CookyJar's Streetwalker Photos

[Ed Norton]

I am new here and a novice to SW mongering, so please forgive the naivete. I have a slightly different take on using the names. I find the photos and the descriptions of what took place to be the most important part of the posting, not the name.

As I have toured the avenues in Philly and NJ, I look for the face not the name. The photo let's me know the SW is not LE. The description gives me a hint at what the price may be and what the quality of service is likely to be, with the knowlege that YMMV. This has been very helpful because I have found it difficult to distingush between SW and civilians on K. In NJ it is much easier to spot a SW, but I have not seen one that's my flavor.

Another reason, I don't want the SW to know I have seen her is I beleive it will only lead to more questions; .i.e, where did you see me, what was said, who said it, are you going to say anything about me. I could also lead to the SW giving information she should not divulge about her clients. Why, because our conversation revolves around the board. No sir, I rather we take about war and peace. I don't know her and she doesn't know me. It's best for all if that's what she believes.

The less the SW knows about me, the less you can tell others on the board and possibly LE. You all seem very honorable, but I don't want a popular SW quizzed by an unscrupulous member seeking info about others on the board who utilize her services.

Duke PV did a good job of compiling photos taken Cooky's and others into a wonderful list of faces. Is it more difficult to track who is who. Most certainly. I'm proof of that. Because I am going strictly off the photos, I have yet to find a SW on the K. But again, I am new to this and I have found the board extremely helpful. It should remain a guide that requires a little effort to navigate it and not a book that leads LE or others to your doorstep.

Hope I have not overstepped my bounds with this post. If I have, please write it off as lack of knowledge of the streets.

Ice

Good insights, Ice. You certainly haven't overstepped any bounds.

I agree that the face and the descriptions are of prime importance in touring the avenues. The name becomes important...later. One of the great features of this forum is the building-on of knowledge about the SWs that comes when a monger with a slightly different take on a girl makes a followup post. That's where the common name used here helps in providing useful info.

You've noticed that there are many more written reports than photo reports...that's just a reality, since we don't all go around toting cameras. Some, but not many, of these written reports are followed by a photo report, or vice-versa. That's where my plea comes in. Let's keep the names the same, just as the girl has given it. If later on she changes it, which is not common among the SWs discussed here, then someone will surely report it, but at least till then we'll know what she looks like AND what written reports have said about her.

And your last point is your best. Don't tell the SW where you saw her photo or what you've heard about her. We're here to get info about her, not to give info to her or make discoveries about our fellow mongers.

[Ted E Bear]

Hence my public plea: CookyJar, if a girl hasn’t specifically given you a “photo name”, and if my assumption is correct that you at least ask a girl’s name before negotiating with her, please USE THE NAME SHE GIVES YOU.

Why? It’s messing up the discussions that go on, in this thread as well as in other Philadelphia threads. What’s the sense of generating talk like this “Oh, Gia, that’s actually Brittney!” or “Oh, Cherry, that’s really Julie!” or causing people to use double names like Brittney aka Gia or Cherry/Julie? And if one of us meets up with a girl with mismatched boobs or reads Mike’s description of her, it will ENHANCE our experience if we can match his post with yours, if the names are the same, to get a fuller take on this person. Will we ever be able to match up someone’s negative report (using real name) with your positive report on “Queen” or “Princess” or “Blondie”? I doubt it.

I know you have dismissed this topic before as minor or silly. That’s your opinion and I suggest that it’s not the majority opinion here in Philadelphia (though I’m sure your point of view will get support from out-of-towners who rarely monger here). Sure, knowing a name is unnecessary to score pussy, but I’m talking about helping your fellow Philadelphia mongers’ DISCUSSIONS here. Using a provider’s given name will help us all benefit from Jackson’s forum more. Believe me, girls DO change their names, but the girls on the Avenue we’re talking about here usually DON’T unless it’s for another venue such as an escort service or club.

I am new here and a novice to SW mongering, so please forgive the naivete. I have a slightly different take on using the names. I find the photos and the descriptions of what took place to be the most important part of the posting, not the name.

As I have toured the avenues in Philly and NJ, I look for the face not the name. The photo let's me know the SW is not LE. The description gives me a hint at what the price may be and what the quality of service is likely to be, with the knowlege that YMMV. This has been very helpful because I have found it difficult to distingush between SW and civilians on K. In NJ it is much easier to spot a SW, but I have not seen one that's my flavor.

Another reason, I don't want the SW to know I have seen her is I beleive it will only lead to more questions; .i.e, where did you see me, what was said, who said it, are you going to say anything about me. I could also lead to the SW giving information she should not divulge about her clients. Why, because our conversation revolves around the board. No sir, I rather we take about war and peace. I don't know her and she doesn't know me. It's best for all if that's what she believes.

The less the SW knows about me, the less you can tell others on the board and possibly LE. You all seem very honorable, but I don't want a popular SW quizzed by an unscrupulous member seeking info about others on the board who utilize her services.

Duke PV did a good job of compiling photos taken Cooky's and others into a wonderful list of faces. Is it more difficult to track who is who. Most certainly. I'm proof of that. Because I am going strictly off the photos, I have yet to find a SW on the K. But again, I am new to this and I have found the board extremely helpful. It should remain a guide that requires a little effort to navigate it and not a book that leads LE or others to your doorstep.

Hope I have not overstepped my bounds with this post. If I have, please write it off as lack of knowledge of the streets.

Ice

[Ed Norton]

Good photos, as usual, CookyJar. The energy and passion that you put into your photographic efforts is amazing. The move over to this thread seems to have benefitted everyone. With your collection grouped in one thread, guys can scroll back to their heart’s delight to see the variety of girls you (and others) have found on the streets. And the visitors from the photograph gallery can provide comments on your works without criticism from the peanut gallery.

I had a nice week out there on the K. Two encounters with Brittney, who has been reported on by several members. There is no need to repeat observations made by others, but I will add my favorable opinion here before going to the main point of my post. Brittany, in case you doubt I saw her, was wearing a light blue sweater-jacket this week, with a fabric softener swatch in the right pocket to keep it sweet smelling. She has two tattoos of her 3 yr-old son D_____ on her body, and her hair is showing her natural dirty blond color at the roots of her otherwise dyed black hair. She’s moody, but reacts very well to being treated nice. She pretty much wants to go off in her own world once the action is over and she has been paid. But she gives great head, she is VERY nice, and we all know she’s hot-looking.

Where you come in, CookyJar, is the photos that you posted of her. I couldn’t avoid mentioning them to her, and I don’t think you can criticize anyone here for making comments to her such as, “you looked good in them”. In no way did I, or should others, inquire about your fees or your car or your anything. I did ask one question, again without mentioning anything in your written post or anything about you as a person. And that was: “If I took pictures of you, would you mind using your name ‘Brittney’ “? She said no, she didn’t mind that.

I wish in retrospect I had asked her a followup question: “Who came up with the name “Gia”? But that would have gotten into your post more than is ethical. Asking it here, however, is ethical: CookyJar, who came up with the name “Gia” to go along with her photographs, and why? Based on Brittney”s response and your prior comments, I suspect it was you.

Hence my public plea: CookyJar, if a girl hasn’t specifically given you a “photo name”, and if my assumption is correct that you at least ask a girl’s name before negotiating with her, please USE THE NAME SHE GIVES YOU.

Why? It’s messing up the discussions that go on, in this thread as well as in other Philadelphia threads. What’s the sense of generating talk like this “Oh, Gia, that’s actually Brittney!” or “Oh, Cherry, that’s really Julie!” or causing people to use double names like Brittney aka Gia or Cherry/Julie? And if one of us meets up with a girl with mismatched boobs or reads Mike’s description of her, it will ENHANCE our experience if we can match his post with yours, if the names are the same, to get a fuller take on this person. Will we ever be able to match up someone’s negative report (using real name) with your positive report on “Queen” or “Princess” or “Blondie”? I doubt it.

I know you have dismissed this topic before as minor or silly. That’s your opinion and I suggest that it’s not the majority opinion here in Philadelphia (though I’m sure your point of view will get support from out-of-towners who rarely monger here). Sure, knowing a name is unnecessary to score pussy, but I’m talking about helping your fellow Philadelphia mongers’ DISCUSSIONS here. Using a provider’s given name will help us all benefit from Jackson’s forum more. Believe me, girls DO change their names, but the girls on the Avenue we’re talking about here usually DON’T unless it’s for another venue such as an escort service or club.

PUH-LEESE, CookyJar, help us out here by continuing to contribute great photographs, and by remembering the girl’s given name, and by using that name with your posts.

Thanks,
Ed

[CookyJar]

Showed a nice petite body for a 36yo mom. She asked me if I like small or big breasts then said she's got one of each. She wasn't kidding.

Pleasant, friendly woman. I liked her.

I do not think this is the same girl as Mike's. Very similar, though.


I hesitated before posting Blondie. On many different levels I pondered the prudence of posting her pictures. She was a fairly nice date with an okay attitude. I do not want to give the impression that her ability to provide good service was in anyway hampered by what some might call her obvious physical flaw. I have said in the pass, that I post pictures on what is actually out there. I stand by that affirmation. I am not responsible for Blondie being out there. The decision to offer her services was hers. She willing agreed to pose for pictures knowing that I intended to post them on this site.

I am not issuing a warning. I am divulging information. The one problem that I had with Blondie is that, unlike the girl in Mike 80's post, she did not make me aware of her uniqueness prior to our agreement. If was not until we were sitting in my living room and she had started to undress that she informed me about the condition of her upper body. In the car, after I had asked to touch her breast, she had willing and even proudly offered up her right boob for me to see and feel. Her exposing her good tit, assured me that she was not LE, but it also peaked my interest. At not time during the ride did she hint to anything other then her ability to provide good service.

As Blondie started to undress she asked if she had to get completely naked. I reminded her that I had explained to her, what I had wanted in the car during the negotiations. She then stated that one of her breast was bigger then the other. She went on to explain that she had been involved in an accident while in jail. After I assured her that as a mature adult male, who has been around, it would not matter to me; she removed her prosthesis and bra. I did explain to her that other, less mature or understanding men, may find it upsetting that she had not explained her condition prior to making any final arrangements. She continued to be understandably shy during the photo session.

The point I really want to make is that Blondie’s BJ and FS technique is well within the normal range for a SW. After replacing her brassiere, she relaxed and settled down. She preformed a nice deep throat BJ. She was equally as nice in both the doggie style and mist positions. She had a fresh smell about her, like she had just bathed. Her hair was a deep dark black, braided at the scalp and leading down into a nice full hair style. She was nicely dressed, but appeared to have been in the same clothing for a while – like she was coming back in after being out on the town, clubbing.

I liken my experience with Blonde with that other well known let down. We have all been with a girl (SW or civilian) who has waited a bit too long to inform us that she is on the rag. There is some information that should be shared before my dick gets hard. With that having been said, the question arises, would I date Blondie again? The answer is yes. But, of cause as always, YMMV

CookyJar

[WebDog]

Let’s not get this twisted. The $35 was in addition to her regular quoted fee. I was about to pay $35 for a cheap motel room. I persuaded her to come back to my place and I'd give her the $35 bucks plus her normal asking price.
My little hide-away is a distance from Camden. Most girls do not like traveling to far away. Time is money and time away from their pickup location could mean lost income.

I still consider this a bargain. I got two hours of fun and games, plus pictures (the pictures were extra). It all cost me less than $100 buck-a-roos. And remember, we got to do it all in a real bed with clean sheets.

I had some problem with a provider last year after a monger quoted to her the price I broke down on this board. Now I am purposely hazy with regards to pricing. I should point out, that another monger on the South Jersey board gave a fair quote of Cherry (aka Julies) normal asking price.
CookyJar

At $100 it is still a bah-gin (as we say up here). I hope you properly scolded her for shaving that snatch bald. I love a good strawberry patch!!

[Tommy Knocker6]

Cookyjar,

You're the man. What sweet ones you find and the great shots, including the twat.

Cherry's sure hot; if I ever get to Philly I'll have to PM you for pointers.

That said, does she allow trips on the Hershey Highway?

Thanks man for all the great reports and PIX!

[CookyJar]

Cherry is smoking hot and $35 is such a deal for 2 hours. Just wish we had some action like Cherry in San Diego. Girls like her don't come around too often so enjoy her while you can.

Let’s not get this twisted. The $35 was in addition to her regular quoted fee. I was about to pay $35 for a cheap motel room. I persuaded her to come back to my place and I'd give her the $35 bucks plus her normal asking price.
My little hide-away is a distance from Camden. Most girls do not like traveling to far away. Time is money and time away from their pickup location could mean lost income.

I still consider this a bargain. I got two hours of fun and games, plus pictures (the pictures were extra). It all cost me less than $100 buck-a-roos. And remember, we got to do it all in a real bed with clean sheets.

I had some problem with a provider last year after a monger quoted to her the price I broke down on this board. Now I am purposely hazy with regards to pricing. I should point out, that another monger on the South Jersey board gave a fair quote of Cherry (aka Julies) normal asking price.

CookyJar

[Ted E Bear]

As a newbie to the forum and area, I hope to lose my cherry with Cherry. Thanks CJ for the thorough report. I will be on the lookout for her.

[CookyJar]

I have gotten a lot a questions asking how I get girls to pose. There is not big secret. I ask them. It does help to have a bit of personality. A nice line does not hurt. One thing that I have learned, you do not need to bull shit them, be honest and tell them straight up what you intend to do with the pictures. And most important, offer them some money.

I rarely give up much more then the norm for a BJ or FS plus a tip. I usually ask the girl what she gets for a BJ. If she says X amount of dollars for a BJ, I counter with an offer of X minus a few bucks for 10 pictures. I may promise a tip if I like what she has. Later, after I have seen the body and gotten a feel for her attitude I will offer a additional little something for a BJ or FS. She will usually agree. She is looking at the overall amount which will be more then she expected. I try and make sure that the picture taking session was fun for her. So the only real work, for her, is the BJ or FS.

For example, take this hypothetical situation: The girl says she normally gets $30 for a BJ. I offer $20 for ten pictures. Later I offer an additional $20. She ends up with $40, which is $10 more then the $30 she first quoted and expected for a car day. I normally throw in a $10 tip just too sweeten her up for next time or as a incentive to tell her friends good things about me. $50 is about what most of you pay give or take a few bucks.

There are always exceptions. If the girls is a real hottie, she may get a few bucks more. Sometimes the girl manages to persuade me that she is worth more, even though she is not. It is that same old bargaining process that men and women have used for centuries.

However, my latest session with Cherry (aka Julie) was near the fringe of my spending limits.

I went back to her house in Camden. She tried to get me to come in but I had other things in mind, which included a real FS session in a real bed. At first we were at an impasse. She wanted $150 to return to Philly with me. No, nope, no way in hell was I going to pay $150. So we agreed on going to a local motel at $35 for two hours. On our way to the motel, I pointed out that she could get the $35, plus her regular going price and a meal at Mickie D’s, she opted to take the trip.

There is no need for me to review Cherry’s (aka Julie) service. Ditto my last report. She was all about full service. The moment we were finish squabbling over money, she went right into girlfriend mode. In bed she offered up everything, except anal. She was just about to toss some salad, but I stopped her. I am not into anything going up my ass.

Cherry (aka Julie) is a great find. I warn anyone that is interested, get it while it is hot. She will not last long. As always, YMMV.

CookyJar

PS: I owe a debt of thanks to Jack Ace. I held out for the BBBJ and got it. Oh! And Cherry (aka Julie) asked me to add something extra to her review. She wants everyone to know that her place is safe. There are additional pictures posted in the South Jersey section.

[Loop Vet]

First, I agree and would fully support Cooky's nomination as Monger of the Year. This is one dedicated and talented monger.

I must also chime in on your guys questions about how does he get girls to pose for him, etc. From my own personal experience, I have photographed numerous sw's, and made movies with sw's, and never once have I paid them any extra money. In DC the fs going rate is around 5 jacks and if they come to my house for that, most likely they will pose for pics or be filmed. It all starts by making them comfortable with you and acting like the pictures are no big deal. I use my cell phone or a web-cam for my photos and movies, which takes the creep level down substantially. Seems more innocent and commonplace than if you bust out a nice camera with a lense or what not.

Now with Cooky doing all the poses and stuff, that may make the girl a little more reluctant and creeped-out, especially when he does the outdoor shots, which may require a few extra ducets, but if you have any level of trust or familiarity with the girls, most likely they'd be willing to let you snap some shots while in the comfort of your home.

I usually dont say much. Maybe while we're hanging out I might start by taking a cell phone pic of their face while they're still fully clothed. Then maybe when they take their shirt off I comment on how pretty their tits are and say I gotta get a shot of that, grab the phone and snap. If they allow that, they'll allow more. Maybe one or two chicks have been reluctant. Most of the time I just act normal and start snapping.

I would imagine that if my intention to pick up the girl was to have a photoshoot like CJ, and if I'd have to prep them and explain what I wanted to do, the girls would expect to be compensated. My intention is to bang a hot young chick, and pics and video are just bonus and something that happens in a natural flow of events; at least I try to make it that way.

I've probably filmed 10 or so girls, some in the act, others not, all with their permission. Again, never paid extra, just the 5 jack fs rate (except of course for this one crackhead-to-be who settled for 40 plus a mug of change. She was more than a pain in the ass though.)

In summary, most of these girls are willing to take pics. It's especially easy if you are familiar with the subject. You just have to eliminate a creep factor in you and dont act nervous when asking. I just start lining them up with my camera phone and most of the time they just start posing. Some might say, "are you taking a picture?" and I'll just say "if you dont mind, you're just too cute" or something. Give it try sometime, you'll be surprised at how easy it is.

Here is a link to the DC Photo Thread where I have posted some pics (a lot of them are video stills). http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...6&page=3&pp=40 And a link to my most recent model, who uses the pics on her CL ads. http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...343#post507343

[Mike 80]

I nominate cookyjar for pimp of the year.

I second that. However keep in mind there is an actual "Pimp of the Year" award (trophy and all) and a recent two-time winner of the award, Matthew Thompkins aka "Knowledge" just went to prison for 25 years for that accomplishment. Cooky is too valuable. We can't afford to lose him like that.

BTW I would love to see photos of the women convicted with Thompkins in his scheme which he ran out of LV, AC, NYC, and a few other places. If anybody comes across photos, please PM me. I dated several high-end SW/CGs in AC who'd give unlikely names like Fortune, Success, and Passion and had LV cell #s. I'm guessing these were part of his stable. Two co-conspirators mentioned in news reports are sisters and I'm curious to know if they are Fortune and Madonna, two hot young blondes who looked so much alike that I wondered if they were twins. After the Pimp of the Year's arrrest I never saw any of those girls again.

[CookyJar]

Do you ever date girls that you don't photograph? If a girl turns you down (and I gotta believe that must happen at least sometimes), do you still finish the "date" or does it depend on the girl?

You are right, shit happens. LOL Usually, the prettier girls are eager to have their pictures taken. However, there were a few times when I went one or two girls down before the third agreed. Most often, the first girl out agrees. Rarely, very rarely will I date a girl who refuses to have her picture taken. Why? Picture taking is but a tool in my arsenal.

Let me try and explain. Take Gia (aka Brittany) for example. I would not have pass up this girl for any reason, had I known what she looked like. Unfortunately, I had no way of knowing how she truly looked until I had gotten her to take her clothing off and by then we had settled into a car date type of situation. Look at it this way, how many times have you picked up what appeared to be a great fine, only to get her back to the hotel and find sagging tits, flabby thighs, needle marked arms and pus filled sores – that were hidden beneath tight jeans. The camera as a tool helps to lessen these occurrences. Normally a girl will not want me to take her picture if she has a bad body. Usually they will ask if they have to be completely nude. Sometime they will offer to show just their breast or upper body. I usually insist on complete nudity. If the body, personality or something else does not meet with my approval, I will pass on any thing additional or just settle for a BJ. On rear occasions, after seeing something special that I liked about her appearance or personality, will I agree on a date without pictures. I do not think that I have ever posted a review without pictures.

CookyJar

[Mike 80]

Very nice pic, Arnie. I'd love to see her turn around. To echo you and other posters who've commented since Cooky's last photo set, I agree that Cooky is on a big-time roll. CJ, I think you've even raised it up a notch w/ these latest few sets and the kinds of poses you're getting these girls to do. Just fantastic. I think "WhenInVegas" makes a good point about how a monger knows when he's read a great report.

I too am impressed and curious at how you're able to get this kind of cooperation. I also have a question and apologize if you've answered it before. Do you ever date girls that you don't photograph? If a girl turns you down (and I gotta believe that must happen at least sometimes), do you still finish the "date" or does it depend on the girl?

[Vegas Black]

I nominate cookyjar for pimp of the year. this guy never disappoints. i still aint figure out how he gets these girls to pose for him the way they do.
Be safe out there...........

[Arnold Bocklin]

And to think, I had been about to pass on Jennifer. Sometimes finding the best girl is just a matter of luck.

CookyJar

CJ,

Well done, sir.

As you may recall (or not, it's been a while since I last posted, but I've been keeping up with things), I kind of enjoy the photography thing myself. I've shot SW's, and more recently have found a couple of first-time amateurs on CL. I've had good and bad experiences with both.

The key to it all, IMO, is the rapport between photographer and model. It requires something of an outgoing personality on BOTH sides of the camera.

Obviously, CJ, you HAVE that or you wouldn't: a.) be able to talk the girls into it in the first place; or: b.) get such good work from them.

But I've found that the girl's attitude equally important, if not more so. If you find a girl for whom it's all about the $$$, then it doesn't work so well.

But, if you're able to find a girl (or girls) who are interested in and excited about the project, and are able to "work" them, get into the project with equal enthusiasm, then you come out with a good photography, as opposed to a buncha crappy snapshots.

You, sir, have accomplished both. The enthusiasm on both sides of the camera is evident. My compliments.

Arnie

PS -- the attached is a result of my CL work. And no, I'm not posting any more of her, because I told her I wouldn't. Yeah, I'm kind of stretching that promise by showing this one, but she's facing away. Also, she's not a SW. This was her first nude photo shoot, and she was about as enthusiastic as they, ummmm, come.