Korean Agency BB

**Toungsten** · 03-22-21 19:51

In this era of changing names, locations and agencies there is one thing we can depend on and her name is Viki. A cute little thing who epitomizes the word spinner. A cute face and a hot petite body and most importantly skills that will always leave wanting more and more of her. A great combination of GFE and PSE she will begin her sensuality and passion as you walk in the door. She will hold you and kiss you and is certainly one of the best kissers. She won't stop and neither will I. I've never been with a provider that makes everything seem so real probably because she loves sex so much that it really isn't a job for her. Just pure bliss and enjoyment. All she wants is what you want and if you get off that helps her get off too. Her BBBJCIMNQNS is as good as it gets as she takes it nose deep until you can hear her gagging sounds. Her ball licking and cock sucking is perfection. And if you love a girl who has complete control of her Kegels let Viki get on top and feel her pussy squeezing your cock as she slides up and down your pole. Got to love the way we move from position to position with ease because of her petite size without losing pussy to cock contact. For those of you who have seen Viki you know what I'm talking about and for those of you who haven't seen her you don't know what you're missing.

http://sexyfunkgirls2.escorts.biz/viki/

**Nike2020** · 03-22-21 19:16

Just a newbie question, when the price advertised is not bareback (just the price and the time, no BB next to it), does this mean BJ is also covered?

**GoldDust58** · 03-22-21 16:34

Originally Posted by KingsFoil [View Original Post]

Casino has always used Julia Boin's pictures, and she probably always will. This is how well-established older providers who don't like to use their own pictures tell everyone where they are even if the booker changes their name.

Unsure about Casinos case but some use fake because they have obtained citizenship and / or now call LA home. They don't want their pictures around the internet for all the public to access. They might have family and kids or just often out and about with their daily life routine in ktown. Often it's more about their privacy and safety.

**Toungsten** · 03-22-21 12:45

M. Jia,

Sunny. Niya, Nuri, Lyn, Joy, Carissa.

Newtopasian. LA Sera, Sia.

Sexy Angels. Sophia, Emma.

SFK. Viki.

PKL. Saki, Ara.

Sesang.

Angelsinwla.

KGLA. Piper, Saki, Mimi.

**DennyBoy** · 03-22-21 11:28

Originally Posted by PsuGuy911 [View Original Post]

So on Friday I saw Yoji first time since covid that I've seen her and I can verify she is still petite with spinner body, the only downside is she is a bit on the older side and while very skinny her body is not toned, service however is off the charts as usual 2 x cip with lots of dfk.

Today I also saw Chanel from M for the first time ever and I have to say she may be my new ATF to replace Hana, I would rate Chanel face wise compared to Hana very equal although Hana may have the slightest edge, body wise I'd rate Chanel a 9/10 and Hana an 8/10, service wise Hana is a 10/10 for me and chanel a 7. 5/10 but I'm almost certain with repeat visits with chanel she will become a 10/10 for me also, if Hana truly did retire then I'm glad I've found Chanel to replace her with, if she hasn't quit then I'm going to have a damn hard time deciding who to see every week 🤣.

Do you have their HX link?

**FunTimes2260** · 03-22-21 08:27

Anybody know what happened to Grace she was with cupcake in Oc and ktown in LA but disappeared spring last year?

**RazGrizace00** · 03-22-21 06:02

Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty [View Original Post]

I haven't seen her but expect pics to be real. She used same pics for a few years now. Just don't expect her to be as pretty as pics. Somebody on this site reviewed her a few weeks ago in OC and sounded like she was decent time. There are non-upcharge girls in LA, OC, and the Bay though.

Her TER review: (click here).

Thanks Boner, she also went by Hannah on at various agencies in the east.

**BonerAppetitty** · 03-22-21 02:03

I haven't seen her but expect pics to be real. She used same pics for a few years now. Just don't expect her to be as pretty as pics. Somebody on this site reviewed her a few weeks ago in OC and sounded like she was decent time. There are non-upcharge girls in LA, OC, and the Bay though.

Her TER review: (click here).

Originally Posted by RazGrizace00 [View Original Post]

Just looking to see if anyone has seen her yet https://www.candygirlla.com/cherry.

I've seen her floating around the east coast before but not BBFS. I will make it out to LA later this summer to experience what you guys are having. TIA!

**PsuGuy911** · 03-22-21 01:55

Originally Posted by Panda1203 [View Original Post]

Would this be the same Chanel you're talking about?

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...4866866-349637

Yes that's the one.

**KingsFoil** · 03-22-21 01:50

Originally Posted by Slim129 [View Original Post]

I can definately tell you that this Rosa is a fake pic, I would know my favorite JAV actress even without her face as that's clearly Julia Boin. People really need to stop using Julia Boin as a photo it's the equvialant IMO as a white girl using Jenna Jameson or Pamela Anderson. But hey if you wanna use a fake pic I guess that's one way to make it easy for all of us to know.

https://www.candygirlla.com/niomi

https://static-ca-cdn.eporner.com/ph...de-880x660.jpg

https://www.avidol.org/category/julia-boin/

Casino has always used Julia Boin's pictures, and she probably always will. This is how well-established older providers who don't like to use their own pictures tell everyone where they are even if the booker changes their name.

**BonerAppetitty** · 03-22-21 01:43

That won't work with me. My top 5 and more all live in LA. I can always take a break from Kgirls if quality is not up to my standard. Price increase won't work with me if girls are not hot and young.

Just like upcharge didn't really work on me.

Originally Posted by Jack926 [View Original Post]

Will disappear next week. I think that either he Bookers are collectively trying to lower the # of good girls, so they can do price increase. That is my gut feeling.

**OneADay** · 03-22-21 00:45

There is a new "Jenny" on SA, but it's not the Jenny everyone talks about. I have seen this new Jenny, and she is not even come close to the SA Jenny people know and love. Aren't they worried people will get confused and book this Jenny and lose future business for SA and for the Jenny who used to have pics up at SA? I'm so confused.

**OneADay** · 03-22-21 00:42

Is Eye still around? She almost always is posted as "OFF" on BG and CGLA websites. But occasionally it is not written as "OFF" but when I ask to see her they say she is off and they suggest someone else. What gives? It has been about 2 months or more since she started to nearly always be listed as "OFF".

**Wheapers** · 03-22-21 00:30

Anyone know which booker to go through to get an appointment with mistress X, or have a recommendation for a provider who's similar?

**Panda1203** · 03-21-21 22:50

Originally Posted by PsuGuy911 [View Original Post]

So on Friday I saw Yoji first time since covid that I've seen her and I can verify she is still petite with spinner body, the only downside is she is a bit on the older side and while very skinny her body is not toned, service however is off the charts as usual 2 x cip with lots of dfk.

Today I also saw Chanel from M for the first time ever and I have to say she may be my new ATF to replace Hana, I would rate Chanel face wise compared to Hana very equal although Hana may have the slightest edge, body wise I'd rate Chanel a 9/10 and Hana an 8/10, service wise Hana is a 10/10 for me and chanel a 7. 5/10 but I'm almost certain with repeat visits with chanel she will become a 10/10 for me also, if Hana truly did retire then I'm glad I've found Chanel to replace her with, if she hasn't quit then I'm going to have a damn hard time deciding who to see every week 🤣.

Would this be the same Chanel you're talking about?

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...4866866-349637