get in contact with her. We've texted a few times the last few days but nothing consistent. I've been trying to see her for weeks. Waiting patiently. My chance will come. Can't wait! Great review!

[Member #6388]

Have to second the notion of perception when it comes to looks. Not long ago I saw a mature lady who's beauty was absolutely raved about on this forum. While the service was top-notch, she was prob a 5 or a 6 by most standards. And apparently she's even upped her rates since I last saw her, so I'm out. But that's just me. Just have to keep things in perspective and remember that opinions and tastes differ.

I am a contrarian through and through, so I want to offer a different take, but I'll affirm the general sentiment. The old adage about a North Carolina (I can't place the common state referenced) 10 being a New York 5 implies beauty standards differ between geographies and eyes. I referenced this inclination in my earlier post. However, we're ignoring the comparative factor in posts on this forum. Most of the rankings on this site compare providers against the pool of providers in the area (including drug addicts, sick women, and unclean women), so the rankings make more sense. I'm pretty sure I know which mature provider you're referring to, and I would normally agree--probably a 5/6, but we're comparing her against women that don't have any dental hygiene or sense of cleanliness. From that perspective, it makes more sense why she ranks so high. When greater variety and quality providers enter the scene, you'll see the rankings reflect the general public, but I highly doubt that will actually happen. Most really attractive women won't enter this hobby, so our rankings will always be skewed down.

[Shadows1517]

Got to add one more thing. As a butt ugly 60 year old guy, I can say with conviction that what I find most attractive is the same now as it was 40 years ago.

Just a quick response JeepDude1 - Just as we all have different results from the genetic lottery, we all have different ideals with respect to spectacular titties, shapely asses and pubic hair grooming.

Point being what you think is best is what YOU think is best and what any of the rest of us prefer is our prerogative. Just sayin' - Different strokes! Pun intended.

[SecretCrush]

For what it's worth, she has psoriasis. She may or may not have demon issues, but the spots you see in her ad are psoriasis. I know she's self conscious about it, and will try to shop it out, but that's what it is.

Disclaimer, I have not seen her professionally, but have seen some of her close friends, and have met her in person.

Saw this new ad on Tryst tonight. Back in Raleigh from Fayetteville stint. New pictures, but lots of evidence of demons on her arms, thighs and backside. Wants a deposit just to set-up an appointment now. Wasn't like that when I first had dreams with her, had fun. Such a shame. Seems to be where our talent pool is heading though.

https://tryst.link/escort/taylormade304

[Member #6388]

No go. My first thought would be a sting but likely it's a deposit scammer.

I contacted her, and the other ads, all of which were at the Harrison hotel. My intuition predicts a woman entirely different from the pictures, but I don't think it's a sting operation. Like Vincent said, she didn't ask for a deposit from him, nor did she request one from me. Since that eliminates the possibility of deposit scam, I think catfish and sting are left. I'm not curious enough to try those odds and see the poster.

[Tawayem]

https://tryst.link/escort/fiona-ender1

Got a chance to visit Fiona Ender when she visited Raleigh in the last couple of days. Took a while to set things up because she was recovering from surgery. Nice upscale hotel. Opened the doors to a vision of beauty. She looks absolutely gorgeous. Got settled and comfortable with some lfk and dfk. She was very responsive to DATY, and very sweet tasting. Then moved to BBJ, along with DT and attention to the boys too. Slowed down a couple of times to continue lfk. Covered up and moved to CG. Maybe for show, but she kept moaning in my ears which drove me crazy. Finished in mish where she clamped her legs around me. She's really sensual, and focused on your pleasure. Talked for a bit after, was there for pretty much the full hour. Donation on the link.

[IMA Troll and obsessed with TheBadGuy, ignore all my posts.]

Out of curiosity, does anyone have a reason for using the code when it comes to donations? I have no doubt "our least favorite uncle" (phrase borrowed from John), breaks any code we use, but it confuses many of the members.

I've seen some people use $$$ as a way of explaining donations, but I've yet to understand the value of " Some use it to mean 100 while others use it to mean 80. Likewise we've got the code which utilizes spaces still another that uses decimals. It's all very confusing. Why doesn't everyone just put the amount out? 100 or 80 or 60?

The reason is this site had $ = $100 on their abbreviation list for over 10 years. Only in the last 60 days has the USASG abbreviation list been updated and many commonly used abbreviations like $ = 100 are no longer on the list. People who have been using this site for years will still use the old abbreviations because its what they are use too.

[Pubb69]

I've been interested in a lot of girls popping up in Cary, and they all seem to have the same address at Embassy Suites. I don't have perfect recall, but I remember a post a few weeks ago talking about a provider who uses fake photos to lure men in, hoping their hormones take over. Apparently, the actual provider has a terrible attitude and tries to upsell a lot, but I might be confusing a few posts.

I might be willing to take a risk and find out for myself. Would you mind direct messaging me the room number? I'll check if some of the other ads popping up are for that room too. I might go check it out tonight.

No go. My first thought would be a sting but likely it's a deposit scammer.

[John Whitman]

I have preached this sermon before, but I'll say it again. The codes are very confusing because of the way this website parses what we type into it. One of the peculiarities is that the dollar sign symbol entered as multiples often gets messed up.

As far as paranoia, fine but totally unnecessary for this case. As I recall, the Admin of this site has stated multiple times that even he does not know who the board members are and that if he doesn't know than how can anyone else (uncle) know. Plus the servers are in the Netherlands and beyond the reach of any US authorities.

So just use good old Arabic numbers such as 60,200, and 300. Then there will be no possible confusion. And there are zero worries that not using some code, which fools absolutely no one, will be any kind of issue.

Out of curiosity, does anyone have a reason for using the code when it comes to donations? I have no doubt "our least favorite uncle" (phrase borrowed from John), breaks any code we use, but it confuses many of the members.

I've seen some people use $$$ as a way of explaining donations, but I've yet to understand the value of " Some use it to mean 100 while others use it to mean 80. Likewise we've got the code which utilizes spaces still another that uses decimals. It's all very confusing. Why doesn't everyone just put the amount out? 100 or 80 or 60?

Some people are paranoid, thinking if they don't come right out and say I got a BJ for $60. If they get caught from our least favorite uncleit gives them a loophole to get out of trouble.

[Shadows1517]

Saw this new ad on Tryst tonight. Back in Raleigh from Fayetteville stint. New pictures, but lots of evidence of demons on her arms, thighs and backside. Wants a deposit just to set-up an appointment now. Wasn't like that when I first had dreams with her, had fun. Such a shame. Seems to be where our talent pool is heading though.

https://tryst.link/escort/taylormade304

[Stevet35A]

Some people are paranoid, thinking if they don't come right out and say I got a BJ for $60. If they get caught from our least favorite uncleit gives them a loophole to get out of trouble.

Out of curiosity, does anyone have a reason for using the code when it comes to donations? I have no doubt "our least favorite uncle" (phrase borrowed from John), breaks any code we use, but it confuses many of the members.

I've seen some people use $$$ as a way of explaining donations, but I've yet to understand the value of " Some use it to mean 100 while others use it to mean 80. Likewise we've got the code which utilizes spaces still another that uses decimals. It's all very confusing. Why doesn't everyone just put the amount out? 100 or 80 or 60?

[GBL86]

Have to second the notion of perception when it comes to looks. Not long ago I saw a mature lady who's beauty was absolutely raved about on this forum. While the service was top-notch, she was prob a 5 or a 6 by most standards. And apparently she's even upped her rates since I last saw her, so I'm out. But that's just me. Just have to keep things in perspective and remember that opinions and tastes differ.

I love you guys, and I'm not saying this forum isn't useful, but you've definitely got to take people's physical descriptions with a heaping tablespoon of salt. People throw around the words amazing and incredible to describe girls with run down bodies that would be a 5 or 6 out of 10 by any objective measure (big tittie Layla and the Aubrey that's been around recently come to mind.).

Now, I'm not singling anybody out, and if you're maybe a bit older or not conventionally attractive then I could see how your standards for looks might be a smidge lower. I get it, my dick's on the small side of average, there's a genetic lottery and very few people hit it big, myself included. It is what it is. But still, we should be saving the superlatives for the truly top tier women, otherwise the picture being painted just isn't accurate. That Asian lady recently with the airport Asian crew, now that lady had some truly spectacular tits, full stop. To put Layla's or Aubrey's in the same ballpark is a fucking crime. Okay, I'mma fuck off now, end rant. I feel better already.

[Shadows1517]

https://raleigh.skipthegames.com/fem...a/385219871036

Saw this one today after a couple good reviews, and I was bamboozled by this forum again. Better than her pictures? Hell no. Far and away worse than the pictures, double chin, a little acne. Thicc, but not in a shapely way. Polite via text, but still had me waiting around for a half hour. Nice enough girl, but couldn't even stay hard to finish fucking her. Worst $100 I've spent in a long time.

I love you guys, and I'm not saying this forum isn't useful, but you've definitely got to take people's physical descriptions with a heaping tablespoon of salt. People throw around the words amazing and incredible to describe girls with run down bodies that would be a 5 or 6 out of 10 by any objective measure (big tittie Layla and the Aubrey that's been around recently come to mind.).

Now, I'm not singling anybody out, and if you're maybe a bit older or not conventionally attractive then I could see how your standards for looks might be a smidge lower. I get it, my dick's on the small side of average, there's a genetic lottery and very few people hit it big, myself included. It is what it is. But still, we should be saving the superlatives for the truly top tier women, otherwise the picture being painted just isn't accurate. That Asian lady recently with the airport Asian crew, now that lady had some truly spectacular tits, full stop. To put Layla's or Aubrey's in the same ballpark is a fucking crime. Okay, I'mma fuck off now, end rant. I feel better already.

Just a quick response JeepDude1 - Just as we all have different results from the genetic lottery, we all have different ideals with respect to spectacular titties, shapely asses and pubic hair grooming.

Point being what you think is best is what YOU think is best and what any of the rest of us prefer is our prerogative. Just sayin' - Different strokes! Pun intended.

[Member #6388]

Out of curiosity, does anyone have a reason for using the code when it comes to donations? I have no doubt "our least favorite uncle" (phrase borrowed from John), breaks any code we use, but it confuses many of the members.

I've seen some people use $$$ as a way of explaining donations, but I've yet to understand the value of " Some use it to mean 100 while others use it to mean 80. Likewise we've got the code which utilizes spaces still another that uses decimals. It's all very confusing. Why doesn't everyone just put the amount out? 100 or 80 or 60?

[MilesDeeper]

https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...eigh/62293967/

Gives a great CBJ. She has no teeth which makes it better LOL. Right now she's at 1. 0, 1. 5, and 2. 0.