Arrangement Reports

**OnlyDreams** · 02-14-21 03:00

I took like a 4 month break from SA because I found a stable SB (now it ended) , however, during that time I must have received at least over 100 messages from" LOCAL" smoking hot girls!! Now that I renewed my membership, I started responding to most of those messages and all of those profiles are either fake or scammers or have been deactivated. So when you don't review your membership, SA wants to convince you to renew it by sending you messages from bots they create. Now the only messages I receive are from girls in Filipinas, Venezuela, Brazil, Uruguay, United Kingdom (I must be very popular in those countries).

Also, SA allows scammers to roam freely. I came across this girl who created 3 different profiles but used the same pictures and same phone number. She asked for money in advance through Cash App. Maybe she gets reported but keeps creating different accounts with the greatest of ease and using the same profile pictures. On the other hand, I've heard when a guy is reported, it's hard to open a new / different account. So SA must definitely love scammers and bots because it attracts guys and the more guys, the more money they get. Plain and simple!

**RitTigers** · 02-13-21 12:11

Hi,

I'm new to this and created my account last month, but still haven't had any success. I'm taking to her and see is desperate to meet.

Any reviews on this one.

https://www.seeking.com/member/ff020...a-6e65223287c1

Thanks in advance.

**GWheaton** · 02-13-21 10:34

Originally Posted by TimeForPlay10 [View Original Post]

My membership ended 2 weeks ago. I knew that there would be a promo coming for V day. After browsing the site for the last week, I just don't see the point of re-joining. Mainly the same ones on there all the time. Anything new seems like a scam. My last 30 days started off decent but the list I ended up with for M&G's quickly dwindled to 1 or 2 real POTS that I'm still working on. I won't be signing up for the promo. I'm going to take a breather from the site and focus on the few options I have. I'm also going back to some old ones I lost touch with and having some success. I'm honestly just tired of the search.

I did not renew either. SA has become a waste of time for me. Sometimes I will check it out but there are just way too many scammers on there.

**TimeForPlay10** · 02-12-21 18:28

Originally Posted by SeanKonnery [View Original Post]

So after reading the "recent" reports looks like the Valentine special of 25% may not be worth it. I'm a numbers guy and it looks like just from the "recent" reports There are only these that are DTF that are reasonable. I haven't been successful on SA in 2021. Only with a old contact from 2020 which is still strong. But getting bored.

https://www.seeking.com/member/01dd8...3-460a01a54889

https://www.seeking.com/member/02b63...-fe4d1c46ed68. (has not been active 2 weeks).

https://www.seeking.com/member/4f302...d-805124dfe480 (not active in 3 weeks).

https://www.seeking.com/member/df291...b-941c1ad5f473

https://www.seeking.com/member/bfbd6...0-667373b6374d

This means that if all these were 100% that's $15 surcharge for the membership. Any thoughts?

My membership ended 2 weeks ago. I knew that there would be a promo coming for V day. After browsing the site for the last week, I just don't see the point of re-joining. Mainly the same ones on there all the time. Anything new seems like a scam. My last 30 days started off decent but the list I ended up with for M&G's quickly dwindled to 1 or 2 real POTS that I'm still working on. I won't be signing up for the promo. I'm going to take a breather from the site and focus on the few options I have. I'm also going back to some old ones I lost touch with and having some success. I'm honestly just tired of the search.

**Jinurso** · 02-12-21 17:52

Originally Posted by MnCuckold [View Original Post]

Petite refers to stature not weight. You can wish it to mean something else, but a 5'0" person describing themselves as "petite" is using the term correctly.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/petite

"having a small trim figure".

That woman obviously does not have a small trim figure.

Roseanne Barr is 5'3". Nobody would ever credibly describe her as petite.

**Donger999** · 02-12-21 16:48

https://www.seeking.com/member/90209...8-97ab2bd5152e

This one wants 800 per meet and then offered 400 for a BJ. I said really, how about 200 (which is nothing to sneeze at for just that, and, of course, crickets. Not increasing my offer.

**SeanKonnery** · 02-12-21 16:38

Originally Posted by HitMan1783 [View Original Post]

Tried sendin pm dude.

Just cleared my inbox.

**HitMan1783** · 02-12-21 16:15

Originally Posted by SeanKonnery [View Original Post]

So after reading the "recent" reports looks like the Valentine special of 25% may not be worth it. I'm a numbers guy and it looks like just from the "recent" reports There are only these that are DTF that are reasonable. I haven't been successful on SA in 2021. Only with a old contact from 2020 which is still strong. But getting bored.

https://www.seeking.com/member/01dd8...3-460a01a54889

https://www.seeking.com/member/02b63...-fe4d1c46ed68. (has not been active 2 weeks).

https://www.seeking.com/member/4f302...d-805124dfe480 (not active in 3 weeks).

https://www.seeking.com/member/df291...b-941c1ad5f473

https://www.seeking.com/member/bfbd6...0-667373b6374d

This means that if all these were 100% that's $15 surcharge for the membership. Any thoughts?

Tried sendin pm dude.

**SeanKonnery** · 02-12-21 14:48

So after reading the "recent" reports looks like the Valentine special of 25% may not be worth it. I'm a numbers guy and it looks like just from the "recent" reports There are only these that are DTF that are reasonable. I haven't been successful on SA in 2021. Only with a old contact from 2020 which is still strong. But getting bored.

https://www.seeking.com/member/01dd8...3-460a01a54889

https://www.seeking.com/member/02b63...-fe4d1c46ed68. (has not been active 2 weeks).

https://www.seeking.com/member/4f302...d-805124dfe480 (not active in 3 weeks).

https://www.seeking.com/member/df291...b-941c1ad5f473

https://www.seeking.com/member/bfbd6...0-667373b6374d

This means that if all these were 100% that's $15 surcharge for the membership. Any thoughts?

**LoveSmallPerky** · 02-12-21 14:10

Originally Posted by MnCuckold [View Original Post]

Petite refers to stature not weight. You can wish it to mean something else, but a 5'0" person describing themselves as "petite" is using the term correctly.

If it helps, here is the urban dictionary definition.

Petite.

A woman UNDER 5'4 (or 162 cm), who is small-framed and, usually skinny.

All thin girls are not petite but, all petite girls aren't necessarily thin either.

**Meddic80** · 02-12-21 13:53

Originally Posted by ScottWeir [View Original Post]

Any Intel on this one? Says she can hosts $250.

https://www.seeking.com/member/5d6f6...2-1f893e5b5d19

Sent me a bunch of nudes. Looks semipro.

I talked to her before, she's definitely eager to meet. Agreed with $200, but I backed out.

Let me know how it goes and report back.

**SeekAndDestroy** · 02-12-21 13:16

Originally Posted by Chicago41 [View Original Post]

She has "average" as her body type, which looks pretty accurate to me. Short girls sometimes look larger than they are if they have big tits.

Look at her tagline. The first word you see when looking at her profile is "petite". She is 50 lbs overweight! When I'm fucking a petite girl I want to see my dick moving in her stomach LOL, not what looks to be a small child or a thanksgiving dinner for a family.

**ScottWeir** · 02-12-21 12:21

Any Intel on this one? Says she can hosts $250.

https://www.seeking.com/member/5d6f6...2-1f893e5b5d19

Sent me a bunch of nudes. Looks semipro.

**MnCuckold** · 02-12-21 12:18

Originally Posted by Jinurso [View Original Post]

Some girls seem to think "short" = "petite".

That is not so.

Petite refers to stature not weight. You can wish it to mean something else, but a 5'0" person describing themselves as "petite" is using the term correctly.

**Chicago41** · 02-12-21 11:32

Originally Posted by SeekAndDestroy [View Original Post]

I usually roll my eyes when guys complain about girls using in-accurate descriptions on their tags, which in turn makes it difficult to search based on body type. Just because its unrealistic for these girls to describe themselves as "super dumpy!" or "kinda gross! And its all part of the game. But. That said, this one made me actually stop and think for a little bit. She isn't even trying to hide anything with the photos. No angles, no edits, she's straight up. She legitimately thinks of herself as petite and assumes we all will agree. I love SA.

https://www.seeking.com/member/ceb31...d-0738c8640198

She has "average" as her body type, which looks pretty accurate to me. Short girls sometimes look larger than they are if they have big tits.