KAngels Discussion

[AussieFury]

I apologize I like to be private, but wanted to help and contribute what I can. They ask the basic, where I found them email, race, age and wanted I'd or references.

Hi, Byum Yum. We've got a brand new agency combined with your single-digit post count USAG handle making a positive post about it. I hope you can understand why some here are naturally skeptical.

How did you hear about this new agency? What made you double your post count to tell us about them? Anything else you can share with us to increase our confidence that you're not affiliated with them?

Also, did you write this review on TER?

https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/detail/coco-review-by-ykyss-2271959

The writing sounds similar to your posts here. The tone of that review seems like it could easily be associated with this new agency because it tries to instill confidence that the new agency is legit... even though that Ykyss has only one review ever.

We’ve all learned to be extremey skeptical with Asian agencies — and brand new ones in particular.

Thanks and safe hobbying.

[AussieFury]

Yeah, keep thinking those photos are wishful thinking.

In 99 out of 100 cases at Kangels and most agencies, the photos are NOT the actual girl. In the 1 out of 100 that are real, they are still heavily photoshopped and usually outdated.

Everyone reading this should stop making ANY decisions based on Korean provider photos. Of all the things to drive your decision, the photo should be last on the list.

That said, there are agencies that use real (still Photoshopped) photos. Kangels is not one of them and this new agency isn't either.

MelodyDD is the current Kangels exception. She looks slightly older in pics but that's her.

[Byum Yum]

You've been on this site for nearly a decade and this is the first time you chime in regarding any topic? Holy hell man. Spill the beans, how special do I need to be to get in on these new agencies early?

I apologize I like to be private, but wanted to help and contribute what I can. They ask the basic, where I found them email, race, age and wanted I'd or references.

[Rex Hughes]

Reminders: KAngels.

Ivy = Diana. Both now on their site.

Melody DD = Suzy DD. Both just popped back onto their site.

[MartyByrde]

I would say its very close. Chest probably large B or small C, but real not MM. Ass is really nice, enjoy seeing it very much. Honestly looks wise, you will not be disappointed.

Sent you a PM a couple of days ago, but no reply. Would appreciate one (just sent it again).

[ItssHHuk]

I can verify they real and the girl (Coco) was very attractive, girl in the pics? Could very well be. I don't want to get into great detail but it is YMMV. She can communicate decently, and worth the trip, at least for me. Would see coco again for sure.

You've been on this site for nearly a decade and this is the first time you chime in regarding any topic? Holy hell man. Spill the beans, how special do I need to be to get in on these new agencies early?

[Byum Yum]

Nice looking Korean gal. Her measurements are stated as 34 c-30-34, but in the pictures, waist looks much smaller. Can you clarify that?

I would say its very close. Chest probably large B or small C, but real not MM. Ass is really nice, enjoy seeing it very much. Honestly looks wise, you will not be disappointed.

[MartyByrde]

Kangels clone. The girls were at Kangles a year or 2 ago.

Yeah, keep thinking those photos are wishful thinking.

[BBPornoGeek]

Looks like we got a new agency in town.

https://btownks.com/our-models/

Kangels clone. The girls were at Kangles a year or 2 ago.

[Duke Of Exeter]

That's the favicon for WordPress which is a popular blogging and website building platform. Anyone that doesn't change the default favicon has that one.

Ah, thanks! That possibility occurred to me, but I did not recognize the logo.

[MartyByrde]

I can verify they real and the girl (Coco) was very attractive, girl in the pics? Could very well be. I don't want to get into great detail but it is YMMV. She can communicate decently, and worth the trip, at least for me. Would see coco again for sure.

Nice looking Korean gal. Her measurements are stated as 34 c-30-34, but in the pictures, waist looks much smaller. Can you clarify that?

[Byum Yum]

Hesitant to try a new agency without any vouches. Be careful out there.

(as much as I hate tna, one good thing is seeing a provider's reviews mean you know its not a string.). Whoever takes one for the team, be careful, don't request any service over text, etc.

I can verify they real and the girl (Coco) was very attractive, girl in the pics? Could very well be. I don't want to get into great detail but it is YMMV. She can communicate decently, and worth the trip, at least for me. Would see coco again for sure.

[SeoulSea]

I see that GSL has a new girl Hera. Anyone seen her? I feel like I've seen those same pics used somewhere. Might've been Kbeautypops or another one of those similar sites. Any intel is appreciated!

[Morgan Creamin]

Looks like we got a new agency in town.

https://btownks.com/our-models/

Obviously don't trust the reviews on the site, most likely fake. A whois search just shows "california' and that the domain was just created on the 9th. Yet already one of review talks about visiting multiple times. Possible? Sure. Likely? I'm skeptical. Could be a pig in k-girl clothing.

[MartyByrde]

The agencies price HH like that because they don't want you to do HH visits.

And a quick Google image search reveals, as expected, those photos are re-used on unrelated websites (i.e. They are not real).

So, HH rates are just a rip off? Actually, in doing the math, it costs only $80 more to double the session time.

And as for the pictures of the women, my "hope" statement was just that: a hope that the pictures were real and unique. Thanks for your work, AussieFury.