KAngels Discussion

**AussieFury** · 03-09-21 21:57

Saw Hera at GSL today. She had great reviews on TNA from her time in Philly (her home base). She was here last year with the same agency as "Hanna" but there's a different Hanna who is often here with Kangels so apparently she's using her "primary" name. But regardless of her name, she was fucking awesome today.

Fucking.

Awesome.

Before some of you horn-dogs ask, no she doesn't do BBFS. It's your standard K-girl "script" but DAMN if she doesn't run it like an Academy Award winner.

I'm going back again Thursday for another ride on that coaster.

Photos are her but PhotoShopped. She looks more natural in person. Slender, about 5' 6" and natural Ds that drive me crazy when they move around.

https://www.classyphilly.com/hera

Damn. Maybe I won't wait until Thursday lol.

Of course YMMV, but today was the third time I've seen her and our chemistry is great.

**AussieFury** · 03-09-21 11:47

Originally Posted by AussieFury [View Original Post]

There's one glowing review of Coco on TER from a new user who only has that one review. Even though they claim to visit all the K-girls.

FYI, Coco has a new review on TER today. Written by "Bdyumyum. " His review history does show two visits in LA to a provider I know (who happens to be visiting Seattle this week) and the reviews read accurate.

So it's possible Bdyumyum is a legit hobbyist. But I still don't like all the cloak and dagger fake PM BS. Use a VPN, don't use real personal info, and then share info openly here.

**AussieFury** · 03-09-21 11:35

Originally Posted by Treskl [View Original Post]

The photos between Jo and Angel look quite different, I'm wondering if anyone has met with the girl in the photos for Jo? The one time I met with "Jo", I met a girl that looks so similar to Angel that I assume it's her. Angel was great but I'm wondering if the other girl exists?

I've met a handful of other kangels and it's the same story. The girls are cute / hot enough but the photos are all heavily photoshopped. I would rate the photo similarity 6/10 but there is some baseline that the photos work off of and the descriptions are kinda right.

I think your 6/10 is generous. We all need to give up the notion that the photos are anywhere near accurate. 19 times out of 20 they are not the same girl -- and the remaining 1 in 20 is old and heavily photoshopped.

The entire reason this thread came into existence is because the info represented by the K-agencies is always inaccurate and optimistic to their advantage.

Assume the general rule is that one girl gets two photos and profiles on their website (I. E. They always have half as many actual providers as appear on their website). I have no clue why they do this. But we need to accept that's what they do.

And yes, Jo = Angel (and has been discussed at length here). Happy Hobbying!

**Treskl** · 03-09-21 01:44

Originally Posted by PoundVages [View Original Post]

Others: Jina = Jasmin, and Jo = Angel.

The photos between Jo and Angel look quite different, I'm wondering if anyone has met with the girl in the photos for Jo? The one time I met with "Jo", I met a girl that looks so similar to Angel that I assume it's her. Angel was great but I'm wondering if the other girl exists?

I've met a handful of other kangels and it's the same story. The girls are cute / hot enough but the photos are all heavily photoshopped. I would rate the photo similarity 6/10 but there is some baseline that the photos work off of and the descriptions are kinda right.

**Rex Hughes** · 03-08-21 17:37

I am also worried about LE.

Get caught in a sting, and our reals names will be in the news.

It cost former KJR host Mitch Levy his job. Unless his name was made public, just because he's a public figure.

**Rex Hughes** · 03-08-21 17:35

Tell me, that Tina and Vivi do or don't look like they may be the same girl?

Both 5'6".

Both with "distinct" features, same.

But, if "they" are hot, and good, it's all good.

**Ashun** · 03-08-21 01:34

Originally Posted by AussieFury [View Original Post]

Are we still at zero confirmed reports about BtownKs (https://btownks.com/)?

It's strange that they "launched" with two girls, one of which (Yuri) left immediately before anyone could see her -- and then the other one (Coco) left a day or two after that.

There's one glowing review of Coco on TER from a new user who only has that one review. Even though they claim to visit all the K-girls.

And then there's one glowing review here from a low post-count user -- who writes a LOT like the author of the TER review and prefers to answer questions via PM but then never actually sends the PM.

It's either LE or one of the least organized Asian operations I've seen. The K-houses are supposed to be pros at this. Particularly at the current crazy Seattle K-girl rates. I now wonder if those girls were ever actually in town. Maybe the agency was trying to prime the pump and create some market buzz before they bring in actual providers. I'm going to need to read positive reviews from users I trust before I go anywhere near these guys. Even the ill-fated Luna House in Tacoma had a better launch than this.

I also find it funny that they use a JAV video on their front page for an agency that provides 'Korean angels'.

**AussieFury** · 03-07-21 20:44

Are we still at zero confirmed reports about BtownKs (https://btownks.com/)?

It's strange that they "launched" with two girls, one of which (Yuri) left immediately before anyone could see her -- and then the other one (Coco) left a day or two after that.

There's one glowing review of Coco on TER from a new user who only has that one review. Even though they claim to visit all the K-girls.

And then there's one glowing review here from a low post-count user -- who writes a LOT like the author of the TER review and prefers to answer questions via PM but then never actually sends the PM.

It's either LE or one of the least organized Asian operations I've seen. The K-houses are supposed to be pros at this. Particularly at the current crazy Seattle K-girl rates. I now wonder if those girls were ever actually in town. Maybe the agency was trying to prime the pump and create some market buzz before they bring in actual providers. I'm going to need to read positive reviews from users I trust before I go anywhere near these guys. Even the ill-fated Luna House in Tacoma had a better launch than this.

**AussieFury** · 03-07-21 20:27

I don't know why I can't quit those damn Chinese AAMPs. Usually the girl isn't that hot and the session is rushed. But every now and then it's great, like today.

Texted the booker's number from this ad and asked who was in Renton.

https://seattle.rubratings.com/180475

They sent a fake photo (like they always do). I just want to see whether it's a different fake photo than before, meaning it's a new girl. Got the address to an apt complex near Renton Landing. FYI. They also sometimes have a room at a nearby hotel but that's not where I went today.

I've been to this apartment before, so I knew to expect the door to be answered by a Chinese dude in his late 20's. Inside was Chloe, who is less than 5' tall, perfect bubble butt, flat tummy, bouncy perky Bs, and an adorable face. Score.

The move is to tell the booker you want half hour at $160, then pay her $200. The +$40 gets you better service including BBBJ usually, which was the case for me today tho YMMV -- and it's best for them if the booker doesn't know what kind of tip they get (so tell the booker you just want HHR). Chloe was unlike the standard Chinese AAMP girl. I never felt rushed. She offered me a shower (which I took). Got right to playtime and had a great time. She makes all the right noises and has a tight little box. Never told me to "hurry up and come, honey." Finished by pulling out, pulling off the hat, and a vigorous HJ on her tits while she grinned. I took a post shower and then she took one, too. English wasn't awesome, but we still chatted just fine. I got the full HHR, which is also far too rare with the Chinese groups. She says she's here for another 10 days, but you can NEVER know with these Chinese outfits. I plan on seeing her again on Tuesday.

But as always, BEWARE OF FUCKERY with the Chinese groups. Be ready to walk if they try to stick you with a granny or an overly chubby one (unless either is your thing). They will lie about the name of the girl and tell you it's the same girl you saw last time when it's not. They say ANYTHING to get you in the door hoping you won't have the balls to leave. Just assume the booker is lying and you'll be fine. LOL.

**MartyByrde** · 03-06-21 18:58

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because the subject of the report was in direct violation of a posted Admin Restriction on the author, the thread, and/or the subject. This behavior will not be tolerated, and a 2nd violation will result in an automatic banning.

You are restricted from commenting other people's posts because you simply cannot refrain from being an asshole. The next time you comment another members posts I will ban you.

A2

**Ashun** · 03-06-21 16:34

Originally Posted by MartyByrde [View Original Post]

I can see the possible confusion. My very recent posts on this thread have been about Byum Num, along with at least one by AussieFury. Also, as I mentioned, it's been a while since Wong Hing has posted here, whereas Byum Num has some recent posts. If you looks at posts 201, and 203-205, you'll see what I mean. As for post 205 from BBPornoGeek and his statement in that post "Whatever happened to the other guy who was posting lots of "info" about KAngels and then disappeared when this separate section was created? Yes, that is referring to Wong Hing. But the first part of that post was in response to my post right below that, which again was in reference to Byum Num.

If you look at the post I was directly responding to, I was answering BBPornoGeek's question. The world does not revolve around you and not everyone's responses are directed towards you.

**MartyByrde** · 03-06-21 13:56

Originally Posted by Camhole [View Original Post]

Maybe this will help your understanding of what Ashun was responding to.

I can see the possible confusion. My very recent posts on this thread have been about Byum Num, along with at least one by AussieFury. Also, as I mentioned, it's been a while since Wong Hing has posted here, whereas Byum Num has some recent posts. If you looks at posts 201, and 203-205, you'll see what I mean. As for post 205 from BBPornoGeek and his statement in that post "Whatever happened to the other guy who was posting lots of "info" about KAngels and then disappeared when this separate section was created? Yes, that is referring to Wong Hing. But the first part of that post was in response to my post right below that, which again was in reference to Byum Num.

**Camhole** · 03-06-21 02:04

Originally Posted by MartyByrde [View Original Post]

But that is not who we have been discussing / referring to. It is Byum Num. In fact, Wong Hing has not been around for quite a while.

Originally Posted by Ashun [View Original Post]

He actually PM'd me and told me he was leaving this board before this separate section was created.

Originally Posted by BBPornoGeek [View Original Post]

And I highly doubt you'll get any details. Whatever happened to the other guy who was posting lots of "info" about KAngels and then disappeared when this separate section was created?

Maybe this will help your understanding of what Ashun was responding to.

**MartyByrde** · 03-05-21 20:16

Originally Posted by Ashun [View Original Post]

I'm talking about Wong Hing.

But that is not who we have been discussing / referring to. It is Byum Num. In fact, Wong Hing has not been around for quite a while.

**Ashun** · 03-05-21 20:05

Originally Posted by MartyByrde [View Original Post]

If you are talking about Byum Num, he actually first appeared after this thread was created. And h even posted that he sent me a PM. Never saw one, even though I sent him the same 3 PMs, requesting details on his "visit".

I'm talking about Wong Hing.