Find Your New Baby
rubmaps
Best Escorts
The hottest girls are here
Top Tier Escorts
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Best Escorts
The hottest girls are here
Top Tier Escorts
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Best Escorts
The hottest girls are here
Top Tier Escorts
The Only Limits are Your Imagination

Thread: Seeking Arrangements

+ Add Report
Page 406 of 733 FirstFirst ... 306 356 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 456 506 ... LastLast
Results 6,076 to 6,090 of 10986
This blog is moderated by Psalyer
  1. #4911

    Anyone see this one

    https://www.seeking.com/member/b2be0...6-fcd7e83cf1af

    Reached out a couple times with no success. Maybe she's just not interested so just curious.

  2. #4910
    She wanted 400 and no Greek. When I said no thanks, she lit up my phone. Had to block her #.

    Quote Originally Posted by EuHunter  [View Original Post]
    I think someone had seen this one but I went bwck 50 pages and could not find out. Wants me to go to her place and seems fun.

  3. #4909

    Sugar2184

    Wanted $250 to meet for coffee or whatever. Might have considered a small donation (not $250) at the first meet a few years ago, but not now that the deposit game is in full swing.

    Quote Originally Posted by MeloYello  [View Original Post]
    Definitely a newer profile, I spoke to her and tried to set up a meet. She wanted money up front before we met. I said no thanks and that was it.

  4. #4908
    I think someone had seen this one but I went bwck 50 pages and could not find out. Wants me to go to her place and seems fun.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Screenshot_20210403-115348_Chrome.jpg‎  

  5. #4907

    Sugar2184

    Quote Originally Posted by Echoniner  [View Original Post]
    Good morning, folks. Any intel on this one?

    https://www.seeking.com/member/787b5...7-c2d642f76a7d

    I remember reading something somewhere about her, but I can't recall if it was good, bad, or indifferent. I'm leaning more towards "bad" than "good" based on the fact that I didn't bother retaining the details, haha.

    This is a newer profile, but I feel like her old profile might have had the word "butterfly" in it. Running a search in these forums didn't turn up anything, though. Thanks in advance.
    Definitely a newer profile, I spoke to her and tried to set up a meet. She wanted money up front before we met. I said no thanks and that was it.

  6. #4906

    Sugarbaby2184

    Good morning, folks. Any intel on this one?

    https://www.seeking.com/member/787b5...7-c2d642f76a7d

    I remember reading something somewhere about her, but I can't recall if it was good, bad, or indifferent. I'm leaning more towards "bad" than "good" based on the fact that I didn't bother retaining the details, haha.

    This is a newer profile, but I feel like her old profile might have had the word "butterfly" in it. Running a search in these forums didn't turn up anything, though. Thanks in advance.

  7. #4905
    Quote Originally Posted by BostonJones  [View Original Post]
    https://www.seeking.com/member/85540...a-66fac12a602b

    All of her pictures are from the instagram account of a University of Georgia student, that doesn't look like she's ever set foot in any state north of Virginia. In my experience this is at best a bait and switch if not a flat out fake profile.
    How did you find her IG photos? They don't come up doing a Google image search.

  8. #4904
    Quote Originally Posted by Hobbyist420  [View Original Post]
    And for those who work at SA who think it being a "paid" site gives them protection from LEO:

    "One of the sites the men met women through was called Seeking Arrangement, which describes itself as a place where wealthy people find attractive companions and pamper them "with fine dinners, exotic trips and allowances. " The site's founder has said it has 20 million members worldwide. The FBI mentioned the website in a conversation with at least one potential witness, according to a person familiar with the conversation. ".

    https://www.boston.com/news/politics...-paid-to-women
    I just finished a 30 day membership under a new account after being blocked, I met 1 girl twice and that was it. I texted with over 30 woman off site and messaged with at least another 5 o thru the sites messaging and there all scammers, or want online only or a complete waste of time. At least I met 1 chick for a fwb situation. 300 no limits on what we do nor time, she's very cool other than that waste of time being on there. To much entitlement with these girls. Even today being my last day on membership I got 2 cashapp scams. Do these girls really believe anyone is going to fall for it. I'm taking a break for now.

  9. #4903

    Sweetsop1

    https://www.seeking.com/member/85540...a-66fac12a602b

    All of her pictures are from the instagram account of a University of Georgia student, that doesn't look like she's ever set foot in any state north of Virginia. In my experience this is at best a bait and switch if not a flat out fake profile.

  10. #4902

    You're right

    Was on SA a few years ago and met some great ladies and had a lot of fun.

    Rejoined last year and almost every girl I contacted either had major pps or wants only online friend or text buddy. The pps ones wanted payment upfront which was min 500 but I never gave it.

    Not sure whose giving these girls 500 to text but it def not me.

    I don't recommend them. Maybe things will change at some point but who knows. I'd suggest maybe $9. 99/ month for them but still nowhere near what they're asking now.

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnTies  [View Original Post]
    The Golden Goose is dying and they know it. SA has screwed themselves by allowing all these women on who do not want to meet, who want online only, who want to sell pictures, etc.

    Last time I was on was a complete waste of time. So much spam.

    For the price they are charging should be better. They should lower their rate to $50, they would probably kill it as they are pricing themselves out for the product they deliver now.

  11. #4901

    It's been great for me

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnTies  [View Original Post]
    Last time I was on was a complete waste of time. So much spam.
    Yes, there is a bunch of scam, time wasters, GPS and it's been a ton of work. I've been on SA for 3 months now and have been very happy. I've seen 11 girls, 30 meets in total, 3 were one and done, 4 I've seen 5+ times, the other 4 I'll see again, just difficult to schedule with so many that I'm happy with. I gravitate first to the ones that are at 150/200, 3 allow bare (including CIA), all BBBJ (most CIM), meetings have averaged 3-4 hours, all GFE and MSOG, up to 4 times. Tell me where I can find something better for on average 200?

  12. #4900
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnTies  [View Original Post]
    The Golden Goose is dying and they know it. SA has screwed themselves by allowing all these women on who do not want to meet, who want online only, who want to sell pictures, etc.

    Last time I was on was a complete waste of time. So much spam.

    For the price they are charging should be better. They should lower their rate to $50, they would probably kill it as they are pricing themselves out for the product they deliver now.
    I concur, but OF is also playing a role in the demise of meet ups on seeking. You have girls who use SA to promote their OF. I'm hoping SA becomes better by May but who knows.

  13. #4899

    Cash app

    Quote Originally Posted by Hobbyist420  [View Original Post]
    And for those who work at SA who think it being a "paid" site gives them protection from LEO:

    "One of the sites the men met women through was called Seeking Arrangement, which describes itself as a place where wealthy people find attractive companions and pamper them "with fine dinners, exotic trips and allowances. " The site's founder has said it has 20 million members worldwide. The FBI mentioned the website in a conversation with at least one potential witness, according to a person familiar with the conversation. ".

    https://www.boston.com/news/politics...-paid-to-women
    Yeah. This is what I was concerned about when I asked about paying via cash app vs cash last month. Nothing prevents the girl from giving copies of their cash app transactions to the press / authorities. Going to keep with cash only.

    "The Times has reviewed receipts from Cash App, a mobile payments app, and Apple Pay that show payments from Gaetz and Greenberg to one of the women."

  14. #4898
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnTies  [View Original Post]
    The Golden Goose is dying and they know it. SA has screwed themselves by allowing all these women on who do not want to meet, who want online only, who want to sell pictures, etc.

    Last time I was on was a complete waste of time. So much spam.

    For the price they are charging should be better. They should lower their rate to $50, they would probably kill it as they are pricing themselves out for the product they deliver now.
    And for those who work at SA who think it being a "paid" site gives them protection from LEO:

    "One of the sites the men met women through was called Seeking Arrangement, which describes itself as a place where wealthy people find attractive companions and pamper them "with fine dinners, exotic trips and allowances. " The site's founder has said it has 20 million members worldwide. The FBI mentioned the website in a conversation with at least one potential witness, according to a person familiar with the conversation. ".

    https://www.boston.com/news/politics...-paid-to-women

  15. #4897
    Quote Originally Posted by Hobbyist420  [View Original Post]
    It's 33% off right now for a reason. They know the male well is drying because as much as online pics and fun can be appealing, and certainly is safer....what drove the site's growth was UTR cash for GFE fun.

    If CL and BP didn't go down, there'd be almost no reason for the site, minus the dating site GUI it offers (even though the app sucks ass). SA, and paid sites like it, is the only place to find UTR right now and that sucks.
    The Golden Goose is dying and they know it. SA has screwed themselves by allowing all these women on who do not want to meet, who want online only, who want to sell pictures, etc.

    Last time I was on was a complete waste of time. So much spam.

    For the price they are charging should be better. They should lower their rate to $50, they would probably kill it as they are pricing themselves out for the product they deliver now.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
The Velvet Rooms
Live Escorts
High Class Companions
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Meet Sugar Babies
Top Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
Live Escorts
High Class Companions
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Meet Sugar Babies
Top Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
Live Escorts
High Class Companions
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Meet Sugar Babies
Top Escorts

Protected by Copyscape