Escort Reports

**JasonG76** · 02-07-21 21:12

Avoid this girl. Went to see her for a QV. Got to location. Lives at corner of fletcher and nebraska. 118 michigan ave. Got to location and went downhill. Asked for donation and put it away which was my first mistake. Got down to it and started with BBBJ that lasted 10 seconds and then started bitching about how I had a bad attitude. She doesn't look like pics. Missing a ton of teeth. Definitely heavy candy use. Pulled weapon on me and that; s when I booked it. Avoid at all cost. You will get robbed. You have been warned. https://milfy.com.listcrawler.eu/pos...ampa/58535224/.

J.

**TeamCommando** · 02-07-21 18:57

Originally Posted by Admin2 [View Original Post]

Just for curiosity don't the charge have a different name like felony prostitution or something?

A2.

Probably. But I've never actually seen anyone in the Tampa Bay charged with felony prostitution, even when it was a 3rd strike. The charge is always just "Prostitution".

**NeeditWantit** · 02-07-21 17:23

Who is pooning during the game and which provider?

**Admin2** · 02-07-21 17:14

Originally Posted by TeamCommando [View Original Post]

In Florida, anyone who is charged with prostitution MAY volunteer to be screened for STD. But, whether or not they volunteer, they will be screened. Any positive results are reported to Department of Health, medical personnel, appropriate state agencies, state attorneys, and courts of appropriate jurisdiction to support any future charges related to prostitution (I. E. Knowingly being STD positive) and endangering someone by continuing to engage in prostitution. This part of the law changes prostitution charges to a first degree misdemeanor or a third degree felony.

Florida does not have a charge of "aggravated prostitution" like Tennessee and some other states but the law is clear that the felony charge only applies to someone who knows they are HIV positive and subsequently engages in prostitution. Prior knowledge of having any other STD and subsequently committing prostitution remains a third degree misdemeanor offense. There is a 3 strike rule that raises prostitution to a felony charge regardless of infection.

Either way, the conviction would stipulate what the underlying offense is and would be a matter of public records so it POSSIBLE that a simple STD could be part of the conviction record for a third degree misdemeanor. Being HIV positive is the underlying requisite for a felony conviction so that will certainly be in the public record. As A2 states CONVICTIONS, not CHARGES are what count.

Just for curiosity don't the charge have a different name like felony prostitution or something?

A2.

**Member #6280** · 02-07-21 13:39

Originally Posted by TeamCommando [View Original Post]

In Florida, anyone who is charged with prostitution MAY volunteer to be screened for STD. But, whether or not they volunteer, they will be screened. Any positive results are reported to Department of Health, medical personnel, appropriate state agencies, state attorneys, and courts of appropriate jurisdiction to support any future charges related to prostitution (I. E. Knowingly being STD positive) and endangering someone by continuing to engage in prostitution. This part of the law changes prostitution charges to a first degree misdemeanor or a third degree felony.

Florida does not have a charge of "aggravated prostitution" like Tennessee and some other states but the law is clear that the felony charge only applies to someone who knows they are HIV positive and subsequently engages in prostitution. Prior knowledge of having any other STD and subsequently committing prostitution remains a third degree misdemeanor offense. There is a 3 strike rule that raises prostitution to a felony charge regardless of infection.

Either way, the conviction would stipulate what the underlying offense is and would be a matter of public records so it POSSIBLE that a simple STD could be part of the conviction record for a third degree misdemeanor. Being HIV positive is the underlying requisite for a felony conviction so that will certainly be in the public record. As A2 states CONVICTIONS, not CHARGES are what count.

Thanks I really was just curious. Did not mean to offend at all. The answers were seen by everyone on here and now it is clear. That is a very rare situation I wasn't aware of, as I suspected there might be. I just couldn't for the life of me think how someone's private medical health records could be public. I appreciate the honest feedback.

**Tattoo47** · 02-07-21 13:31

https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...ampa/58543578/

After 5 no responses, I finally got one today. She states that she was flooded with texts and never saw mine (sure). She also stated that she sent 5 pics (Only got 1). Her rate is $$ regardless in or outcall or car date. She suggested Brandon Motor Lodge, but has she has no comments or reviews anywhere, I did play it safe and suggest somewhere else or car date. She states that she is hesitant as I might be LE. I do reply that she can be one as well. She will be available after the game. She is hot enough, but LE senses are going off, so will play it cautious. No hotel and empty parking out. I will post later if all goes well, if I don't we know that it is a scam / LE.

**TeamCommando** · 02-07-21 11:27

Originally Posted by Admin2 [View Original Post]

In nearly every single state, and Florida for sure, when a person is convicted of prostitution part of the sentence is screening for HIV, Hep C ect. If they are found to be positive they are informed that any future arrests for commercial sex would be a felony and not a misdemeanor, I think it's called aggravated prostitution but I'm not sure. If they are subsequently arrested for that the conviction of the greater crime is straight forward and it's a matter of public record. It has to be a conviction, not a charge because DA's especially in Florida, in order to prove to the public they are tough on crime, routinely charge sex workers with aggravated prostitution only to later, after the newspaper stories, reduce the charge to simple prostitution.

So if somebody is convicted of aggravated prostitution (or whatever they call it) then it's nearly certainly true they have one of the major STD's and that information can be posted here. If they have clap or syphilis, it won't be in the public record but those are easily taken care of and if guys are banging commercial sex workers uncovered they have made a choice to accept that risk.

A2

In Florida, anyone who is charged with prostitution MAY volunteer to be screened for STD. But, whether or not they volunteer, they will be screened. Any positive results are reported to Department of Health, medical personnel, appropriate state agencies, state attorneys, and courts of appropriate jurisdiction to support any future charges related to prostitution (I. E. Knowingly being STD positive) and endangering someone by continuing to engage in prostitution. This part of the law changes prostitution charges to a first degree misdemeanor or a third degree felony.

Florida does not have a charge of "aggravated prostitution" like Tennessee and some other states but the law is clear that the felony charge only applies to someone who knows they are HIV positive and subsequently engages in prostitution. Prior knowledge of having any other STD and subsequently committing prostitution remains a third degree misdemeanor offense. There is a 3 strike rule that raises prostitution to a felony charge regardless of infection.

Either way, the conviction would stipulate what the underlying offense is and would be a matter of public records so it POSSIBLE that a simple STD could be part of the conviction record for a third degree misdemeanor. Being HIV positive is the underlying requisite for a felony conviction so that will certainly be in the public record. As A2 states CONVICTIONS, not CHARGES are what count.

**Admin2** · 02-07-21 11:20

Originally Posted by Nflfan [View Original Post]

Prosecutors over charge defendants as a matter of practice and increasing leverage for bargain. It also helps them if a case goes to jury, then a lesser charge can be applied. It sure beats the humiliation of an acquittal. In Florida the prosecutor is a political animal.

However for aggravated prostitution there really isn't any wiggle room. Once a sex worker has been, what "identified" I guess, they pick up a ton of restrictions, they can go to jail for simply being around other sex workers. Or for being in a place that is known for prostitution, they don't actually have to solicit anybody.

There really isn't anything to bargain or leverage if you were previously found to be positive and if you are charged with aggravated prostitution and you hadn't been previously found to be positive it's automatically dropped because the the hasn't satisfied the requirements of the crime. It would be like saying you broke into a building that hadn't been robbed or killed a person that was still alive. They do it for optics and nothing more.

A2.

**Nflfan** · 02-07-21 11:13

Originally Posted by Admin2 [View Original Post]

In nearly every single state, and Florida for sure, when a person is convicted of prostitution part of the sentence is screening for HIV, Hep C ect. If they are found to be positive they are informed that any future arrests for commercial sex would be a felony and not a misdemeanor, I think it's called aggravated prostitution but I'm not sure. If they are subsequently arrested for that the conviction of the greater crime is straight forward and it's a matter of public record. It has to be a conviction, not a charge because DA's especially in Florida, in order to prove to the public they are tough on crime, routinely charge sex workers with aggravated prostitution only to later, after the newspaper stories, reduce the charge to simple prostitution.

So if somebody is convicted of aggravated prostitution (or whatever they call it) then it's nearly certainly true they have one of the major STD's and that information can be posted here. If they have clap or syphilis, it won't be in the public record but those are easily taken care of and if guys are banging commercial sex workers uncovered they have made a choice to accept that risk.

A2

Prosecutors over charge defendants as a matter of practice and increasing leverage for bargain. It also helps them if a case goes to jury, then a lesser charge can be applied. It sure beats the humiliation of an acquittal. In Florida the prosecutor is a political animal.

**Admin2** · 02-07-21 10:37

Originally Posted by BootyHolic71 [View Original Post]

So, as you can see personal health information (such as STD test results) connected with a persons name would be a HIPAA violation and therefore would be illegal because a persons private medical records ARE NOT public information anyone should be able to access. By law. So what are we supposed to do then? People deserve to know if there is a legitimately infected provider out there spreading STDs. And the ONLY way other than they themselves posting the information on a site with internet accessible public records, is if someone sees a provider and then gets an infection.

Again, not trying to be argumentative here. I literally can't think of an example that is legal that would qualify. I could be wrong though. So please educate me / us on what examples would qualify.

Thanks. Just trying to help avoid these types of posts and people getting in trouble on here.

In nearly every single state, and Florida for sure, when a person is convicted of prostitution part of the sentence is screening for HIV, Hep C ect. If they are found to be positive they are informed that any future arrests for commercial sex would be a felony and not a misdemeanor, I think it's called aggravated prostitution but I'm not sure. If they are subsequently arrested for that the conviction of the greater crime is straight forward and it's a matter of public record. It has to be a conviction, not a charge because DA's especially in Florida, in order to prove to the public they are tough on crime, routinely charge sex workers with aggravated prostitution only to later, after the newspaper stories, reduce the charge to simple prostitution.

So if somebody is convicted of aggravated prostitution (or whatever they call it) then it's nearly certainly true they have one of the major STD's and that information can be posted here. If they have clap or syphilis, it won't be in the public record but those are easily taken care of and if guys are banging commercial sex workers uncovered they have made a choice to accept that risk.

A2

**RookieMonger** · 02-07-21 08:03

Originally Posted by HoChaser1 [View Original Post]

I'm happy she is doing well. Back in the day (2016/17) she was staying in motels all over Nebraska / Florida / Busch and other places. I spent time with her a lot back then at the Lamp Lighter and other motels. She also stayed alot on Nebraska by the Publix with my friend Crystal who is now clean. Kayla was always nice. Back then she walked Nebraska and only would ask me for 30 to 40 bucks each time. That was the same donations others gave her then too. Whatever her requested donations are now, good for her if she is getting higher donations. I only say that for her since she was my friend and I spent lots of time with her back then, even had her cry on my shoulder before.

I've always had a great time with her, I know others had reported otherwise. Was she hard to get a hold of sometimes? Sure, just like they all have that issue. She had a sugar daddy back then as well from what I remember. Glad she's doing well.

**HoChaser1** · 02-07-21 02:25

I'm happy she is doing well. Back in the day (2016/17) she was staying in motels all over Nebraska / Florida / Busch and other places. I spent time with her a lot back then at the Lamp Lighter and other motels. She also stayed alot on Nebraska by the Publix with my friend Crystal who is now clean. Kayla was always nice. Back then she walked Nebraska and only would ask me for 30 to 40 bucks each time. That was the same donations others gave her then too. Whatever her requested donations are now, good for her if she is getting higher donations. I only say that for her since she was my friend and I spent lots of time with her back then, even had her cry on my shoulder before.

Originally Posted by Hobby4 [View Original Post]

Hey gang I posted a while ago about finding Kate posting again. Well I finally was able to get our schedules to match up. I can say she is way better than before! She has a few more pounds but looks good on her, not fat at all. Great communication she came to see me at my place. Was on time. I really just wanted some good headache relief and damn did she deliver! BBBJ with lots of dt. Way better than I remembered. Lasted about 10 min and she took my load with a smile! Recommend and will be repeating!

https://tryst.link/escort/lady-kay

**Member #6280** · 02-07-21 01:11

"EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted in accordance with the Forum's policy prohibiting unsubstantiated reports claiming that another person is afflicted with a Sexually Transmitted Disease, this limitation being necessary because a disturbing number of these reports are less than genuine.

STD allegations are not permitted in the forum at any time EXCEPT when substantiated by links to internet-accessible public records.

Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

Three strikes and you're out.

And no, you're not trying to "help people out" when new users create a new account to receptively post about some chick having an STD it's never about an STD and it's always about some idiot with an agenda.

A2".

Sorry, I am not trying to be argumentative at all, but admin keeps saying no STD allegations that are not accompanied by internet-accessible public records. But what internet-accessible public records would be legally allowed to be posted publicly any way? I thought that was a HIPAA violation.

https://www.hipaajournal.com/what-is...n-under-hipaa/

My reading of this information tells me that what you ask for does not even exist.

In particular: (From the site I linked).

"PHI is any health information that can be tied to an individual, which under HIPAA means protected health information includes one or more of the following 18 identifiers. If these identifiers are removed the information is considered de-identified protected health information, which is not subject to the restrictions of the HIPAA Privacy Rule.

Names (Full or last name and initial).

All geographical identifiers smaller than a state, except for the initial three digits of a zip code if, according to the current publicly available data from the USA Bureau of the Census: the geographic unit formed by combining all zip codes with the same three initial digits contains more than 20,000 people; and the initial three digits of a zip code for all such geographic units containing 20,000 or fewer people is changed to 000.

Dates (other than year) directly related to an individual.

Phone Numbers.

Fax numbers.

Email addresses.

Social Security numbers.

Medical record numbers.

Health insurance beneficiary numbers.

Account numbers.

Certificate / license numbers.

Vehicle identifiers (including serial numbers and license plate numbers).

Device identifiers and serial numbers;.

Web Uniform Resource Locators (URLs).

Internet Protocol (IP) address numbers.

Biometric identifiers, including finger, retinal and voice prints.

Full face photographic images and any comparable images.

Any other unique identifying number, characteristic, or code except the unique code assigned by the investigator to code the data."

So, as you can see personal health information (such as STD test results) connected with a persons name would be a HIPAA violation and therefore would be illegal because a persons private medical records ARE NOT public information anyone should be able to access. By law. So what are we supposed to do then? People deserve to know if there is a legitimately infected provider out there spreading STDs. And the ONLY way other than they themselves posting the information on a site with internet accessible public records, is if someone sees a provider and then gets an infection.

Again, not trying to be argumentative here. I literally can't think of an example that is legal that would qualify. I could be wrong though. So please educate me / us on what examples would qualify.

Thanks. Just trying to help avoid these types of posts and people getting in trouble on here.

**Hobby4** · 02-06-21 19:30

Hey gang I posted a while ago about finding Kate posting again. Well I finally was able to get our schedules to match up. I can say she is way better than before! She has a few more pounds but looks good on her, not fat at all. Great communication she came to see me at my place. Was on time. I really just wanted some good headache relief and damn did she deliver! BBBJ with lots of dt. Way better than I remembered. Lasted about 10 min and she took my load with a smile! Recommend and will be repeating!

https://tryst.link/escort/lady-kay

**Tease6968** · 02-06-21 02:13

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted in accordance with the Forum's policy prohibiting unsubstantiated reports claiming that another person is afflicted with a Sexually Transmitted Disease, this limitation being necessary because a disturbing number of these reports are less than genuine.

STD allegations are not permitted in the forum at any time EXCEPT when substantiated by links to internet-accessible public records.

Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

Three strikes and you're out.

And no, you're not trying to "help people out" when new users create a new account to receptively post about some chick having an STD it's never about an STD and it's always about some idiot with an agenda.

A2